Search

Rationale: Ventilatory demand-capacity imbalance, as inferred based on a low ventilatory reserve, is currently assessed only at peak cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Peak ventilatory reserve, however, is poorly sensitive to the submaximal, dynamic mechanical ventilatory abnormalities that are key to dyspnea genesis and exercise intolerance. Objectives: After establishing sex- and age-corrected norms for dynamic ventilatory reserve at progressively higher work rates, we compared peak and dynamic ventilatory reserve for their ability to expose increased exertional dyspnea and poor exercise tolerance in mild to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: We analyzed resting functional and incremental CPET data from 275 controls (130 men, aged 19-85 yr) and 359 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease patients with stage 1-4 obstruction (203 men) who were prospectively recruited for previous ethically approved studies in three research centers. In addition to peak and dynamic ventilatory reserve (12[ventilation / estimated maximal voluntary ventilation]3100), operating lung volumes and dyspnea scores (0-10 on the Borg scale) were obtained. Results: Dynamic ventilatory reserve was asymmetrically distributed in controls; thus, we calculated its centile distribution at every 20 W. The lower limit of normal (lower than the fifth centile) was consistently lower in women and older subjects. Peak and dynamic ventilatory reserve disagreed significantly in indicating an abnormally low test result in patients: whereas approximately 50% of those with a normal peak ventilatory reserve showed a reduced dynamic ventilatory reserve, the opposite was found in approximately 15% (P,0.001). Irrespective of peak ventilatory reserve and COPD severity, patients who had a dynamic ventilatory reserve below the lower limit of normal at an isowork rate of 40W had greater ventilatory requirements, prompting earlier attainment of critically low inspiratory reserve. Consequently, they reported higher dyspnea scores, showing poorer exercise tolerance compared with those with preserved dynamic ventilatory reserve. Conversely, patients with preserved dynamic ventilatory reserve but reduced peak ventilatory reserve reported the lowest dyspnea scores, showing the best exercise tolerance. Conclusions: Reduced submaximal dynamic ventilatory reserve, even in the setting of preserved peak ventilatory reserve, is a powerful predictor of exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance in COPD. This new parameter of ventilatory demand-capacity mismatch may enhance the yield of clinical CPET in the investigation of activity-related breathlessness in individual patients with COPD and other prevalent cardiopulmonary diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess whether night-time increases in mechanical loading negatively impact respiratory muscle function in COPD and whether compensatory increases in inspiratory neural drive (IND) are adequate to stabilize ventilatory output and arterial oxygen saturation, especially during sleep when wakefulness drive is withdrawn. Methods: 21 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and 20 age-/sex-matched healthy controls (CTRL) participated in a prospective, cross-sectional, one-night study to assess the impact of COPD on serial awake, supine inspiratory capacity (IC) measurements and continuous dynamic respiratory muscle function (esophageal manometry) and IND (diaphragm electromyography, EMGdi) in supine sleep. Results: Supine inspiratory effort and EMGdi were consistently twice as high in COPD versus CTRL (p < 0.05). Despite overnight increases in awake total airways resistance and dynamic lung hyperinflation in COPD (p < 0.05; not in CTRL), elevated awake EMGdi and respiratory effort were unaltered in COPD overnight. At sleep onset (non-rapid eye movement sleep, N2), EMGdi was decreased versus wakefulness in COPD (− 43 ± 36%; p < 0.05) while unaffected in CTRL (p = 0.11); however, respiratory effort and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were unchanged. Similarly, in rapid eye movement (stage R), sleep EMGdi was decreased (− 38 ± 32%, p < 0.05) versus wakefulness in COPD, with preserved respiratory effort and minor (2%) reduction in SpO2. Conclusions: Despite progressive mechanical loading overnight and marked decreases in wakefulness drive, inspiratory effort and SpO2 were well maintained during sleep in COPD. Preserved high inspiratory effort during sleep, despite reduced EMGdi, suggests continued (or increased) efferent activation of extra-diaphragmatic muscles, even in stage R sleep. Clinical trial information: The COPD data reported herein were secondary data (Placebo arm only) obtained through the following Clinical Trial: "Effect of Aclidinium/Formoterol on Nighttime Lung Function and Morning Symptoms in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease" (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02429765; NCT02429765). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objective: The combination of both reduced resting diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and ventilatory efficiency (increased ventilatory requirement for CO2 clearance [V˙E/V˙CO2]) has been linked to exertional dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. The current study examined if low resting DLCO and higher exercise ventilatory requirements were associated with earlier critical dynamic mechanical constraints, dyspnoea and exercise limitation in patients with mild COPD. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we compared V˙E/V˙CO2, dynamic inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), dyspnoea and exercise capacity in groups of patients with Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 1 COPD with (1) a resting DLCO at or greater than the lower limit of normal (≥LLN; Global Lung Function Initiative reference equations [n = 44]) or (2) below the

Dyspnea and exercise limitation are among the most common symptoms experienced by patients with various chronic lung diseases and are linked to poor quality of life. Our understanding of the source and nature of perceived respiratory discomfort and exercise intolerance in chronic lung diseases has increased substantially in recent years. These new mechanistic insights are the primary focus of the current review. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides a unique opportunity to objectively evaluate the ability of the respiratory system to respond to imposed incremental physiological stress. In addition to measuring aerobic capacity and quantifying an individual's cardiac and ventilatory reserves, we have expanded the role of CPET to include evaluation of symptom intensity, together with a simple "non-invasive" assessment of relevant ventilatory control parameters and dynamic respiratory mechanics during standardized incremental tests to tolerance. This review explores the application of the new advances in the clinical evaluation of the pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic asthma, interstitial lung disease (ILD) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We hope to demonstrate how this novel approach to CPET interpretation, which includes a quantification of activity-related dyspnea and evaluation of its underlying mechanisms, enhances our ability to meaningfully intervene to improve quality of life in these pathologically-distinct conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]