Search

Background: Renin–angiotensin system blockers (RASBs) reduce end-stage kidney disease and cardiovascular event (CVE) development in chronic kidney disease. However, whether RASBs improve long-term prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients remain unknown. Method: We investigated 900 kidney transplant patients in a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan and compared death-censored graft survival and CVE (total, cardiac events, stroke) based on RASB use within 12 months after KT. The associations were examined using a Cox hazard model and propensity score-matching analysis. Results: The cohort comprised 375 patients treated with RASBs (RASB group) and 525 patients without RASBs (control group). The median observational period was 82 months, with 68 patients reaching graft loss: 79 total CVE, 36 cardiac events, 26 stroke. In a matching cohort comprising 582 patients, death-censored graft survival, total CVE, and cardiac events were not different between the two groups. Only stroke incidence rate was significantly lower in the RASB group compared with the control group (1.4 vs. 6.4 per 1000 patients/year, log-ranked P = 0.005). In a multivariable analysis, stroke events were also significantly lower in the RASB group compared with the control group (Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval, 0.20 [0.04–0.62]). Conclusion: Thus, RASBs potentially reduce stroke events in KT recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, acute rejection (AR) is a common complication in kidney transplantation and is associated with reduced graft survival. Current diagnosis of AR relies mainly on clinical monitoring including serum creatinine, proteinuria, and confirmation by histopathologic assessment in the biopsy specimen of graft kidney. Although an early protocol biopsy is indispensable for depicting the severity of pathologic lesions in subclinical acute rejection (subAR), it is not acceptable in some cases and cannot be performed because of its invasive nature. Therefore, we examined the detection of noninvasive biomarkers that are closely related to the pathology of subAR in protocol biopsies three months after kidney transplantation. In this study, the urinary level of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), and human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) were measured three months after kidney transplantation. Urine samples of 80 patients undergoing kidney transplantation between August 2014 to September 2016, were prospectively collected after three months. SubAR was observed in 11 patients (13.8%) in protocol biopsy. The urinary levels of LC3, MCP-1, NGAL, and HE4 were significantly higher in patients with subAR than in those without, while those of L-FABP did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate regression models, receiver-operating characteristics (ROC), and areas under ROC curves (AUC) were used to identify predicted values of subAR. Urinary HE4 levels were able to better identify subAR (AUC = 0.808) than the other four urinary biomarkers. In conclusion, urinary HE4 is increased in kidney transplant recipients of subAR three months after kidney transplantation, suggesting that HE4 has the potential to be used as a novel clinical biomarker for predicting subAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the most realistic option for patients with end-stage kidney disease because of a severe shortage of deceased donors. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN) and hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARDN) have been undertaken at our institute. We compared these 2 surgical procedures with respect to donor outcome and the graft function of recipients. We reviewed data from 840 consecutive live-donor kidney transplants from October 2003 to April 2019. Propensity scores were calculated for each patient using bivariate logistic regression. After propensity-score matching, the 2 groups each contained 205 patients. Donors in the HALDN group had a longer procedure time (217 minutes, P <.0001), less estimated blood loss (51 mL, P <.0001), lower serum levels of C-reactive protein at postoperative day (POD) 1 (7.9 mg/dL, P <.0001) than those in the HARDN group. There were 22 modified Clavien-classifiable complications among the study groups. A significantly higher conversion to open surgery was noted in the HARDN group (P =.0181) than in the HALDN group, but there was no significant difference in the prevalence of complications in either group. There was no significant difference in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of recipients at POD14 between the 2 groups. Safety and early graft function of HALDN in LDKT are comparable to or even better than that of HARDN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]