Search

Background Hyperkalemia (HK) is a frequent condition in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) that is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Patiromer has recently been introduced as a potassium binder. Data on patiromer use in patients with CKD in the real-world setting in Europe are lacking. We describe time to discontinuation and changes in serum potassium levels among German CKD stage 3–5 patients starting patiromer. Methods Duration of patiromer use was estimated by Kaplan–Meier curve, starting at patiromer initiation and censoring for death, dialysis, transplant or loss to follow-up. Serum potassium levels and renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitor (RAASi) use are described at baseline and during follow-up, restricted to patients remaining on patiromer. Results We identified 140 patiromer users within our analysis sample [81% CKD stage 4/5, 83% receiving RAASi, and median K+ 5.7 (5.4, 6.3) mmol/L]. Thirty percent of patiromer users had prior history of polystyrene sulfonate use. Overall, 95% of patiromer users stayed on treatment past 1 month, with 53% continuing for over a year. Mean serum potassium levels decreased after patiromer initiation and remained stable under treatment during follow-up (up to 180 days). Among these patients, 73%–82% used RAASis during the time periods before and after patiromer initiation, with no obvious trend indicating discontinuation. Conclusion Real-world evidence of patiromer use in Germany shows that, in line with what has been observed in clinical trials, patients on patiromer have a reduction in serum potassium when used long-term. Moreover, most patients on patiromer do not discontinue treatment prior to 1 year after initiation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with autosomal or X-linked Alport syndrome (AS) with heterozygous mutations in type IV collagen genes have a 1-20 % risk of progressing to end-stage renal disease during their lifetime. We evaluated the long-term renal outcome of patients at risk of progressive disease (chronic kidney disease stages 1-4) with/without nephroprotective therapy. Methods: This was a prospective, non-interventional, observational study which included data from a 4-year follow-up of AS patients with heterozygous mutations whose datasets had been included in an analysis of the 2010 database of the European Alport Registry. Using Kaplan-Meier estimates and logrank tests, we prospectively analyzed the updated datasets of 52 of these patients and 13 new datasets (patients added to the Registry after 2011). The effects of therapy, extrarenal symptoms and inheritance pattern on renal outcome were analyzed. Results: The mean prospective follow-up was 46 ± 10 months, and the mean time on therapy was 8.4 ± 4.4 (median 7; range 2-18) years. The time from the appearance of the first symptom to diagnosis was 8.1 ± 14.2 (range 0-52) years. At the time of starting therapy, 5.4 % of patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <60 ml/min, 67.6 % had proteinuria and 27.0 % had microalbuminuria. Therapeutic strategies included angiotensin-converting enzymer inhibitors (97.1 %), angiotensin receptor antagonists (1 patient), dual therapy (11.8 %) and statins (8.8 %). Among patients included in the prospective dataset, prevented the need for dialysis. Among new patients, no patient at risk for renal failure progressed to the next disease stage after 4 years follow-up; three patients even regressed to a lower stage during therapy. Conclusions: Treatment with blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system prevents progressive renal failure in AS patients with heterozygous mutations in the genes causing AS. Considerable numbers of aging AS patients on dialysis may have heterozygous mutations in these genes (present in 1 % of total population) as underlying disease. Hence, greater alertness towards timely diagnosis and therapy has the potential to prevent progressive renal failure in most-if not all-AS patients with heterozygous mutations in the causal genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]