Search

This study aimed to investigate the association between self-rated mental health (SRMH) and current health status of an Iranian population. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 3400 individuals selected through random sampling in Shiraz, Iran between January 2014 and March 2015. Data were gathered through face-to-face interviews. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 19.0, and R.3.1.2 software was used for SCAD penalized logistic regression. The mean age of the participants was 38.5 (± 14.1 years). There were significant relationships between better SRMH and younger ages (p < 0.001), and between better SRMH and better self-rated physical health (p < 0.001). Individuals with poor SRMH were more likely to have signs and symptoms of medical diseases. SRMH, a component of self-rated health, was related to a variety of health problems in our study population. Therefore, paying attention to SRMH and mental well-being could be useful in making decision about implementation of preventive measures.

Objective: This study aimed to reveal the relationship between self-rated health (SRH) and objective health status in the general population in the Southwest of Iran., Study Design: A cross-sectional study., Methods: Data were collected by face-to-face interview with 3554 residents, aged ≥18 years, who were selected by multistage sampling procedure. Collected data included sociodemographic, SRH status, and medical conditions; chronic diseases and mental symptoms. SRH was indicated by a single question in five scales of very good, good, fair, poor and very poor. An ordinal logistic regression analysis was used. Independent variables were organized into four blocks: block 1, age, gender, marital status, education level, employment status, size of household and monthly household income; block 2, chronic or long-term illness (coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes mellitus); block 3, psychological disorders (anxiety, impatience and sleep disorders); and block 4 (visual, skin, hearing and oral disorders)., Results: SRH status in most subjects reported to be positive, indicating 47.3% as very good, 30.8% good, 16.2% fair, 3.3% bad and 2.4% very bad. In studied subjects, poorer SRH was significantly related to older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.01), low-education level (OR, 1.09), single status (OR, 1.25), monthly household income (OR, 1.21), more chronic or long-term illness (OR, 1.61), greater psychological health disorders (OR, 1.69), more dermatologic disorders (OR, 1.30), and hearing problems (OR, 1.47)., Conclusion: Results of this study revealed that subjects with worse SRH were older with low-education level, lower household monthly income, more chronic illness, greater psychological health disorders, and more visual, skin, hearing and oral disorders. So, SRH, as indicated globally, can be used as a population screening tool to identify subjects who are most in need of public health services., (Copyright © 2016 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)