Search

Aim: Nurses are expected to have a role in the transition of care from pediatric to adult medical practices for adolescents and young adults with childhood-onset chronic diseases. This study compares the experience, knowledge, and perceptions regarding the ideal care among adult unit and pediatric nurses regarding the transition to adult care for those with childhood-onset chronic diseases., Methods: A cross-sectional study using self-report questionnaires was conducted with nurses in a tertiary hospital in Tokyo. Questions were generated based on a literature review and expert discussion. Data from 1,064 participants were analyzed (adult unit nurses: n = 959, 90.1%; pediatric nurses: n = 105, 9.9%)., Results: Among 623 adult unit nurses who had care experience for adult patients with a childhood-onset chronic disease, 458 nurses (73.6%) were unaware of the concept of transitional care. As the obstructive factors for transition, pediatric nurses recognized problems in healthcare providers' attitudes and lack of transitional care coordinators, while the adult unit nurses emphasized the patients' wishes to continue to receive pediatric healthcare. Most adult unit nurses expected pediatric nurses to function as transitional care coordinators., Conclusion: Adult unit and pediatric nurses had different perceptions of the barriers in transitioning children with chronic diseases to adult care. It is important to have educational programs focusing on transitional care for all nurses, both to enable pediatric nurses to improve transition readiness of children with chronic diseases and to offer adult patients with a childhood-onset chronic disease continuing support through adult unit nurses., (© 2020 Japan Academy of Nursing Science.)

Background: The evaluation of transition readiness is indispensable for long‐term follow‐ups of adolescent patients with childhood‐onset chronic diseases (CCD). We developed a Japanese version of the TRANSITION‐Q (TRANSITION‐Q‐J) and used it to assess Japanese patients with CCD. Methods: The TRANSITION‐Q‐J was developed through forward and backward translations followed by cognitive interviews with five adolescent patients. The field test was conducted with 125 adolescent patients, and a retest was conducted with 113 adolescent patients. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two‐factor analysis model including F1 (communication and self‐management) and F2 (examination behavior). Sufficient internal consistency and test‐retest reliability were demonstrated among the total 14 items, F1, and F2 (Cronbach's α > 0.80, intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.85). Convergent and discriminant validity for the 14 items and F1 were acceptable; however, F2 did not correlate significantly with the Rosenberg Self‐Esteem Scale and Independent Consciousness Scale. Regarding known‐groups validity, the older group had a significantly higher mean TRANSITION‐Q‐J score (50.05) than the younger group (43.28; P = 0.04). The same results were found for both F1 and F2. Conclusions: The TRANSITION‐Q‐J for adolescent patients with CCD was developed and its reliability and validity were verified. This scale is easy to administer. In addition to being a tool for transition period support, it could be used to verify effective factors and in program outcome evaluation, including intervention studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]