Search

The aim of this study was to evaluate the oocyte maturation rate when GnRH-a and hCG (dual trigger) are co-administered, compared to the standard hCG trigger within the same patient. Included in the study were GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles performed in 137 patients who had a standard hCG trigger cycle and a dual trigger cycle between 1/1/2013 and 31/12/2017. The mean patient age (35.9 ± 5.6 and 35.2 ± 5.9; <0.001), FSH dose (4140 ± 2065 and 3585 ± 1858; <0.01), number of retrieved oocytes (10.3 ± 6.2 and 8.9 ± 6.1; 0.011) were higher in the dual trigger group compared to the hCG trigger group, oocyte maturation rate was identical. Maturation rate following dual trigger was significantly higher among 34 patients who had a maturation rate of <70% following hCG triggering and among 16 patients with a maturation rate <50% rate following hCG trigger (54% vs. 74%, p < .001 and 44% vs. 73%, p = .006; respectively). In conclusion, co-administration of GnRH agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation substantially increased the oocyte maturation rate in patients with low oocyte maturation rate in their hCG triggered cycle, but not in an unselected population of patients.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The co-administration of GnRH agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation prior to oocyte retrieval may improve IVF outcome in patients with a high proportion of immature oocytes. The few studies on dual trigger in patients with a high proportion of immature oocytes or in normal responders have shown conflicting results.What do the results of this study add? We found that co-administration of GnRH agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation substantially increased the oocyte maturation rate in patients with low oocyte maturation rate in their hCG triggered cycle, but not in an unselected population of patients.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The results of this study implicate that in selected population with low oocyte maturation rate, there is an advantage in using dual trigger. However, larger prospective trials are warranted to better assess oocyte response in dual trigger. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To assess the impact of oocyte aspiration, denudation, and sperm injection timing in relation to oocyte hCG exposure time on intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcome. Design Cohort study. Setting Tertiary medical center. Patient(s) A total of 614 consecutive ICSI cycles were performed in 421 patients aged <38 years with at least three aspirated oocytes and no more than three previous treatments. Intervention(s) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or GnRH antagonist suppression; oocyte pickup (OPU)–hCG interval more/less than 36 hours; OPU–denudation interval more/less than 2 hours; denudation–ICSI interval more/less than 1 hour. Main Outcome Measure(s) Fertilization, embryo transfer, and pregnancy rates. Result(s) Late OPU was associated with more available embryos than early OPU and significantly higher rates of fertilization (66.0% ± 22.8% vs. 61.8% ± 24.3%), ET (99.5% vs. 96.2%), and pregnancy (47.2% vs. 35.4%). This advantage was more pronounced in GnRH agonist cycles. The length of incubation before or after denudation had no effect, regardless of OPU timing. On logistic stepwise regression, OPU timing was the only significant independent predictor of pregnancy (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.29). Conclusion(s) The timing of OPU has a predominant effect on ICSI success, especially in GnRH agonist cycles. Delaying oocyte denudation or sperm injection does not compensate for insufficient postpriming exposure to the follicular environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]