Search

Background: Acetylcholinergic (ACh) neurons interface with the mesolimbic dopamine pathway implicated in addiction, and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEis) have been shown to reduce the immediate effects of cocaine and amount used. Our study is the first to examine if the safe and low-interaction AChEi rivastigmine (riv) alters the subjective effects produced by cocaine administration., Methods: Cocaine-dependent subjects were randomized to daily placebo, riv 3 mg, or riv 6 mg, administered inpatient for 10 days. On day 1 (pre-dose) and day 9, subjects received both IV cocaine 40 mg or placebo in a randomized order with subsequent serial assessments of visual analog scale (VAS) subjective effects and pharmacokinetic measurements. On day 10 all participants received one baseline dose of cocaine 20 mg with assessment of subjective effects, and were then able to purchase additional doses at 15 min intervals with study earnings., Results: 40 subjects were randomized to placebo (n = 16), riv 3 mg (n = 13), or riv 6 mg (n = 12). All subjects completed the study and there were no demographic differences between treatment groups. Pre- and post- treatment, there were no significant pharmacokinetic differences (blood levels of cocaine, BE, EME) following cocaine administration. In a two-way ANOVA, IV cocaine significantly increased positive VAS category ratings compared to placebo, but rivastigmine treatment at either dose had no significant effect on any VAS category ratings. Similarly, there was no significant rivastigmine effect on any category in the day 10 cocaine administration, and no effect on number of subsequent doses participants purchased., Conclusion: Rivastigmine 3 or 6 mg had no significant effect on the subjective effects of cocaine after 9 days of treatment. This is an important finding as other drugs in the AChEi class (donepezil, Huperzine A) have produced significant results, but differ in their receptor specificity and PK parameters., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Cholinergic transmission is altered by drugs of abuse and contributes to psychostimulant reinforcement. In particular, acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, like huperzine A, may be effective as treatments for cocaine use disorder., Methods: The current report describes results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which participants (n=14-17/group) were randomized to huperzine A (0.4 or 0.8 mg) or placebo. Participants received randomized infusions of cocaine (0 and 40 mg, IV) on days 1 and 9. On day 10, participants received noncontingent, randomized infusions of cocaine (0 and 20mg, IV) before making 5 choices to receive additional infusions., Results: Huperzine A was safe and well-tolerated and compared with placebo, treatment with huperzine A did not cause significant changes in any cocaine pharmacokinetic parameters (all P>.05). Time-course and peak effects analyses show that treatment with 0.4 mg of huperzine A significantly attenuated cocaine-induced increases of "Any Drug Effect," "High," "Stimulated," "Willing to Pay," and "Bad Effects" (all P>.05)., Conclusions: The current study represents a significant contribution to the addiction field since it serves as the first published report on the safety and potential efficacy of huperzine A as a treatment for cocaine use disorder., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Long-term cocaine use is a risk factor for the onset of neurocognitive impairment. This study sought to determine whether the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine could improve neurocognitive performance in cocaine-dependent individuals. Cocaine-dependent individuals who were not seeking treatment at the time of enrollment in the study were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=16), rivastigmine 3mg (n=13), or rivastigmine 6mg (n=12). The baseline neurocognitive assessment, which included measures of attention/information processing (as measured by the Continuous Performance Task-II (CPT-II)), verbal learning/episodic memory (as measured by the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R)), and working memory (as measured by the Dual N-Back Task), was conducted prior to the administration of study medication (Day 0). The follow-up assessment was conducted on Day 8 after the participants had received rivastigmine or placebo for 7days (Day 2-8). Rivastigmine administration significantly improved performance on one measure of working memory span (mean n-back span). This study provides additional data showing that cocaine-associated neurocognitive impairment, specifically working memory deficits, can be remediated, at least to some degree., (Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Compared to smokers alone, smokers with co-morbid substance use disorders are at greater risk of suffering from smoking-related death. Despite this, relatively few studies have examined smoking cessation treatments for those with stimulant dependence. In the current study, we sought to evaluate the effects produced by short-term exposure to the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine (0, 3 or 6 mg) on cigarette smoking in non-treatment-seeking, methamphetamine-dependent volunteers. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study that took place over 9 days. The data indicate that rivastigmine treatment did not alter Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence scores, carbon monoxide readings, or cigarettes smoked per day, but a trend toward reduced urges to smoke (p<0.09) was detected during treatment with rivastigmine 3mg. These data, while preliminary, indicate that cholinesterase inhibitors warrant consideration as treatments for nicotine dependence, including use in stimulant-dependent individuals who exhibit significantly higher rates of smoking than the general population., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A human laboratory model of intravenous methamphetamine self-administration may facilitate study of putative treatments for methamphetamine addiction. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, between groups investigation of the acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor rivastigmine in non-treatment-seeking volunteers who met criteria for methamphetamine abuse or dependence. Safety and subjective effects data derived from days 1-10 of this protocol are described in a separate publication. In this report, we describe self-administration outcomes in participants randomized to treatment with rivastigmine (0 mg, N=7; 1.5 mg, N=6; 3 mg, N=9); data that were collected on days 11-15 of the inpatient protocol. On day 11, participants sampled two infusions of methamphetamine (0 and 30 mg, i.v.). On days 12-15, participants made ten choices each day to receive an infusion of either methamphetamine (3 mg, IV) or saline or a monetary alternative ($0.05-$16). The study design allowed for evaluation of differences in behavior on days in which infusions were performed by the physician (experimenter-administered) versus by the participant using a PCA pump (self-administered), and when monetary alternatives were presented in either ascending or descending sequence. The data show that rivastigmine (1.5 and 3 mg), as compared to placebo, did not significantly alter total choices for methamphetamine (p=0.150). Importantly, the number of infusion choices was greater when methamphetamine was available then when saline was available (p<0.0001), and the number of money choices was greater when saline was available then when methamphetamine was available (p<0.0001). The total number of choices for methamphetamine was not altered as a function of a participant's preferred route of methamphetamine use (p=0.57), and did not differ significantly whether they were experimenter-administered or self-administered (p=0.30). In addition, total choices for methamphetamine were similar made when money was available in an ascending versus descending sequence (p=0.49). The participants' years of methamphetamine use, recent use of methamphetamine (in the past 30 days), or baseline craving (indexed here as "Desire") on the day of the self-administration task were not predictive of number of choices for methamphetamine. In a subset of participants (N=8) for which data was available, individual dose of methamphetamine (3 x 3 mg, i.v.) produced significant increases in positive subjective effects, and a preliminary analysis revealed that 3 mg rivastigmine was associated with reductions in these responses, as compared to placebo. In summary, the current report indicates that there were no effects of rivastigmine on total choices for methamphetamine, that there were low levels of methamphetamine self-administration but these were 8 times greater than saline, and that choice behavior was insensitive to alternative reinforcers. In addition, we showed that rivastigmine may reduce the positive subjective effects produced by methamphetamine during self-administration.

Abstract: We previously reported that treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine (3mg, PO for 5days) significantly attenuated “Desire for METH”. Given that higher dosages of rivastigmine produce greater increases in synaptic ACh, we predicted that 6mg should have more pronounced effects on craving and other subjective measures. In the current study, we sought to characterize the effects of short-term exposure to rivastigmine (0, 3 or 6mg) on the subjective and reinforcing effects produced by administration of methamphetamine (METH) in non-treatment-seeking, METH-dependent volunteers. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants received METH on day 1, and were then randomized to placebo or rivastigmine on day 2 in the morning and treatment continued through day 8. METH dosing was repeated on day 6. The data indicate that METH (15 and 30mg), but not saline, increased several positive subjective effects, including “Any Drug Effect”, “High”, “Stimulated”, “Desire METH”, and “Likely to Use METH” (all p''s <0.0001). In addition, during self-administration sessions, participants were significantly more likely to choose METH over saline (p <0.0001). Evaluating outcomes as peak effects, there was a trend for rivastigmine to reduce “Desire METH” (p =0.27), and rivastigmine significantly attenuated “Likely to Use METH” (p =0.01). These effects were most prominent for rivastigmine 6mg when participants were exposed to the low dose (15mg, IV), but not high dose (30mg, IV), of METH. The self-administration data reveal that rivastigmine did not alter total choices for METH (5mg, IV/choice). Overall, the results indicate some efficacy for rivastigmine in attenuating key subjective effects produced by METH, though additional research using higher doses and longer treatment periods is likely needed. These data extend previous findings and indicate that cholinesterase inhibitors, and other drugs that target acetylcholine systems, warrant continued consideration as treatments for METH dependence. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]