Search

• Evolocumab did not impair cognitive function in pediatric FH after 24 weeks. • Abnormal cognitive decline was less frequent with evolocumab than with placebo. • Small improvements observed with evolocumab in psychomotor function and attention. Evolocumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody inhibitor of PCSK9 approved for lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults and pediatric patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). The cognitive safety of evolocumab has been established in adults but has not yet been described in pediatric patients. To determine the effects of evolocumab on cognitive function in pediatric heterozygous FH. Cognitive function was assessed during a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (HAUSER-RCT) evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 24 weeks of monthly subcutaneous injections of evolocumab in pediatric patients with FH. Cognitive safety endpoints included changes from baseline to week 24 in test scores in domains of psychomotor function, attention, visual learning, and executive function. Between-group differences in age-standardized mean test score changes were analyzed using analysis of covariance models and point estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI). Magnitudes of difference between treatment groups (Cohen's d) and reliable change indices were calculated for each cognitive function test. At week 24, changes from baseline in age-standardized cognitive test scores were similar between the treatment groups. Differences (95% CI) between the evolocumab and placebo groups in mean test score changes for the Groton Maze Learning, One-Card Learning, Identification, and Detection tests were 0.1 (–0.2, 0.4), –0.1 (–0.5, 0.4), 0.3 (0.0, 0.7), 0.3 (–0.1, 0.8), respectively. For all tests, abnormal and clinically important cognitive decline occurred with lesser frequency in the evolocumab group. In pediatric patients with FH, 24-week treatment with evolocumab did not negatively influence cognition. This study was funded and designed by Amgen. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study hypothesized that 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) can identify carotid plaque cholesteryl ester in vivo in humans. Background: Liquid phase cholesteryl ester comprises a major fraction of atherosclerotic plaque, and its abundance is associated with plaque rupture and atherothrombosis. A noninvasive imaging technique to detect liquid cholesteryl ester that has been applied ex vivo is now demonstrated in vivo. Methods: 1H-MRS scans were obtained of carotid plaques of 35 subjects at 3.0 T. Turbo spin echo, black blood, T1-weighted images were acquired for localization. Spectra were acquired using a 2-dimensional point resolved spectroscopy sequence: repetition time/echo time = 1,100/30 ms, 5-mm slice thickness, 8 × 8-cm field of view, 16 × 16 matrix size, and 13-min acquisition time. Saturation bands were placed around the artery. Resonance of methylene protons and allylic methylene protons were assigned to 1.2 ppm and 2.0 ppm. The 2.0:1.2 ppm ratio was calculated to reflect the ratio of the fatty acid composition of plaque cholesteryl ester to that of triglycerides of perivascular tissue. We obtained spectra of lipid standards as a reference. Results: Our 1H-MRS data showed typical spectra of cholesteryl ester mixed with triglycerides, with intense resonance from methylene (1.2 ppm) and allylic methylene (2.0 ppm) protons. The average 2.0:1.2 ppm ratio was 0.10 ± 0.03. The 2.0:1.2 ppm ratio correlated with the plaque tissue volume to perivascular tissue volume ratio (Spearman rho = 0.55, p = 0.02), suggesting that more 1H-MRS signal was obtained from cholesteryl ester when the 1H-MRS voxel comprised more plaque tissue. Repeat 1H-MRS scans in 4 subjects showed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.92 (95% prediction intervals: 0.40 to 0.99), indicating good reproducibility. Seventeen of the 35 1H-MRS spectra were of adequate quality for analysis. Conclusions: In vivo image-guided 1H-MRS for detection of liquid phase cholesteryl ester in carotid atherosclerotic plaques in humans is feasible. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background There is an ongoing debate about the performance of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non- HDL-C) compared with apolipoprotein B (apo B) in the prediction of coronary heart disease ( CHD) risk. Therefore, we compared the associations between non- HDL-C and apo B in regard to CHD among apparently healthy Western European individuals. Design In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition ( EPIC)-Norfolk prospective population study, 25 639 men and women aged 45-79 years were followed for 11·4 ± 2·8 years. Those with diabetes or prevalent CHD at baseline were excluded. A total of 2066 (12·1%) participants developed CHD during 195 692 person-years follow-up. Results The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio [ HR] of future CHD per one standard deviation increase was 1·22 [95% confidence interval ( CI): 1·17-1·27] for LDL-C, 1·26 (95% CI 1·20-1·31) for non- HDL-C and 1·19 (95% CI 1·14-1·24) for apo B, respectively. The multivariable-adjusted HR of future CHD in the highest quartile LDL-C was 1·67 (95% CI: 1·47-1·91). For non- HDL-C and apo B, these respective HRs were 1·87 (95% CI: 1·62-2·15) and 1·56 (95% CI: 1·36-1·78). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that there was incremental and comparable increase in risk of CHD with increasing quartiles of both non- HDL-C and apo B. Conclusions In this prospective study, non- HDL-C and apo B were comparable in their ability to predict risk of future CHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Ezetimibe stimulates faecal neutral sterol (FNS) excretion in mice, which cannot be explained by cholesterol absorption inhibition alone. We investigated whether these effects are mediated via the sterol exporter ATP binding cassette transporter G8 (abcg8). Ezetimibe increased FNS excretion 2.7-fold in WT mice and 1.5-fold in abcg8−/− mice, without affecting biliary cholesterol secretion. Daily FNS excretion exceeded the sum of dietary cholesterol intake and biliary secretion by about 60%. Ezetimibe enhanced this ‘extra’ FNS excretion by 3.5-fold and 1.5-fold in wildtype (WT) and abcg8−/− mice, respectively. Ezetimibe stimulates fecal sterol excretion of non-biliary and non-dietary origin, probably through stimulation of trans-intestinal cholesterol excretion. We show that this effect depends on intact abcg8 function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor, reduces levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when added to statin treatment. However, the effect of ezetimibe on the progression of atherosclerosis remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, 24-month trial comparing the effects of daily therapy with 80 mg of simvastatin either with placebo or with 10 mg of ezetimibe in 720 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Patients underwent B-mode ultrasonography to assess the intima–media thickness of the walls of the carotid and femoral arteries. The primary outcome measure was the change in the mean carotid-artery intima–media thickness, which was defined as the average of the means of the far-wall intima–media thickness of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries. Results: The primary outcome, the mean (±SE) change in the carotid-artery intima–media thickness, was 0.0058±0.0037 mm in the simvastatin-only group and 0.0111±0.0038 mm in the simvastatin-plus-ezetimibe (combined-therapy) group (P=0.29). Secondary outcomes (consisting of other variables regarding the intima–media thickness of the carotid and femoral arteries) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At the end of the study, the mean (±SD) LDL cholesterol level was 192.7±60.3 mg per deciliter (4.98±1.56 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin group and 141.3±52.6 mg per deciliter (3.65±1.36 mmol per liter) in the combined-therapy group (a between-group difference of 16.5%, P<0.01). The differences between the two groups in reductions in levels of triglycerides and C-reactive protein were 6.6% and 25.7%, respectively, with greater reductions in the combined-therapy group (P<0.01 for both comparisons). Side-effect and safety profiles were similar in the two groups. Conclusions: In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, combined therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin did not result in a significant difference in changes in intima–media thickness, as compared with simvastatin alone, despite decreases in levels of LDL cholesterol and C-reactive protein. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00552097.) N Engl J Med 2008;358:1431-43. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epidemiologic studies have shown that the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a strong, independent, inverse predictor of coronary heart disease risk. This identifies HDL-C as a potential therapeutic target. Compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agents, however, currently available HDL-raising drugs are relatively ineffective. Consequently, recent years have seen considerable efforts expended on identifying new drugs that can raise HDL-C. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in cholesterol metabolism, being responsible for the transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL to very low-density lipoproteins and LDLs. The observation that Japanese populations with CETP deficiency exhibited high levels of HDL-C has led to the concept that drugs targeting CETP activity may elevate HDL-C levels and potentially decrease cardiovascular risk. Support of this proposition has been obtained in rabbits where inhibition of CETP activity is markedly antiatherogenic. Two CETP inhibitors—torcetrapib and JTT-705—are currently in the preliminary stages of clinical development. Initial studies with these drugs in humans show that they substantially increase HDL-C levels and modestly decrease LDL-C levels. Larger, long-term, randomized, clinical end point trials are required to determine whether the beneficial effects of CETP inhibitors on lipoprotein metabolism can translate into reductions in cardiovascular events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Despite a growing body of research on the benefit of combination drug therapy for dyslipidemia in the metabolic syndrome or diabetes mellitus, there are insufficient outcome data on the use of combination therapy as well as inadequate data to compare certain combination regimens. The focus of the therapeutic approach in treating the metabolic syndrome has been almost exclusively on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol for approximately the past 10 years, and specifically on statin therapy. Although results of epidemiologic studies as well as clinical trials using angiographic and clinical end points confirm the association of LDL cholesterol and risk of coronary artery disease, data are lacking regarding the effects of combination therapy in the management of coronary artery disease. Management of the metabolic syndrome focusing on the modification of plasma LDL as well as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is reviewed. Future management strategies with the use of novel combination therapy is also discussed. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background Plasma apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) levels are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Objective To assess whether lipoprotein-associated apoC-III levels predict risk of CAD events. Methods apoC-III associated with apoB, apoAI, and Lp(a) (apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-apoAI, and apoCIII-Lp(a), respectively) were measured using high-throughput chemiluminescent enzyme-linked immunoassays in 2711 subjects (1879 controls and 832 cases with CAD) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk prospective population study with 7.4 years of follow-up. These measures were correlated with a variety of lipid measurements and the presence of CAD. The indices of "total apoCIII-apoB" and "total apoCIII-apoAI" were derived by multiplying plasma apoB and apoAI, respectively. Results apoCIII-apoB (P =.001), apoCIII-Lp(a) (P <.001), apoCIII-apoAI (P =.005) were higher in cases vs controls; tended to correlate positively with body mass index, hsCRP, apoC-III, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, remnant cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein, LDL and high-density lipoprotein particle number and very low density lipoprotein size; but negatively with LDL and high-density lipoprotein particle size (P <.001 for all). apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-apoAI, apoCIII-Lp(a), total apoCIII-Lp(a), and total apoCIII-apoB were predictors of CAD after adjustment of age, sex, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, hypertensive and lipid-lowering drug use, but they lost their significance after further adjustment of lipid and lipoprotein variables. Conclusions This study suggests that enzyme-linked immunoassay–measured lipoprotein-associated apoC-III markers reflect atherogenic lipid particles but do not independently predict risk of CAD events. Highlights • High-throughput enzyme-linked immunoassays were developed to measure lipoprotein-associated apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) levels. • apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-Lp(a), and apoCIII-apoAI were measured in EPIC-Norfolk. • apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-Lp(a), and apoCIII-apoAI reflect atherogenic lipid particles. • apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-Lp(a), and apoCIII-apoAI do not independently predict risk of coronary artery disease events. • Their role in patients with prior history of coronary artery disease needs to be evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Long-term effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition have not been thoroughly investigated in these patients. Objective We evaluated efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a PCSK9 inhibitor, vs placebo in patients with HeFH. Methods In total, 1257 patients with HeFH on maximally tolerated statin ± other lipid-lowering therapies from four 78-week ODYSSEY trials were analyzed. In FH I and II, patients with baseline LDL-C levels ≥70/100 mg/dL ( n = 735), depending on documented cardiovascular disease history, received placebo or alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W; with dose increase to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 if week 8 LDL-C was ≥70 mg/dL). Separately, data were pooled from HIGH FH (baseline LDL-C ≥160 mg/dL) and patients with HeFH from LONG TERM (baseline LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL), where patients received placebo or alirocumab 150 mg Q2W ( n = 522). Results At week 24, alirocumab reduced LDL-C levels by −48.8% (75/150 mg Q2W; placebo: +7.1%) and −55.0% (alirocumab 150 mg Q2W; placebo: +1.3%) (both P < .0001 vs placebo; intention-to-treat analysis). Least-squares mean LDL-C levels of 69.1 to 75.6 mg/dL (alirocumab 75/150 mg/dL Q2W; baseline: 141.3 mg/dL) and 72.2 to 82.3 mg/dL (alirocumab 150 mg Q2W; baseline: 168.4 mg/dL) were achieved at weeks 24 to 78 (on-treatment analysis). Additional beneficial effects were observed in other lipids. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were similar in the alirocumab (80.5%) and placebo groups (83.0%). Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with HeFH, alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C levels. Alirocumab was generally well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background TA-8995 is a potent inhibitor of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) with beneficial effects on lipids and lipoproteins. The effect of TA-8995 on cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC), a measure of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) function, and HDL subparticle distribution is largely unknown. Objective To assess the effect of the CETP inhibitor TA-8995 on ABCA1- and non–ABCA1-driven CEC and on HDL particle distribution. Methods Total, non–ABCA1-, and ABCA1-specific CEC from J774 cells and HDL subclass distribution assessed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis were measured at baseline and after 12-week treatment in 187 mild-dyslipidemic patients randomized to placebo, 1 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg TA-8995, or 10 mg TA-8995 combined with 10 mg rosuvastatin (NCT01970215). Results Compared with placebo, total, non–ABCA1-, and ABCA1-specific CEC were increased dose dependently by up to 38%, 72%, and 28%, respectively, in patients randomized to 10 mg of TA-8995. PreBeta-1 HDL, the primary acceptor for ABCA1-driven cholesterol efflux, was increased by 36%. This increase in preBeta-1 HDL correlated significantly with the total and the ABCA1-driven CEC increase, whereas the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increase did not. Conclusion TA-8995 dose dependently increased not only total and non–ABCA1-specific CEC but also ABCA1-specific CEC and preBeta-1 HDL particle levels. These findings suggest that TA-8995 not only increases HDL-C levels but also promotes functional properties of HDL particles. This CETP inhibitor–driven preBeta-1 HDL increase is an important predictor of both ABCA1 and total CEC increase, independent of HDL-C increase. Whether these changes in HDL particle composition and functionality have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular outcome requires formal testing in a cardiovascular outcome trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses the detection of variations in DNA sequences in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Cause of the disorder; Number of mutations found; Why large-scale population-based genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolemia is not practical.

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in cholesterol metabolism because it is responsible for the transfer of cholesteryl esters from high-density lipoprotein (HDL) to very-low-density lipoproteins and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs). The development of CETP inhibitors represented a novel approach for raising HDL cholesterol and reducing LDL cholesterol levels to alter atherogenesis. However, results from recent clinical trials question the therapeutic use of at least 1 CETP inhibitor, torcetrapib (Pfizer Inc, New York, NY), which was demonstrated to increase blood pressure and have no effect on decreasing the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. This article discusses the use of CETP inhibitors and their effects on lipoprotein metabolism and whether they can ultimately lead to reductions in cardiovascular events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

High-dose statin therapy has been demonstrated to provide incremental benefit when low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations are lowered well below recommended target levels. This secondary analysis of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study was conducted to investigate whether the attainment of very low LDL cholesterol levels was associated with a further reduction in major cardiovascular events compared with higher LDL cholesterol concentrations and whether any incremental benefit was achieved without additional safety risk. Patients with coronary heart disease and LDL cholesterol levels <130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/L) were randomized to therapy with atorvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 5,006) or 80 mg/day (n = 4,995). The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event. Clinical outcomes and safety data were compared across on-treatment LDL cholesterol quintiles. There was a highly significant reduction in the rate of major cardiovascular events with descending achieved levels of on-treatment LDL cholesterol (p <0.0001 for trend across LDL cholesterol). Analysis of individual components of the primary end point demonstrated similar results. Death from any cause and from noncardiovascular causes was lowest in patients with the lowest on-treatment LDL cholesterol levels. Cardiovascular deaths were also reduced with lower levels of on-treatment LDL cholesterol. There were no clinically important differences in adverse event rates across quintiles. Specifically, no increase in muscle complaints, suicide, hemorrhagic stroke, or cancer deaths was observed at the lowest LDL cholesterol levels. In conclusion, the present analysis adds support to the concept that for patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, a further risk reduction without sacrifice of safety can be achieved by reducing LDL cholesterol to very low levels. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) study is an investigator-initiated trial designed to determine whether additional clinical benefit might be gained through a strategy that decreases levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels better than those currently achieved with established statin therapy in patients who have coronary heart disease. IDEAL is a multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded, end point classification study. Patients who had myocardial infarction were randomized to prescription treatment with 80 mg/day of atorvastatin or 20 mg/day of simvastatin (the dose was increased to 40 mg/day at week 24 in those patients whose plasma total cholesterol remained >5.0 mmol/L, or 190 mg/dl, or whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained >3.0 mmol/L, or 115 mg/dl). The primary clinical outcome variable is the time to initial occurrence of a major coronary event, which is defined as nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, coronary death, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The study is designed to have a power of 90% to detect a relative decrease of 20% in the atorvastatin-group compared with the simvastatin-group in the number of major events caused by coronary heart disease over ∼5.5 years. The 8,888 randomized patients had the following characteristics: mean age 61.7 ± 9.5 years, 19.1% women (mean age 64.0 ± 9.5 years), baseline total cholesterol 5.1 ± 1.0 mmol/L (197 mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 3.2 ± 0.9 mmol/L (124 mg/dl), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 1.2 ± 0.3 mmol/L (46 mg/dl). Drug treatment before randomization consisted of statins in 77% of patients, aspirin in 78.9%, β blockers in 75.1%, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in 30%. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: The ORION-1 trial (Trial to Evaluate the Effect of ALN-PCSSC Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [LDL-C]) demonstrated that inclisiran, an siRNA therapeutic that targets protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 mRNA within hepatocytes, produces significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. The effects of inclisiran on other lipids are less well described.Methods: ORION-1 was a phase 2 trial assessing 6 different inclisiran dosing regimens versus placebo. Participants with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol despite receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy received a single-dose (200, 300, or 500 mg) or 2-dose starting regimen (100, 200, or 300 mg on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran or placebo. This prespecified analysis reports the percentage reductions in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein (apo) B, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), triglycerides, HDL-C, and apo A1 at the primary efficacy time point (day 180) with mixed-effect models for repeated measures. Additional prespecified analyses report time course of changes from baseline at each visit to day 210, interindividual variation in response, and lipid goal attainment.Results: The mean age of the 501 participants was 63 years, 65% were male, 69% had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, 73% used statins, and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 128 mg/dL. A single dose of inclisiran reduced apo B, non-HDL-C, and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol over 210 days. A second dose of inclisiran provided additional lowering of these lipids. At day 180, non-HDL-C was lowered dose-dependently: by 25% from 148±43 to 110±45 mg/dL in the 200-mg single-dose group and by 46% from 161±58 to 91±58 mg/dL in the 2-dose 300-mg group. For the same dosing regimens, apo B was reduced by 23% from 101±23 to 78±29 mg/dL and by 41% from 106±31 to 65±33 mg/dL ( P<0.001 for all groups versus placebo). In the 300-mg 2-dose group, all individuals experienced apo B and non-HDL-C reductions. There was larger interindividual variation in very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and lipoprotein(a) reductions. In the 300-mg 2-dose group, the percentages of patients achieving guideline-recommended apo B goals for high- and very-high-risk patients at day 180 were 78% and 90%; 68% and 83% of participants achieved non-HDL-C <100 and <130 mg/dL.Conclusions: Inclisiran produces significant and prolonged reductions in atherogenic lipoproteins, suggesting that inhibiting the synthesis of protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 through siRNA may be a viable alternative to other approaches that target protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9.Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02597127. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and aim We evaluated whether the severity of the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) phenotype, i.e. increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, decreases in more distantly related patients within one family. Methods We included heterozygous FH patients identified by genetic cascade screening in the Netherlands from 1994 to 2014. A cascade starts with identification of a genetically proven FH patient (“index patient”) followed by testing in first degree relatives. If a mutation carrier is identified, their first degree relatives are tested as well, and so on. The associations between distance-to-index (expressed as family relationship) and both LDL-C levels and CVD risk, were evaluated using multivariable linear and Cox regression models. Results Distance-to-index could be determined in 13,374 patients. Mean (±standard error) levels of LDL-C did not differ significantly in 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th or more family members: 5.46 (1.42), 5.17 (1.42), 4.89 (1.37), and 4.58 (1.27) mmol/L, respectively (adjusted p-for-trend: 0.104). The adjusted hazard ratio of increasing distance-to-index for CVD was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.82–1.03). Conclusion This study was the first to investigate the association between distance-to-index and the phenotype of a monogenetic disorder. The absence of a decrease of phenotype severity lends support for genetic cascade testing in FH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels using statins is associated with significant reductions in cardiovascular (CV) events in a wide range of patient populations. Although statins are generally considered to be safe, recent studies suggest they are associated with an increased risk of developing Type 2 diabetes (T2D). This led the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to change their labelling requirements for statins to include a warning about the possibility of increased blood sugar and HbA1c levels and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to issue guidance on a small increased risk of T2D with the statin class. This review examines the evidence leading to these claims and provides practical guidance for primary care physicians on the use of statins in people with or at risk of developing T2D. Overall, evidence suggests that the benefits of statins for the reduction of CV risk far outweigh the risk of developing T2D, especially in individuals with higher CV risk. To reduce the risk of developing T2D, physicians should assess all patients for T2D risk prior to starting statin therapy, educate patients about their risks, and encourage risk-reduction through lifestyle changes. Whether some statins are more diabetogenic than others requires further study. Statin-treated patients at high risk of developing T2D should regularly be monitored for changes in blood glucose or HbA1c levels, and the risk of conversion from pre-diabetes to T2D should be reduced by intensifying lifestyle changes. Should a patient develop T2D during statin treatment, physicians should continue with statin therapy and manage T2D in accordance with relevant national guidelines. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine whether residual risk after high-dose statin therapy for primary prevention individuals with reduced levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is related to on-treatment apolipoprotein B, non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C), trigylcerides, or lipid ratios, and how they compare with on-treatment LDL-C. Background: Guidelines focus on LDL-C as the primary target of therapy, yet residual risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among statin-treated individuals remains high and not fully explained. Methods: Participants in the randomized placebo-controlled JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) trial were adults without diabetes or CVD, with baseline LDL-C levels <130 mg/dl, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels ≥2 mg/l, and triglyceride concentrations <500 mg/dl. Individuals allocated to receive rosuvastatin 20 mg daily with baseline and on-treatment lipids and lipoproteins were examined in relation to the primary endpoint of incident CVD (nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, arterial revascularization, or cardiovascular death). Results: Using separate multivariate Cox models, statistically significant associations of a similar magnitude with residual risk of CVD were found for on-treatment LDL-C, non–HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, total cholesterol/HDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B/A-I. The respective adjusted standardized hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for each of these measures were 1.31 (1.09 to 1.56), 1.25 (1.04 to 1.50), 1.27 (1.06 to 1.53), 1.22 (1.03 to 1.44), 1.29 (1.09 to 1.52), and 1.27 (1.09 to 1.49). The overall residual risk and the risk associated with these measures decreased among participants achieving on-treatment LDL-C ≤70 mg/dl, on-treatment non–HDL-C ≤100 mg/dl, or on-treatment apolipoprotein B ≤80 mg/dl. In contrast, on-treatment triglycerides showed no association with CVD. Conclusions: In this primary prevention trial of nondiabetic individuals with low LDL-C and elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, on-treatment LDL-C was as valuable as non–HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, or ratios in predicting residual risk. (JUPITER—Crestor 20mg Versus Placebo in Prevention of Cardiovascular [CV] Events; NCT00239681) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between lipid and nonlipid biomarker levels achieved during statin therapy and the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MCVEs) in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). Background: Several plasma nonlipid biomarkers have been shown to predict MCVEs in population studies. Methods: This is a nested case-control study in the TNT (Treating to New Targets) study population, a randomized trial that compared the efficacy of high- (80 mg) versus low-dose (10 mg) atorvastatin for the secondary prevention of CHD. Fasting plasma levels of standard lipids and of 18 nonlipid biomarkers were obtained after an 8-week run-in period on atorvastatin 10 mg and again 1 year after being randomized to 10 or 80 mg atorvastatin in 507 patients who experienced MCVEs during the 4.9 years of study follow-up and in 1,020 control subjects. An MCVE was defined as CHD death; nonfatal, non–procedure-related myocardial infarction; resuscitated cardiac arrest; or fatal or nonfatal stroke. Results: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were all predictive of recurrent MCVEs (p ≤ 0.009). Concentrations of many of the 18 nonlipid biomarkers were lowered by atorvastatin therapy (independent of dose). However, almost none of the nonlipid biomarker levels, whether measured after the 8-week run-in period or after 1 year of treatment with 10 or 80 mg atorvastatin, were predictive of recurrent MCVEs. Conclusions: In patients with stable CHD, atorvastatin improved plasma levels of an expanded panel of nonlipid biomarkers. However, independently of atorvastatin dose, the achieved levels of the vast majority of nonlipid biomarkers did not predict MCVEs. (A Study to Determine the Degree of Additional Reduction in CV Risk in Lowering LDL Below Minimum Target Levels [TNT]; NCT00327691) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that at any low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, other lipid parameters such as non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, triglyceride (TG) levels, and the total cholesterol (TC)/HDL-C are still associated with an increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Background: Although LDL-C is considered to be the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy, other parameters of the lipoprotein-lipid profile may more closely associated with CHD risk. Methods: In the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk prospective population study, 21,448 participants without diabetes or CHD between age 45 and 79 years were followed for 11.0 years. A total of 2,086 participants developed CHD during follow-up. Results: Among individuals with low LDL-C levels (<100 mg/dl), after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, physical activity, and hormone replacement therapy (in women), those with non–HDL-C >130 mg/dl had a hazard ratio (HR) for future CHD of 1.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12 to 3.04) when compared with those with non–HDL-C levels <130 mg/dl. In a similar model, individuals with TG levels >150 mg/dl had an HR of 1.63 (95% CI: 1.02 to 2.59) when compared with those with TG levels <150 mg/dl, and individuals with a TC/HDL-C ratio >5 had an HR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.22 to 3.93) when compared with those with a TC/HDL-C ratio <5. Conclusions: In this prospective study, independently of their plasma LDL-C levels, participants with high non–HDL-C levels, high TG levels, or with an elevated TC/HDL-C ratio were at increased CHD risk. CHD risk assessment algorithms as well as lipid targets of lipid-lowering trials may also need to consider other easily available parameters such as non–HDL-C. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Increased levels of the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein predict cardiovascular events. Since statins lower levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as well as cholesterol, we hypothesized that people with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels but without hyperlipidemia might benefit from statin treatment.Methods: We randomly assigned 17,802 apparently healthy men and women with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg per liter or higher to rosuvastatin, 20 mg daily, or placebo and followed them for the occurrence of the combined primary end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes.Results: The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 1.9 years (maximum, 5.0). Rosuvastatin reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 50% and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels by 37%. The rates of the primary end point were 0.77 and 1.36 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio for rosuvastatin, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.69; P<0.00001), with corresponding rates of 0.17 and 0.37 for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P=0.0002), 0.18 and 0.34 for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.79; P=0.002), 0.41 and 0.77 for revascularization or unstable angina (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70; P<0.00001), 0.45 and 0.85 for the combined end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.69; P<0.00001), and 1.00 and 1.25 for death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97; P=0.02). Consistent effects were observed in all subgroups evaluated. The rosuvastatin group did not have a significant increase in myopathy or cancer but did have a higher incidence of physician-reported diabetes.Conclusions: In this trial of apparently healthy persons without hyperlipidemia but with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, rosuvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00239681.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and hepatic lipase (HL) are two HDL modifying proteins that have both pro- and anti-atherogenic properties. We hypothesized that CETP and HL synergistically affect HDL cholesterol and atherosclerotic risk. To test our hypothesis, we analysed the genotype frequencies of CETP Taq1B (rs708272) and LIPC-514C/T (rs1800588) polymorphisms in male coronary artery disease patients (CAD; n =792) and non-symptomatic controls (n =539). Cases and controls had similar allele frequencies, but the occurrence of the combined genotypes differed (p =0.027). In CAD patients, 1.3% had the CETP-B2B2/LIPC-TT genotype, with only 0.2% in controls (p =0.033). The presence of the CETP lowering B2 allele and the HL lowering LIPC-T allele synergistically increased HDL cholesterol from 0.87±0.19mmol/L in the B1B1/CC (n =183) to 1.21±0.25mmol/L in the B2B2/TT carriers (n =10). The B1B1/CC carriers had an increased CAD risk (OR 1.4; p =0.025). Despite their high HDL cholesterol, the B2B2/TT individuals also had an increased CAD risk (OR 3.7; p =0.033). In a 2-year follow up, the loss of coronary artery lumen diameter in these patients was higher than in all other patients combined (0.34±0.70 versus 0.10±0.29mm; p =0.044). We conclude that a high HDL cholesterol does not protect against coronary artery disease when associated with combined CETP- and HL-lowering gene variants. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The Justification for the Use of statins in Primary prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled primary prevention trial of statin therapy among persons with average to low levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol who are at increased cardiovascular risk due to elevated plasma concentrations of the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). A total of 17,802 persons with LDL cholesterol <130 mg/dl (3.36 mmol/L) and hs-CRP ≥2 mg/L were recruited from 26 countries and randomly allocated to 20 mg/day rosuvastatin or placebo. In contrast to previous studies of statin therapy in primary prevention, JUPITER is evaluating a group with modest plasma concentrations of LDL cholesterol (median 108 mg/dl, interquartile range 94 to 119). Further, the trial includes 6,801 women (38.2%) and 5,577 participants with metabolic syndrome (32.1%). Thus, in addition to broadening our understanding of statin therapy and inflammation, the JUPITER trial will provide important and clinically relevant information on primary prevention among patients who do not currently qualify for lipid-lowering therapy. In conclusion, as 20 mg of rosuvastatin can reduce LDL cholesterol by up to 50%, JUPITER will also provide crucial safety data for several thousand patients who should achieve LDL cholesterol levels <50 mg/dl on a long-term basis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) has recently been shown to effectively increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. This study examined the use of the CETP inhibitor JTT-705 combined with pravastatin. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 155 patients with type II dyslipidemia using pravastatin 40 mg were treated with placebo or JTT-705 300 or 600 mg. Four weeks of treatment with JTT-705 600 mg led to a 30% decrease in CETP activity (p &#60;0.001), a 28% increase in HDL cholesterol (p &#60;0.001), and a 5% decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p &#60;0.03). Combination therapy using JTT-705 and pravastatin effectively increases HDL cholesterol levels and is safe and well tolerated up to 4 weeks of administration. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Fecal bile acid and neutral sterol excretion are the obligate endpoints of the reverse cholesterol transport pathway (RCT). In studies in mice, no evidence was found for a relation between HDL-cholesterol (HDL-c) levels and fecal sterol excretion. In this study, we have evaluated this relationship in patients with isolated low HDL-c versus controls. Results: Fecal sterol excretion was studied in 12 subjects with familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia (FHA) and 11 healthy controls. Compared to the controls (8.9±6.3mg/kg/day), neutral sterol excretion was significantly lower in the FHA group (4.0±2.4mg/kg/day). Fecal bile acid excretion showed a similar pattern. Across the groups, a strong positive correlation between HDL-c and fecal neutral sterol excretion was found (r =0.53; p =0.01). Conclusions: Isolated low HDL-c levels in humans are associated with reduced fecal sterol excretion suggesting that in humans HDL regulates the final step in the RCT pathway at low HDL-c levels. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Previous trials have demonstrated that lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels below currently recommended levels is beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of lowering LDL cholesterol levels below 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter) in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: A total of 10,001 patients with clinically evident CHD and LDL cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) were randomly assigned to double-blind therapy and received either 10 mg or 80 mg of atorvastatin per day. Patients were followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event, defined as death from CHD, nonfatal non–procedure-related myocardial infarction, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or fatal or nonfatal stroke. Results: The mean LDL cholesterol levels were 77 mg per deciliter (2.0 mmol per liter) during treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin and 101 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter) during treatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin. The incidence of persistent elevations in liver aminotransferase levels was 0.2 percent in the group given 10 mg of atorvastatin and 1.2 percent in the group given 80 mg of atorvastatin (P<0.001). A primary event occurred in 434 patients (8.7 percent) receiving 80 mg of atorvastatin, as compared with 548 patients (10.9 percent) receiving 10 mg of atorvastatin, representing an absolute reduction in the rate of major cardiovascular events of 2.2 percent and a 22 percent relative reduction in risk (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.89; P<0.001). There was no difference between the two treatment groups in overall mortality. Conclusions: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with 80 mg of atorvastatin per day in patients with stable CHD provides significant clinical benefit beyond that afforded by treatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin per day. This occurred with a greater incidence of elevated aminotransferase levels. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1425-35. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]