1. ERCP using balloon-assisted endoscopes versus EUS-guided treatment for common bile duct stones in Roux-en-Y gastrectomy.
- Author
-
Sato T, Nakai Y, Kogure H, Mitsuyama T, Shimatani M, Uemura S, Iwashita T, Tanisaka Y, Ryozawa S, Tsuchiya T, Itoi T, Kin T, Katanuma A, Kashima K, Irisawa A, Kayashima A, Iwasaki E, Yoshida A, Takenaka M, Himei H, Kato H, Masuda A, Shiomi H, Kawakubo K, Kuwatani M, Otsuka T, Matsubara S, Nishioka N, Ogura T, Tamura T, Kitano M, Hayashi N, Yasuda I, and Fujishiro M
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Gastrectomy, Common Bile Duct, Endoscopes, Treatment Outcome, Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde adverse effects, Gallstones diagnostic imaging, Gallstones surgery
- Abstract
Background and Aims: We compared ERCP using a balloon-assisted endoscope (BE-ERCP) with EUS-guided antegrade treatment (EUS-AG) for removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones in patients with Roux-en-Y (R-Y) gastrectomy., Methods: Consecutive patients who had previous R-Y gastrectomy undergoing BE-ERCP or EUS-AG for CBD stones in 16 centers were retrospectively analyzed., Results: BE-ERCP and EUS-AG were performed in 588 and 59 patients, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar, except for CBD diameter and angle. The technical success rate was 83.7% versus 83.1% (P = .956), complete stone removal rate was 78.1% versus 67.8% (P = .102), and early adverse event rate was 10.2% versus 18.6% (P = .076) in BE-ERCP and EUS-AG, respectively. The mean number of endoscopic sessions was smaller in BE-ERCP (1.5 ± .8 vs 1.9 ± 1.0 sessions, P = .01), whereas the median total treatment time was longer (90 vs 61.5 minutes, P = .001). Among patients with biliary access, the complete stone removal rate was significantly higher in BE-ERCP (93.3% vs 81.6%, P = .009). Negative predictive factors were CBD diameter ≥15 mm (odds ratio [OR], .41) and an angle of CBD <90 degrees (OR, .39) in BE-ERCP and a stone size ≥10 mm (OR, .07) and an angle of CBD <90 degrees (OR, .07) in EUS-AG. The 1-year recurrence rate was 8.3% in both groups., Conclusions: Effectiveness and safety of BE-ERCP and EUS-AG were comparable in CBD stone removal for patients after R-Y gastrectomy, but complete stone removal after technical success was superior in BE-ERCP., Competing Interests: Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: Y. Nakai: Speaker for Olympus, Boston Scientific Japan, and Gadelius Medical; research support from Fujifilm; scholarship donation from Boston Scientific Japan. M. Shimatani: Speaker for Fujifilm, Gadelius Medical, and Kaneka Corporation. M. Kitano: Speaker for Olympus; research support from Fujifilm, Boston Scientific Japan, Medicos Hirata, and Zeon Medical. I. Yasuda: Speaker from Olympus, Gadelius Medical, and Medicos Hirata; research support from Olympus. M. Fujishiro: Speaker for and research support from Olympus and Fujifilm. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF