Search

Plants are constantly exposed to temperature fluctuations, which have direct effects on all cellular reactions because temperature influences reaction likelihood and speed. Chloroplasts are crucial to temperature acclimation responses of plants, due to their photosynthetic reactions whose products play a central role in plant metabolism. Consequently, chloroplasts serve as sensors of temperature changes and are simultaneously major targets of temperature acclimation. The core subunits of the complexes involved in the light reactions of photosynthesis are encoded in the chloroplast. As a result, it is assumed that temperature acclimation in plants requires regulatory responses in chloroplast gene expression and protein turnover. We conducted western blot experiments to assess changes in the accumulation of two photosynthetic complexes (PSII, and Cytb6f complex) and the ATP synthase in tobacco plants over two days of acclimation to low temperature. Surprisingly, the concentration of proteins within the chloroplast varied negligibly compared to controls. To explain this observation, we used a simplified Ordinary Differential Equation (ODE) model of transcription, translation, mRNA degradation and protein degradation to explain how the protein concentration can be kept constant. This model takes into account temperature effects on these processes. Through simulations of the ODE model, we show that mRNA and protein degradation are possible targets for control during temperature acclimation. Our model provides a basis for future directions in research and the analysis of future results.

SUMMARY: Chloroplast perturbations activate retrograde signalling pathways, causing dynamic changes of gene expression. Besides transcriptional control of gene expression, different classes of small non‐coding RNAs (sRNAs) act in gene expression control, but comprehensive analyses regarding their role in retrograde signalling are lacking. We performed sRNA profiling in response to norflurazon (NF), which provokes retrograde signals, in Arabidopsis thaliana wild type (WT) and the two retrograde signalling mutants gun1 and gun5. The RNA samples were also used for mRNA and long non‐coding RNA profiling to link altered sRNA levels to changes in the expression of their cognate target RNAs. We identified 122 sRNAs from all known sRNA classes that were responsive to NF in the WT. Strikingly, 142 and 213 sRNAs were found to be differentially regulated in both mutants, indicating a retrograde control of these sRNAs. Concomitant with the changes in sRNA expression, we detected about 1500 differentially expressed mRNAs in the NF‐treated WT and around 900 and 1400 mRNAs that were differentially regulated in the gun1 and gun5 mutants, with a high proportion (~30%) of genes encoding plastid proteins. Furthermore, around 20% of predicted miRNA targets code for plastid‐localised proteins. Among the sRNA–target pairs, we identified pairs with an anticorrelated expression as well pairs showing other expressional relations, pointing to a role of sRNAs in balancing transcriptional changes upon retrograde signals. Based on the comprehensive changes in sRNA expression, we assume a considerable impact of sRNAs in retrograde‐dependent transcriptional changes to adjust plastidic and nuclear gene expression. Significance Statement: Perturbations of plastid functions trigger retrograde signalling to adjust plastidic and nuclear gene expression; however, the role of small non‐coding RNAs acting as regulators in these pathways is not well understood. We analysed small non‐coding RNA expression in response to retrograde signals in Arabidopsis thaliana wild type and two retrograde signalling mutants and identified members of all known small non‐coding RNA classes, pointing to a functional role of these RNA classes in retrograde pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]