1. Umeclidinium/vilanterol as step-up therapy from tiotropium in patients with moderate COPD: a randomized, parallel-group, 12-week study.
- Author
-
Kerwin EM, Kalberg CJ, Galkin DV, Zhu CQ, Church A, Riley JH, and Fahy WA
- Subjects
- Aged, Argentina, Benzyl Alcohols adverse effects, Bronchodilator Agents adverse effects, Chlorobenzenes adverse effects, Drug Substitution, Europe, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Intention to Treat Analysis, Least-Squares Analysis, Logistic Models, Lung physiopathology, Male, Middle Aged, Muscarinic Antagonists adverse effects, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive diagnosis, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive physiopathology, Quinuclidines adverse effects, Recovery of Function, South Africa, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Tiotropium Bromide adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, United States, Vital Capacity, Benzyl Alcohols administration & dosage, Bronchodilator Agents administration & dosage, Chlorobenzenes administration & dosage, Lung drug effects, Muscarinic Antagonists administration & dosage, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive drug therapy, Quinuclidines administration & dosage, Tiotropium Bromide administration & dosage
- Abstract
Introduction: Patients with COPD who remain symptomatic on long-acting bronchodilator monotherapy may benefit from step-up therapy to a long-acting bronchodilator combination. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) in patients with moderate COPD who remained symptomatic on tiotropium (TIO)., Methods: In this randomized, blinded, double-dummy, parallel-group study (NCT01899742), patients (N=494) who were prescribed TIO for ≥3 months at screening (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV
1 ]: 50%-70% of predicted; modified Medical Research Council [mMRC] score ≥1) and completed a 4-week run-in with TIO were randomized to UMEC/VI 62.5/25 µg or TIO 18 µg for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included trough FEV1 at Day 85 (primary end point), 0-3 h serial FEV1 , rescue medication use, Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs)., Results: Compared with TIO, UMEC/VI produced greater improvements in trough FEV1 (least squares [LS] mean difference: 88 mL at Day 85 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 45-131]; P <0.001) and FEV1 after 5 min on Day 1 (50 mL [95% CI: 27-72]; P <0.001). Reductions in rescue medication use over 12 weeks were greater with UMEC/VI versus TIO (LS mean change: -0.1 puffs/d [95% CI: -0.2-0.0]; P ≤0.05). More patients achieved clinically meaningful improvements in TDI score (≥1 unit) with UMEC/VI (63%) versus TIO (49%; odds ratio at Day 84=1.78 [95% CI: 1.21-2.64]; P ≤0.01). Improvements in SGRQ and CAT scores were similar between treatments. The incidence of AEs was similar with UMEC/VI (30%) and TIO (31%)., Conclusion: UMEC/VI step-up therapy provides clinical benefit over TIO monotherapy in patients with moderate COPD who are symptomatic on TIO alone., Competing Interests: Disclosure EMK has served on advisory boards, speaker panels, and received travel reimbursement from Amphastar, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Forest, Ironwood, Mylan, Novartis, Pearl, Sunovion, Targacept, Teva, and Theravance; has conducted multicenter clinical research trials for ~40 pharmaceutical companies. CJK, DVG, C-QZ, AC, JHR, and WAF are employees of GSK and hold stocks/shares in GSK. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF