Search

Aim: Development of a routine screening technique for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. The proposed approach involves the CRISPR RNA (crRNA). In the presence of the target sequence, the RNase activity of the Cas13a protein is activated, and it cleaves RNA fluorescent probe so that fluorescence will be emitted. Results: The sensitivity of the detection based on CRISPR-Cas13a was 10 fM. The results obtained by CRISPR-Cas13a and quantitative polymerase chain reaction were closely correlated: χ 2  = 81.798 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The method can be carried out at room temperature and yields results within 2 h. The developed technique does not require expensive instruments and, thus, can meet the needs of community hospitals and other institutions for screening.

Background: In a context of increasing use of Nucleic Acid Amplification Test, diagnoses of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections among men increased in Europe and USA since 2007. We aimed to describe trends in the incidence of male urethritis in France between 2007 and 2017., Methods: We analysed male urethritis clinical cases reported by the French GPs' Sentinelles network., Results: GPs reported 1944 cases of male urethritis during the study period. The estimated annual incidence rates in men aged 15 years and older remained stable between 226 cases per 100,000 seen in 2007 and 196 in 2017 (P value = 0.9). A third-generation cephalosporin with macrolide or tetracycline was prescribed in 17.5% of cases in 2009 (27/154) and 32.4% in 2017 (47/145) (P value = 0.0327)., Conclusions: The incidence rates for adult male urethritis diagnosed in primary care have remained stable since 2007 in France in contrast with the increasing trend of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections based on microbiological surveillance. Using stable clinical definition for male urethritis seems essential to follow correctly epidemiological dynamic.

A prevalence of 3.47% of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis has been previously reported among males living with HIV infection in Brazil. This study aims to assess the recurrence of C. trachomatis urethritis three years later in the same cohort of patients and analyze associated risk factors. A total of 115 male patients diagnosed with HIV infection, with no symptoms of urethritis and observed since May of 2015 in followup visits were enrolled. They had urine samplers tested by PCR for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae between February and March 2018. Results: Three of the four patients who had asymptomatic C. trachomatis urethritis three years before were recurrently positive for C. trachomatis urethritis. Two new patients were diagnosed as positives, accounting for a total asymptomatic C. trachomatis urethritis prevalence of 4.34%. The prevalence during the whole study was 5.21%. The relative risk for a new urethritis episode among those previously diagnosed with urethritis is RR=41.62 (95% CI: 9.42-183.84), p < 0.01. Patients who presented asymptomatic urethritis anytime and who were recurrently positive for C. trachomatis had a lower mean age (p<0.01). Married individuals were protected regarding asymptomatic urethritis [p<0.01, OR = 0.04 (0.005-0.4)] and had lower risk to develop recurrence [p<0.01, RR = 0.86 (0.74-0.99)]. Illicit drugs users had risk associated to asymptomatic urethritis [p=0.02, OR= 5.9 (1.03-34)] and higher risk to develop recurrence [p<0.01, RR=1.1 (1-1.22)]. Conclusion: The recurrence of asymptomatic C. trachomatis urethritis after treatment among males living with HIV infection in Brazil can be considered high and should not be neglected.

Urethral swabs are the samples of choice for point-of-care Gram stain testing to diagnose Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection and nongonococcal urethritis (NGU) in men. As an alternative to urethral swabs, meatal swabs have been recommended for the collection of urethral discharge to diagnose N. gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in certain populations by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), as they involve a less invasive collection method. However, as meatal swabs could be sampling a reduced surface area and result in fewer collected epithelial cells compared to urethral swabs, the adequacy of meatal swab specimens to collect sufficient cellular material for Gram stain testing remains unknown. We enrolled 66 men who underwent either urethral or meatal swabbing and compared the cellular content and Gram stain failure rate. We measured the difference in swab cellular content using the Cepheid Xpert CT/NG sample adequacy control crossing threshold (SAC CT ) and determined the failure rate of Gram stain smears (GSS) due to insufficient cellular material. In the absence of discharge, meatal smears were associated with a significant reduction in cellular content ( P = 0.0118), which corresponded with a GSS failure rate significantly higher than that for urethral swabs (45% versus 3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). When discharge was present, there was no difference among results from urethral and meatal swabs. Therefore, if GSS testing is being considered for point-of-care diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae infection or NGU in men, meatal swabs should be avoided in the absence of a visible discharge., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.)

Background: Chlamydia trachomatis is mentioned among the etiologic factors for urinary tract infections. Chlamydias are parasites inside a cell. A very significant problem of C. trachomatis infections is their asymptomatic character. The most frequent infections caused by these bacteria are inflammations of the urethra and bladder; of the vagina, cervix, vaginal cavity and adnexa in women; and of the epididymis, testicles and prostate in men. In the diagnosis of C. trachomatis infections, the following methods are used: immunofluorescent techniques, immunoenzymatic assays, serological examinations and genetic techniques (for example PCR)., Objectives: The aim of the study was to detect C. trachomatis among patients with symptoms of non-gonorrheal urethritis using diagnostic serologic methods and direct immunofluorescence. The purpose was to assess the connection between the incidence of urinary tract infections caused by C. trachomatis and symptoms that patients report as well as other data from interviews., Material and Methods: Blood serum and urethral smears were taken from each of 57 patients. The ELISA method was used to mark specific IgG and IgGcHSP60 anti-chlamydia antibodies in the blood serum. In the urethral smear, antigens were marked using the direct immunofluorescence method., Results: Evidence for urinary tract infection caused by C. trachomatis was found in 15.79% of the examined patients using the immunofluorescence method. In the blood serum, positive results for IgGcHSP60 were obtained in 17.54% of the patients and for IgG in 8.77%., Conclusions: The studies carried out so far suggest that C. trachomatis has a significant role in the etiology of urethritis in adults and children. Other serological tests should be conducted in all the patients in order to study the immune responses in infected individuals and to confirm C. trachomatis infection using genetic methods such as PCR.

Sexually transmitted infections of the urogenital tract are most commonly caused by the intracellular bacteria Chlamydia trachomatis worldwide, resulting the clinical picture of acute urethritis in men as well as urethritis and endocervicitis in women. As women often present with few symptoms only or a completely symptom-free disease course, one of the most important long-term complications is chronic pelvic inflammatory disease often followed by the development of infertility caused by chronic scar formation. Well-organized screening programs are considered to have a leading role in the prevention of disease spreading and long lasting unwanted complications. Antibiotic treatment options are often influenced by special circumstances, such as pregnancy and several complicated clinical forms. The aims of the authors are to give a concise review on the current knowledge regarding Chlamydia trachomatis infections and summarize typical clinical signs, modern diagnostic techniques as well as accepted treatment protocols and basic aspects of screening.

Urethritis is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality in developing countries. The aim of this study was to detect common bacterial causes of urethritis in men by Gram stain, culture and multiplex PCR.185 male patients who presented at the Skin and venereal clinic of the Dhaka Medical College, Bangladesh with clinical symptoms suggestive of urethritis were enrolled in this study. Urethral discharges were tested for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae by Gram stain, culture and PCR. Multiplex PCR assay was done to detect DNA of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma genitalium. Out of 185 participants, 30.27% and 14.6% were infected by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis respectively. None of the individuals was found positive for either Ureaplasma urealyticum or Mycoplasma genitalium. Among the Neisseria gonorrhoeae positive patients 27.57% were positive from Gram stain, 26.49% were culture positive, 30.27% were positive by PCR (p<0.001). 32.65% of the Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates were penicillinase producers and 83.67% were susceptible to ceftriaxone. Considering culture as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae was 100%, and 94.85% respectively with an accuracy of 96.22%. 3.73% of the 134 smear negative and 5.15% of the 136 culture negative samples were positive by PCR. PCR was the most sensitive and rapid method for the diagnosis of urethritis. Multiplex PCR may be a useful approach to laboratory diagnosis of urethritis in men for its high sensitivity and specificity.

Background: Many countries have witnessed a disturbing increase in cases of Chlamydia trachomatis infection despite enhanced control programs. Since the goal of Chlamydia control is to prevent reproductive complications such as pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy, an understanding of recent trends in these conditions is needed to fully evaluate the effect of control efforts., Methods: We analyzed 2 provincial, comprehensive health services administrative databases (encompassing hospitalizations and all physician-delivered services) for pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy trends from 1992 through 2009 in women of reproductive age in British Columbia, Canada. Trends were compared to provincial Chlamydia surveillance data by time-series analysis, using the cross-correlation function method and Granger causality testing., Results: Chlamydia cases substantially increased from 1992 through 2009. Inpatient, outpatient, and total diagnoses of pelvic inflammatory disease and ectopic pregnancy declined from 1992 through 2003. After 2003, pelvic inflammatory disease rates continued to fall, while ectopic pregnancy rates significantly increased. The male Chlamydia urethritis rate increased from 39.4 to 173.6 cases/100,000 from 1996 to 2009., Conclusions: In the context of increasing Chlamydia infection rates, the reproductive complications of Chlamydia infection in women are declining overall. A recent increase in rates of ectopic pregnancies is cause for concern.

Objectives: Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum are common pathogens of sexually transmitted diseases. The majority of human ureaplasma isolates belong to the new species U. parvum. Clinically, C. trachomatis and U. parvum usually double infect in the nongonococcal urethritis patients. A novel method for simultaneous detection of C. trachomatis and U. parvum was set up in the present work., Design and Methods: Multiple real-time quantitative PCR was developed to allow for rapid, sensitive, specific and quantitative detection of C. trachomatis and U. parvum, simultaneously. To evaluate the applicability of the multiplex real-time quantitative PCR assay to clinical specimens, 64 samples of cervical swabs collected were studied., Results: Compared to the results obtained from single real-time quantitative PCR of C. trachomatis and U. parvum, the specificity, sensitivity and quantitative detection results of multiple real-time quantitative PCR are approximately identical with those of the former., Conclusions: This assay will be of great value in the simultaneous and rapid diagnosis of C. trachomatis and U. parvum in the future., (Copyright © 2012 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Given recent increasing case rates of Chlamydia trachomatis infection, we evaluated trends in chlamydia rates and related health outcomes in women and men aged 15 to 44 years who were enrolled in a Pacific Northwest health plan., Methods: We identified chlamydia, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy, and male urethritis cases occurring annually during 1997-2007 using computerized health plan databases, calculating rates per 100,000 person-years (py) by gender and 5-year age groups. We also calculated annual chlamydia testing rates., Results: In women, chlamydia testing rates increased by approximately 23% (220 tests per 1000 py in 1997 to 270 tests per 1000 in 2007). Chlamydia diagnosis rates rose from 449 cases/100,000 py in 1997 to 806/100,000 in 2007, a 79% increase (P = 0.01). Increases were greatest during 2005-2007, also the period of major conversion to nucleic acid amplification test. PID rates in this interval declined steadily from 823 cases/100,000 py to 473/100,000 (P < 0.01). Ectopic pregnancy rates remained unchanged. In men, chlamydia testing rates increased nearly 3.5-fold, from 12 to 42 tests per 1000 py. Chlamydia rates for men also rose significantly throughout the study interval (from 91 cases/100,000 py to 218/100,000; P < 0.01) as did urethritis diagnosis rates (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: Between 1997 and 2007, annual health plan chlamydia rates increased significantly for both women and men. These trends may be due in part to increased testing rates and increased use of more sensitive tests, but they likely do not explain the increased urethritis rates. During this same interval, we observed steady declines in PID rates, consistent with other national data sources.

Background: Criteria for diagnosis of male urethritis based on a Gram-stained smear (GSS) of urethral discharge were developed before the era of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) and Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct) and may be too stringent when considering the higher sensitivity of NAAT., Objective: To evaluate Ct and Ng positivity at different strata of polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) per high power field (hpf) GSS microscopy., Methods: A retrospective analysis of the electronic medical record system of the Denver Metro Health Clinic between March 1, 2005 and December 31, 2010; all men with a GSS test during this period had an NAAT for Ct and Ng and had GSS results recorded at 1 PMN/hpf increments., Results: A total of 13,520 GSS were available for analysis. For Ct, a statistically significant trend was observed along the PMN/hpf incremental spectrum, and a significant increase in positivity was observed between the 1 and 2 PMN/hpf strata (from 6.5% to 16.2%). For men diagnosed with Ng, no such trend was observed, and >95% of GSS results fell in the >10 strata. A subanalysis to control for laboratory technician variance and difference in NAAT technology showed similar results., Conclusion: Our data support lowering the diagnostic criteria of the GSS diagnosis of male urethritis to ≥2 PMN/hpf. At this level, the Ct positivity (16.2%) is similar or higher than positivity in men who receive presumptive chlamydia treatment as a contact to patients diagnosed with gonorrhea, pelvic inflammatory disease, or mucopurulent cervicitis.

Background: Timely notification and treatment of sex partners exposed to a sexually transmitted disease (STD) is essential to reduce reinfection and transmission. Our objectives were to determine factors associated with patient-initiated notification of sex partners and preferences regarding standard partner referral versus expedited partner therapy (EPT)., Methods: Participants diagnosed with gonorrhea, chlamydia, trichomoniasis, or nongonococcal urethritis within the previous year were administered a baseline survey asking about demographics, sexual history, and partner treatment preferences (standard partner referral vs. EPT). They identified up to 4 sex partners within the past 2 months, and answered questions on relationship characteristics, quality, and notification self-efficacy. At follow-up, participants with a current STD were asked whether they notified their partners. Generalized estimating equations were used to evaluate the associations between predictor variables and partner notification., Results: Of the 201 subjects enrolled, 157 had a current STD diagnosis, and 289 sex partners were identified. The rate of successful partner notification was 77.3% (157/203 sex partners). Partner notification was increased if the subject had a long-term relationship with a sex partner (odds ratio: 3.07; 95% confidence interval: 1.43, 6.58), considered the partner to be a main partner (odds ratio: 2.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.43, 6.58), or had increased notification self-efficacy. Overall, participants did not prefer EPT over standard referral; however, females, those with higher education levels, and those with a prior STD preferred EPT., Conclusions: Patient-initiated partner referral is more successful in patients with increased self-efficacy who have stronger interpersonal relationships with their sex partners.

In a sexually transmitted disease clinic-based sample of men who have sex with women, positivity for urethral Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was 3.5% and 3.1%, respectively, among patients whose only urethral exposure in the previous 3 months was receiving fellatio from a woman. Urethral infections acquired by fellatio might contribute to ongoing disease spread.

To explore the possibilities of a novel multiplex real-time PCR system for rapid diagnosis, genetic typing of serovars and clinical application in NGU, we developed a multiplex real-time PCR system for the simultaneous diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma parvum and Ureaplasma urealyticum and molecular detection of serovars of C. trachomatis and U. parvum in NGU using the SNP technology and TaqMan-LNA probe. In 57 pathogen-positive clinical specimens, we identified the following C. trachomatis serovars: D (20.05%, 12/57), E (36.84%, 21/57), F (19.30%, 11/57), G (8.77%, 5/57), H (5.26%, 3/57), J (3.51%, 2/57), and K (5.26%, 3/57). In 115 pathogen-positive clinical specimens, we identified the following U. parvum serovars: 1 (0.87%, 2/115), 3 (55.65%, 64/115), 6 (20.87%, 24/115) and 14 (21.74%, 25/115). Our fast pathogen diagnosis and serotyping assay using real-time TaqMan-LNA PCR may improve our ability to study the pathogenesis and epidemiology of NGU., (Crown Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The overall agreement between different criteria for cervicitis in women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis and/or Mycoplasma genitalium, and in women who tested negative was examined. Women attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases were enrolled because of sexual partners' suspected chlamydia infection. M. genitalium was tested in a sample of first-catch urine and an endocervical specimen, whereas specimens from four different sites were used for detection of C. trachomatis. Signs of friability and purulent endocervical discharge were documented at gynaecological examination. Specimens for microscopy were taken from the endocervix and urethra as well as the vaginal discharge, and bacterial vaginosis was examined for. The criteria being evaluated included cervical friability and/or pus; polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNL)/epithelium cell ratio in the vaginal discharge; and more than 30 PMNL per high-power field in the endocervical smear. The overall agreement of the indicators of cervicitis in women infected with C. trachomatis and/or M. genitalium was 40.5% (15/37), and for those women with negative tests 35.3% (12/34). The criteria for cervicitis require further evaluation, including study of a control group of women at low risk of having a sexually transmitted infection.

Introduction: Nongonococcal urethritis is the most common sexually transmitted infection in men, with vast majority of the etiological agents such as Chlamydia trachomatis, followed by urogenital mycoplasmas. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis in nongonococcal urethritis in men, and to examine infections associated with these agents. Material and methods 299 sexually active, heterosexual men with nongonococcal urethritis were included into the study. Urethral samples were taken with a dacron swab placed into the urethra up to 2-3 cm. The Direct immunofluorescence technique was performed for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis. Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis were detected with Mycoplasma IST assay., Results: Chlamydia trachomatis was detected in 22.75%, Uraeplasma urealyticum in 21.08% and Mycoplasma hominis in 8.02% cases. We found no significant differences in prevalence between Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticym (p > 0.05). Monoinfections were found in 51.85% with significantly higher rate (p < 0.01) than associated infections (11.70%). Among associated infections, coinfection of Chlamydia trahomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum was predominant. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis with urogenital mycoplasmas was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the one between Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis. In 36.45% patients no patogenic microorganisms were detected., Conclusion: These results confirmed the etiological role of Chlamydia trachomatis and urogenital mycoplasmas in nongonococcal urethritis with prevalence of 51.85% in monoinfections and 11.70% in associated infections. In 36.45% of cases the etiology of urethritis was not elucidated. These results suggest that more sensitive diagnostic tool should be applied when searching for the derailed etiology of nongonococcal urethritis.

There is currently a debate as to whether microscopy is necessary in asymptomatic men presenting for a sexual health screen. Arguments favouring microscopy include finding chlamydia in a significant proportion of sexual partners of men with non-specific urethritis (NSU) in studies that included symptomatic men. We aimed to investigate the proportion of partners of men with asymptomatic NSU who were diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection. A retrospective case-note review was carried out for all men diagnosed with asymptomatic pathogen-negative NSU, and their traced sexual contacts, during a nine-month period. As a result of contact-tracing, we identified 42 partners who attended the clinic. Only one partner (2.4%) tested positive for chlamydia. A further two partners were diagnosed with a viral sexually transmitted infection (STI). The low level of chlamydia and other STIs in partners of asymptomatic men with pathogen-negative NSU does not support the routine use of microscopy to identify these patients.

A 16-year-old heterosexual man presented to our hospital with a purulent urethral discharge and pain at voiding. These symptoms began seven days after oral-genital contact (fellatio) with his partner. A Gram-stained smear from the urethral discharge showed Gram-negative diplococci, and the antigen of Chlamydia trachomatis from urine was positive. We initially made a diagnosis of urethritis caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis. However, N. meningitidis was isolated by culture. Clinicians should pay attention to the possibility of N. meningitidis infection in all cases resembling gonococcal urethritis.

With the increasing pressure to achieve the government's 48 hour access target for departments of genitourinary (GU) medicine better utilization of resources must be part of the solution. The leucocyte esterase (LE) test has been shown to perform as well as a urethral smear in asymptomatic men in identifying chlamydia-positive individuals and is likely to perform better in detecting genitalium-positive individuals than chlamydia-positive men. The LE test, which is both inexpensive and non-invasive, offers an interim, evidence-based, solution to the issue of whether asymptomatic men attending departments of GU medicine should be screened for the presence of urethral inflammation.

Introduction: The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in patients attended in a clinic for sexually transmitted disease in Seville (Spain). Microbiological diagnosis was performed in various types of samples., Material and Methods: The study included 3854 patients (50.8% women and 49.2% men, mean age 30.1 years) seen from 2002 to 2004. Among the total, 50% belonged to groups engaging in high risk sexual practices: female commercial sex workers (CSWs) (47%), men who maintain sexual relationships with other men (MSM) (45%), users of prostitution (4%), promiscuous heterosexual men (4%), those with a risk partner (2.7%) and injection drug users (IDU) (2.2%). We analyzed a total of 5978 samples (2384 cervical exudates, 2645 urethral exudates and 949 rectal exudates), for the detection of C. trachomatis by PCR technique with the COBAS Amplicor CT System., Results: Prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 6% (4.3% in women and 7.8% in men). Among the total in women, 51.2% of positive samples were from women with high-risk sex factors and 73.8% of the women were asymptomatic. In men, the proportions were 70.5% and 36.9%, respectively. Cervical, urethral and rectal exudates yielded positive results in 4%, 4.9% and 4.3%, respectively., Conclusions: Systematic sampling for C. trachomatis detection is necessary in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients practicing high-risk sex; periodic follow-up studies are also needed for early detection of sexually transmitted infection. Rectal sample collection is important for detecting this infection in MSM and in patients whose sexual habits make it advisable.

Almost all physicians involved in treating sexually transmitted infections recognize the specific clinical manifestations of patients with urethritis. However, in previous studies, the diagnosis of gonococcal urethritis was based on cultures or staining methods. In this study, we examined in detail the clinical manifestations of patients with urethritis diagnosed by the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). A total of 154 patients with male urethritis were included in the study. The NAAT could distinguish 64 patients with gonococcal urethritis, 45 patients with chlamydial urethritis, and 45 patients with nongonococcal and nonchlamydial urethritis. Forty-three (67.2%) patients with gonococcal urethritis had more severe symptoms, i.e., moderate or profuse urethral discharge, and cloudy or purulent discharge, than patients with chlamydial urethritis, nongonococcal and nonchlamydial urethritis. There were 39 (86.7%) patients in the chlamydial urethritis group with mild symptoms, clear discharge or none, and moderate or profuse discharge. Although the diagnosis of male urethritis can be performed by microbiological examination, the typical symptoms help us to distinguish each type of urethritis and understand this kind of disease.

The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STI) in the partners of men with non-chlamydial, non-gonococcal urethritis (NCNGU). Observational study of the sexual partners of men with NCNGU diagnosed in the Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Edinburgh between 1 June 2002 and 31 December 2003. The diagnosis of chlamydial infection was based on ligase chain reaction (LCx) between June 2002 and March 2003, and on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) thereafter. Gonococcal infection was diagnosed with culture method.Sexual partners of 99 (25%) of the 403 heterosexual men diagnosed with NCNGU were screened. Chlamydial infection was detected in 19 (19%) of the female sexual partners. Higher proportion of female partners of symptomatic men (15/51) had chlamydial infection compared with that of partners of asymptomatic men (4/48) (P < 0.005).NCNGU may be related to false-negative results of chlamydial diagnostic tests. Screening and treatment of sexual partners of men with NCNGU is therefore necessary.

We previously reported that seminal vesiculitis was associated with acute epididymitis, and that Chlamydia trachomatis was the major causative pathogen for infection of the seminal vesicle, suggesting that seminal vesiculitis was a discrete disease entity. In this paper, we report two patients with bacteriologically and cytologically proven seminal vesiculitis who had asymptomatic urethritis but not epididymitis. The clinical courses of these patients suggest that chlamydial seminal vesiculitis may be a cause of asymptomatic infection of the urethra or subsequent development of acute epididymitis.

The performance of Roche polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Amplicor to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in first-voided urine specimens from 422 males and 456 females attending two clinics for sexually transmitted infections was evaluated in comparison with cultures of urethral and cervical specimens. At the same time, the ability of leucocyte esterase (LE) in first-voided urine and the presence of leucocytes in urethral and cervical smears to identify C. trachomatis-infected individuals based on PCR and culture was determined. The prevalence of C. trachomatis infection was 10.9% in men and 7.7% in women. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of Amplicor was 93.5%, 99.7%, 97.7% and 99.2% in males and 91.4%, 99.5%, 94.1% and 99.3% in females. All Chlamydia-infected men were identified by means of a combination of urethritis (4 leucocytes in the urethral smear) and/or a positive LE test in urine, although the specificity was only 42.2%. In women, the combination of urethritis and/or cervicitis and/or a positive LE test identified 85.7% of Chlamydia-infected patients with a specificity of 38.2%. It is concluded that a combination of urethral and/or cervical smears and LE testing of urine can be used as a screening test to select patients, especially males, for specific C. trachomatis testing.

Background: Gram stain is used to detect urethral inflammation, suggestive of infection, in men and guide therapeutic decisions. In the absence of signs, symptoms, or polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) on urethral Gram stain, treatment and sometimes testing is deferred., Goal: Determine the proportion of men with chlamydia or gonorrhea diagnosed by nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) or culture who lack Gram stain evidence of inflammation and compare their clinical characteristics to men with inflammation., Methods: Records from 2629 men presenting for routine sexually transmitted disease care with urethral PMN count and NAAT data were retrospectively analyzed. A subpopulation tested by NAAT and culture was analyzed. Men receiving antibiotics within the prior month or those reporting a sexual partner with trichomoniasis were excluded., Results: Among 2266 eligible men, 353 (16%) had chlamydia and 462 (20%) had gonorrhea. Among chlamydia-infected men, PMNs per oil-immersion field (oif) on Gram stain were > or =5 in 291 (82%), 1 to 4 in 20 (6%), and none in 42 (12%). In men with gonorrhea, PMNs/oif were > or =5 in 433 (94%), 1 to 4 in 6 (1%), and none in 23 (5%). Urethral symptoms, discharge, and/or > or =5 PMNs/oif were absent in 47 (13%) and 22 (5%) of chlamydial and gonococcal infections, respectively (including no PMNs/oif and 1-4 PMNs/oif). None of these 47 chlamydial-infected men and only 4 of 22 men with gonorrhea received therapy at the time of initial examination., Conclusions: Twelve percent of chlamydial and 5% of gonococcal infections had no Gram stain evidence of urethral inflammation. Absence of symptoms and discharge is not uncommon in chlamydial infection detected by NAAT, and without testing, many infections will go untreated, furthering the possibility of complications or partner transmission.

Objectives: To study the prevalence, symptoms, and signs of Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women attending a Swedish STD clinic, accessible for both sexes, and in a group of young women called in the cervical cancer screening programme., Methods: A cross sectional study among female STD clinic attendees in Orebro and a study among women called for Papanicolaou smear screening. Attendees were examined for urethritis and cervicitis. First void urine and endocervical samples were tested for M genitalium and C trachomatis., Results: The prevalence of C trachomatis and M genitalium in the STD clinic population was 10% (45/465) and 6% (26/461), respectively. Dual infection was diagnosed in four women. In the cancer screening group of women the corresponding prevalence was 2% (1/59) and 0%, respectively. Among the STD clinic attendees there were no significant differences in symptoms (32% v 23%, RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.6 to 3.4) or signs (71% v 50%, RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.3) between C trachomatis and M genitalium infections. Microscopic signs of cervicitis were significantly more common among M genitalium and C trachomatis infected women than in the cancer screening group of women. 56% (15/27) of male partners of M genitalium infected women were infected with M genitalium compared to 59% of male partners of C trachomatis infected women who were infected with C trachomatis (p = 0.80)., Conclusions: M genitalium is a common infection associated with cervicitis and with a high prevalence of infected sexual partners supporting its role as a cause of sexually transmitted infection.

We have investigated the correlation of symptoms, signs and microscopy on the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in men attending our clinic. One hundred and eleven men diagnosed with chlamydia over an 11-month period in our clinic were reviewed. Of these, 70 (63%) were symptomatic and 41 (37%) were asymptomatic. 84% (59/70) of symptomatic and 51% (21/41) of asymptomatic patients met the UK clinical criteria for diagnosis of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) and received treatment appropriate for chlamydia and NGU at their initial clinic visit. Our findings show that 19% (21/111) of men with Chlamydia trachomatis infection would leave the clinic untreated if a urethral smear preparation was not performed on those who were clinically asymptomatic at presentation. We feel that this is a sufficient argument to warrant continuing the current practice of testing asymptomatic men attending GUM clinics for NGU.

Background: Noninvasive urine samples have been used to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infections, with the assumption that the first-void urine (FVU), defined as the first 20 to 30 ml at any micturition, would be the optimal collection. We compared testing technologies on first, second, and third volumes for diagnosis., Goal: The goal was to test in nonculture assays three sequential volumes of urine from men also undergoing urethral swabbing for C trachomatis culture specimens., Study Design: A total of 237 men attending an STD clinic (C trachomatis prevalence, 11%) collected three containers of urine (each containing 20-30 mL) for testing in four nonculture assays. A urethral swab specimen was tested in cell culture., Results: The numbers of men positive by testing of FVU with nucleic acid amplification (LCx chlamydia), nucleic acid hybridization (PACE 2), enzyme immunoassay (Chlamydiazyme), and a leukocyte esterase dipstick were 26, 7, 14, and 11, respectively; urethral culture identified 6 of the infected men. Comparative testing of all voids from the 26 men positive by the FVU assays demonstrated a reduction of LCx-positives. Non-amplified-test positivity declined precipitously in subsequent voids, approaching zero in the third void. The presence of symptoms and time of last void up to 8 hours had little effect on the number of positives detected by LCx of FVU., Conclusion: Amplified testing of FVU was most effective for diagnosing infection in these men.

A nucleic acid amplification method based on DNA detection, the current standard method for the diagnosis of genital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis, has been shown to potentially yield false-positive results after treatment in the clinical setting. RNA detection methods are more appropriate because viable organisms have multiple RNA copies that are surely detected by the method. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a new RNA detection test kit, the VIDAS PROBE CT test, in the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection. For comparison, the standard DNA detection method, Amplicor STD-I, was also used in the study. First voided-urine samples and urethral smears from male patients with urethritis, and first voided-urine samples and cervical smears from female patients with cervicitis served as samples for the detection of C. trachomatis. Of the 60 first voided-urine samples from male patients, 21 were positive and 39 negative with the VIDAS PROBE CT test. Amplicor STD-I achieved exactly the same result. In female patients with cervicitis, the two test kits produced the same result, with 2 positive cervical smears and 38 negative. These results suggest that the VIDAS PROBE CT test is as efficient as Amplicor STD-I in the detection of C. trachomatis. While studies including a greater number of patients will be needed for revealing the unique advantages of the new RNA detection test kit, VIDAS PROBE CT, we concluded from the current study that the test may be clinically useful in the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection.

In 1998, when ligase chain reaction testing for chlamydial infection was introduced in our clinic in Edinburgh, routine clinic protocol included the testing of all heterosexual, but not homosexual, men for urethral chlamydial infection. We audited all new homosexual and bisexual male attendees with a diagnosis of chlamydial infection or non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) in 1999, together with heterosexual men with the same diagnoses attending in alternate months of the same year. Urethral Chlamydia trachomatis infection was detected in 14.6% (350/2402) of heterosexual men and 2.4% (11/465) of homosexual men tested. Fifty percent of chlamydial infections were asymptomatic. In this population 44% (84/190) of NGU in heterosexual men is attributable to C. trachomatis as opposed to only 10% (6/59) of that in homosexual men. These rates of chlamydial infection differ from previous reports in Scotland and recent studies from the USA. Our clinic protocol has been revised to include routine testing for chlamydial infection in all men.

Using a qualitative amplified enzyme-linked immunoassay, two hundred and eighty-nine male patients with symptoms and signs suggestive of urethritis were investigated for Chlamydia trachomatis as a cause of non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU). Ninety-one (31.49%) of the 289 male patients investigated had gonococcal urethritis whilst 198 (68.51%) had NGU out of which 112 (56.60%) had chlamydial urethritis and 14 (7.1%) had Trichomonal urethritis. Two (6.7%) of the control subjects had C. trachomatis in their urethral swabs. The difference in the occurrence of C. trachomatis between the patients and the controls was highly statistically significant (P<0.001). The age range of peak incidence among the patients investigated was 20-29 years. Thirteen of the men treated for gonorrhoea still had watery urethral discharge and irritation and were diagnosed as having post-gonococcal urethritis (PGU), eleven (84.6%) of whom had C. trachomatis demonstrated in their urethral swabs. We were able to demonstrate a significant difference in clinical symptoms in men with gonorrhoea and NGU but only a slight difference between men with chlamydia-positive NGU and chlamydia-negative NGU.

Objectives: To compare endourethral swabs and urine as diagnostic specimens for the detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), in male patients attending a genitourinary clinic and to assess whether the first endourethral swab used solely for diagnosing gonococcal infection could be used for C trachomatis detection as well., Methods: Two endourethral swabs were taken from 80 male patients, in whom the likelihood of genital C trachomatis infection was high. The first swab was used for microscopy and culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae, before being used for C trachomatis detection. First voided urine specimens were collected from 61 of these patients. All three specimens were processed for C trachomatis DNA detection using the Roche Cobas Amplicor PCR. A diagnosis of genital C trachomatis infection was made if any one of the specimens tested reproducibly positive. Samples from 13 patients showing discrepant PCR results between swabs and/or urine were retested by ligase chain reaction (LCR)., Results: Chlamydia trachomatis DNA was detected in 35 (43.8%) of the 80 patients. In 17 of the 35 patients (48.6%), all the genital specimens were positive. However, in 18 (51.4%) patients, one or more of the genital specimens had negative PCR results. Among the 18 patients with discrepant results, urine was found to be a more sensitive diagnostic specimen than the second urethral swab picking up 13 out of 16 positives (81.3%) as opposed to five out of 18 (27.8%). There was no significant difference between the two swabs. Retesting by LCR, of the samples from 13 of the 18 patients with discrepant PCR results confirmed them all as true positives, although as with PCR, not all specimens in the set were concordantly positive. LCR detected all the 13 positives in urine, while there was no difference in the detection rate between the first and the second urethral swabs., Conclusions: Urine appeared to be a better diagnostic specimen than the conventional second endourethral swab for C trachomatis detection by PCR in this cohort of male patients. There was no difference between the first swab, intended primarily for N gonorrhoeae testing and the second swab intended for C trachomatis detection. This raises questions over the need for the conventional second swab for detecting C trachomatis.

The use of nucleic acid amplification tests for the diagnosis of C. trachomatis has made it possible to send urine samples instead of urethral swab specimens to the laboratory. The sensitivity is very high, but not 100%, and we continue to perform a test for urethritis at our STD clinic. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two alternative tests in the diagnosis of urethritis as predictors of C. trachomatis infection: the leukocyte esterase (LE) dipstick test of first-voided urine and polymorphonuclear leukocyte counts in a methylene blue-stained (MBS) urethral smear. Urine samples from 480 male patients attending an STD clinic were analysed using the LE test and LCR assay for C. trachomatis; urethral samples were analysed with MBS urethral smear and LCR. The majority (75.8%) of the 480 patients examined were asymptomatic. Chlamydial infection was detected in 50 patients. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of the LE test for predicting C. trachomatis infection were 46.0, 91.6 and 39.0%, respectively, among all patients examined and 25.9, 95.8 and 33.3%, respectively, among the asymptomatic patients. The corresponding values for the MBS urethral smear were 76.0, 82.1 and 33.0% among all patients and 63.0, 89.6 and 32.7% among the asymptomatic patients. At our STD clinic we chose to perform the examination of MBS urethral smears in the diagnosis of urethritis because of its higher sensitivity relative to the LE test for predicting C. trachomatis.

Background: Cost containment has led to a concern that health maintenance organization-insured patients presenting with complaints of urethritis may be treated without being tested., Goal: To determine the proportion of men presenting with symptoms of urethritis who are tested for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae., Study Design: Reviews were performed on 196 randomly selected patient records with an outpatient visit and a diagnostic code consistent with urethritis between 1995 and 1997. Data were collected on demographics, diagnostic testing, and treatment., Results: Diagnostic testing for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae was performed, respectively, in 92.3% and 83.2% of the men presenting at an initial visit with complaints of urethritis. Altogether, 98.2% of the patients who met the Centers for Disease Control criteria for documenting urethritis were tested for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae., Conclusion: Diagnostic testing for C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae is nearly universal in this multispecialty group practice setting, facilitating surveillance and public health efforts.

Background: Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis is known to be a common cause of urethritis and cervicitis. The standard methods of detection require the collection of intra-urethral and/or cervical swabs, which may be submitted for culture, antigen detection or nucleic acid amplification. The collection of swabs is suitable only within the context of a health care facility. Recent reports have indicated that antigen detection can be used with urine specimens, and because these can be self-collected, this may be particularly useful for the detection of asymptomatic carriage., Objective: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of urine antigen assays in the detection of chlamydial infection in men., Setting: Two groups of men were investigated; men with urethritis attending clinics or private practitioners, and healthy adult men enrolled into either urban or rural HIV prevention projects., Methods: Urine samples from men in both groups were collected and assayed for the presence of chlamydial antigen using a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) kit. For symptomatic men an intra-urethral swab was also collected and assayed for antigen detection using a commercial EIA. For asymptomatic men, a ligase chain reaction was carried out on the same urine sample., Results: The prevalence of chlamydial antigen in symptomatic men was 15% (39/257), and in asymptomatic men was 4% (15/349). The sensitivity and specificity of urine EIA for symptomatic men was 87% and 83% respectively. For asymptomatic men, the sensitivity of urine EIA was 86%, and the specificity was 100%., Conclusion: Urine EIA is a relatively inexpensive method for the detection of chlamydial infections in men. The true specificity in symptomatic men may be higher, as the "gold standard" that we used may give false negative results. Antigen EIA for examination of urine specimens from community surveys of asymptomatic men may be particularly useful because of the low cost of assays, and because urine samples can be self-collected without discomfort to study subjects. The prevalence of C. trachomatis that we describe here is consistent with other studies of chlamydial epidemiology in Zimbabwe.

One hundred and thirty-four male and 32 female patients with ankylosing spondylitis and 33 women with pure ileitis terminalis Crohn were examined. The study protocol included a medical-rheumatological examination and thorough investigation for genitourinary infection. Urethroadnexitis was found in 37/134 male patients (2 patients suffered from balanitis, 17 patients from urethritis, 18 patients from prostatitis, and 2 patients from epididymitis), 15/32 female patients (11 of them had urethritis and in 4 cases urethritis associated with vaginitis) and 5/33 women with ileitis terminalis (every case with urethritis). The microorganism isolated most frequently from patients with genitourinary infection was Chlamydia trachomatis. The majority of patients with genitourinary infection were HLA-B27 positive. Nevertheless, the following conclusions can be reached: (1) evidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection is frequent in male and female patients with ankylosing spondylitis, (2) patients with genitourinary infection tend to have HLA-B27, and (3) furthermore, presence of genitourinary infection was not significantly associated with chronic illness.

Urethritis in men has been categorized historically as gonococcal or nongonococcal (NGU). The major pathogens causing NGU are Chlamydia trachomatis and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Trichomonas vaginalis may be involved occasionally. In up to one-half of cases, an etiologic organism may not be identified. In this review we present recent advances in the diagnosis and management of NGU and discuss how they may be applied in a variety of clinical settings, including specialized STD clinics and primary health care practices. In particular, the development of the noninvasive urine-based nucleic acid amplification tests may warrant rethinking of the traditional classification of urethritis as gonococcal urethritis or NGU. Diagnostic for Chlamydia are strongly recommended because etiologic diagnosis of chlamydial urethritis may have important public health implications, such as the need for partner referral and reporting. A single 1-g dose of azithromycin was found to be therapeutically equivalent to the tetracyclines and may offer the advantage of better compliance.

PCR and culturing were compared for the routine diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Two laboratories experienced in both techniques participated in the study, which included 513 specimens. Both techniques were performed on each specimen; the portion of the specimen used for PCR was divided in two, and each half was sent to one of the two laboratories, where the tests were run in a blinded fashion. The PCR primers used by the two laboratories matched different parts of the bacterial genome. PCR inhibitors were looked for in all specimens. Overall, PCR was more sensitive than culturing; the difference was marked for sperm and endopelvic specimens and nonsignificant for urethral and cervical specimens. False-positive PCR results were few in number; there were no consistent false-positive results when each specimen was amplified twice. PCR inhibitors were rarely present in urethral and cervical specimens but were found in 7% of sperm and endopelvic specimens. PCR inhibitors should be looked for routinely during PCR testing of sperm or endopelvic specimens.

Using the direct immunofluorescence method with a Chlamyset of Orion Co. Finland for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, the authors examined smears from male and female patients with manifestations of non-specific urethritis and cervicitis. In women also specimens from the cervix were examined. The IF examinations of smears from the urethra of 72 men were positive in 25, i.e. 34.7%. IF examinations of 70 women with manifestations of cervicitis and urethritis were positive in 17, i.e. 24.3% from the urethra and in 20 cases, i.e. 28.6% from the cervix. The positive findings of Chlamydia trachomatis indicate the importance of diagnosing urethritis of chlamydial origin and aimed treatment.

Background: The leukocyte esterase (LE) test has a limited role in determination of empiric therapy for male patients screened for urethritis because of its poor positive predictive value in low (< 5%) prevalence settings. The recent advent of nucleic acid amplification testing of first-void urine (FVU) has dramatically increased the ease with which widespread screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae can be performed, but the costs of such testing may be prohibitive. The LE test may therefore have a role in management of urethritis because of its high negative predictive value., Objectives: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of LE testing for the diagnosis of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis in male FVU specimens in a low-prevalence urban setting using a commercial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as the gold standard., Methods: Data were obtained on men presenting to an urban sexually transmitted disease clinic over a 16-month period. Patients were included if an FVU had been tested for the presence of LE using a rapid dipstick, read by an automated urine analyzer, and the sample (either an FVU or urethral swab) had then been processed for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis by PCR., Results: Of 301 assessable patients, there were 14 cases of gonorrhoea, 21 cases of chlamydia, and 1 case of dual infection detected by PCR. Most men (245/301; 81.4%) were asymptomatic, of whom 12 of 245 (4.9%) had an infection detected compared with 24 of 56 (42.9%) in the symptomatic men (P < 0.001). Using a "< or = trace" cutoff, the overall value for the sensitivity of the LE test was 77.8% (95% confidence interval, 60.4-89.3), specificity 80.8% (75.4-85.2), positive predictive value 35.4% (25.2-47.1), and negative predictive value 96.4% (92.8-98.3)., Conclusions: The negative predictive value of the LE test may be of use in determining which patients should proceed to specific diagnosis by nucleic amplification methods (e.g., PCR or ligase chain reaction). By limiting testing to patients with positive LE results, cost savings may be made, enabling the technology to be used in a wider community setting. The value of the LE test in higher prevalence populations with access to nucleic amplification testing remains to be established.