Search

Purpose: The aim was to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of urinary protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and factors influencing its substitutability of 24-h urine protein (24hUP) in children with proteinuria. Methods: A total of 356 children were recruited, including 149 with non-nephrotic-range proteinuria and 207 with nephrotic-range proteinuria which were further divided into Henoch–Schönlein purpura nephritis (HSPN), lupus nephritis (LN), and primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS). The urine protein and creatinine were measured by routine methods. Bland–Altman analysis was used to test the agreement. Spearman correlation was performed to evaluate the relevance. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of UPCR. Results: Bland–Altman analysis showed there was an excellent agreement between UPCR and 24hUP in each group. Correlations between UPCR and 24hUP were strong in 356 children (r = 0.869) and in the non-nephrotic-range proteinuria group (r = 0.806), but moderate in nephrotic-range proteinuria group (r = 0.586). With the increase of nephrotic-range proteinuria, the correlations between UPCR and 24hUP were decreased further, however, after UPCR was adjusted by 24-h urine creatinine (24hUCr), the correlation coefficient was improved (r = 0.682). In three subgroups with nephrotic-range proteinuria, high correlation coefficient (r = 0.731) was observed in HSPN, but not in LN (r = 0.552) and PNS (r = 0.563). The sensitivity and specificity of UPCR for diagnosing nephrotic-range proteinuria were 89.9 % and 92.2%. Conclusions: UPCR is competent in evaluating proteinuria. The degree of proteinuria, 24hUCr and the underlying pathological types of renal disease may be the important influencing factors in the correlation between UPCR and 24hUP in children with nephrotic-range proteinuria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Annual urinary screening is conducted at municipal kindergartens, elementary schools, and junior high schools in Ikeda City, Osaka, Japan (Ikeda City School System), and the results are reviewed by a general physician, but standards for when to recommend specialist referral have not been clear. Methods: In all children attending the Ikeda City School System in 2012, dipstick urinalysis of a first-morning urine specimen was recommended once or twice, and if a second urinalysis showed proteinuria (≥1+), the urinary protein/creatinine ratio was measured. If this showed ≥0.2 g/g of creatinine (g/gCr), it was recommended that the child be evaluated by a specialist at Ikeda City Hospital. Results: Urinary screening was performed in about 20% (388) of kindergarten, about 90% (5363) of elementary school, and about 86% (2523) of junior high school children living in Ikeda City. Urine samples were obtained from 387, 5349, and 2476 children, respectively. The urinary protein/creatinine ratio was ≥0.2 g/gCr in 13 children, including 1 elementary and 12 junior high children. In these 13 children, chronic nephritic syndrome (CNS) was suspected in 6 junior high school children, and of these, this was a new finding in 5, and renal biopsy was indicated in 3. In Ikeda City, the prevalence of CNS in elementary school children was <0.03%, the prevalence of CNS in junior high school children was 0.29%, and a renal biopsy was indicated in 0.14%. By eliminating the costs associated with assessment of the results by the Ikeda Medical Association, and by directly contracting with the testing company, the expenses paid by Ikeda City for the system itself decreased from 2,508,619 yen to 966,157 yen. Conclusions: Incorporating the urinary protein/creatinine ratio into the school urinary screening system in the Ikeda City School System and clarifying standards for specialist referral has enabled restructuring of the system so that is efficient and its effectiveness can be assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]