Search

The aim of the current study was to examine the effectiveness of a school-centered multicomponent PA intervention, called 'Active Living', on children's daily PA levels. A quasi-experimental design was used including 9 intervention schools and 9 matched control schools located in the Netherlands. The baseline measurement took place between March-June 2013, and follow-up measurements were conducted 12months afterwards. Accelerometer (ActiGraph, GT3X+) data of 520 children aged 8-11years were collected and supplemented with demographics and weather conditions data. Implementation magnitude of the interventions was measured by keeping logbooks on the number of implemented physical environmental interventions (PEIs) and social environmental interventions (SEIs). Multilevel multivariate linear regression analyses were used to study changes in sedentary behavior (SB), light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) between baseline and follow-up. Finally, effect sizes (ESs) were calculated using Cohen's d. No pooled effects on PA and SB were found between children exposed and not exposed to Active Living after 12months. However, children attending Active Living schools that implemented larger numbers of both PEIs and SEIs engaged in 15 more minutes of LPA per weekday at follow-up than children in the control condition (ES=0.41; p<.05). Moreover, children attending these schools spent less time in SB at follow-up (ES=0.33), although this effect was non-significant. No significant effects were found on MVPA. A school-centered multicomponent PA intervention holds the potential to activate children, but a comprehensive set of intervention elements with a sufficient magnitude is necessary to achieve at least moderate effect sizes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] An extensive set of food parenting practices, and related concepts, was identified [•] Increased clarity about distinct food parenting practice concepts was realized [•] The process of consensus development in food parenting research is supported [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective/background: The inverse relationship between sleep duration and body mass index (BMI) has been well established and appears to be stronger among boys than girls. However, less is known about the mechanisms responsible for this sex-specific link. The main aim of the current study was to examine the sex-specific interaction between food responsiveness and sleep duration in explaining BMI among children. This sex-specific moderation will give more insight into a possible underlying food intake mechanism.Patients/methods: In total, 206 caregivers filled out questionnaires on child's sleep duration and food responsiveness (49.5% boys; mean age = 9.5 years; standard deviation = 1.4 years). Child's weight and height were measured, after which age- and sex-specific standardized BMI values (referred to as zBMI here) were calculated. Descriptive statistics and regression analysis were conducted. A potential significant three-way interaction was further examined using simple slopes analysis and slope difference tests.Results: A significant inverse correlation was found between sleep duration and zBMI for boys, but not for girls. Moreover, a significant and robust three-way interaction between sex, food responsiveness and sleep duration explaining child's zBMI was found. Slope difference tests indicate that the sleep-BMI slopes only significantly differed between high-food-responsive boys and high-food-responsive girls and between high-food-responsive boys and low-food-responsive boys.Conclusions: These findings suggest that increased food intake might be a mechanism explaining the inverse sleep-BMI link among boys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]