Search

Background and aims Current research outcomes in paediatric eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) are directed towards histological improvement with no attention to health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The primary objective of this study was to identify key patient-reported and parent proxy outcome elements of EoE disease-specific HRQOL. Methods The research team comprised clinical allergists and gastroenterologists with expertise in paediatric EoE as well as two PhD psychologists with extensive experience in qualitative research. Focused interview techniques were adapted from the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0™ methodology and the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research. A semi-structured interview guide of open-ended questions was developed, and extensive review of audio-taped transcripts was performed. Results A total of 42 focus interviews were conducted. Child self-reports were obtained for patients in the 5-7, 8-12 and 13-18 years of age groups, and parent proxy reports were obtained in the 2-4, 5-7, 8-12 and 13-18 years of age groups. We discovered that patients and parents often had different concerns, illustrating unique aspects of EoE-specific HRQOL that were not captured in generic HRQOL instruments. Specific themes that emerged from these interviews included, but are not limited to: feelings of being different than family and peers, diet and medication adherence, difficulties with eating food and worry about symptoms and illness. Conclusion Paediatric EoE patient and parent proxy interviews revealed many EoE-specific aspects of HRQOL that are not captured in generic HRQOL instruments. Outcome measures that reflect patient- and parent proxy-reported HRQOL are a critical need in paediatric EoE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Symptoms of vomiting and dysphagia in children with eosinophilic esophagitis may be related to the development of mucosal fibrosis.Aim: Our aims were to (1) investigate esophageal fibrosis in children with EoE compared to patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and normal individuals, and (2) to assess the degree of mucosal fibrosis in patients with EoE before and after medical treatment.Methods: A retrospective analysis of esophageal biopsies from patients with EoE, GERD, and normal mucosa was performed. Demographic data, clinical information, eosinophil number, and sub-epithelial fibrosis was compared among the groups. A similar comparison was performed in EoE patients, before and after therapy.Results: Esophageal biopsies from 53 children were included, of which 17 with EoE, 17 GERD, and 19 were normal. A significantly higher number of eosinophils and greater fibrosis was found in EoE patients vs. GERD and normal (fibrosis grade 2: 13 patients in the EoE group vs. one patient for each control group; p=0.0001). After therapy, a significant decrease in fibrosis and eosinophils number was noted in EoE patients [fibrosis grade 2: 10 (71.5%) patients vs. one (7.1%) patient, and eosinophil count was 35.5/HPF vs. 13.4/HPF, pre- and post-therapy, respectively; p<0.05]. The decrease in esophageal fibrosis paralleled the improvement in the related clinical symptoms.Conclusion: A higher degree of esophageal fibrosis was found in patients with EoE compared to GERD or normal esophagus. Conventional therapy in EoE improved obstructive symptoms, decreased eosinophils count, and reversed the degree of fibrosis. We suggest that appropriate therapy in patients with EoE will improve clinical symptoms and histology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EE). Methods: A retrospective review of 657 patients seen at the EE center of a tertiary care children''s hospital between 1994 and 2007 was performed. Charts were reviewed for the 144 patients who were also seen by the otolaryngology service. Results: One hundred forty-four patients received 193 otolaryngology-related diagnoses. Eustachian tube dysfunction (27.5%) and sleep disordered breathing (24.9%) were the most common, followed by dysphagia (13.0%), rhinosinusitis/nasal congestion (9.3%) and airway stenosis (5.2%). Seventy-nine patients (54.9%) had a pre-existing diagnosis of EE at the time of their otolaryngology consultation. Twenty-one patients (14.6%) were referred to the gastroenterology service for evaluation for EE. Forty-four patients (30.5%) remained undiagnosed. Twenty-five of these patients presented with dysphagia, 16 of whom were not previously diagnosed with EE; only 4 of these 16 patients were referred for evaluation for EE. In one case, a child with moderate sized tonsils underwent adenotonsillectomy for dysphagia and failure to thrive; this patient was diagnosed with EE 1 month post-operatively. Conclusions: Twenty percent of patients with EE may require care by an otolaryngologist for a myriad of complaints. Even experienced pediatric otolaryngologists may not recognize this condition. Otolaryngologists should consider EE in patients presenting with dysphagia. A careful gastroenterology review of symptoms may also allow otolaryngologists to identify EE in patients with allergy mediated nasal complaints, or laryngeal/airway disorders. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]