Search

Background: Sliding indirect inguinal hernias containing ovary are not uncommon in girls. We reported our experience with laparoscopic treatment of inguinal ovarian hernias in female infants and children with the aim to standardize the surgical technique.Methods: The medical records of all girls who underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in our unit over the past 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Only patients with an ovary found intraoperatively in the hernia sac were included in the study. All patients younger than 1 year received preoperatively a bowel preparation with simethicone and enemas.Results: A total of 289 girls (median age 3.2 ± 0.5 years) underwent laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair during the study period. Thirty-seven patients (12.8%) had an ovarian hernia and were included in the study. Of these 37 girls, 9 (28.1%) were younger than 1 month, 20 (62.5%) ranged in age from 2 months to 1 year, and 3 (9.4%) were from 1 to 7 years. The average operative time was 23.7 minutes (range 18-43 minutes). No necrotic ovary was found intraoperatively, and all the procedures were accomplished laparoscopically. Neither intraoperative nor postoperative complications were reported. A patency of the contralateral canal of Nuck was found in 16 of the 37 patients (43.2%) and repaired during the same procedure. The average length of hospitalization was 21.8 hours (range 18-36 hours). No hernia recurrence or ovarian atrophy was recorded at a mean follow-up of 36 months (range 1-60 months).Conclusions: On the basis of our experience, laparoscopy should be considered the gold standard for the treatment of inguinal ovarian hernias in girls. Key points for standardization of the technique are as follows: bowel preparation in children younger than 1 year, use of 5-mm umbilical balloon trocar, correct positioning of 3-mm working screw trocars, section of the abnormal attachment of ovarian suspensory ligament, section of the periorificial peritoneum, and use of nonresorbable sutures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Analyzing the recent literature, it seems that the use of irrigation increases the incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses (IAAs) and infectious complications in perforated appendicitis. The aim of this study was to compare peritoneal irrigation and suction versus suction only during laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for perforated appendicitis in children.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 699 patients (460 boys and 239 girls, average age 9.8 years) who underwent LA for complicated appendicitis in six international centers of pediatric surgery over a 5-year period. The appendix was perforated with localized peritonitis in 465 cases and diffuse peritonitis in 234 patients. Irrigation + suction was used in 488 cases (group 1 [G1]), whereas suction only was used in 211 cases (group 2 [G2]).Results: No significant difference between the two groups was found in regard to average operative time (P = .23), average time of resumption of oral diet (P = .55), average reprise of gastrointestinal transit (P = .55), and average length of hospital stay (P = .41). As for postoperative complications, the incidence of IAAs was significantly higher in G2 (41/211; 19.4%) compared with G1 (38/488; 7.7%) (P = .0000), whereas no significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to wound infection (G1: n = 2 or 0.4%; G2: n = 4 or 1.8%; P = .05) and small bowel obstruction rates (G1: n = 8 or 1.6%; G2: n = 2 or 0.9%; P = .47).Conclusions: In contrast with the most recent literature on this topic, our results demonstrated that peritoneal irrigation and suction were associated with a lower rate of postoperative IAA formation compared with the suction-only approach in children with perforated appendicitis. In such cases, peritoneal irrigation and abdominal drainage should be the preferred methods for peritoneal toilette, with no increase in operative time and postoperative morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: This study aimed to report our preliminary experience with pediatric endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (PEPSiT).Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the reports of 15 patients, 6 girls and 9 boys, with an average age of 16 years (range 13-18) with noninfected pilonidal sinus disease who underwent PEPSiT in our institution over an 18-month period. Four cases were redo-procedures, for recurrence of disease after open excision repair. Surgical outcomes of sinus healing, recurrence of disease, postoperative pain, hospital stay, analgesic requirements, and patient satisfaction levels were evaluated and a comparison analysis with classic open repair was performed.Results: All procedures were performed under subarachnoid spinal anesthesia. We always adopted a fistuloscope, an endoscopic forceps, and a monopolar electrode to remove the hairs and to heal the fistula. The average length of surgery was 28.5 minutes (range 26-41). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. The average pain score evaluated using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scale during the first 48 postoperative hours was 3.2 (range 2-5). The average analgesic requirement was 22 hours (range 16-28). The average hospital stay length was 28 hours (range 22-48). They changed dressing daily, by applying a topical solution of eosin 2% and a silver sulfadiazine spray. At 1 month postoperatively, the external openings were closed in all patients and no recurrence was recorded at a mean follow-up of 6 month. PEPSiT was associated with a significantly shorter, painless, and better outcome compared to open technique.Conclusion: On the basis of our preliminary experience, we believe that PEPSiT is a promising technique for surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus in children. It is technically easy and quick to perform, with a short and painless hospital stay, without recurrences in our series. It allows operated patients an early return to full daily activities without restrictions that happen for the classic treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The surgical repair of inguinal hernia and hydrocele is one of the most common operations performed in pediatric surgery practice. This article reviews current concepts in the management of inguinal hernia and hydrocele based on the recent literature and the authors׳ experience. We describe the principles of clinical assessment and anesthetic management of children undergoing repair of inguinal hernia, underlining the differences between an inguinal approach and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Other points discussed include the current management of particular aspects of these pathologies such as bilateral hernias; contralateral patency of the peritoneal processus vaginalis; hernias in premature infants; direct, femoral, and other rare hernias; and the management of incarcerated or recurrent hernias. In addition, the authors discuss the role of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of an inguinal hernia and hydrocele, emphasizing that the current use of MIS in pediatric patients has completely changed the management of pediatric inguinal hernias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: The lymphatic preservation to prevent hydrocele formation after laparoscopic varicocelectomy is essential. Lymphatic sparing procedures using scrotal injection give a rate of mapping failures of 20%–30%. The aim of the present study is to standardize the technique of injection to perform a lymphatic sparing procedure in case of laparoscopic varicocelectomy. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 50 patients who underwent laparoscopic varicocelectomy from July 2010 to July 2013. Patients were divided into two groups: G1 (25 patients) those who underwent a classical isosulfan blue scrotal intra-dartos injection and G2 (25 patients) those who underwent the new standardized isosulfan blue scrotal intra-dartos/intra-testicular injection. Results: In G1 lymphatic vessels were identified as blue coloured in 19/25 of cases (76%), in G2 in 25/25 of cases (100%). The results were analyzed using test χ2 with Yates' correction and there was a statistically significant difference (χ2 =0.05,1) between G2 and G1. Postoperative hydrocele was noted in 2/6 patients of G1 in whom the lymphatic vessels were not identified. Conclusions: Laparoscopic lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy is an effective procedure to adopt in children with varicocele. The intra-dartos/intra-testicular injection of isosulfan blue is significantly better than the previously described intra-dartos injection, permitting to identify lymphatic vessels in 100% of cases in our series. No allergy to isosulfan blue was reported in both groups. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary Background Controversy still exists about the indications and the gold standard approach for varicocele treatment in pediatric population. Objective The authors report their 23 years of experience in laparoscopic varicocele repair in the pediatric population. Study design We retrospectively evaluated the data of 345 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic left varicocelectomy from January 1993 to December 2015. Average patient age was 12.5 years (range 8–17). Seven out of 345 patients (2%) had a recurrent varicocele, and five out of 345 patients (1.4%) had a varicocele on a single testis. In 335/345 patients (97.1%) we performed a Palomo procedure, and in 10/345 patients (2.9%) an artery-sparing Palomo procedure. After 2010, in 105/345 patients (30.4%) we performed a lymphatic sparing procedure using isosulfan blue injection preoperatively. Results All procedures were completed in laparoscopy ( Figure ), without conversions or intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 17 min (range 14–45) for the Palomo procedure and 26 min (range 18–50) for artery-sparing Palomo. In 45/345 patients (13%) we performed additional procedures. We recorded 4/345 (1.3%) recurrences/persistences in patients undergoing Palomo, while we recorded 1/10 (10%) recurrence/persistence after artery-sparing Palomo. On 230 Palomo procedures performed in the pre-isosulfan blue era, we recorded 25 cases of hydrocele (10.8%), 13 of these were treated with transcrotal puncture and 12 required surgical operation. The last 105 patients undergoing isosulfan blue injection had no postoperative hydrocele. We also reported 10 other complications (I grade Clavien-Dindo) such as umbilical granuloma or instrumental problems. Discussion Analyzing the international literature of the last 25 years, most papers focused on the minimally invasive treatment of pediatric varicocele. There are several reasons to perform laparoscopic repair of pediatric varicocele. First of all, it is technically easy to perform, the average operative time is very short, and it has excellent outcome in regard to varicocele persistence/recurrence. In addition it has a very low complication rate, and in particular adopting the intradartoic/intratesticular isosulfan blue injection before surgery we recorded no postoperative hydrocele. Conclusion On the basis of our 23 years of experience with varicocele repair, we clearly believe that laparoscopic Palomo lymphatic sparing varicocelectomy should be considered the standard of care for the treatment of pediatric patients with varicocele. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is technically easy and quick to perform, painless, and scarless, with a recurrence rate of about 1%. The use of a preoperative injection of isosulfan blue completely eliminates postoperative hydrocele formation. Figure Palomo procedure: bundle is clipped and sectioned and the blue-colored lymphatics are spared. Figure [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]