Search

Objective: To systematically review the literature with the primary aim of identifying behavioural interventions to improve vitamin D stores in children from at-risk ethnic groups.Design: Review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017080932. Health Behaviour Model and Behaviour Change Wheel framework constructs used to underpin evaluation of interventions. Methodological quality evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias, Cochrane ROBINS-I and NHLBI tools.Setting: Databases Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL with secondary search of Google Scholar. No country limits set. Papers between January 1990 and February 2018, published in English included. Anticipating study heterogeneity, outcome measures not pre-specified and identified from individual full papers. Updated literature search November 2020.Participants: Patient or population including pregnant women, newborns and children aged under 18 years, from Asian or African ethnic groups.Results: Of 10 690 articles screened, 298 underwent full-text review, with 24 ultimately included for data extraction. All identified studies conducted a vitamin D pharmacological supplementation intervention, with two also incorporating a behavioural intervention strategy. No study explicitly defined a primary aim of evaluating a behavioural intervention, undertaken to study its effect on vitamin D supplement uptake.Conclusions: There is a need to address the paucity of data in ethnic at-risk children on how behavioural interventions ideally developed and co-produced with the community under study, affect and help improve vitamin D uptake, within the antenatal and pregnancy phase as well as during childhood. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Recent UK policy drivers such as the National Collaboration for Integrated Care and Support and Making Every Contact Count prioritise integrated care, an approach that seeks to provide more coordinated and seamless health and social care. In children's services, despite many partners, there are challenges around integrating care. A deprived borough of London ran short training and networking sessions for services supporting children and young people. This study examined whether intersectoral training would improve participants' knowledge of local services and joint working (including communication, navigation and confidence in collaboration). As part of a service evaluation, the study utilised a pre–post Likert scale survey design for each training session, a 1‐month follow‐up survey, and telephone interviews with a subsample of participants. The educational intervention was three sets of 1.5 hr educational workshops from December 2016 to February 2017. There were 302 attendances from 202 individuals from the health (n = 99), education (n = 145), social care (n = 39) and voluntary (n = 19) sectors. The pre and post surveys found significant increases in self‐assessed knowledge of health/education/social care/voluntary services and in some elements of joint working. However, these increases were not sustained in any domain after 1 month of follow‐up. There was also no difference in self‐assessments amongst those who attended three sessions compared to those who attended one or two. Telephone interviewees highlighted networking as being helpful and suggested that informative tasks and diverse attendance would be beneficial in future. To conclude, this study suggests that although short‐learning sessions may seem to improve immediate knowledge and some elements of joint working in the short term, any gains are not sustained in the long term. The cost effectiveness of such schemes is in doubt but may be improved by a more targeted delivery of content. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The original version of this article unfortunately contained an omission. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]