Search

Unwanted hair is a common concern among patients presenting to pediatric dermatology clinics, and parents and patients alike inquire about the safety of methods employed for elective removal. Various methods of hair removal exist with different levels of invasiveness and permanence, from simple mechanical depilation to light‐based therapies. All methods of hair removal appear to be safe and generally well tolerated in children, and there are no age restrictions to any modality. In this review, we aim to address the available literature on the safety and efficacy of hair removal modalities in pediatric patients and propose guidance on how to manage requests for at‐home and in‐office therapies within an ethical framework. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Methotrexate (MTX) is a readily accessible drug, first used in 1948 and employed for a wide variety of indications since then. However, despite widespread off‐label use, FDA labeling does not include approved indications for the use of MTX for many inflammatory skin diseases in pediatric patients, including morphea, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and alopecia areata, among others. Without published treatment guidelines, some clinicians may be hesitant to use MTX off‐label, or uncomfortable prescribing MTX in this population. To address this unmet need, an expert consensus committee was convened to develop evidence‐ and consensus‐based guidelines for use of MTX to treat pediatric inflammatory skin disease. Clinicians with experience and expertise in clinical research, drug development, and treating inflammatory skin disease in pediatric patients with MTX were recruited. Five committees were created based on major topic areas: (1) indications and contraindications, (2) dosing, (3) interactions with immunizations and medications, (4) adverse effects (potential for and management of), and (5) monitoring needs. Pertinent questions were generated and addressed by the relevant committee. The entire group participated in a modified Delphi process to establish agreement on recommendations for each question. The committee developed 46 evidence‐ and consensus‐based recommendations, each with >70% agreement among members, across all five topics. These are presented in tables and text, along with a discussion of supporting literature, and level of evidence. These evidence‐ and consensus‐based recommendations will support safe and effective use of MTX for the underserved population of pediatric patients who may benefit from this valuable, time‐honored medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: The primary objective was to assess pain catastrophizing and functional disability in pediatric patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and their parents/guardians. Secondary objectives included examining relationships between pain catastrophizing, functional disability, and correlations with other factors (e.g., age, disease severity, and percent of body surface area (BSA) involved). Methods: Patients with EB ages 8–16 and their parents/guardians who were English or Spanish speaking completed a one-time online survey. Parent measures included: demographics questionnaire, Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Parent (PCS), and Parent Functional Disability Inventory (FDI). Child measures included: PCS child and child FDI. Higher scores on both scales indicate higher levels of catastrophizing and functional disability. Results: Of 31 children, the mean age was 11.47 years and the majority (70.97%) had dystrophic EB. Mean scores were: 35.84 = PCS parent; 34.58 = PCS child; 30.87 = parent FDI; 29.77 = child FDI. Total scores for PCS parent, parent FDI, and child FDI increased significantly with disease severity and percentage of involved BSA (p < .01 for all). Total scores for PCS child increased significantly with percent of EB skin involvement (p = .04) but not disease severity. Older children reported more functional disability than their parents and younger children (p = .02). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate significant positive correlations between negative thoughts related to pain and the experience of functional difficulties in patients with EB and their caregivers. Psychological, psychiatric, and/or behavioral interventions to help managing chronic pain may be effective for patients with EB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD) has historically challenged dermatologists given the variable response of patients to treatment and limited available therapeutic options, often with significant potential side effects. Over the last decade, targeted treatments including dupilumab and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as significant treatment advances. An updated therapeutic approach for incorporating these new practice-changing medications can help clinicians manage these challenging patients. In this review, we discuss emerging topical and systemic (oral and injectable) treatments in pediatric AD, including topical PDE4 inhibitors and tapinarof, oral JAK inhibitors, and injected biologics including IL-4Rα inhibitor dupilumab, IL-13 inhibitor tralokinumab, IL-13Rα inhibitor lebrikizumab, IL-31Rα inhibitor nemolizumab, and IL-5Rα inhibitor benralizumab. We also review experimental agents in early clinical trials, such as targeted microbiome transplant lotions/antimicrobials, which may gain relevance in AD treatment. Finally, we propose a therapeutic approach for pediatric AD that incorporates newer therapies including dupilumab and JAK inhibitors, recognizing that these agents may not be universally available or approved. Further trials that include pediatric patients, especially head-to-head studies among therapeutic classes, are needed to clarify the role of emerging treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective: In spring 2020, high numbers of children presented with acral pernio‐like skin rashes, concurrent with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Understanding their clinical characteristics/ infection status may provide prognostic information and facilitate decisions about management. Methods: A pediatric‐specific dermatology registry was created by the Pediatric Dermatology COVID‐19 Response Task Force of the Society for Pediatric Dermatology (SPD) and Pediatric Dermatology Research Alliance (PeDRA) and was managed by Children's Hospital of Philadelphia using REDCap. Results: Data from 378 children 0‐18 years entered into the registry between April 13 and July 17, 2020 were analyzed. Data were drawn from a standardized questionnaire completed by clinicians which asked for demographics, description of acral lesions, symptoms before and after acral changes, COVID‐19 positive contacts, treatment, duration of skin changes, laboratory testing including SARS‐CoV‐2 PCR and antibody testing, as well as histopathology. 229 (60.6%) were male with mean age of 13.0 years (± 3.6 years). Six (1.6%) tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2. Pedal lesions (often with pruritus and/or pain) were present in 96%. 30% (114/378) had COVID‐19 symptoms during the 30 days prior to presentation. Most (69%) had no other symptoms and an uneventful course with complete recovery. Conclusions and Relevance: Children with acral pernio‐like changes were healthy and all recovered with no short‐term sequelae. We believe these acral changes are not just a temporal epiphenomenon of shelter in place during the spring months of the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic and may be a late phase reaction that needs further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Head and neck dermatitis after dupilumab therapy for atopic dermatitis has been frequently reported in adults and only rarely in adolescents. No cases detailing disease course and treatment response have previously been described in adolescents. Methods/Results: This case series presents five adolescent patients who developed new‐onset or worsening head and neck dermatitis after dupilumab therapy for atopic dermatitis. All five patients improved after oral antifungal therapy. Conclusions: The clinical features, treatment response, and potential disease pathogenesis in pediatric patients are described. Adolescents with new‐onset head and neck dermatitis after dupilumab therapy may clinically improve with antifungal therapy, suggesting that Malassezia species may be a contributing factor or antifungal therapy may be an effective antiinflammatory agent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: Epidemiologic studies of children with alopecia areata (AA) are sparse, and there are no studies that focus on the youngest children with AA. Evaluation of the clinical presentations of AA in children <4 years of age was performed in order to identify the prognostic factors for disease progression. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 125 pediatric patients seen at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia with an initial presentation of AA under the age of 4. Disease severity was measured using the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score at initial presentation, 3‐6 months later, 1 year later, and then at 2 years. Results: Initial presentation was most common between ages 2 and 4 years. Most children had mild disease severity and continued mild disease over the next 2 years. Children with more than 50% of hair loss at presentation were much more likely to have worsening SALT scores over time and remain more severe. Approximately 41% had concomitant atopic dermatitis, 28% had a family member with AA, and 27% had a first‐degree family member with one or more autoimmune diseases. Conclusions: In a diverse patient population, most children with AA even when presenting under age 4 have mild disease (<50% hair loss on scalp). Those who present with more severe disease are more likely to worsen or remain severe over time. These findings can aid family counseling and education. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]