Search

Determination of the physical compatibility of acetaminophen and two different electrolyte solutions (an isotonic, balanced electrolyte solution and a hypotonic, glucose containing electrolyte solution) with drugs frequently used in routine pediatric intensive care.Analytical investigations for frequently used combinations without pre-existing data were performed. Visual and microscopic observations according to the European Pharmacopeia as well as pH measurements and ultraviolet visible spectrometry at wavelengths of 350, 410 and 550 nm were conducted to analyze physical compatibility. All measurements were performed immediately after mixing as well as 1, 4, and 24 h after.In total, 42 combinations were analyzed. Visual incompatibilities were found with pantoprazole and diazepam with both electrolyte solutions. For furosemide, a particle formation in mixture with the hypotonic glucose-containing electrolyte solution and a change in pH ≥ 0.5 after 24 h with both electrolyte solutions were observed. Ampicillin, cefuroxime, diazepam, furosemide, linezolid, meropenem, and pantoprazole showed an aberration of the absorbance ≥0.04 (350 nm/410 nm) or ≥0.01 (550 nm) in the photometric measurements with the electrolyte solutions. For acetaminophen, a physical incompatibility was observed with ampicillin, diazepam, furosemide, and pantoprazole.Most of the analyzed combinations showed no signs of physical incompatibility and may therefore be administered via the same Y-site. However, diazepam, furosemide, and pantoprazole should not be administered simultaneously with acetaminophen or both electrolyte solutions.

Background Children and adolescents are at particular risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). We investigated physicians’ perceptions on ADRs in pediatric routine care. Methods In this exploratory study from April to November 2020, we invited physicians treating pediatric patients across Germany to complete an online questionnaire consisting mainly of closed questions. Results Completion rate was 98% (127/129). Of all participants, 23% (29/127) stated they were not able to estimate how many of their pediatric patients experienced ADRs during drug therapy. The remaining physicians estimated that 7.5% (median; Q25/Q75 3%/20%) of their pediatric patients were affected by ADRs. Regarding counseling on ADRs, 61% (77/127) stated they do not ask regularly the extent to which parents want to be informed. In total, 26% (33/127) stated they avoid counseling on ADRs concerning commonly used approved therapies, whereas only 4% (5/127) did so concerning off-label use (P Conclusions Physicians’ perspectives on ADRs were ambivalent: ADRs influenced their parent counseling and drug prescribing; yet, they struggled to estimate the impact of ADRs on their patients and were not aware of specific pharmacovigilance measures.

This study aimed to compare assessment methods to determine adverse drug reactions (ADRs) at nonelective hospital admission in pediatric patients, to investigate the interrater reliability of assessment methods in pediatric care, and to analyze symptoms related to ADRs and (suicidal) drug intoxications.For 1 year, the medical records of nonelective patients admitted to a university pediatric department were evaluated for potential ADRs using 4 assessments methods by 1 experienced rater. Krippendorff α was calculated from a sample of 14 patients evaluated by 4 experienced raters to determine interrater reliability.In 1831 nonelective hospital admissions, 63.4% (1161 of 1831) of patients had received at least one drug before admission. We found a potential causal relationship between drugs and symptoms documented at admission and thus potential ADRs according to Naranjo in 23.3% (271 of 1161) of those patients, World Health Organization - Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) in 22.5% (261 of 1161), Koh in 21.7% (252 of 1161), and Begaud in 16.5% (192 of 1161). The probability rating of the potential causal relationships varied considerably between the methods (Naranjo-Begaud, P0.01; Naranjo-Koh, P0.001; Koh-Begaud, P0.01; Begaud-WHO-UMC, P0.01). Acceptable interrater reliability (α ≥ 0.667) was only obtained for WHO-UMC (α = 0.7092). The most frequently identified definite ADR was sedation in 1.5% of all nonelective patients with medication before hospital admission. In 1.2% (22 of 1831) of all nonelective admissions, we found drug intoxications with suicidal intent.The assessment methods showed a high variability in the determination of a potential causal relationship between drug and documented symptom, in the classification of the probability of ADRs, and suboptimal interrater reliability. Thus, their feasibility in pediatric patients is limited.

Aim Meeting children's needs when communicating an epilepsy diagnosis can have a large impact on their treatment. We investigated children's experiences and wishes concerning their first conversation about epilepsy. Methods This prospective study was performed in the neuropaediatric departments of two German university hospitals from 2 October 2018 to 12 April 2019. The semi-structured interview contained open questions and multiple answers were allowed. Results We interviewed 101 patients (57 male) aged 6-17 (median 11) years and asked them to put themselves in the place of a physician delivering an epilepsy diagnosis. They said they would be careful and friendly and consider the children's feelings (29%), give them detailed information about their condition (29%) and reduce their fears and offer hope (26%). They would tell them the importance of always taking their medication and explain why (25%), make sure that the conversation took place in a comfortable setting (21%), explain any safety precautions (19%), keep the conversation straightforward and provide examples (16%). Conclusion Children with epilepsy provided concrete recommendations for physicians delivering an epilepsy diagnosis, with regard to the ideal setting, important topics and optimal communication. The recommendations could help physicians meet children's needs.

Background Little is known about children's perspectives and attitudes towards their long-term and rescue anticonvulsant medication. Methods We interviewed paediatric patients aged 6–18 years in two university hospitals concerning their anticonvulsant treatment based on a structured questionnaire. We also asked them to draw a picture titled “Me and my medication”. Results We interviewed 100 patients with anticonvulsant long-term medication. 87/100 patients considered their medication to be helpful. 66/100 patients gave an explanation on why a regular medication intake is important, e.g. “Reduction/prevention of seizures”, “Otherwise I have to go to hospital”, “I don't want to die” or “Kill the virus which is causing epilepsy”. Of 92 patients with a prescribed rescue medication, 22 (24%) did not know about it. Of the remaining 70, 39 (56%) stated they always carry it with them. When asked to imagine being the physician and to inform about the medication, the children would use illustrative (e.g. brochures) or demonstration material (e.g. “real tablets”) to aid their consultation (47/100). 55/100 would stress the necessity of a regular intake. 52 participants drew a picture related to the given topic. Of those, only 1 depicted rescue medication. Conclusion Paediatric patients mostly have a positive attitude towards their medication. However, misconceptions exist and participants expressed the desire for more interactive support in the medical counselling. Children are not sufficiently aware of their rescue medication in everyday life. Consequently, physicians should consider the children's needs in their consultations and put more focus on potentially life-saving rescue medication.

A diagnosis of epilepsy substantially influences the lives of affected children and adolescents, and concealing the diagnosis can generate additional stress. However, little is known about whether children and adolescents communicate their diagnosis to their friends. We performed a survey at two German university hospitals. Epilepsy patients aged 6–18 years were asked why they did or did not disclose their condition to their friends. A total of 101 patients (44 female, 57 male) were interviewed. Twenty-one (21%) informed all their friends about their epilepsy, 63 (62%) informed only certain friends, and 3 (3%) did not specify. Fourteen (14%) did not inform any friends. Their reasons for informing their friends were trust in friends (47/87; 54%); questions from friends, e.g., about missed school days (29/87; 33%); a wish for friends to be informed in case of an emergency (15/87; 17%); and a desire to live openly with the condition (8/87; 9%). The reasons for not informing friends were fear of stigmatization/shame (4/14; 29%), discouragement from parents (3/14; 21%), and a wish for confidentiality (3/14; 21%).Conclusion: Most children and adolescents inform their friends about their epilepsy. Fear of stigmatization is the main reason for not informing friends about this condition. What is Known• An epilepsy diagnosis is a life-changing event for affected children and adolescents.• Having to conceal the diagnosis can be very stressful. What is New• Most pediatric epilepsy patients informed at least some close friends about their diagnosis motivated by trust in friends; questions from friends, e.g., about missed school days; and a wish for friends to be informed in case of an emergency.• Fear of stigmatization/shame, discouragement from parents, and a wish for confidentiality were the motivations for concealing the disease.

Anticonvulsant drugs have a high risk of adverse drug events. Little is known about the perception of those events by pediatric patients. We performed a survey in the neuropediatric departments of two university hospitals. Using a questionnaire, we interviewed patients aged 6–18 years with current anticonvulsant treatment regarding (i) their fears about potential adverse drug events, (ii) experienced adverse drug events, and (iii) perceived burden of experienced adverse drug events. One hundred patients took part in the interview. (i) 40 (40%) expressed fears that the medication could harm them. Eighteen of 40 (45%) named fears concerning specific adverse drug events. Of those, 12/18 (67%) feared neurologic or psychiatric symptoms. (ii) 37 (37%) of children described altogether 60 experienced adverse drug events. Of those, 38 (63%) concerned neurologic or psychiatric symptoms. (iii) 32/37 (82%) children who experienced adverse drug events felt bothered by the experienced event. Among others, they described an emotional burden (11/37, 30%), and restrictions in school performance (8/37, 22%) and favorite leisure activities (4/37, 11%).Conclusion: School-aged children are well able to describe adverse drug events of their anticonvulsant medication. Almost two thirds of the described events concern neurologic or psychiatric symptoms that cause an emotional burden and restrictions according to the patients. What is Known:• Anticonvulsants have a high potential of adverse drug events.• In an earlier survey, parents expressed fears of severe adverse drug events such as liver failure, which seldom occur, and reported a high number of neurological and psychological adverse drug events. What is New:• Many children fear that their anticonvulsants could harm them, and they fear and experience neurological and psychological adverse drug events.• According to the children, adverse drug events cause an emotional burden and restrictions in school performance and favorite leisure activities.

Febrile seizures (FS) in children are common, but little is known about parents’ perceptions and knowledge of FS. We interviewed parents of children aged 6 months to 6 years affected by FS (FS group, 65 parents) or unaffected (control group, 54 parents). In the FS group, 32% said they knew their child had an FS when the first event occurred, and 89% described fear when the child had a seizure, with a median intensity of 10/10 (Q25/Q75: 9/10). Related to follow-up, 77% in the FS group (will) observe their child more carefully after the first seizure happened, and 63% (will) give antipyretics earlier at a median temperature of 38.2 °C (100.8 °F). In the FS group, 62% were unaware of FS before the first event (54% of control group did not know about FS thus far, n.s.). In the FS group, 20% would put a solid object in the mouth of a child having a seizure (control group, 39%, p = 0.030), and 92% would administer an available anti-seizure rescue medication (control group, 78%, p = 0.019). In the FS group, 71% feared that children with FS might suffocate (control group, 70%, n.s.).Conclusion: Information about FS and their management should be more available to improve parents’ coping and patient safety. What is Known:• Febrile seizures in children are common.• The prognosis of children suffering from febrile seizures is usually rather good. What is New:• Over half of parents had not informed themselves about febrile seizures so far; and only 32% of parents realized their child had a febrile seizure when it occurred.• Most parents described own fear with a median intensity of 10/10; and 63% (will) give antipyretics earlier at a median temperature of 38.2 °C (100.8 °F).

BACKGROUND Children suffering from bronchial diseases need assistance from nurses in the use of inhalation devices. PURPOSE We aimed to assess nurses' skills and knowledge concerning drug administration with inhalation devices in hospitalized pediatric patients. METHODS An expert panel defined medication errors in drug administration with inhalation devices in children. We monitored 241 inhalation procedures to investigate nurses' inhalation technique skills. Twenty-nine nurses completed a questionnaire to assess nurses' knowledge. RESULTS Skills: In 93 of 241 (39%) inhalation procedures, the mask/mouthpiece did not fit airtight. In none of the 11 inhalations administering a glucocorticoid, the patient's mouth was thoroughly cleaned afterward. Knowledge: Ten of 29 nurses (34%) thought a distance between mask and the patient's face was acceptable. Only 16 of 29 (55%) knew that it is necessary to thoroughly clean the patient's mouth after the inhalation of budesonide. CONCLUSIONS We found that education on inhalation procedures including practical training is required to increase patient safety.

Experienced drug-handling problems and inadequately considered expectations for drug therapy have an unfavorable influence on therapy. We performed a questionnaire survey in (i) parents of 0–5-year-old children and (ii) 6–17-year olds and their parents. We assessed (A) experienced drug-handling problems and (B) expectations for drug therapy. (i) Forty-six parents and (ii) 103 children and their parents participated in the study. Experienced drug-handling problems were described by (i) 100% of parents and (ii) 62% of children and 70% of parents. Problems concerned with the preparation of the drug, dosing, compliance with the time interval, and acceptance. (i) Sixty-five percent of parents preferred a peroral route of drug administration, while (ii) 74% of children and 86% of parents did so. Preferred characteristics of peroral drug formulations, e.g., liquid versus solid drug formulations or flavor, were highly heterogeneous. Preferences of 6–17-year-old children and their parents matched in 43 to 66%. Conclusion: Most children and their parents had already experienced drug-handling problems. Preferences concerning the ideal pediatric drug were highly heterogeneous and in about half of cases, preferences of children and their parents differed. Thus, the children should be approached directly. If information is solely gained from parents, the children’s needs might remain unmet. What is Known:• Pediatric drug administration is complex and therefore error-prone.•Experiences and expectations of children and their parents should be considered. What is New:•Most pediatric patients and their parents have already experienced drug-handling problems.• Expectations concerning the ideal pediatric drug are highly heterogeneous. Parents are often insufficiently aware of those expectations in their children.

Objective Parents of children with epilepsy are at risk of committing high-risk handling errors with a high potential to harm the patient when administering anticonvulsant rescue medication. We developed a training concept addressing identified high-risk handling errors and investigated its effects on parents' skills. Study design In a controlled prospective intervention study, parents of children with epilepsy were asked to demonstrate their administration of rescue medication by using dummy dolls. A clinical pharmacist monitored rectal or buccal administration and addressed errors in the intervention group with training and information sheets. Three to 6 weeks later, intervention's sustainability was assessed at a home visit. Results One hundred sixty-one parents completed full study assessment: 92 in the intervention group and 69 in the control group. The number of processes with at least one handling error was reduced from 96.4% to 56.7% in rectal tube administration and from 66.7% to 13.5% in buccal administration (both p Conclusion A one-time intervention for parents significantly and sustainably reduced high-risk handling errors. Dummy dolls and information sheet were adequate for an effective and feasible training to support the correct administration of anticonvulsant rescue medication.

A developmental disorder of a child has a major impact on the affected families' lives. However, data about the parents' perception of the revealing of the diagnosis is scarce.Parents of children with developmental disorder treated as outpatients in a university hospital were interviewed about the initial medical consultation concerning the diagnosis of their child.Parents of 210 children agreed to take part in the study. 35/210 (17%) had to be excluded from the study as they were not able to remember the initial medical consultation, or claimed there was either no initial medical consultation or they did not attend it. The diagnosis of developmental disorder was made in median 4 months (Q25/Q75: 0/12; min/max: 0/63) after the parents had noticed the first symptoms. According to the parents, options to support the development of the child were the most frequently addressed topic in the initial medical consultation (119/175, 68%). Some parents wished more empathy (19/175, 11%), and less medical terminology (12/175, 7%). 114/175 (65%) of parents rated the initial medical consultation as "very good" or "good". After their initial medical consultation, 66/175 (38%) of the parents had open questions mainly concerning the prognosis of the disease. Sources of information that were used after the consultation were most often the treating physician (150/175, 86%) and the internet (133/175, 76%).Generally, parents perceive the initial medical consultation on the developmental disorder of their child well. Nevertheless, many parents state that they had unanswered questions after the consultation. The internet is one of the main sources parents use to answer those questions.Die Entwicklungsverzögerung eines Kindes hat einen erheblichen Einfluss auf das Leben betroffener Familien. Es gibt jedoch kaum Daten darüber, wie Eltern die Diagnoseeröffnung erleben.Eltern, deren Kinder ambulant in einer Universitätsklinik behandelt wurden, wurden zum ärztlichen Erstgespräch zur Diagnose ihres Kindes befragt.Eltern von 210 Kindern stimmten der Teilnahme zu. 35/210 (17%) mussten ausgeschlossen werden, weil sie sich entweder nicht an das Erstgespräch erinnern konnten oder angaben, dass ein solches Gespräch nie stattgefunden habe oder sie nicht daran teilgenommen haben. Die Diagnose Entwicklungsverzögerung wurde im Median 4 Monate (Q25/Q75: 0/12; min/max: 0/63), nachdem die Eltern die ersten Symptome beobachtet hatten, gestellt. Laut Eltern wurden im Erstgespräch insbesondere Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten für die Entwicklung des Kindes besprochen (119/175, 68%). Einige Eltern wünschten sich mehr Empathie (19/175, 11%) und weniger medizinische Fachausdrücke (12/175, 7%). 114/175 (65%) der Eltern bewerteten das Gespräch als „sehr gut“ oder „gut“. Nach dem Erstgespräch hatten 66/175 (38%) der Eltern offene Fragen, insbesondere bezüglich der Prognose der Erkrankung. Als Hauptinformationsquellen nach dem Erstgespräch dienten der behandelnde Arzt (150/175, 86%) und das Internet (133/175, 76%).Im Allgemeinen empfinden Eltern das Erstgespräch zur Entwicklungsverzögerung ihres Kindes positiv. Dennoch geben viele Eltern an, dass sie nach dem Erstgespräch offene Fragen hatten. Das Internet ist eine der Hauptinformationsquellen, die Eltern zur Beantwortung dieser Fragen nutzen.

Prolonged seizures can cause severe harm and even death. For seizures lasting longer than 5min, an administration of rescue medication is therefore recommended. Caregivers such as preschool teachers should be able to administer correctly anticonvulsive rescue medication to children.A training concept for preschool teachers on seizure management focussing on practical skills was developed. To assess the success of the training, a structured interview on attitudes relating to rescue medication administration was conducted. The number of committed errors during administration of a rectal/buccal rescue medication to dummy dolls was compared before and after training.210 teachers from 115 preschools participated while all teachers from 303 preschools had been invited. The self-reported level of confidence in their own skills to administer anticonvulsive rescue medication increased from 5 to 8 on a scale from 1 to 10 (p0.001). The number of participants who agreed to administer rescue medication rose from 195/210 (92.8%) before training to 209/210 (99.5%, p0.001) after training for the rectal route, and from 173/210 (82.4%) to 209/210 (99.5%, p0.001) for the buccal route. For teachers who administered rescue medication before and after training, the number of administrations without any administration errors rose from 1/195 (0.5%) to 117/195 (60.0%, p0.001) for the rectal route, and from 13/173 (7.5%) to 95/173 (54.9%, p0.001) for the buccal route.A training for preschool teachers boosted the level of self-confidence relating to administration of anticonvulsive rescue medication. Teachers also committed fewer errors when administering rescue medication to dummy dolls.

Seizure disorder and developmental disorder are two of the most common chronic disorders in childhood. Data on perceived parental burden and specific effects on daily life is scarce. We performed a structured interview, consecutively talking to all parents of pediatric outpatients of our university hospital diagnosed with seizure or developmental disorder. Three hundred seven parents (of 317 affected children: 53 with seizure disorder, 44 with specific developmental disorder, 35 with learning disorder, 71 with intellectual disability, 15 with seizure + specific developmental disorder, 23 with seizure + learning disorder, 76 with seizure disorder + intellectual disability) were interviewed. Parents of children with both seizure disorder and intellectual disability stated the highest constraints in daily life, regarding friends, hobbies, emotional pressure, occupation, partnership, habitation, and financial burden. Due to diagnosis of seizure or developmental disorder, 155/307 (51%) parents reduced their working hours/stopped working, 62/307 (20%) changed their habitation, and 46/307 (15%) broke up. As judged by parents, 148/317 (47%) children are being discriminated against, even own family/friends and educators are held responsible.Parents perceive changes in their daily life and discrimination of their children due to their children's seizure and developmental disorders. An intellectual disability combined with seizure disorder caused the highest constraint. What is Known: • Seizure and/or developmental disorders of children may adversely influence quality of life for affected parents. • Caring for a child with special health care needs can take complete attention and own parental needs may therefore be difficult to meet. What is New: • Two out of three parents stated changes of their daily life such as quitting work, change of habitation, or breakup of partnership due to their child's diagnosis. • As judged by the parents, one in two children with developmental disorder of any kind is being discriminated against, even teachers and own family are held responsible.

Epilepsy and bronchial asthma are frequent in adolescents. Data on adolescents' experiences with their disease and on their expectations for the future, however, is scarce. Patients of a university hospital aged 12 to 17 with epilepsy or bronchial asthma were interviewed based on a questionnaire. Forty-five patients with epilepsy and 47 with bronchial asthma were interviewed. Adolescents with epilepsy felt more impaired by their disease (median 2.5; Q25/Q75 0.75/3.0; 6-level Likert scales: 0 = not at all, 5 = very strong) than those with asthma (1.0; 0/3.0; p = 0.017). Seventy-nine patients (85.9%) had never used the Internet to gain information about their disease. Adolescents with epilepsy felt more limited in their career possibilities by their disease (2.0; 0/4.0) than those with asthma (0; 0/2.0; p = 0.001) and had a higher level of concern about passing their disease on to their children (3.0; 0/4.0) than their peers with asthma (1.5; 1.5/3.0; p = 0.016). Girls with epilepsy were more anxious (4.0; 0.5/5.0) than girls with asthma (0; 0/4.0) about complications of the disease regarding pregnancy (p = 0.019).As well adolescents with epilepsy as with asthma described limitations of their daily life and concerns about the future. What is Known: • Epilepsy and bronchial asthma are frequent chronic diseases in adolescents. • Those diseases can affect psychosocial development. What is New: • Adolescents with epilepsy and bronchial asthma described a high burden of their disease, and most adolescents had not used the Internet to inform themselves on their disease. • Especially adolescents with epilepsy fear limitations in their job possibilities, inheritance of their disease and complications in their prospective pregnancy.

Background The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is popular. Parents of children suffering from epilepsy may also consider administering CAM to their children. Systematic data about frequency of and motivations for CAM use, however, are scarce. Methods In a university hospital's neuropaediatric department parents of patients aged 0–18 years suffering from epilepsy were consecutively invited to take part in a structured interview during 4 months in 2014. Results Of the invited parents, 164/165 (99%) agreed to participate. From those, 21/164 (13%) stated that they used CAM in their child. The highest independent predictive value of CAM use was the occurrence of adverse drug events (ADE) of anticonvulsants as judged by parents. Patients affected by ADE had a 5.6 higher chance of receiving CAM compared to patients without ADE. Most commonly used were homeopathy (14/21, 67%) and osteopathy (12/21, 57%). The internet was the most frequently used source of information (14/21, 67%). Of the parents, 10/21 (48%) described positive effects of CAM on seizure frequency, 12/21 (57%) on general condition of their child, and 20/21 (95%) wished to continue CAM for epilepsy therapy. From the non-users of CAM, 91/143 (66%) expressed the desire to learn more about CAM for epilepsy therapy. Limitations Our study was performed in a university hospital in a large urban city in Eastern Germany. CAM user rates can differ in other parts of Germany and Europe, in other institutions and for chronic diseases other than epilepsy. Conclusion The main reason for CAM use was the occurrence of ADE of anticonvulsants. More than half of the parents saw a benefit of CAM for their children. Almost all parents wished to continue CAM use, even those who did not see concrete positive effects.

Expertise in a variety of fields is required for the diagnostic process of epilepsies in children and adolescents as well as for their treatment with anticonvulsants. Patients benefit in the process from the cooperation of different health care professionals. It is of critical importance for risks to be minimised and for the efficacy shown in controlled clinical trials to be maintained in routine conditions. In the first instance, drug prescription procedures, including the choice of anticonvulsants and combinations of drugs and dosing, have to be considered. The administration of drugs has, of course, also to be taken into account. Only if patients are given their anticonvulsants appropriately, the intended success of the therapy can be accomplished. Strategies aimed at improving drug administration have to be directed not only at nurses but also at parents, children and adolescents themselves, as well as caregivers in schools and children's day-care facilities. By providing theoretical teaching, practical training, and routinely including pharmacists in the therapeutic team, drug-related problems that may result in limited effectiveness and increased risks are prevented. As a result, drug (therapy) safety is not only qualitatively improved, but the degree of participation and quality of life of patients and families is improved as well.Für die Diagnostik von Epilepsien im Kindes- und Jugendalter und deren Behandlung mit Antikonvulsiva ist Expertise in unterschiedlichen Bereichen nötig. Der Patient profitiert dabei vom Zusammenwirken verschiedener Berufsgruppen. Risiken müssen reduziert und die in klinischen Studien gezeigte Wirksamkeit auch in eine möglichst gute Effektivität unter Routinebedingungen umgesetzt werden. Dabei sollten zunächst Aspekte der Arzneimittelverschreibung durch den Arzt berücksichtigt werden, wie etwa die Auswahl, Kombination und Dosierung der Antikonvulsiva. Dabei sollte die Arzneimittelanwendung nicht vergessen werden. Erst, wenn ein Antikonvulsivum richtig angewendet wird, kann der vom verordnenden Arzt gewünschte Therapieerfolg auch erreicht werden. Dabei sollten sich Maßnahmen nicht nur auf den Pflegedienst, sondern auch auf die Eltern, die Kinder und Jugendlichen selbst sowie Betreuer in Schulen und Kindertageseinrichtungen erstrecken. Durch theoretische Schulungen, praktische Übungen und regelmäßige Einbindung von Apothekern ins interdisziplinäre Behandlungsteam wird vermeidbaren arzneimittelbezogenen Problemen, die zu mangelnder Effektivität und dem Auftreten erhöhter Risiken führen können, vorgebeugt. Auf diese Weise wird nicht nur die Arzneimittel(therapie)sicherheit qualitativ verbessert, sondern auch die Teilhabe und Lebensqualität der Patienten und deren Familien positiv beeinflusst.

Background The main source of knowledge on adverse drug events (ADE) are physicians' reports in controlled clinical trials. In contrast, little is known about the parents' perception of ADE of anticonvulsants their children receive. Methods After approval by the local ethics committee, we performed a survey in a neuropediatric outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Based on a structured questionnaire, we interviewed parents of children with current anticonvulsant treatment regarding (i) their fears about potential ADE, (ii) experienced ADE according to parents, and (iii) implications of ADE on the child's life. Results Parents of 150 patients took part in the interview. (i) 95 (63.3%) parents expressed fears concerning ADE, mostly liver injury/liver failure (33 [22%]). (ii) 129 (86%) parents reported experienced ADE, mostly sedation (65 [43.3%]) and abnormal behavior (54 [36%]). (iii) Parents reported substantial implications of ADE on the child's daily life for 84 (56%) children, and 63 (42%) parents expressed a negative impact on the child's development. Conclusion We recognized a great discrepancy between those ADE that were feared and those that were experienced. Parents feared life-threatening ADE and experienced less severe ADE that nevertheless have a negative impact on the child's daily life.

BACKGROUND: Anticonvulsants require special consideration particularly at the interface from hospital to ambulatory care. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Observational study for 6 months with prospectively enrolled consecutive patients in a neuropediatric ward of a university hospital (age 0

Aim In Germany, preschool teachers supervise children up to six years of age and are also responsible for supervising older pupils after school. This study explored the impact of a teaching session on epilepsy for teachers in charge of children from 1-10 years of age. Methods We evaluated the benefit of a teaching session offered to all preschool teachers in Leipzig, Germany, in 2014-2015, by asking them to complete the same questionnaire 12-24 months pre-intervention, and 12 months post-intervention. Results Both questionnaires were completed by 123 teachers. The number of teachers who felt they were prepared to handle an acute seizure rose from 36 (29%) pre-intervention to 65 (53%) post-intervention (p

Quality of parents' performance in administering anticonvulsive rescue medication to their children suffering from seizures is unknown. After obtaining ethical approval, we used a questionnaire to ask parents of children with seizures, who had been prescribed rescue medications, about their experience in administering those. To assess the frequency of actually committed drug-handling errors, we let them administer rescue medications to dummy dolls. An expert panel rated the clinical risk of handling errors from "1" (lowest) to "6" (highest). Eighty-one parents completed the study. In the questionnaire, 85 % (100 %) of parents that already conducted rectal (buccal) administration reported that they had never experienced problems. The number of rectal administrations with at least one handling error (97 %, 58/60) was higher than in buccal administration (58 %; 14/24; p 0.001). According to logistic regressions, previous use of rescue medication was not a predictor of the number of committed errors per process (n. s.). All errors were rated with a high clinical risk (class 4-6).By observing parents' administration of rescue medication to dummy dolls, we found a high frequency of clinically relevant drug-handling errors. Most parents, however, self-reported to have never experienced problems while administering rescue medications to their children.• For seizures with duration of more than 5 min, the administration of anticonvulsive rescue medication is recommended. • Outside the hospital, the administration of rescue medication to children is performed most frequently by their parents. What is New: • Most of the parents reported that they had never experienced problems in handling anticonvulsive rescue medication. • But in the observed drug-handling performances, identified errors committed by parents were alarmingly frequent and pose a high clinical risk according to an expert panel.

In tertiary care, computerized physician order entries may improve performance, cross-linking, and documentation when prescribing drugs. A clinical decision support integrated in these systems is discussed to prevent additional medication errors. For an optimal performance, the implementation into the clinical information systems is required to gain access to patient data (e. g. from laboratory). In routine care, the question rises whether a benefit of the systems can be proven in clinical studies and whether there is a difference between the systems. To achieve optimal results, these systems should also consider specific requirements, i. e. the patient groups and prescribed drugs in the local setting. We performed a systematic literature evaluation searching for published data in the topic electronic prescribing to assess them in a structured analysis considering medical-pharmaceutical aspects. Additionally, we assessed three databases in German language and one in English language taking drug-drug-interactions as an example to compare the identification of drug-related problems. Medication data from our own patients in a paediatric intensive care unit of a university hospital were analysed by the systems. Our results revealed strengths but also limitations of electronic prescribing.

Since anticonvulsants such as valproate or oxcarbazepine have quite a disadvantageous profile of possible adverse drug events (ADEs), safer alternatives are being sought. The newer anticonvulsant levetiracetam is often considered advantageous. We performed a chart review of children and adolescents aged from 0.5 to 16.9 years, who had been started on an initial monotherapy with levetiracetam, valproate, or oxcarbazepine between 2007 and 2011, in order to analyze the therapy’s failure rate during the first year. We differentiated failure of monotherapy due to a lack of effectiveness and due to ADEs. No psychometric tests were performed. Lack of effectiveness and inacceptable ADEs were assumed according to the judgment of physicians and families. Anticonvulsive monotherapy failed in 29/61 (48 %) levetiracetam patients and in 18/49 (37 %) valproate patients (for focal and generalized epilepsies; n.s.). This was caused by a lack of effectiveness in 25/61 (41 %) levetiracetam patients and in 11/49 (22 %) valproate patients (p ≤ 0.05). A modification of therapy due to ADEs was performed in 4/61 (7 %) levetiracetam patients and in 7/49 (14 %) valproate patients (n.s.). An anticonvulsive monotherapy failed in 21/42 (50 %) patients treated with levetiracetam and in 10/34 (29 %) patients treated with oxcarbazepine (for focal epilepsies; n.s.). Changes of monotherapy were caused by a lack of effectiveness in 17/42 (40 %) of levetiracetam patients and in 6/34 (18 %) of oxcarbazepine patients (p ≤ 0.05). ADEs leading to changes in therapy were reported for 4/42 (10 %) of levetiracetam and 4/34 (12 %) of oxcarbazepine patients (n.s.). An initial monotherapy of levetiracetam failed more frequently due to a lack of effectiveness than a monotherapy with valproate or oxcarbazepine. We found no significant difference in therapy failure due to ADEs.