51. Evaluation of postoperative esophagram following peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).
- Author
-
Benson, Jamie, Boutros, Christina, Khan, Saher-Zahra, Lyons, Joshua, Hashimoto, Daniel A., and Marks, Jeffrey M.
- Subjects
- *
POSTOPERATIVE care , *DIGESTIVE system endoscopic surgery , *T-test (Statistics) , *FISHER exact test , *MYOTOMY , *RETROSPECTIVE studies , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics , *CHI-squared test , *LONGITUDINAL method , *ESOPHAGEAL achalasia , *MEDICAL needs assessment , *DATA analysis software , *CONTRAST media ,ESOPHAGEAL radiography - Abstract
Introduction: The routine use of post-operative esophogram has come under evaluation for multiple upper GI surgeries such as with bariatric surgery and gastric resections. A major complication following Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) is a leak from the myotomy site. A post-operative contrast esophogram is often utilized to evaluate the presence of a leak, however it is not a standardized care practice for all patients. Presently it is selectively performed depending on physician assessment intra-operatively. This project will evaluate the necessity of post-operative contrast esophogram following POEM. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 277 patients diagnosed with achalasia who underwent POEM by two surgeons from 2011 to 2022. 173 patients met the inclusion criteria. A post-operative esophogram was used for the evaluation of a leak. Post-operative esophagram were selectively performed on day 1 following surgery using a water-soluble material. Data was evaluated using Stata. Results: There were 3 detected leaks in the group that underwent esophagrams compared to the non-esophagram group in the early post-operative period. The overall complication rate was 5.5% in the non-esophagram versus 7.9% in the esophagram group. Length of stay was 1.48 days in the non-UGI vs 1.76 days in the esophagram group. Readmission rate was 10.9% in non-esophagram versus 8.7% in esophagram group. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes in patients undergoing POEM who received post-operative esophagram verses patients who did not receive post-operative esophagram. The routine use of a contrast esophogram to detect a leak following POEM may not be justified. This study suggests that esophagrams should be performed depending on the clinical signs/symptoms post-operatively that would warrant imaging and intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF