Search

BackgroundUltrasound has demonstrated its interest in the analysis of diaphragm function in patients with respiratory failure. The criteria used to diagnose hemidiaphragm paralysis are not well defined.MethodsThe aim of this observational retrospective study was to describe the ultrasound findings in 103 patients with diaphragm paralysis, previously diagnosed by conventional methods after various circumstances such as trauma or surgery. The ultrasound study included the recording of excursions of both diaphragmatic domes and the measurement of inspiratory thickening.ResultsOn paralyzed hemidiaphragm, thickening was less than 20% in all patients during deep inspiration. Thinning was recorded in 53% of cases. In some cases, the recording of the thickening could be difficult. The study of motion during voluntary sniffing reported a paradoxical excursion in all but one patient. During quiet breathing, an absence of movement or a paradoxical displacement was observed. During deep inspiration, a paradoxical motion at the beginning of inspiration followed by a reestablishment of movement in the cranio-caudal direction was seen in 82% of cases. In some patients, there was a lack of movement followed, after an average delay of 0.4 s, by a cranio-caudal excursion. Finally, in 4 patients no displacement was recorded. Evidence of hyperactivity (increased inspiratory thickening and excursion) of contralateral non-paralyzed hemidiaphragm was observed.ConclusionTo accurately detect hemidiaphragm paralysis, it would be interesting to combine the ultrasound study of diaphragm excursion and thickening. The different profiles reported by our study must be known to avoid misinterpretation.

BackgroundAlthough previous studies have determined limit values of normality for diaphragm excursion and thickening, it would be beneficial to determine the normal diaphragm motion-to-inspired volume ratio that integrates the activity of the diaphragm and the quality of the respiratory system.MethodsTo determine the normal values of selected ultrasound diaphragm motion-volume indices, subjects with normal pulmonary function testing were recruited. Ultrasound examination recorded diaphragm excursion on both sides during quiet breathing and deep inspiration. Diaphragm thickness was also measured. The inspired volumes of the corresponding cycles were systematically recorded using a spirometer. The indices were calculated using the ratio excursion, or percentage of thickening, divided by the corresponding breathing volume. From this corhort, normal values and limit values for normality were determined. These measurements were compared to those performed on the healthy side in patients with hemidiaphragm paralysis because an increase in hemidiaphragm activity has been previously demonstated in such circumstances.ResultsA total of 122 subjects (51 women, 71 men) with normal pulmonary function were included in the study. Statistical analysis revealed that the ratio of excursion, or percentage of thickening, to inspired volume ratio significantly differed between males and females. When the above-mentioned indices using excursion were normalized by body weight, no gender differences were found. The indices differed between normal respiratory function subjects and patients with hemidiaphragm paralysis (27 women, 41 men). On the paralyzed side, the average ratio of the excursion divided by the inspired volume was zero. On the healthy side, the indices using the excursion and the percentage of thickening during quiet breathing or deep inspiration were significantly increased comparedto patients with normal lung function. According to the logistic regression analysis, the most relevant indice appeared to be the ratio of the excursion measured during quiet breathing to the inspired volume.ConclusionThe normal values of the diaphragm motion-volume indices could be useful to estimate the performance of the respiratory system. Proposed indices appear suitable in a context of hyperactivity.

BackgroundSARS-CoV-2 infection can impair diaphragm function at the acute phase but the frequency of diaphragm dysfunction after recovery from COVID-19 remains unknown.Materials and methodsThis study was carried out on patients reporting persistent respiratory symptoms 3–4 months after severe COVID-19 pneumonia. The included patients were selected from a medical consultation designed to screen for recovery after acute infection. Respiratory function was assessed by a pulmonary function test, and diaphragm function was studied by ultrasonography.ResultsIn total, 132 patients (85M, 47W) were recruited from the medical consultation. During the acute phase of the infection, the severity of the clinical status led to ICU admission for 58 patients (44%). Diaphragm dysfunction (DD) was detected by ultrasonography in 13 patients, two of whom suffered from hemidiaphragm paralysis. Patients with DD had more frequently muscle pain complaints and had a higher frequency of prior cardiothoracic or upper abdominal surgery than patients with normal diaphragm function. Pulmonary function testing revealed a significant decrease in lung volumes and DLCO and the dyspnea scores (mMRC and Borg10 scores) were significantly increased in patients with DD. Improvement in respiratory function was recorded in seven out of nine patients assessed 6 months after the first ultrasound examination.ConclusionAssessment of diaphragm function by ultrasonography after severe COVID-19 pneumonia revealed signs of dysfunction in 10% of our population. In some cases, ultrasound examination probably discovered an un-recognized pre-existing DD. COVID-19 nonetheless contributed to impairment of diaphragm function. Prolonged respiratory physiotherapy led to improvement in respiratory function in most patients.Clinical trial registration[www.cnil.fr], identifier [#PADS20-207].