Search

Background: Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an advanced radiotherapy technique to improve the accuracy of treatment delivery. However, a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy either via IGRT or routine care (no daily IGRT) reported a statistically significant worse overall survival for those treated with IGRT. This raised the concern regarding the effectiveness of IGRT for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (dCCRT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESqCC)., Methods: Eligible LA-ESqCC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2015 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We estimated propensity scores to construct a 1:1 propensity-score-matched groups and balance observable potential confounders. The hazard ratio (HR) of death as well as other outcomes was compared between IGRT and non-IGRT matched groups during the entire follow-up period. The impact of additional covariables was considered in the sensitivity analysis., Results: Our study population included 590 patients in the primary analysis. The HR for death when IGRT was compared with non-IGRT was 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.77-1.10, P = 0.35). There were also no significant differences for other outcomes or sensitivity analyses., Conclusions: In this updated nonrandomized study using real world data, we found that the overall survival of LA-ESqCC patients treated with dCCRT was not statistically different between those treated with IGRT versus those without IGRT, although the hazard ratio was less than unity, ie, in favor of IGRT. The results should be interpreted with caution given the nonrandomized design and RCTs are needed to clarify our findings., Key Points: Significant findings of the study: The OS of LA-ESqCC patients treated with dCCRT was not statistically different between those treated with IGRT versus those without IGRT, although the hazard ratio was less than unity, ie, in favor of IGRT., What This Study Adds: In this updated nonrandomized study using real world data with additional potential confounders, our study provided a reasonable tentative evidence of lack of RCT as suggested in the literature., (© 2019 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: The role of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ACCRT) is unclear for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who receive esophagectomy with clean margins. We compared the survival of the ACCRT versus observation groups for these patients staged with positron emission tomography (PET) via a population‐based approach. Methods: Eligible patients with locally advanced ESCC diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 were identified via the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We used propensity score (PS) weighting to balance observable potential confounders between groups. The hazard ratios (HR) of death and incidence of esophageal cancer mortality (IECM) were compared between the ACCRT and observation groups. We also evaluated overall survival (OS) in subgroups of either with or without lymph node metastases. Results: Our primary analysis consisted of 105 patients in whom the covariates were well balanced after PS weighting. The HR for death when ACCRT was compared with observation was 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.28–1.21, p = 0.15). The results were also not significantly different for IECM or in the subgroup analyses. Conclusion: We found that for patients with PET‐staged ESCC who received esophagectomy with clean margins, the survival was not statistically different between ACCRT and observation. Further studies (randomized or larger sample size) are needed to clarify this issue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: For advanced esophageal cancer, the clinical significance of pretreatment nodal status (cN) as determined by different examinations remains unclear. Patients and methods: Patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery were analyzed in this study. Pretreatment cN status assessed by CT, EUS, and PET/CT and clinicopathological features were used to evaluate tumor recurrence and long-term survival. Results: Two hundred and twenty-two patients were identified in this study. Pretreatment PET/CT cN0 [odds ratio (OR) cN0 versus cN+, 5.316, p < 0.001] and pretreatment CT cN0 (OR 1.957, p = 0.032) both independently predicted ypN0. Pretreatment PET/CT cN0 was also associated with a lower recurrence rate and longer survival across the entire study group. Among patients with ypN0, pretreatment PET/CT cN+ indicated poor disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 2.777, p = 0.001] and overall survival (HR 2.211, p = 0.034) compared with pretreatment PET/CT cN0, which predicted a favorable prognosis. Conclusions: Data from the current study suggest that pretreatment lymph node status as assessed by PET/CT is strongly correlated with survival outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. ypN0 patients can achieve better survival outcomes when pretreatment cN0 is assessed by PET/CT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]