Search

The promiscuous D6 receptor binds several inflammatory CC chemokines and has been recently proposed to act as a chemokine-scavenging decoy receptor. The present study was designed to better characterize the spectrum of CC chemokines scavenged by D6, focusing in particular on CCR4 ligands and analyzing the influence of NH(2)-terminal processing on recognition by this promiscuous receptor. Using D6 transfectants, it was found that D6 efficiently bound and scavenged most inflammatory CC chemokines (CCR1 through CCR5 agonists). Homeostatic CC chemokines (CCR6 and CCR7 agonists) were not recognized by D6. The CCR4 agonists CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17) and CCL22 bound to D6 with high affinity. CCL17 and CCL22 have no agonistic activity for D6 (chemotaxis and calcium fluxes), but were rapidly scavenged, resulting in reduced chemotactic activity on CCR4 transfectants. CD26 mediates NH(2) terminus processing of CCL22, leading to the production of CCL22 (3-69) and CCL22 (5-69) that do not interact with CCR4. These NH(2)-terminal truncated forms of CCL22 were not recognized by D6. The results presented in this study show that D6 recognizes and scavenges a wide spectrum of inflammatory CC chemokines, including the CCR4 agonists CCL22 and CCL17. However, this promiscuous receptor is not engaged by CD26-processed, inactive, CCL22 variants. By recognizing intact CCL22, but not its truncated variants, D6 expressed on lymphatic endothelial cells may regulate the traffic of CCR4-expressing cells, such as dendritic cells.

Dendritic cells (DC) orchestrate the trafficking of lymphocytes by secreting chemokines with different specificity and function. Chemokines are produced at higher levels by mature DC. This study shows that CCL18 is one of the most abundant chemokines produced by immature DC. In contrast to all other chemokines investigated to date, CCL18 was selectively down-regulated during the maturation process induced by LPS, TNF, CD40 ligand, Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I, Candida albicans, and influenza virus. IL-10 and vitamin D(3), two known inhibitors of DC differentiation and function, strongly promoted CCL18 secretion, whereas IFN-gamma, a costimulator of DC function, inhibited its production. IL-10 also induced CCL18 secretion in blood myeloid DC. No CCL18 secretion was observed in blood plasmacytoid DC. The opposite pattern of regulation was observed for CCL20, a prototypic inflammatory chemokine. CCL18 was found to be a chemotactic factor for immature DC. Therefore, CCL18 may act as a chemotactic signal that promotes the colocalization of immature DC with naive T lymphocytes in an IL-10-dominated environment with the consequent generation of T regulatory cells. These characteristics suggest that CCL18 may be part of an inhibitory pathway devoted to limiting the generation of specific immune responses at peripheral sites.

Macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC)/CCL22 is a CC chemokine active on dendritic cells (DC), NK cells and Th2 lymphocytes. The present study was aimed at comprehensively investigating MDC production in vitro and in vivo. DC were the most potent producers of MDC among leukocytes tested. Endothelial cells did not produce MDC under a variety of conditions. Signals that induce maturation (lipopolysaccharide, IL-1, TNF, CD40 ligand, recognition of bacteria and yeast) dramatically augmented MDC production, and dexamethasone and vitamin D3 blocked it. Prostaglandin E(2), which blocked the acquisition of IL-12 production and the capacity to promote Th1 generation, did not affect MDC production. Using mass spectrometry-based techniques, DC supernatants were found to contain N-terminally truncated forms of MDC [MDC(3-69), MDC(5-69) and MD(C7-69)] as well as the full-length molecule. In vivo, CD1a(+), CD83(+), MDC(+) DC were found in reactive lymph nodes, and in Langerhans' cell histiocytosis. Skin lesions of atopic dermatitis patients showed that CD1a(+) or CD1b(+) DC, and DC with a CD83(+) phenotype were responsible for MDC production in this Th2-oriented disorder. Thus, DC are the predominant source of MDC in vitro and in vivo under a variety of experimental and clinical conditions. Processing of MDC to MDC(3-69) and shorter forms which do not recognize CCR4 is likely to represent a feedback mechanism of negative regulation.