1. Macitentan in pulmonary hypertension due to left ventricular dysfunction
- Author
-
Kelly Papadakis, Gabriela Lack, Hikmet Al-Hiti, Michela Efficace, Jean-Luc Vachiery, Martin Hutyra, Marion Delcroix, and Lewis J. Rubin
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Internationality ,Hypertension, Pulmonary ,Cardiac index ,Hemodynamics ,Blood Pressure ,Walk Test ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,Placebo ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Ventricular Dysfunction, Left ,0302 clinical medicine ,Double-Blind Method ,Internal medicine ,Natriuretic Peptide, Brain ,medicine ,Humans ,Pulmonary Wedge Pressure ,Pulmonary wedge pressure ,Macitentan ,Aged ,Sulfonamides ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Pulmonary hypertension ,Peptide Fragments ,Blood pressure ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Pyrimidines ,Treatment Outcome ,030228 respiratory system ,chemistry ,Vascular resistance ,Cardiology ,Female ,Vascular Resistance ,business - Abstract
The MELODY-1 study evaluated macitentan for pulmonary hypertension because of left heart disease (PH-LHD) in patients with combined post- and pre-capillary PH.63 patients with PH-LHD and diastolic pressure gradient ≥7 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >3WU were randomised to macitentan 10 mg (n=31) or placebo (n=32) for 12 weeks. The main end-point assessed a composite of significant fluid retention (weight gain ≥5% or ≥5 kg because of fluid overload or parenteral diuretic administration) or worsening in New York Heart Association functional class from baseline to end of treatment. Exploratory end-points included changes in N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and haemodynamics at week 12.Seven macitentan-treated and four placebo-treated patients experienced significant fluid retention/worsening functional class; treatment difference, 10.08% (95% CI −15.07–33.26; p=0.34). The difference, driven by the fluid retention component, was apparent within the first month. At week 12, versus placebo, the macitentan group showed no change in PVR, mean right atrial pressure or pulmonary arterial wedge pressure; a non-significant increase in cardiac index (treatment effect 0.4 (95% CI 0.1–0.7) L·min−1·m−2) and decrease in NT-proBNP (0.77 (0.55–1.08)) was observed. Adverse events and serious adverse events were numerically more frequent with macitentan versus placebo.Macitentan-treated patients were quantitatively more likely to experience significant fluid retention versus placebo. Macitentan resulted in no significant changes in any exploratory end-points. more...
- Published
- 2017