Search

In vitro assessment of mutagenicity is an essential component in the chemical risk assessment. Given the diverse modes of action by which chemicals can induce DNA damage, it is essential that these in vitro assays are carefully evaluated for their possibilities and limitations. In this study, we used a fluorescent protein HepG2 reporter test system in combination with high content imaging. To measure induction of the DNA damage response (DDR), we used three different green fluorescent protein reporters for p53 pathway activation. These allowed for accurate quantification of p53, p21 and BTG2 (BTG anti-proliferation factor 2) protein expression and cell viability parameters at a single cell or spheroid resolution. The reporter lines were cultured as 2D monolayers and as 3D spheroids. Furthermore, liver maturity and cytochrome P450 enzyme expression were increased by culturing in an amino acid-rich (AAGLY) medium. We found that culture conditions that support a sustained proliferative state (2D culturing with normal DMEM medium) give superior sensitivity when genotoxic compounds are tested that do not require metabolisation and of which the mutagenic mode of action is dependent on replication. For compounds, which are metabolically converted to mutagenic metabolites, more differentiated HepG2 DDR reporters (e.g. 3D cultures) showed a higher sensitivity. This study stratifies how different culture methods of HepG2 DDR reporter cells can influence the sensitivity towards diverse genotoxicants and how this provides opportunities for a tiered genotoxicity testing strategy.

Androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors represent the mainstay of prostate cancer treatment. In a genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screen using LNCaP prostate cancer cells, loss of co-repressor TLE3 conferred resistance to AR antagonists apalutamide and enzalutamide. Genes differentially expressed upon TLE3 loss share AR as the top transcriptional regulator, and TLE3 loss rescued the expression of a subset of androgen-responsive genes upon enzalutamide treatment. GR expression was strongly upregulated upon AR inhibition in a TLE3-negative background. This was consistent with binding of TLE3 and AR at the GR locus. Furthermore, GR binding was observed proximal to TLE3/AR-shared genes. GR inhibition resensitized TLE3KO cells to enzalutamide. Analyses of patient samples revealed an association between TLE3 and GR levels that reflected our findings in LNCaP cells, of which the clinical relevance is yet to be determined. Together, our findings reveal a mechanistic link between TLE3 and GR-mediated resistance to AR inhibitors in human prostate cancer.

Oxidative stress leads to the activation of the Nuclear factor-erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway. While most studies have focused on the activation of the Nrf2 pathway after single chemical treatment, little is known about the dynamic regulation of the Nrf2 pathway in the context of repeated exposure scenarios. Here we employed single cell live imaging to quantitatively monitor the dynamics of the Nrf2 pathway during repeated exposure, making advantage of two HepG2 fluorescent protein reporter cell lines, expressing GFP tagged Nrf2 or sulfiredoxin 1 (Srxn1), a direct downstream target of Nrf2. High throughput live confocal imaging was used to measure the temporal dynamics of these two components of the Nrf2 pathway after repeated exposure to an extensive concentration range of diethyl maleate (DEM) and tert-butylhydroquinone (tBHQ). Single treatment with DEM or tBHQ induced Nrf2 and Srxn1 over time in a concentration-dependent manner. The Nrf2 response to a second treatment was lower than the response to the first exposure with the same concentration, indicating that the response is adaptive. Moreover, a limited fraction of individual cells committed themselves into the Nrf2 response during the second treatment. Despite the suppression of the Nrf2 pathway, the second treatment resulted in a three-fold higher Srxn1-GFP response compared to the first treatment, with all cells participating in the response. While after the first treatment Srxn1-GFP response was linearly related to Nrf2-GFP nuclear translocation, such a linear relationship was less clear for the second exposure. siRNA-mediated knockdown demonstrated that the second response is dependent on the activity of Nrf2. Several other, clinically relevant, compounds (i.e., sulphorophane, nitrofurantoin and CDDO-Me) also enhanced the induction of Srxn1-GFP upon two consecutive repeated exposure. Together the data indicate that adaptation towards pro-oxidants lowers the Nrf2 activation capacity, but simultaneously primes cells for the enhancement of an antioxidant response which depends on factors other than just Nrf2. These data provide further insight in the overall dynamics of stress pathway activation after repeated exposure and underscore the complexity of responses that may govern repeated dose toxicity.