Search

Objective: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) recommendations for cesarean section (ERAC), likely the most common reason for laparotomy in women, were issued in 2018-19. We examined how current perioperative management at cesarean section in Austrian hospitals aligns with ERAS recommendations., Study Design: We surveyed the 21 largest public obstetric units in Austria for alignment with 20 of the 31 strong ERAS recommendations regarding perioperative maternal care at cesarean section. We also looked at how the German-language clinical guideline for cesarean section (AWMF Guideline Sectio caesarea) aligns with ERAS recommendations., Results: The 21 obstetric units cared for about 51% of all births in Austria in 2019. Cesarean section rates ranged from 17.7% to 50.4%. All 21 units implemented the five strong recommendations regarding patient information and counselling, regional anesthesia, euvolemia and multimodal analgesia. The least implemented strong recommendation was the one for the use of pneumatic compression stockings to prevent thromboembolic disease (0/21 units). Overall, all 21 units implemented ≥11 and 13 (62%) implemented ≥15 (≥75%) of the 20 strong recommendations; no unit implemented all 20 strong recommendations. There were no differences in the implementation of strong recommendations according to hospital volume., Conclusions: Even in the absence of formal adoption of ERAS program for cesarean section many perioperative ERAS recommendations are already implemented in Austria. The least implemented recommendations were the use of pneumatic compression stockings (0 of 21 units) and immediate catheter removal (4 of 21 units). Only 10 of the 20 ERAS recommendations we looked at are included in the current German-language clinical guideline for cesarean section., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Spontaneous vaginal twin delivery after 32nd week of gestation is safe when first twin presenting cephalic. Aim of this study is to identify obstetric factors influencing the condition of second twin and to verify whether non-cephalic presentation and vaginal breech delivery of the second twin is safe., Methods: This is a retrospective case controlled cohort study of 717 uncomplicated twin deliveries ≥32 + 0 weeks of gestation from 2005 to 2014 in two tertiary perinatal centers. Obstetric parameters were evaluated in three groups with descriptive, univariate logistic regression analysis for perinatal outcome of second twins., Results: The three groups included twins delivered by elective cesarean section ECS (n = 277, 38.6%), by unplanned cesarean section UPC (n = 233, 32.5%) and vaginally (n = 207, 28.9%). Serious adverse fetal outcome is rare and we found no differences between the groups. Second twins after ECS had significant better umbilical artery UA pH (p < 0.001) and better Apgar compared to UPC (p = 0.002). Variables for a fetal population "at risk" for adverse neonatal outcome after vaginal delivery (UA pH < 7.20, Apgar 5´ < 9) were associated with higher gestational age (p = 0.001), longer twin-twin interval (p = 0.05) and vacuum extraction of twin A (p = 0.04). Non-cephalic presentation of second twins was not associated (UA pH < 7.20 OR 1.97, CI 95% 0.93-4.22, p = 0.07, Apgar 5´ < 9 OR 1.63, CI 95% 0.70-3.77, p = 0.25, Transfer to neonatal intermediate care unit p = 0.48). Twenty-one second twins (2,9%) were delivered by cesarean section following vaginal delivery of the first twin. Even though non-cephalic presentation was overrepresented in this subgroup, outcome variables were not significantly different compared to cephalic presentation., Conclusions: Even though elective cesarean means reduced stress for second twins this seems not to be clinically relevant. Non-cephalic presentation of the second twin does not significantly influence the perinatal outcome of the second twin but might be a risk factor for vaginal-cesarean birth.

Purpose: Numbers of planned cesarean deliveries are increasing in twin pregnancies, despite the lack of evidence for this approach, and the second twin is thought to be at risk for a poorer outcome. The aim of this study was to examine whether twins have a poorer outcome if an attempted vaginal delivery is changed to a cesarean section or combined delivery., Methods: This retrospective data analysis included all women with dichorionic twin pregnancies attempting vaginal delivery over a 10-year period. Outcome parameters for the first and second twins relative to their mode of birth were compared. A correlation model between the interdelivery time interval and Apgar scores was calculated. Subgroup analyses assessing the birth mode of the first and second twins were conducted., Results: A total of 248 women were enrolled in the study. The second twins had significantly lower values for outcome parameters, such as umbilical artery cord pH and Apgar scores in comparison with the first twins (P < 0.01). The subgroup analysis of birth modes in first and second twins showed a significantly poorer outcome in the cesarean section and combined delivery group (P < 0.05). The interdelivery time interval was significantly longer in the second twin cesarean section group (P < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between the interdelivery time intervals and Apgar scores (P > 0.05)., Conclusion: Although outcome parameters were significantly lower in second twins and twins born via secondary cesarean section, the clinical relevance of this appears to be negligible.

Objective  Twin vaginal deliveries (VDs) are often performed in the operating room (OR) given the risk of conversion to cesarean delivery (CD) for the aftercoming twin. We aim to investigate the rates of conversion to CD for planned twin VDs and identify predictors and outcomes of conversion. Study Design  A retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent a planned twin VD at two large academic medical centers over 4 years. Demographic and outcome data were chart abstracted. Various statistical tests were used to evaluate the influence of perinatal variables on mode of delivery and identify possible predictors of conversion. Results  Eight hundred and eighty-five twin deliveries were identified, of which 725 (81.9%) were possible candidates for VD. Of those, 237 (32.7%) underwent successful VD of twin A. Ninety-five (40.1%) had a nonvertex second twin at time of delivery. Conversion to CD occurred in 10 planned VDs (4.2%). Conversions were higher with spontaneous labor (relative risk [RR]: 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6–2.7; p  = 0.003), and having an intertwin delivery interval greater than 60 minutes (RR: 5.1; 95% CI: 2.5–10.8; p  < 0.001). Nonvertex presentation of twin B, type of delivery provider, or years out in practice of delivery provider were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between VD and conversion groups. There was a significant association between use of forceps for twin B and successful VD (p  = 0.02), with 84.6% in the setting of a nonvertex twin B. Conclusion  Successful VD was achieved in planned VD of twins in 95.8% of cases, and there were no significant differences in maternal and fetal outcomes between successful VD and conversion to CD for twin B. With the optimal clinical scenario and shared decision-making, performing vaginal twin deliveries in labor and delivery rooms should be discussed. Key Points There is a propensity to perform twin vaginal deliveries in the operating room. Rates of conversion to cesarean section are very low. There are no significant differences in perinatal outcomes with conversion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To establish the frequency of vacuum extraction among parturients with twin pregnancies, identify the risk factors and perinatal outcomes. Methods: A retrospective cohort database study was conducted between 2005–2018. Twin fetuses with vertex presentation >34 weeks gestation who achieved vaginal delivery were included. Outcomes were compared between neonates who were delivered by vacuum extraction and neonates delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery (aORs; [95% CI]). Results: A total of 1751 neonates of 905 parturients with twin pregnancies met inclusion criteria, of which 163 (18%) parturients had vacuum extraction and 225 (12.8%) neonates were delivered by vacuum extraction. The most significant risk factors for vacuum extraction were primiparity (6.79 [4.77–9.66]), previous cesarean delivery (5.59 [3.13–9.97]), and epidural analgesia (4.34 [1.83–10.31]). Vacuum extractions were associated with a spectrum of adverse maternal outcomes (2.60 [1.61–4.19]), particularly postpartum hemorrhage and its associated morbidities. From the neonatal aspect, vacuum extraction deliveries were associated with a composite of birth trauma injuries (21.81 [6.43–73.91]). Conclusion: Vacuum extractions among twin pregnancies were found to be associated with significantly higher rates of postpartum hemorrhage, blood transfusion, and perinatal birth trauma. These findings should be presented to women when counseling on mode of delivery and considered individually against cesarean delivery disadvantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]