Search

Purpose: To develop and validate the efficacy and accuracy of a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) reconstructive rapid prototyping drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement., Methods: CT thin-layer scans were obtained from 12 adult cadaveric cervical specimens and reconstructed. The ideal screw channels were chosen by analyzing the cross sections of the reconstructed 3D images. The navigation templates were designed and printed based on the optimal screw channels. The pedicle screws were placed on the cadaver specimens under template guidance, and the cadaver specimens were scanned and reconstructed. The pre- and post-operative models were compared. Entry point and exit point data of these two models were collected and compared using the Chi-square test., Results: A total of 164 cervical pedicle screws were placed; among them, six punctured the cortical bone of the vertebral pedicle reaching an accuracy of 96.3%. Among the outside screws, all of the deviation distances were <2 mm. The Chi-square test results showed that when a deviation of 1.2 mm was used as a standard for the entry point, there was no difference between the two groups (χ 2  = 1.346, p = 0.248); when a deviation of 2.2 mm was used as a standard for the exit point, there was no difference between the two groups (χ 2  = 3.250, p = 0.061)., Conclusion: The 3D CT reconstructive rapid prototyping drill template combined with the screw tunnel design based on 3D cutting technique can help facilitate accurate cervical pedicle screw insertion.

A finite element model was used to compare the biomechanical properties of a novel anterior transpedicular screw artificial vertebral body system (AVBS) with a conventional anterior screw plate system (ASPS) for fixation in the lower cervical spine. A model of the intact cervical spine (C3-C7) was established. AVBS or ASPS constructs were implanted between C4 and C6. The models were loaded in three-dimensional (3D) motion. The Von Mises stress distribution in the internal fixators was evaluated, as well as the range of motion (ROM) and facet joint force. The models were generated and analyzed by mimics, geomagic studio, and ansys software. The intact model of the lower cervical spine consisted of 286,382 elements. The model was validated against previously reported cadaveric experimental data. In the ASPS model, stress was concentrated at the connection between the screw and plate and the connection between the titanium mesh and adjacent vertebral body. In the AVBS model, stress was evenly distributed. Compared to the intact cervical spine model, the ROM of the whole specimen after fixation with both constructs is decreased by approximately 3 deg. ROM of adjacent segments is increased by approximately 5 deg. Facet joint force of the ASPS and AVBS models was higher than those of the intact cervical spine model, especially in extension and lateral bending. AVBS fixation represents a novel reconstruction approach for the lower cervical spine. AVBS provides better stability and lower risk for internal fixator failure compared with traditional ASPS fixation.

Study Design: Biomechanical in vitro study., Objective: To determine whether the peak pull-out force (PPF) of cervical anterior transpedicular screw (ATPS) fixed in osteoporotic vertebrae positively influence screw stability or not before and after fatigue., Summary of Background Data: Multilevel cervical spine procedures with osteoporosis can challenge the stability of current screw-and-plate systems. A second surgical posterior approach is coupled with potential risks of increased morbidity and complications. Hence, anterior cervical instrumentation that increases primary construct stability, while avoiding the need for posterior augmentation, would be valuable., Methods: Sixty formalin-fixed vertebrae at different levels were randomly selected. The vertebrae were divided into healthy controls (groups A1, A2), osteoporotic controls (B1, B2), healthy ATPS groups (C1, C2), osteoporotic ATPS groups (D1, D2), and osteoporotic restoration controls (E1, E2). The procedure of ATPS insertion was simulated with 2 pilot holes being drilled on each side of 20 vertebral bodies that were implanted with either vertebral screw or polymethylmethacrylate. Each side randomly received either instant PPF or PPF beyond fatigue (2.5 Hz; 20,000 times)., Results: The prefatigue PPFs were significantly higher than the postfatigue PPFs in all groups (group A: 366.06 ± 58.78 vs. 248.93 ± 57.21 N; group B: 275.58 ± 23.18 vs. 142.79 ± 44.78 N; group C: 635.99 ± 185.28 vs. 542.57 ± 136.58 N; group D: 519.22 ± 122.12 vs. 393.16 ± 192.07 N, and group E: 431.78 ± 75.77 vs. 325.74 ± 95.10 N). The postfatigue PPFs were reduced by 32.00% (group A), 48.19% (group B), 14.69% (group C), 24.28% (group D), and 24.72% (group E). The acute and postfatigue PPFs of both control groups were significantly lower than that of ATPS groups (P < 0.05). The cyclic osteoporosis ATPS group achieved the same PPF compared with the vertebral restoration screw group., Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that instant PPF and fatigue resistance capability of an ATPS fixation were significantly better than other control groups, especially in the osteoporotic vertebrae.

Study Design: An experimental study., Objective: To compare the peak pull-out force (PPF) of vertebral screws fixed in osteoporotic vertebrae versus polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) used for augmentation or restoration, before and after fatigue., Summary of Background Data: Failure of screw fixation in anterior cervical interbody fusion remains a significant clinical problem. However, little is known of the biomechanical characteristics of cervical vertebral screws before and after restoration or augmentation, especially after fatigue., Methods: Fifty fresh cervical vertebrae, of which 40 were randomly selected, from 12 adult cadavers were used. The vertebrae were divided into healthy controls, osteoporotic controls, a PMMA restoration group, and a PMMA augmentation group. In each of the control groups, 2 pilot holes on each side of 20 vertebral bodies were implanted with vertebral screws (4 mm in diameter). Each side randomly received either acute PPF or PPF beyond fatigue that was ensured using cyclic loading (2 Hz; 20,000 times). In the PMMA groups, pilot holes were drilled parallel to the sagittal plane and injected with 0.6-1.0 mL PMMA before the vertebral screw was inserted. Each side of each vertebral body randomly received either PPF or PPF beyond fatigue that was ensured using cyclic loading (2 Hz; 20,000 times). A Bose3510-AT fatigue testing machine measured the PPF of vertebral screws with or without PMMA for all specimens before and after fatigue., Results: In all groups, the prefatigue PPF was significantly higher than the postfatigue PPF. Compared with the prefatigue PPF, postfatigue PPF was reduced by 37.40%, 43.10%, 32.08%, and 31.85% in the healthy controls, osteoporotic controls, PMMA restoration, and PMMA augmentation groups, respectively. The acute and postfatigue PPFs of the healthy controls were significantly higher from that of the osteoporotic controls. The acute and postfatigue PPFs of both control groups were significantly lower from that of both PMMA groups. There was no difference in acute and postfatigue PPFs between the PMMA restoration and augmentation groups., Conclusions: The results indicated that both PMMA augmentation and PMMA restoration could significantly increase cervical screw pull-out strength and antifatigue capability. The results provide a biomechanical justification for spine surgeons to use PMMA for augmentation or restoration in cases of surgeries with poor bone quality or osteoporotic vertebral bodies.

Background: Accurate placement of pedicle screw during Anterior Transpedicular Screw fixation (ATPS) in cervical spine depends on accurate anatomical knowledge of the vertebrae. However, little is known of the morphometric characteristics of cervical vertebrae in Chinese population., Methods: Three-dimensional reconstructions of CT images were performed for 80 cases. The anatomic data and screw fixation parameters for ATPS fixation were measured using the Mimics software., Findings: The overall mean OPW, OPH and PAL ranged from 5.81 to 7.49 mm, 7.77 to 8.69 mm, and 33.40 to 31.13 mm separately, and SPA was 93.54 to 109.36 degrees from C3 to C6, 104.99 degrees at C7, whereas, 49.00 to 32.26 degrees from C4 to C7, 46.79 degrees at C3 (TPA). Dl/rSIP had an increasing trend away from upper endplate with mean value from 1.87 to 5.83 mm. Dl/rTIP was located at the lateral portion of the anterior cortex of vertebrae for C3 to C5 and ipsilateral for C6 to C7 with mean value from -2.70 to -3.00 mm, and 0.17 to 3.18 mm. The entrance points for pedicular screw insertion for C3 to C5 and C6 to C7 were recommended -2∼-3 mm and 0-4 mm from the median sagittal plane, respectively, 1-4 mm and 5-6 mm from the upper endplate, with TPA being 46.79-49.00 degrees and 40.89-32.26 degrees, respectively, and SPA being 93.54-106.69 degrees and 109.36-104.99 degrees, respectively. The pedicle screw insertion diameter was recommended 3.5 mm (C3 and C4), 4.0 mm (C5 to C7), and the pedicle axial length was 21-24 mm for C3 to C7 for both genders. However, the ATPS insertion in C3 should be individualized given its relatively small anatomical dimensions., Conclusions: The data provided a morphometric basis for the ATPS fixation technique in lower cervical fixation. It will help in preoperative planning and execution of this surgery.

Objective: To compare the biomechanical properties of the anterior transpedicular screw-artificial vertebral body (AVB) and conventional anterior screw plate system (AP) in lower cervical spine by finite element study., Methods: CT images (C1-T1) were obtained from a 38-year-old female volunteer. The models of intact C(3-7) (intact group), AP fixation (AP group), and AVB fixation (AVB group) were established and analyzed by Mimics 14.0, Geomagic Studio 2013, and ANSYS 14.0 softwares. The axial force of 74 N and moment couple of 1 N x m were loaded on the upper surface and upper facet joint surfaces of C3. Under conditions of flexion, extension, lateral bending, and rotation, the Von Mises stress distribution regularity and maximum equivalent stree of AP and AVB groups were recorded, and the range of motion (ROM) was also analyzed of 3 groups., Results: The intact model of lower cervical spine (C(3-7)) was established, consisting of 286,382 elements and 414,522 nodes, and it was successfully validated with the previously reported cadaveric experimental data of Panjabi and Kallemeyn. The stress concentrated on the connection between plate and screw in AP group, while it distributed evenly in AVB group. Between AP and AVB groups, there was significant difference in maximum equivalent stress values under conditions of 74 N axial force, flexion, extension, and rotation. AVB group had smaller ROM of fixed segments and larger ROM of adjacent segments than AP group. Compared with intact group, whole ROM of the lower cervical spine decreased about 3 degrees, but ROM of C(3,4) and C(6,7) segments increased nearly 5 degrees in both AP and AVB groups., Conclusion: As a new reconstruction method of lower cervical spine, AVB fixation provides better stability and lower risk of failure than AP fixation.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation on cervical stability after anterior cervical interbody fusion (ACIF) before and after fatigue., Methods: Twelve porcine cervical spines (C3-7) were subjected to testing angular displacement parameters, including the range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and elastic zone (EZ), in nondestructive flexion and extension, right/left lateral bending, and left/right rotation on Motion Analysis motion capture system and MTS-858 servo-hydraulic testing machine. Intact cervical spines served as control group (group A); one-level discectomy and fusion was performed with anterior plate fixation based on group A as group B; flexion and extension, left/right lateral bending (5 000 cycles) fatigue testing based on group B as group C; the augmentation screw channel was used based on group C as group D; and flexion and extension, left/right lateral bending fatigue testing were performed based on group D as group E., Results: The ROM, NZ, and EZ in group A were significantly different from those in other groups (P < 0.05) at flexion/extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation. The ROM, NZ, and EZ in group B were significantly smaller than those in group C (P < 0.05) in flexion/extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation, but there was no significant difference when compared with group D (P > 0.05). The ROM and NZ in flexion/extension and the EZ in flexion in group B were significant smaller than those in group E (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the other indexes (P > 0.05). The ROM, NZ, and EZ in group C in flexion and extension, left/right lateral bending, and left/right rotation were significantly higher than those in groups D and E (P < 0.05). The ROM and NZ in flexion and extension and left/right lateral bending, and the ROM in left/right rotation, and the EZ in flexion and extension, right bending, and left/right rotation in group D were significantly smaller than those in group E (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the other indexes (P > 0.05)., Conclusion: PMMA augmentation can significantly increase the instant cervical stability and provide a biomechanics basis in cervical anterior plate fixation.