Search

Background: To compare degrees of cSVA correction and to theorize possible minimum and maximum thresholds of cSVA correction for patients to benefit clinically., Methods: 657 operative ACD patients in a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively enrolled database with complete baseline and two year radiographic and HRQL data were examined. Patients were grouped into an optimally corrected cohort (OC; postop cSVA ≤ 4 cm) and an undercorrected cohort (UC; postop cSVA > 4 cm) based on postoperative radiographs., Results: 265 patients met inclusion criteria (mean age 58.2 ± 11.4 years, BMI 28.9 ± 7.5, CCI 0.9 ± 1.3). 11.2 % of patients were UC, while 88.8 % of patients were OC. UC cohort experienced a significantly greater occurrence of radiographic complications (47.8 % v. 27.6 %, p = 0.046). UC also demonstrated a significantly greater rate of severe 6 M DJK (p < 0.001) and 1Y DJK (26.1 % v. 2.7 %, p < 0.001). In terms of HRQLs, the OC cohort demonstrated significantly greater 2Y EQ5D-Health values (76.9 v. 46.7, p = 0.012). Being UC was a significant predictor of moderate-high 1Y mJOA score (OR 3.0, CI 95 % 1.2-7.3, p = 0.015) Still, in terms of CIT, the threshold for DJF risk increased significantly (p = 0.026) when the cSVA were surgically corrected greater than 5 cm., Conclusion: Undercorrection of cSVA yielded worse clinical outcomes and posed a significant risk for radiographic complications. Although undercorrection does not seem to be efficacious, surgical correction beyond certain thresholds should still be respected as there is a risk for DJK on either end of the spectrum., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The association of Hounsfield units (HU) and junctional pathologies in adult cervical deformity (ACD) surgery has not been elucidated., Objective: Assess if the bone mineral density of the LIV, as assessed by HUs, is prognostic for the risk of complications after ACD surgery., Study Design/setting: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: HUs were measured on preoperative CT scans. Means comparison test assessed differences in HUs based on the occurrence of complications, linear regression assessed the correlation of HUs with risk factors, and multivariable logistic regression followed by a conditional inference tree derived a threshold for HUs based on the increased likelihood of developing a complication., Results: In all, 107 ACD patients were included. Thirty-one patients (29.0%) developed a complication (18.7% perioperative), with 20.6% developing DJK and 11.2% developing DJF. There was a significant correlation between lower LIVs and lower HUs ( r =0.351, P =0.01), as well as age and HUs at the LIV. Age did not correlate with change in the DJK angle ( P >0.2). HUs were lower at the LIV for patients who developed a complication and an LIV threshold of 190 HUs was predictive of complications (OR: 4.2, [1.2-7.6]; P =0.009)., Conclusions: Low bone mineral density at the lowest instrumented vertebra, as assessed by a threshold lower than 190 Hounsfield units, may be a crucial risk factor for the development of complications after cervical deformity surgery. Preoperative CT scans should be routinely considered in at-risk patients to mitigate this modifiable risk factor during surgical planning., Level of Evidence: Level-III., Competing Interests: P.G.P.— Allosource: Other financial or material support; Cervical Scoliosis Research Society: Research support; Globus Medical: Paid presenter or speaker; Medtronic: Paid consultant; Royal Biologics: Paid consultant; Spine: Editorial or governing board; SpineWave: Paid consultant; Terumo: Paid consultant; Zimmer: Paid presenter or speaker. R.L. —Nemaris: Stock or stock Options. A.J.S.— AAOS: Board or committee member; Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American: Editorial or governing board; North American Spine Society: Board or committee member; Spine: Editorial or governing board; Springer: Publishing royalties, financial or material support; Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Publishing royalties, financial or material support. V.L.— DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company: Paid presenter or speaker; European Spine Journal: Editorial or governing board; Globus Medical: Paid consultant; International Spine Study Group: Board or committee member; Nuvasive: IP royalties; Scoliosis Research Society: Board or committee member; The Permanente Medical Group: Paid presenter or speaker. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Adult cervical deformity is a structural malalignment of the cervical spine that may present with variety of significant symptomatology for patients. There are clear and substantial negative impacts of cervical spine deformity, including the increased burden of pain, limited mobility and functionality, and interference with patients' ability to work and perform everyday tasks. Primary cervical deformities develop as the result of a multitude of different etiologies, changing the normal mechanics and structure of the cervical region. In particular, degeneration of the cervical spine, inflammatory arthritides and neuromuscular changes are significant players in the development of disease. Additionally, cervical deformities, sometimes iatrogenically, may present secondary to malalignment or correction of the thoracic, lumbar or sacropelvic spine. Previously, classification systems were developed to help quantify disease burden and influence management of thoracic and lumbar spine deformities. Following up on these works and based on the relationship between the cervical and distal spine, Ames-ISSG developed a framework for a standardized tool for characterizing and quantifying cervical spine deformities. When surgical intervention is required to correct a cervical deformity, there are advantages and disadvantages to both anterior and posterior approaches. A stepwise approach may minimize the drawbacks of either an anterior or posterior approach alone, and patients should have a surgical plan tailored specifically to their cervical deformity based upon symptomatic and radiographic indications. This state-of-the-art review is based upon a comprehensive overview of literature seeking to highlight the normal cervical spine, etiologies of cervical deformity, current classification systems, and key surgical techniques., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.)

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: Construct an individualized cervical realignment strategy based on patient parameters at the presentation that results in superior 2-year health-related quality of life metrics and decreased rates of junctional failure and reoperation following adult cervical deformity surgery., Summary of Background Data: Research has previously focused on adult cervical deformity realignment thresholds for maximizing clinical outcomes while minimizing complications. However, realignment strategies may differ based on patient presentation and clinical characteristics., Methods: We included adult cervical deformity patients with 2-year data. The optimal outcome was defined as meeting good clinical outcomes without distal junctional failure or reoperation. Radiographic parameters assessed included C2 Slope, C2-C7, McGregor's slope, TS-CL, cSVA, T1 slope, and preoperative lowest-instrumented vertebra (LIV) inclination angle. Conditional inference trees were used to establish thresholds for each parameter based on achieving the optimal outcome. Analysis of Covariance and multivariable logistic regression analysis, controlling for age, comorbidities, baseline deformity and disability, and surgical factors, assessed outcome rates for the hierarchical approach within each deformity group., Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients were included. After correction, there was a significant difference in meeting the optimal outcome when correcting the C2 slope below 10 degrees (85% vs. 34%, P <0.001), along with lower rates of distal junctional failure (DJF) (7% vs. 42%, P <0.001). Next, after isolating patients below the C2 slope threshold, the selection of LIV with an inclination between 0 and 40 degrees demonstrated lower rates of distal junctional kyphosis and higher odds of meeting optimal outcome(OR: 4.2, P =0.011). The best third step was the correction of cSVA below 35 mm. This hierarchical approach (11% of the cohort) led to significantly lower rates of DJF (0% vs. 15%, P <0.007), reoperation (8% vs. 28%, P <0.001), and higher rates of meeting optimal outcome (93% vs. 36%, P <0.001) when controlling for age, comorbidities, and baseline deformity and disability., Conclusion: Our results indicate that the correction of C2 slope should be prioritized during cervical deformity surgery, with the selection of a stable LIV and correction of cervical SVA below the idealized threshold. Among the numerous radiographic parameters considered during preoperative planning for cervical deformity correction, our determinations help surgeons prioritize those realignment strategies that maximize the health-related quality of life outcomes and minimize complications., Level of Evidence: Level-III., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Studies have utilized psychological questionnaires to identify the psychological distress among certain surgical populations., Research Question: Is there an additional psychological burden among patients undergoing surgical treatment for their symptomatic degenerative cervical disease?, Materials and Methods: Patients>18 years of age with symptomatic, degenerative cervical spine disease were included and prospectively enrolled. Correlations and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the relationship between these mental health components (PCS, FABQ) and the severity of disability described by the NDI, EQ-5D, and mJOA score. Patient distress scores were compared to previously published benchmarks for other diagnoses., Results: 47 patients were enrolled (age: 56.0 years,BMI: 29.7kg/m 2 ). Increasing neck disability and decreasing EQ-5D were correlated with greater PCS and FABQ(all P<0.001). Patients with severe psychological distress at baseline were more likely to report severe neck disability, while physician-reported mJOA had weaker associations. Compared to historical controls of lumbar patients, patients in our study had greater levels of psychological distress, as measured by FABQ (40.0 vs. 17.6; P<0.001) and PCS (27.4 vs. 19.3;P<0.001)., Discussion and Conclusion: Degenerative cervical spine patients seeking surgery were found to have a significant level of psychological distress, with a large portion reporting severe fear avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing pain at baseline. Strong correlation was seen between patient-reported functional metrics, but less so with physician-reported signs and symptoms. Additionally, this population demonstrated higher psychological burden in certain respects than previously identified benchmarks of patients with other disorders. Preoperative treatment to help mitigate this distress, impact postoperative outcomes, and should be further investigated., Level of Evidence: Level III., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)