Search

Objective: To evaluate risk factors for the development of dysphagia after anterior cervical surgery., Methods: The records of 249 patients who underwent anterior cervical surgery were reviewed. The presence and severity of dysphagia were assessed with the Dysphagia Disability Index 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Age; sex; ethnicity; cigarette smoking; previous cervical surgeries; reoperation for same pathology; type of procedure, incision, and instrumentation; number and levels involved; side of procedure, length of surgery; and use of postoperative bracing were analyzed., Results: During the first 6 months after surgery, 27 (10.8%) patients developed dysphagia. From these patients the presence of dysphagia at 6 weeks and at 3 and 6 months was 88.8%, 29.6%, and 7.4%, respectively. By 12 months, dysphagia had resolved in all cases. The mean age of patients with dysphagia was 55 years (SD 12.98) and 50 years (SD 12.07) in patients without dysphagia (P = 0.05). Dysphagic patients had an average of 2.2 (SD 1.15) levels operated compared with 1.84 (SD 0.950) in nondysphagic patients (P = 0.05). Patients who developed dysphagia were most often treated at C4-5 (67%) and C5-6 (81%: P < 0.001). Although mean operative time was slightly longer in patients with dysphagia (186 minutes) compared with those without (169 minutes), the difference was not significant., Conclusions: In our patients, the incidence of dysphagia was low, and it had completely resolved at 12 months in all cases. Risk factors for dysphagia were multilevel procedures, involvement of C4-5 and C5-6, and age., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of surgical treatment of cervical disc disease., Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty using a new arthroplasty device at 24-months follow-up., Summary of Background Data: Cervical disc arthroplasty preserves motion in the cervical spine. It is an alternative to fusion after neurologic decompression, whereas anterior decompression and fusion provides a rigorous comparative benchmark of success., Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial enrolling patients with cervical disc disease. Ultimately 242 received the investigational device (Bryan Cervical Disc), and 221 patients underwent a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and decompression and fusion as a control group. Patients completed clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery., Results: Analysis of 12- and 24-month postoperative data showed improvement in all clinical outcome measures for both groups; however, 24 months after surgery, the investigational group patients treated with the artificial disc had a statistically greater improvement in the primary outcome variables: Neck disability index score (P = 0.025) and overall success (P = 0.010). With regard to implant- or implant/surgical-procedure-associated serious adverse events, the investigational group had a rate of 1.7% and the control group, 3.2%. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with regard to the rate of secondary surgical procedures performed subsequent to the index procedure. Patients who received the artificial cervical disc returned to work nearly 2 weeks earlier than the fusion patients (P = 0.015)., Conclusion: Two-year follow-up results indicate that cervical disc arthroplasty is a viable alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with persistently symptomatic, single-level cervical disc disease.

Study Design: Biomechanical laboratory research., Objective: To determine whether anterior, posterior, or combined instrumentation provides the best stability for treating a cervicothoracic compression-flexion injury., Summary of Background Data: As the junction between the mobile cervical spine and rigid thoracic spine, the cervicothoracic junction poses unique challenges to the success of any fixation system spanning this region. Although posterior instrumentation is the preferred method of fixation in the unstable cervical spine, it is unknown whether this is the case across the unstable cervicothoracic junction., Methods: Flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of cadaveric specimens were studied during application of nondestructive pure moments in a sequence of conditions: (1) intact, (2) after destabilization, (3) with posterior instrumentation from C6-T1 or T2, and (4) with corpectomy/graft and anterior alone or combined anterior/posterior instrumentation., Results: Compared to anterior instrumentation, posterior instrumentation allowed an 89% smaller range of motion (ROM) during lateral bending (P = 0.01) and 64% smaller ROM during axial rotation (P = 0.04). In most loading modes, combined instrumentation outperformed either anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. Most biomechanical measurements of stability improved when posterior instrumentation was extended from T1 to T2. Small and usually insignificant reductions in ROM averaging 15% were observed with C7 included in the posterior construct versus C7 excluded., Conclusions: Combined instrumentation provides a significant improvement in stability over either anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. Extension of the posterior instrumentation to include T2 improves stability at T1-T2 as well as rostral levels. Inclusion of C7 in the construct is largely inconsequential biomechanically.

Study Design: Comparison of nondestructive multidirectional flexibility in groups of specimens receiving two different posterior instrumentation constructs with or without anterior plating., Objective: To compare stability after a three-column injury stabilized posteriorly by lateral mass screws-rods at C5-C6 and pedicle screws-rods at C7 ("LLP") or by pedicle screws-rods at C5-C6-C7 ("PPP"), and to compare posterior, anterior, and combined anterior-posterior fixation., Summary of Background Data: Pedicle screws resist pullout better than lateral mass screws, but little research has compared the stability of pedicle screws to that of lateral mass screws used within constructs., Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric C4-T1 specimens were tested intact, posteriorly instrumented (7 LLP and 7 PPP), anteriorly instrumented, or with combined (anterior-posterior) instrumentation. Nonconstraining, nondestructive torques induced flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation while angular motion was recorded optically., Results: Posterior, anterior, and combined instrumentation each significantly improved stability (P < 0.05). Combined fixation provided significantly better stability than either anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. In no loading mode and in no testing condition was any parameter significantly different between LLP and PPP. Posterior instrumentation provided significantly better stability than anterior instrumentation., Conclusions: Anterior plate and posterior screw-rod fixation alone improve stability in a two-level, three-column cervical injury model. Combined fixation further improves stability. There is little discernible difference in immediate postoperative stability between posterior rod constructs combining lateral mass and pedicle screws and those using only pedicle screws.

Study Design: Fifty-two study participants underwent cervical spine surgery using intraoperative Iso-C imaging with or without spinal navigation., Objectives: To evaluate prospectively the feasibility, advantages, limitations, and applications of Iso-C in cervical spine surgery., Summary of Background Data: Existing stereotactic spinal navigational systems images must be acquired before surgery and typically require cumbersome point-to-point registration. Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide real-time information but can restrict access to the patient, preclude the use of traditional operating room tables, and are time-consuming. The Iso-C allows quick, CT-quality, real-time data acquisition without restricting access to the patient. The data acquired can be automatically transferred to navigational systems with the immediate ability to navigate for anterior or posterior cervical spine procedures., Methods: High-resolution isotropic three-dimensional data sets were acquired using the Iso-C intraoperative fluoroscopy in 52 cervical spine cases. In 30 cases, the data were imported automatically to the StealthStation Treon to support neuronavigation. In 22 cases, a postprocedural intraoperative CT was obtained with the Iso-C primarily to assess the extent of osseous decompression and/or the accuracy of implants or instrumentation. In most cases, a postoperative high-resolution CT image was obtained and compared with the Iso-C data., Results: Successful automated registration suitable for navigation was attained for all anterior and posterior cervical spinal cases. The postprocedural intraoperative Iso-C data were 100% concordant with those of postoperative high-resolution CT as determined by a blinded neuroradiologist., Conclusions: Iso-C intraoperative fluoroscopy is an accurate and rapid way to perform CT-quality image-guided navigation in cervical spinal surgery. In most cases, it obviates the need for postoperative imaging.

Study Design: In a clinical retrospective study, the authors review long-term results of occipitocervical fusion using a wide diameter, contoured, threaded Steinmann pin., Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of occipitocervical fusion using this technique in a variety of abnormalities including rheumatoid arthritis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. The various surgical techniques and hardware developed for occipitocervical fusion have been associated with mixed results, particularly in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or basilar invagination., Methods: Thirty-nine patients with occipitocervical instability were internally fixed with a wide diameter, contoured, threaded Steinmann pin wired to the occiput and cervical laminae or facets. Fusion was facilitated using autologous iliac crest bone graft and a cervical orthosis. Instability resulted from rheumatoid arthritis (n = 12), congenital anomalies (n = 12), trauma (n = 10), tumor (n = 4), or osteogenesis imperfecta (n = 1). Fifteen patients had radiographic evidence of basilar invagination. Long-term outcome (mean follow-up period, 38.9 months; range, 12-78 months) was based on clinical and radiographic review., Results: Thirty-seven patients (97%) had a stable postoperative occipitocervical construct: there were 35 osseous unions, two fibrous unions, and one nonunion. There was on postoperative death from pulmonary complications. No patient developed evidence of new, recurrent, or progressive basilar invagination., Conclusion: The authors concluded that rigid segmental fixation of the craniovertebral junction using a wide diameter, contoured, threaded Steinmann pin and supplemental autograft creates excellent fusion with minimal complications. This technique is appropriate for a variety of abnormalities including rheumatoid arthritis.

This report details our recent experience with the surgical treatment of complex hangman's fractures after failure of closed reduction and immobilization in external orthosis. We have successfully treated hangman's fractures in 5 patients with anterior Caspar plate stabilization and C2-C3 interbody fusion. The specific anatomical features of these fractures were complex, rendering the spines of the patients highly unstable. The patients were considered surgical candidates when reduction could not be achieved or maintained with axial traction or halo immobilization. Each patient underwent anterior C2-C3 interbody bone fusion and Caspar plating from C2 to C3. All patients achieved adequate intraoperative reduction and were immobilized postoperatively with a halo vest. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 28 months and provided a 100% fusion rate with no complications related to plating or nonunion. Our initial experience indicates that anterior C2-C3 interbody bone fusion and Caspar plate fixation is a suitable treatment option for patients with complex hangman's fractures who are not successfully managed nonoperatively.