Search

Objectives: To quantify the rate of unstable injuries detected by MRI missed on CT in blunt cervical spine (CS) trauma patients and assess the utility of MRI in CS clearance., Methods: We undertook a systematic review of worldwide evidence across five major medical databases and performed a meta-analysis. Studies were included if they reported the number of unstable injuries or gave enough details for inference. Variables assessed included severity, CT/MRI specifications, imaging timing, and outcome/follow-up. Pooled incidences of unstable injury on follow-up weighted by inverse-of-variance among all included and obtunded or alert patients were reported., Results: Of 428 unique citations, 23 proved eligible, with 5,286 patients found, and 16 unstable injuries reported in five studies. The overall pooled incidence is 0.0029 %. Among studies reporting only obtunded patients, the pooled incidence is 0.017 %. In alert patients, the incidence is 0.011 %. All reported positive findings were critically reviewed, and only 11 could be considered truly unstable., Conclusions: There is significant heterogeneity in the literature regarding the use of imaging after a negative CT. The finding rate on MRI for unstable injury is extremely low in obtunded and alert patients. Although MRI is frequently performed, its utility and cost-effectiveness needs further study., Key Points: • There were 16 unstable injuries on follow-up MRI among 5286 patients. • The positive finding rate among obtunded patients was 0.12 %. • The positive finding rate among alert, awake patients was 0.72 %. • MRI has a high false-positive rate; its utility mandates further studies. • The use and role of "confirmatory" tests shows wide variations.

Study Design: Retrospective database analysis., Objective: To determine C2 fracture patterns associated with vertebral artery injury (VAI) as assessed by computed tomography angiography., Summary of Background Data: The incidence of C2 fracture hospitalizations has increased significantly in the last decade. The vertebral arteries are susceptible to injury as each courses through the C2 transverse foramen. Early screening for VAI to institute antithrombotic treatment is critical to prevent ischemic neurological sequelae. Imaging-based fracture classification schemes to determine which patterns are predictors of VAI in isolated C2 fractures using computed tomography angiography have not been described., Methods: Cervical spine computed tomographic (CT) scans at a level I trauma center were reviewed for isolated C2 fractures from 2004 to 2014 under institutional board review approval. Exclusion criteria included penetrating injury or additional cervical/occipital fractures. Fractures were classified using multiplanar CT scans into type I/II/IIa/III spondylolisthesis, type I/IIA/IIB/IIC/III dens, transverse foramen (displacement/comminution/intraforaminal fragments), and miscellaneous vertebral body fractures. Corresponding CT angiograms were assessed for VAI on the basis of the Denver grading criteria. Fisher exact test and Student t test were performed to determine predictors of VAI on the basis of fracture type., Results: Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Fracture pattern analysis revealed that the majority were dens fractures (50.8%) and traumatic spondylolisthesis (41.8%); 29.9% had miscellaneous coronal/sagittal fractures and 22.4% were a combination.VAI was identified in 37.3% of patients with isolated C2 fractures, and 88% of patients had transverse foramen involvement. Fracture patterns significantly associated with VAI were type III dens and transverse foramen fractures with intraforaminal fragments, with or without comminution., Conclusion: The C2 fracture pattern most associated with VAI was comminuted transverse foramen fracture with intraforaminal fragments. Transverse foramen fracture alone was not found to be significant. These results help stratify patients with isolated C2 fractures who are at high VAI risk and should be further evaluated with computed tomography angiography., Level of Evidence: 3.

Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction., Objective: To determine the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial comparing the clinical effectiveness and costs of ventral vs dorsal decompression with fusion surgery for treating CSM., Methods: A nonrandomized, prospective, clinical pilot trial was conducted. Patients ages 40 to 85 years with degenerative CSM were enrolled at 7 sites over 2 years (2007-2009). Outcome assessments were obtained preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. A hospital-based economic analysis used costs derived from hospital charges and Medicare cost-to-charge ratios., Results: The pilot study enrolled 50 patients. Twenty-eight were treated with ventral fusion surgery and 22 with dorsal fusion surgery. The average age was 61.6 years. Baseline demographics and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) scores were comparable between groups; however, dorsal surgery patients had significantly more severe myelopathy (P<.01). Comprehensive 1-year follow-up was obtained in 46 of 50 patients (92%). Greater HR-QOL improvement (Short-Form 36 Physical Component Summary) was observed after ventral surgery (P=.05). The complication rate (16.6% overall) was comparable between groups. Significant improvement in the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale score was observed in both groups (P<.01). Dorsal fusion surgery had significantly greater mean hospital costs ($29 465 vs $19 245; P<.01) and longer average length of hospital stay (4.0 vs 2.6 days; P<.01) compared with ventral fusion surgery., Conclusion: Surgery for treating CSM was followed by significant improvement in disease-specific symptoms and in HR-QOL. Greater improvement in HR-QOL was observed after ventral surgery. Dorsal fusion surgery was associated with longer length of hospital stay and higher hospital costs. The pilot study demonstrated feasibility for a larger randomized clinical trial., (Copyright (C) by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons)

Objective: Patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease may require future surgery for disease progression. We investigated factors related to the rate of additional cervical spine surgery, the associated length of stay, and hospital charges., Methods: The was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study using Washington state's 1998 to 2002 state inpatient databases and International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9) codes to analyze patients undergoing degenerative cervical spine surgery. Multivariate Poisson regression to identify patient and surgical factors associated with reoperation for degenerative cervical spine disease was used. Multivariate linear regressions to identify factors associated with length of stay and hospital charges adjusted for age, sex, year of surgery, primary diagnosis, payment type, discharge status, and comorbidities were also used., Results: A total of 12,338 patients underwent initial cervical spine surgeries from 1998 to 2002; the mean follow-up duration was 2.3 years, and 688 patients (5.6%) underwent a reoperation (2.5% per year). Higher reoperation rates were independently associated with younger patients (P < 0.001) and a primary diagnosis of disc herniation with myelopathy (P = 0.011). Ventral surgery (P < 0.001) and fusion (P < 0.001) were both associated with lower rates of reoperation; however, a high correlation (Spearman's rho = 0.82; P < 0.001) made it impossible to determine which factor was dominant. Longer length of stay was independently associated with nonventral approaches (+1.0 day; P < 0.001) and fusion surgery (+0.8 day; P < 0.001). Greater hospital charges were independently associated with nonventral approaches (+$2900; P < 0.001) and fusion surgery (+$9600; P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Patients undergoing surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease undergo reoperations at the rate of 2.5% per year. An initial ventral approach and/or fusion seem to be associated with lower reoperation rates. An initial nonventral approach and fusion were more expensive.

Cervical radiculopathy is a common condition that usually results from compression and inflammation of the cervical nerve root or roots in the region of the neural foramen. It is frequently caused by cervical disc herniation and cervical spondylosis. The diagnosis can be established by history and physical examination, but care should be taken, as diagnoses can mimic or coexist with cervical radiculopathy, such as entrapment neuropathies. The pathophysiology, presentation, and clinical evaluation of cervical radiculopathy are discussed.