Search

Studies have investigated PAX1 and SEPT methylation were closely associated with cervical cancer. For this study, we verified the expressions of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation in 236 hrHPV women cervical exfoliated cells by using quantitative methylation-specific PCR and we further explored their diagnostic value in cervical (pre)cancer detection. Our results identified that the methylation rates and levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 increased with cervical lesion severity. For a diagnosis of cervical (pre)cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) of PAX1 methylation was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71–0.83) and the AUC of SEPT9 methylation was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81∼0.90). Analyses of the PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation statuses alone or combined with commonly used tests can efficiently identify cervical (pre)cancer. In particular, SEPT9 methylation might serve as an effective and powerful biomarker for the diagnosis of cervical (pre)cancer and as an alternative triage test in HPV-based cervical (pre)cancer screening programs. What is already known on this subject? This subject showed that PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation were closely associated with cervical cancer. The methylation rates and levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 increased with cervical lesion severity and reached a peak in cervical cancer exfoliated cells. We further assessed the diagnostic performances of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation in cervical cancer screening. In detecting cervical (pre)cancer, the sensitivity values of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation were up to 61.18% and 82.35%, respectively, and the specificity values of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation were up to 95.36% and 86.75%, respectively. Moreover, the ROC curve analysis showed AUC values of 0.77 for PAX1 methylation and 0.86 for SEPT9 methylation tests, which were significantly superior to other commonly used tests. These findings suggest that PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation detection may have great clinical potential in cervical cancer screening. What the results of this study add? The rates and levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 methylation increased with the severity of the cervical lesions. For a diagnosis of cervical (pre)cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) of PAX1 methylation was 0.77 (95% CI 0.71–0.83), and the sensitivity and specificity values were 61.18% and 95.36%, respectively. The AUC value of the SEPT9 methylation was 0.86 (95% CI 0.81 ∼ 0.90), and the sensitivity and specificity values were 82.35% and 86.75%, respectively. Compared with the various tests we conducted, the PAX1 methylation showed the highest specificity (95.36%), and the SEPT9 methylation demonstrated the highest accuracy(86.00%). What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The methylation levels of PAX1 and SEPT9 had a certain predictive effect on the severity of cervical lesions in hrHPV-positive women. In addition, SEPT9 methylation analysis performs better than PAX1 methylation analysis and commonly used tests in cervical exfoliated cells for detecting cervical (pre)cancer in hrHPV-positive women. SEPT9 methylation analysis merits consideration as an effective and objective, alternative triage test in HPV-based cervical (pre)cancer screening programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aberrant Septin9 methylation in cervical cancer has been rarely studied. We aimed to identify its diagnostic value in cervical cancer using cervical scrapings, and its predictive potential in plasma for pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer. The statuses of methylated Septin9 in fresh cervical lesions and cervical scrapings were first evaluated by using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Subsequently, the relationship between Septin9 methylation in 113 plasma samples and pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer was evaluated. Methylated Septin9 was detected in all cancerous tissues, but not in cervicitis. The degrees of Septin9 methylation increased with growing severity of cervical lesions in cervical scrapings. The sensitivity of methylated Septin9 was lower than that of cytology, while it yielded a high specificity and area under the curve in detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or cervical cancer; and when Septin9 methylation combined with HPV16/18 genotyping, the sensitivity would increase from 70.42% to 82.39%. Plasma-based Septin9 methylation had a high discriminatory power in predicting pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer, with an optimal specificity of 81.48%. In conclusion, we demonstrated methylated Septin9 to be an innovative diagnostic biomarker for cervical cancer and its non-invasive predictive potential in plasma for pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer. What is already known on this subject? The occurrence of cervical cancer is related to Septin9 methylation. In fresh specimens and cervical scrapings, we found the degrees of methylated Septin9 increased with growing severity of cervical lesions. Compared with HPV16/18 genotyping and cytological detection, Septin9 methylation had a better specificity and AUC in detecting ≥ HSIL. Furthermore, plasma-based Septin9 methylation also had a high specificity for pelvic lymphatic metastasis prediction. What the results of this study add? Methylation analysis of Septin9 indicated a similar sensitivity, specificity and AUC in detecting ≥ HSIL, relative to HPV16/18 genotyping. Compared with cytological method, Septin9 methylation also yielded a higher specificity and AUC in detecting ≥ HSIL. And we also found plasma-based Septin9 methylation had a high discriminatory power in predicting pelvic nodal metastasis of cervical cancer, with an optimal specificity of 81.48%; additionally an increasing sensitivity from 50% to nearly 80% was found when combined with SCCAg. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between Septin9 methylation and cervical cancer, and to explore the value of methylated Septin9 in the detection of cervical (pre)cancerous lesions. Moreover, we would explore plasma-based ctDNA biomarkers for pelvic lymphatic metastasis prediction of cervical cancer, to improve non-invasive predictive accuracy of pelvic nodal metastasis and reduce the complications caused by pelvic lymphadenectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To explore the diagnostic value of FAM19A4 methylation in high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV)-positive cervical samples from Chinese women for estimating cervical cancer or its precancerous lesions.Methods: Cervical samples from 215 women infected with high-risk HPV were collected by smear testing. We purposely chose 61 patients with cervical cancer, 57 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), 31 with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 66 without cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after histological confirmation. Taqman probe-based quantitative PCR (qPCR) was utilized to detect the methylation status of FAM19A4 in the cervical samples and further evaluate the use of this gene in the diagnosis of cervical cancer.Results: (1) An increasing level of FAM19A4 methylation was detected with increasing progression of cervical lesions, with methylation rates of 10.61%(7/66), 35.48%(11/31), 56.14%(32/57) and 93.44%(57/61) in no CIN, LSIL, HSIL and cervical carcinoma samples respectively. (2) In all hrHPV-positive samples, the levels of FAM19A4 methylation in HPV16/18 groups were higher than that in 12 other hrHPV groups (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between two groups after grouping cervical lesions into cervical cancer, HSIL, LSIL and no CIN groups (P>0.05). (3)There were no significant differences of FAM19A4 methylation in different clinicopathological parameters of cervical cancer. (4) Though the sensitivity of FAM19A4 methylation test was inferior to that of cytology and FAM19A4 combining with HPV16/18 genotyping, but showed the best specificity with 81.44% both for detection HSIL alone and ≥ HSIL, with favorable youden index (YI) and area under curve (AUC).Conclusion: FAM19A4 is a specific biomarker of cancerous lesions of the cervix. FAM19A4 methylation analysis may serve as an auxiliary screening method for diagnosis of cervical (pre)cancer. However, in consideration of the limitations of this retrospective study, prospective population-based studies are necessary for further confirmation of the diagnostic value of FAM19A4 methylation for detection of cervical (pre)cancer in Chinese women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]