Search

Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis relies on clinical symptoms complemented with biological biomarkers, the Amyloid Tau Neurodegeneration (ATN) framework. Small non-coding RNA (sncRNA) in the blood have emerged as potential predictors of AD. We identified sncRNA signatures specific to ATN and AD, and evaluated both their contribution to improving AD conversion prediction beyond ATN alone. Methods: This nested case–control study was conducted within the ACE cohort and included MCI patients matched by sex. Patients free of type 2 diabetes underwent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma collection and were followed-up for a median of 2.45-years. Plasma sncRNAs were profiled using small RNA-sequencing. Conditional logistic and Cox regression analyses with elastic net penalties were performed to identify sncRNA signatures for A+(T|N)+ and AD. Weighted scores were computed using cross-validation, and the association of these scores with AD risk was assessed using multivariable Cox regression models. Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopaedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of the identified signatures were performed. Results: The study sample consisted of 192 patients, including 96 A+(T|N)+ and 96 A-T-N- patients. We constructed a classification model based on a 6-miRNAs signature for ATN. The model could classify MCI patients into A-T-N- and A+(T|N)+ groups with an area under the curve of 0.7335 (95% CI, 0.7327 to 0.7342). However, the addition of the model to conventional risk factors did not improve the prediction of AD beyond the conventional model plus ATN status (C-statistic: 0.805 [95% CI, 0.758 to 0.852] compared to 0.829 [95% CI, 0.786, 0.872]). The AD-related 15-sncRNAs signature exhibited better predictive performance than the conventional model plus ATN status (C-statistic: 0.849 [95% CI, 0.808 to 0.890]). When ATN was included in this model, the prediction further improved to 0.875 (95% CI, 0.840 to 0.910). The miRNA-target interaction network and functional analysis, including GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, suggested that the miRNAs in both signatures are involved in neuronal pathways associated with AD. Conclusions: The AD-related sncRNA signature holds promise in predicting AD conversion, providing insights into early AD development and potential targets for prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) increasingly incorporates CSF biomarkers. However, due to the intrinsic variability of the immunodetection techniques used to measure these biomarkers, establishing in-house cutoffs defining the positivity/negativity of CSF biomarkers is recommended. However, the cutoffs currently published are usually reported by using cross-sectional datasets, not providing evidence about its intrinsic prognostic value when applied to real-world memory clinic cases. Methods: We quantified CSF Aβ1-42, Aβ1-40, t-Tau, and p181Tau with standard INNOTEST® ELISA and Lumipulse G® chemiluminescence enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA) performed on the automated Lumipulse G600II. Determination of cutoffs included patients clinically diagnosed with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 37) and subjective cognitive decline subjects (SCD, n = 45), cognitively stable for 3 years and with no evidence of brain amyloidosis in 18F-Florbetaben-labeled positron emission tomography (FBB-PET). To compare both methods, a subset of samples for Aβ1-42 (n = 519), t-Tau (n = 399), p181Tau (n = 77), and Aβ1-40 (n = 44) was analyzed. Kappa agreement of single biomarkers and Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 was evaluated in an independent group of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia patients (n = 68). Next, established cutoffs were applied to a large real-world cohort of MCI subjects with follow-up data available (n = 647). Results: Cutoff values of Aβ1-42 and t-Tau were higher for CLEIA than for ELISA and similar for p181Tau. Spearman coefficients ranged between 0.81 for Aβ1-40 and 0.96 for p181TAU. Passing–Bablok analysis showed a systematic and proportional difference for all biomarkers but only systematic for Aβ1-40. Bland–Altman analysis showed an average difference between methods in favor of CLEIA. Kappa agreement for single biomarkers was good but lower for the Aβ1-42/Aβ1-40 ratio. Using the calculated cutoffs, we were able to stratify MCI subjects into four AT(N) categories. Kaplan–Meier analyses of AT(N) categories demonstrated gradual and differential dementia conversion rates (p = 9.815−27). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models corroborated these findings, demonstrating that the proposed AT(N) classifier has prognostic value. AT(N) categories are only modestly influenced by other known factors associated with disease progression. Conclusions: We established CLEIA and ELISA internal cutoffs to discriminate AD patients from amyloid-negative SCD individuals. The results obtained by both methods are not interchangeable but show good agreement. CLEIA is a good and faster alternative to manual ELISA for providing AT(N) classification of our patients. AT(N) categories have an impact on disease progression. AT(N) classifiers increase the certainty of the MCI prognosis, which can be instrumental in managing real-world MCI subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]