Charidimou A, Boulouis G, Frosch MP, Baron JC, Pasi M, Albucher JF, Banerjee G, Barbato C, Bonneville F, Brandner S, Calviere L, Caparros F, Casolla B, Cordonnier C, Delisle MB, Deramecourt V, Dichgans M, Gokcal E, Herms J, Hernandez-Guillamon M, Jäger HR, Jaunmuktane Z, Linn J, Martinez-Ramirez S, Martínez-Sáez E, Mawrin C, Montaner J, Moulin S, Olivot JM, Piazza F, Puy L, Raposo N, Rodrigues MA, Roeber S, Romero JR, Samarasekera N, Schneider JA, Schreiber S, Schreiber F, Schwall C, Smith C, Szalardy L, Varlet P, Viguier A, Wardlaw JM, Warren A, Wollenweber FA, Zedde M, van Buchem MA, Gurol ME, Viswanathan A, Al-Shahi Salman R, Smith EE, Werring DJ, and Greenberg SM
Background: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is an age-related small vessel disease, characterised pathologically by progressive deposition of amyloid β in the cerebrovascular wall. The Boston criteria are used worldwide for the in-vivo diagnosis of CAA but have not been updated since 2010, before the emergence of additional MRI markers. We report an international collaborative study aiming to update and externally validate the Boston diagnostic criteria across the full spectrum of clinical CAA presentations., Methods: In this multicentre, hospital-based, retrospective, MRI and neuropathology diagnostic accuracy study, we did a retrospective analysis of clinical, radiological, and histopathological data available to sites participating in the International CAA Association to formulate updated Boston criteria and establish their diagnostic accuracy across different populations and clinical presentations. Ten North American and European academic medical centres identified patients aged 50 years and older with potential CAA-related clinical presentations (ie, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, cognitive impairment, or transient focal neurological episodes), available brain MRI, and histopathological assessment for CAA diagnosis. MRI scans were centrally rated at Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, USA) for haemorrhagic and non-haemorrhagic CAA markers, and brain tissue samples were rated by neuropathologists at the contributing sites. We derived the Boston criteria version 2.0 (v2.0) by selecting MRI features to optimise diagnostic specificity and sensitivity in a prespecified derivation cohort (Boston cases 1994-2012, n=159), then externally validated the criteria in a prespecified temporal validation cohort (Boston cases 2012-18, n=59) and a geographical validation cohort (non-Boston cases 2004-18; n=123), comparing accuracy of the new criteria to the currently used modified Boston criteria with histopathological assessment of CAA as the diagnostic standard. We also assessed performance of the v2.0 criteria in patients across all cohorts who had the diagnostic gold standard of brain autopsy., Findings: The study protocol was finalised on Jan 15, 2017, patient identification was completed on Dec 31, 2018, and imaging analyses were completed on Sept 30, 2019. Of 401 potentially eligible patients presenting to Massachusetts General Hospital, 218 were eligible to be included in the analysis; of 160 patient datasets from other centres, 123 were included. Using the derivation cohort, we derived provisional criteria for probable CAA requiring the presence of at least two strictly lobar haemorrhagic lesions (ie, intracerebral haemorrhages, cerebral microbleeds, or foci of cortical superficial siderosis) or at least one strictly lobar haemorrhagic lesion and at least one white matter characteristic (ie, severe visible perivascular spaces in centrum semiovale or white matter hyperintensities in a multispot pattern). The sensitivity and specificity of these criteria were 74·8% (95% CI 65·4-82·7) and 84·6% (71·9-93·1) in the derivation cohort, 92·5% (79·6-98·4) and 89·5% (66·9-98·7) in the temporal validation cohort, 80·2% (70·8-87·6) and 81·5% (61·9-93·7) in the geographical validation cohort, and 74·5% (65·4-82·4) and 95·0% (83·1-99·4) in all patients who had autopsy as the diagnostic standard. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0·797 (0·732-0·861) in the derivation cohort, 0·910 (0·828-0·992) in the temporal validation cohort, 0·808 (0·724-0·893) in the geographical validation cohort, and 0·848 (0·794-0·901) in patients who had autopsy as the diagnostic standard. The v2.0 Boston criteria for probable CAA had superior accuracy to the current Boston criteria (sensitivity 64·5% [54·9-73·4]; specificity 95·0% [83·1-99·4]; AUC 0·798 [0·741-0854]; p=0·0005 for comparison of AUC) across all individuals who had autopsy as the diagnostic standard., Interpretation: The Boston criteria v2.0 incorporate emerging MRI markers of CAA to enhance sensitivity without compromising their specificity in our cohorts of patients aged 50 years and older presenting with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, cognitive impairment, or transient focal neurological episodes. Future studies will be needed to determine generalisability of the v.2.0 criteria across the full range of patients and clinical presentations., Funding: US National Institutes of Health (R01 AG26484)., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AC reports receiving funding from the Bodossaki Foundation and the Frechette Family Foundation and consulting fees from Imperative Care. MPF reports receiving funding from Biogen and Voyager Therapeutics. Gba reports receiving funding from the Rosetrees Trust, Alzheimer's Research UK, NIHR, and the Stroke Association. CC reports receiving funding from the French Ministry of Health and honoraria from Amgen, and participating in data safety monitoring, advisory, or steering committees for the University of Glasgow, University of Caen, Op2Lysis, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Biogen. MD reports receiving funding from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under Germany's Excellence Strategy within the framework of the Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology and the Vascular Dementia Research Foundation. JH reports receiving funding from the German Research Foundation and German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases and tissue from Neurobiobank Munich. JL reports serving on a serving on an advisory board for Biogen and Mediaire. LP reports receiving honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo Ireland. FP reports receiving funding from the Alzheimer's Association (AARG-18-561699), participation on an Advisory Board for Roche, and leadership of the CAA Study Group of the Italia Society of Neurology-Dementia and the iCAB International Network. SR reports receiving funding from the German Research Foundation and brain tissue from Neurobiobank Munich. MAR reports receiving funding from the Wellcome Trust. JAS reports receiving funding from the US National Institutes of Health, consulting fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, and Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, honoraria from Weil Cornell University, payment for expert testimony from the National Hockey League, support for travel from the US National Institutes for Health, serving on safety monitoring or advisory boards for the Framingham Heart Study, DISCOVERY, University of Kansas, Boston University, and University of California Irvine, and serving in leadership positions for the Alzheimer's Association and Foundation Alzheimer France. CSm reports receiving funding from the Medical Research Council UK. LS reports receiving funding from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Ministry for Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the source of the National Research. JMW reports receiving funding from the UK Dementia Research Institute funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Society, and Alzheimer's Research UK, and a leadership role for the European Stroke Organization SVD Guidelines. FAW reports receiving honoraria from Alexion Pharm. MEG reports receiving funding from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, and Boston Scientific. AV reports receiving funding from the US National Institutes of Health and consulting fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Biogen Pharmaceuticals. RA-SS reports receiving funding from the UK Medical Research Council and the Stroke Association. EES reports receiving funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Brain Canada, and Biogen, and consulting fees from Biogen and Eli Lily. DJW reports receiving consulting fees from Alnylam and Novo Nordisk, honoraria from Bayer and Alexion, participation on a safety monitoring board for the OXHARP study, and serving in leadership for the British Association of Stroke Physicians. SMG reports receiving funding from the US National Institutes of Health, royalties from Up-To-Date, consulting fees from Eli Lily, and serving on data safety monitoring committees for Washington University, Bayer, Biogen, and Roche. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)