Search

Background: Cervical cerclage, cervical pessary, and vaginal progesterone have each been shown to reduce preterm birth (PTB) in high-risk women, but to our knowledge, there has been no randomised comparison of the 3 interventions. The SuPPoRT "Stitch, Pessary, or Progesterone Randomised Trial" was designed to compare the rate of PTB <37 weeks between each intervention in women who develop a short cervix in pregnancy., Methods and Findings: SuPPoRT was a multicentre, open label 3-arm randomised controlled trial designed to demonstrate equivalence (equivalence margin 20%) conducted from 1 July 2015 to 1 July 2021 in 19 obstetric units in the United Kingdom. Asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies with transvaginal ultrasound cervical lengths measuring <25 mm between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation were eligible for randomisation (1:1:1) to receive either vaginal cervical cerclage (n = 128), cervical pessary (n = 126), or vaginal progesterone (n = 132). Minimisation variables were gestation at recruitment, body mass index (BMI), and risk factor for PTB. The primary outcome was PTB <37 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included PTB <34 weeks', <30 weeks', and adverse perinatal outcome. Analysis was by intention to treat. A total of 386 pregnant women between 14+0 and 23+6 weeks' gestation with a cervical length <25 mm were randomised to one of the 3 interventions. Of these women, 67% were of white ethnicity, 18% black ethnicity, and 7.5% Asian ethnicity. Mean BMI was 25.6. Over 85% of women had prior risk factors for PTB; 39.1% had experienced a spontaneous PTB or midtrimester loss (>14 weeks gestation); and 45.8% had prior cervical surgery. Data from 381 women were available for outcome analysis. Using binary regression, randomised therapies (cerclage versus pessary versus vaginal progesterone) were found to have similar effects on the primary outcome PTB <37 weeks (39/127 versus 38/122 versus 32/132, p = 0.4, cerclage versus pessary risk difference (RD) -0.7% [-12.1 to 10.7], cerclage versus progesterone RD 6.2% [-5.0 to 17.0], and progesterone versus pessary RD -6.9% [-17.9 to 4.1]). Similarly, no difference was seen for PTB <34 and 30 weeks, nor adverse perinatal outcome. There were some differences in the mild side effect profile between interventions (vaginal discharge and bleeding) and women randomised to progesterone reported more severe abdominal pain. A small proportion of women did not receive the intervention as per protocol; however, per-protocol and as-treated analyses showed similar results. The main study limitation was that the trial was underpowered for neonatal outcomes and was stopped early due to the COVID-19 pandemic., Conclusions: In this study, we found that for women who develop a short cervix, cerclage, pessary, and vaginal progesterone were equally efficacious at preventing PTB, as judged with a 20% equivalence margin. Commencing with any of the therapies would be reasonable clinical management. These results can be used as a counselling tool for clinicians when managing women with a short cervix., Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials register. EudraCT Number: 2015-000456-15, clinicaltrialsregister.eu., ISRCTN Registry: ISRCTN13364447, isrctn.com., Competing Interests: AS is a member of PLOS Medicine’s editorial board. The authors have declared that no other competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Hezelgrave et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

Objective: To determine the performance of the predictive markers of spontaneous preterm birth, cervicovaginal quantitative fetal fibronectin (fFN) and cervical length, in asymptomatic high-risk women with transabdominal, history-indicated or ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage., Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of asymptomatic high-risk women with cervical cerclage and no other prophylactic intervention (including progesterone), who attended the preterm birth clinic at a central London teaching hospital between October 2010 and September 2016. Women had either transabdominal cerclage, placed prior to conception, history-indicated cerclage, placed before 14 weeks' gestation, or ultrasound-indicated cerclage for a short cervix (< 25 mm), placed before 24 weeks. All women underwent serial cervical length assessment on transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester (16-28 weeks), and quantitative fFN testing from 18 weeks onward. Test performance was analyzed for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth before 30 weeks (cerclage failure), 34 weeks and 37 weeks, using receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC)-curve analysis., Results: Overall, 181 women were included in the analysis. Cervical length and fFN were strong predictors of spontaneous preterm birth before 30 weeks in women with cerclage, with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.94) and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.92), respectively. Cervical length was a better predictor of preterm birth before 30 weeks in women with history-indicated compared to those with ultrasound-indicated cerclage, although both showed clinical utility (AUC, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-1.00) vs 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66-0.91); P = 0.01). Quantitative fFN was a strong predictor of spontaneous preterm birth before 30 weeks in women with history-indicated cerclage (AUC, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.75-1.00)) and retained clinical utility in those with ultrasound-indicated cerclage (AUC, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.64-0.89)). There were no spontaneous deliveries before 34 weeks in women with a transabdominal cerclage, so AUC was not calculated. Delivery was delayed significantly in this group (P < 0.01)., Conclusions: Cervical length and quantitative fFN retain clinical utility for the prediction of spontaneous preterm birth in women with cervical cerclage, and prediction is best in women with a history-indicated stitch. These tests can be relied upon to discriminate risk and have utility when planning clinical management with regard to treatment failure. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology., (© 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.)

Background: Clinically, once a woman has been identified as being at risk of spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) due to a short cervical length, a decision regarding prophylactic treatment must be made. Three interventions have the potential to improve outcomes: cervical cerclage (stitch), vaginal progesterone and cervical pessary. Each has been shown to have similar benefit in reduction of sPTB, but there have been no randomised control trials (RCTs) to compare them., Methods: This open label multi-centre UK RCT trial, will evaluate whether the three interventions are equally efficacious to prevent premature birth in women who develop a short cervix (<25 mm on transvaginal ultrasound). Participants will be asymptomatic and between 14 +0 and 23 +6 weeks' gestation in singleton pregnancies. Eligible women will be randomised to cervical cerclage, Arabin pessary or vaginal progesterone (200 mg once daily) (n = 170 women per group). The obstetric endpoints are premature birth rate <37 weeks' of gestation (primary), 34 weeks and 30 weeks (secondary outcomes) and short-term neonatal outcomes (a composite of death and major morbidity). It will also explore whether intervention success can be predicted by pre-intervention biomarker status., Discussion: Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality and a short cervix is a useful way of identifying those most at risk. However, best management of these women has presented a clinical conundrum for decades. Given the promise offered by cerclage, Arabin pessary and vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in individual trials, direct comparison of these prophylactic interventions is now essential to establish whether one treatment is superior. If, as we hypothesise, the three interventions are equally efficacious, this study will empower women to make a choice of treatments based on personal preference and quality of life issues also explored by the study. Our exploratory analysis into whether the response to intervention is related to the pre-intervention biomarker status further our understanding of the pathophysiology of spontaneous preterm birth and help focus future research questions., Trial Registration: EudraCT Number: 2015-000456-15 . Registered 11th March 2015.