Search

Objectives: This study aimed to determine whether parent ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptom severity or externalizing symptoms (EXT) or internalizing symptoms (INT) moderate response to stimulants (STIM) and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (A2As) in preschool ADHD., Methods: Health records for children treated with medication for ADHD and with parent rating scale data available (N = 309; age <72 months) were reviewed at 7 Developmental-Behavioral Pediatric Research Network sites. Severity of ADHD was defined as the number of ADHD symptoms occurring often or very often on DSM-IV-based parent rating scales. EXT or INT from standardized rating scales were categorized as T score <60, 60 to <70, or ≥70. Ordinal logistic regression models predicting response to medication were calculated., Results: The median (interquartile range) age at ADHD diagnosis was 59 (54-65) months. One hundred eighty-three participants had ADHD symptom severity, and 195 had EXT or INT data. ADHD severity was not associated with medication response. Both EXT and INT were associated with medication response but with significant medication class by EXT/INT interactions. Children with higher EXT were less likely to respond to STIM, with percentage of nonresponders for T-score categories <60, 60 to <70, and ≥70 being 3.6%, 25.7%, and 33.3% (p = 0.016) and, for A2As, being 60%, 50%, and 33.3% (p = 0.55), respectively. A similar pattern was observed for INT categories: STIM 19.4%, 22.5%, and 50.0% (p = 0.002) and A2As 42.3%, 30%, and 42.3% (p = 0.48), respectively., Conclusion: For preschool ADHD, low ratings of EXT or INT are associated with a high likelihood of response to STIM. By contrast, response rates to STIM and A2As are more similar for children with high levels of EXT or INT., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To characterize and compare the type and frequency of a range of common and uncommon adverse effects (AEs) associated with α-2 adrenergic agonist (A2A) and stimulant treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder at preschool-age as well as to evaluate the impact of age on common AEs., Study Design: This was a retrospective electronic medical record review of children <72 months of age (n = 497) evaluated at outpatient developmental-behavioral pediatric practices at 7 US academic medical centers within the Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network. Data on AEs were abstracted for children who had treatment initiated by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician with an A2A or stimulant medication between January 2013 and July 2017; follow-up was complete by February 2019., Results: A2A and stimulants had distinctive AE profiles. A2A compared with stimulants had a greater proportion with daytime sleepiness and headaches; stimulants had significantly greater proportions for most other AE, including moodiness/irritability, difficulty with sleep, appetite suppression, stomachaches, skin picking/repetitive behaviors, withdrawn behavior, and weight loss. Younger age was associated with disruptive behavior and difficulty with sleep., Conclusions: Stimulants had a greater rate of most AEs compared with A2A. AE profiles, together with efficacy, should inform clinical decision-making. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to fully compare efficacy and AE profiles of A2A and stimulants., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To determine whether conditions coexisting with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in preschool-age children are associated with choice of stimulants or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (A2As) and/or likelihood of improvement in ADHD symptoms. Methods: A retrospective electronic health record review of 497 children from 7 Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network (DBPNet) sites. Children were <72 months when treated with medication for ADHD from January 1, 2013 to July 1, 2017. We abstracted coexisting conditions, initial medication prescribed, and whether the medication was associated with improvement in symptoms. Analysis of improvement was adjusted for clustering by clinician and site. Results: The median (interquartile range) child age at the time of initiation of ADHD medication was 62 (54-67) months. The most common coexisting conditions included language disorders (40%), sleep disorders (28%), disruptive behavior disorders (22.7%), autism spectrum disorder (ASD; 21.8%), and motor disorders (19.9%). No coexisting conditions were present in 17.1%; 1 in 36.8%, 2 in 26.8%, and ≥3 in 19.3%. Stimulants were initially prescribed for 322 (64.8%) and A2A for 175 (35.2%) children. Children prescribed stimulants were more likely to have no coexisting conditions than those prescribed A2A (22.3% vs. 7.4%; p  < 0.001). Coexisting ASD and sleep disorder were associated with increased likelihood of starting A2As versus stimulants ( p  < 0.0005; p  = 0.002). The association between medication treatment and improvement varied by number of coexisting conditions for 0, 1, 2, or ≥3, respectively (84.7%, 73.8%, 72.9%, 64.6%; p  = 0.031). Children with ≥3 coexisting conditions were less likely to respond to stimulants than children with no coexisting conditions (67.4% vs. 79.9%; p  = 0.037). Conclusions: Among preschool-age children with ADHD, those with ≥3 coexisting conditions were less likely to respond to stimulants than those with no coexisting conditions. This was not found for A2A, but further research is needed as very few children with no coexisting conditions were treated with A2A.

Objective: To understand developmental-behavioral pediatricians' (DBPs') use of clinic versus telephone encounters for preschool attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) medication management. Understanding use of telephone encounters for pharmacologic management of ADHD in preschoolers may inform care for children with ADHD., Methods: DBP investigators within Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network abstracted data from medical records of 503 children aged younger than 72 months treated for ADHD with medication by a DBP clinician between January 1, 2013, and July 1, 2017, across 7 sites. We abstracted data about medication treatment episodes (defined as start and end/change of a specific type, dose, and frequency of ADHD medication) and encounter type (clinic vs telephone). We present descriptive statistics related to encounter types and χ2 analyses to compare frequencies across reasons for the end of treatment episode and across sites., Results: The study included 503 participants with a total of 1734 treatment episodes. The initial medication was started via a clinic encounter 85.9% of the time and via telephone encounters 14.1% of the time. When evaluating reasons for end of treatment episode, decreases in dose/frequency of medication were less common for clinic versus telephone encounters (27% vs 73%; p < 0.001) and adding an additional medication was more common at clinic versus telephone encounters (64% vs 36% p < 0.001). Sites varied significantly in frequency of telephone encounters, ranging from 16.9% to 68.9% (mean 45.7%)., Conclusion: Telephone encounters were used for pharmacologic management of ADHD in preschoolers to varying degrees across 7 DBP sites. These findings suggest that telephone management serves an important role in ADHD care., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Importance: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is diagnosed in approximately 2.4% of preschool-age children. Stimulants are recommended as first-line medication treatment. However, up to 25% of preschool-age children with ADHD are treated with α2-adrenergic agonist medications, despite minimal evidence about their efficacy or adverse effects in this age range., Objective: To determine the frequency of reported improvement in ADHD symptoms and adverse effects associated with α2-adrenergic agonists and stimulant medication for initial ADHD medication treatment in preschool-age children., Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective electronic health record review. Data were obtained from health records of children seen at 7 outpatient developmental-behavioral pediatric practices in the Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics Research Network in the US. Data were abstracted for 497 consecutive children who were younger than 72 months when treatment with an α2-adrenergic agonist or stimulant medication was initiated by a developmental-behavioral pediatrician for ADHD and were treated between January 1, 2013, and July 1, 2017. Follow-up was complete on February 27, 2019., Exposures: α2-Adrenergic agonist vs stimulant medication as initial ADHD medication treatment., Main Outcomes and Measures: Reported improvement in ADHD symptoms and adverse effects., Results: Data were abstracted from electronic health records of 497 preschool-age children with ADHD receiving α2-adrenergic agonists or stimulants. Median child age was 62 months at ADHD medication initiation, and 409 children (82%) were males. For initial ADHD medication treatment, α2-adrenergic agonists were prescribed to 175 children (35%; median length of α2-adrenergic agonist use, 136 days) and stimulants were prescribed to 322 children (65%; median length of stimulant use, 133 days). Improvement was reported in 66% (95% CI, 57.5%-73.9%) of children who initiated α2-adrenergic agonists and 78% (95% CI, 72.4%-83.4%) of children who initiated stimulants. Only daytime sleepiness was more common for those receiving α2-adrenergic agonists vs stimulants (38% vs 3%); several adverse effects were reported more commonly for those receiving stimulants vs α2-adrenergic agonists, including moodiness/irritability (50% vs 29%), appetite suppression (38% vs 7%), and difficulty sleeping (21% vs 11%)., Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective review of health records of preschool-age children with ADHD treated in developmental-behavioral pediatric practices, improvement was noted in the majority of children who received α2-adrenergic agonists or stimulants, with differing adverse effect profiles between medication classes. Further research, including from randomized clinical trials, is needed to assess comparative effectiveness of α2-adrenergic agonists vs stimulants.