1. Apoptosis in stages of mouse hepatocarcinogenesis: failure to counterbalance cell proliferation and to account for strain differences in tumor susceptibility.
- Author
-
Bursch W, Chabicovsky M, Wastl U, Grasl-Kraupp B, Bukowska K, Taper H, and Schulte-Hermann R
- Subjects
- Animals, Apoptosis drug effects, Carcinogens toxicity, Cell Differentiation drug effects, DNA biosynthesis, Diethylnitrosamine toxicity, Liver drug effects, Liver Neoplasms, Experimental chemically induced, Male, Mice, Mice, Inbred Strains, Phenobarbital toxicity, Precancerous Conditions chemically induced, Species Specificity, Apoptosis physiology, Cell Proliferation drug effects, Cocarcinogenesis, Liver pathology, Liver Neoplasms, Experimental pathology, Precancerous Conditions pathology
- Abstract
C3H/He and B6C3F1 show much higher liver cancer susceptibility than C57BL/6J mice. We studied the hypothesis that this difference might result from failure of apoptosis. Hepatocarcinogenesis was induced by a single dose of N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), followed by phenobarbital (PB) for up to 90 weeks. We observed (1) earlier appearance of putative preneoplastic foci (PPF), hepatocellular adenoma (HCA), and carcinoma (HCC) in C3H/He than in C57Bl/6J mice and (2) an increase of hepatocellular DNA synthesis in C3H/He and C57Bl/6J mice, compared to normal liver, via PPF and HCA to HCC. PB enhanced DNA synthesis and growth of PPF, in the C3H/He strain only, and of HCA and HCC of both strains. Apoptoses were rare in unaltered livers as well as in preneoplastic lesions, but tended to increase in HCA and HCC of both strains. PB lowered apoptotic activity in PPF of C3H/He mice, but enhanced it in HCA and HCC of C57Bl/6J mice at late stages. In conclusion, the strain difference in growth rates of PPF and tumors is largely determined by higher rates of cell proliferation in C3H/He mice, with and without promotion by PB. Moreover, in C57Bl/6J mice the promoting effect of PB was restricted to HCA and HCC and was not seen in PPF. Apoptosis was generally low and was not a major cause of the strain difference in tumor susceptibility. In contrast with rat liver, inhibition of apoptosis appears to be a minor determinant of tumor promotion in mice.
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF