Search

The clinical relevance of the urokinase receptor (uPAR) as a prognostic marker in ovarian cancer is well documented. We had shown that the uPAR sequence corresponding to 84-95 residues, linking D1 and D2 domains (uPAR(84-95)), drives cell migration and angiogenesis in a protease-independent manner. This study was aimed at defining the contribution of uPAR(84-95) sequence to invasion of ovarian cancer cells. Now, we provide evidence that the ability of uPAR-expressing ovarian cancer cells to cross extra-cellular matrix and mesothelial monolayers is prevented by specific inhibitors of the uPAR(84-95) sequence. To specifically investigate uPAR(84-95) function, uPAR-negative CHO-K1 cells were stably transfected with cDNAs coding for uPAR D2 and D3 regions exposing (uPARD2D3) or lacking (uPAR Delta D2D3) the 84-95 sequence. CHO-K1/D2D3 cells were able to cross matrigel, mesothelial and endothelial monolayers more efficiently than CHO-K1/Delta D2D3 cells, which behave as CHO-K1 control cells. When orthotopically implanted in nude mice, tumor nodules generated by CHO-K1/D2D3 cells spreading to peritoneal cavity were more numerous as compared to CHO-K1/Delta D2D3 cells. Ovarian tumor size and intra-tumoral microvessel density were significantly reduced in the absence of uPAR(84-95). Our results indicate that cell associated uPAR promotes growth and abdominal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells mainly through its uPAR84-95 sequence.

S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) is the principal methyl donor in transmethylation reactions fundamental to sustaining epigenetic modifications. Over the past decade, AdoMet has been extensively investigated for its anti- proliferative, pro-apoptotic and anti-metastatic roles in several types of human cancer. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common type of cancer worldwide, and is an aggressive type of cancer that is associated with a high recurrence rate, metastasis and poor treatment outcomes. The present study demonstrates, for the first time, to the best of our knowledge, that AdoMet induces cell cycle arrest and inhibits the migratory and invasive ability of two different HNSCC cell lines, oral Cal-33 and laryngeal JHU-SCC-011 cells. In both cell lines, AdoMet attenuated cell cycle progression, decreased the protein level of several cyclins and downregulated the expression of p21 cell cycle inhibitor. Moreover, AdoMet was able to inhibit Cal-33 and JHU-SCC-011 cell migration in a dose-dependent manner after 24 and 48 h, respectively, and also induced a significant reduction in the cell invasive ability, as demonstrated by Matrigel invasion assay monitored by the xCELLigence RTCA system. Western blot analysis of several migration and invasion markers confirmed the inhibitory effects exerted by AdoMet on these processes and highlighted AKT, β-catenin and small mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) as the main signaling pathways modulated by AdoMet. The present study also demonstrated that the combination of AdoMet and cisplatin synergistically inhibited HNSCC cell migration. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the physiological compound, AdoMet, affects the motility and extracellular matrix invasive capability in HNSCC. Thus, AdoMet may prove to be a good candidate for future drug development against metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND Recent evidence assigns the vitronectin receptors (VnRs) an important role in regulating tumour cell invasion and dissemination. In vivo and in vitro studies document that all trans-retinoid acids (ATRAs) inhibit growth-inducing apoptosis in melanomas. OBJECTIVES We have analysed the effects of ATRA treatment on melanoma cell adhesion and motility. METHODS Human M14 melanoma cells were treated with 10 micromol L-1 ATRA for different times and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin to analyse the effect of treatment on cytoskeleton organization. Cell adhesion and cell migration assays were performed to analyse the role of VnRs in the ATRA-induced early stages of apoptosis. VnR expression was evaluated by Western blot, immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemistry assays. RESULTS First, using an annexin V assay, we found that apoptosis was triggered by 48 h with 10 micromol L-1 ATRA exposure. At this time point, decrease in the F-actin polymerization as well as inhibition of cell adhesive ability to vitronectin (Vn) was exerted by ATRA treatment. In the presence of serum, exposure to 10 micromol L-1 ATRA for 48 h produced a dramatic inhibition of the cell adhesion ability that was comparable with that exerted by untreated cells preincubated with anti-alpha(v)beta(3) or anti-alpha(v)beta(5) VnR monoclonal antibodies. Functionally, the treatment of melanoma cells with 10 micromol L-1 ATRA for 48 h causes an inhibition of directional cell migration towards Vn-coated filters. Therefore, we analysed the effect of ATRA on the VnR expression. Both alpha(v)beta(3) and alpha(v)beta(5) VnR levels were reduced upon exposure to 10 micromol L-1 ATRA for 48 h as shown by Western blot, immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemistry assays. CONCLUSIONS Altogether, our data indicate that treatment of M14 melanoma cells with ATRA downregulates VnR expression and that this reduction is closely correlated with the ATRA-dependent inhibition of actin-fibre organization, cell adhesion and migration. Although the mechanism by which ATRA regulates the expression of VnR in M14 melanoma cells needs further elucidation, this system may represent a model for understanding the molecular basis of ATRA therapy in melanoma.

The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) plays an important role in controlling cell migration. uPAR binds urokinase and vitronectin extracellular ligands, and signals in complex with transmembrane receptors such as Formyl-peptide Receptors (FPR)s and integrins. Previous work from this laboratory has shown that synthetic peptides, corresponding to the uPAR(88-92) chemotactic sequence, when carrying the S90P or S90E substitutions, up- or down-regulate cell migration, respectively. To gain mechanistic insights into these opposite cell responses, the functional consequences of S90P and S90E mutations in full-length uPAR were evaluated. First, (HEK)-293 embryonic kidney cells expressing uPAR(S90P) exhibit enhanced FPR activation, increased random and directional cell migration, long-lasting Akt phosphorylation, and increased adhesion to vitronectin, as well as uPAR/vitronectin receptor association. In contrast, the S90E substitution prevents agonist-triggered FPR activation and internalization, decreases binding and adhesion to vitronectin, and inhibits uPAR/vitronectin receptor association. Also, 293/uPAR(S90P) cells appear quite elongated and their cytoskeleton well organized, whereas 293/uPAR(S90E) cells assume a large flattened morphology, with random orientation of actin filaments. Interestingly, when HT1080 cells co-express wild type uPAR with uPAR S90E, the latter behaves as a dominant-negative, impairing uPAR-mediated signaling and reducing cell wound repair as well as lung metastasis in nude mice. In contrast, signaling, wound repair and in vivo lung metastasis of HT1080 cells bearing wild type uPAR are enhanced when they co-express uPAR(S90P). In conclusion, our findings indicate that Ser(90) is a critical residue for uPAR signaling and that the S90P and S90E exert opposite effects on uPAR activities. These findings may be accommodated in a molecular model, in which uPAR(S90E) and uPAR(S90P) are forced into inactive and active forms, respectively, suggesting important implications for the development of novel drugs targeting uPAR function.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) plays a central role in sustaining the malignant phenotype and promoting tumor metastasis. The Ser88-Arg-Ser-Arg-Tyr92 is the minimum chemotactic sequence of uPAR required to induce the same intracellular signaling as its ligand uPA. Here, we describe the generation of new peptide inhibitors of cell migration and invasion derived from SRSRY by a drug design approach. Ac-Arg-Glu-Arg-Phe-NH2 (i.e., RERF), which adopts a turned structure in solution, was selected for its ability to potently prevent SRSRY-directed cell migration. Fluorescein-RERF associates with very high affinity to RBL-2H3 rat basophilic leukemia cells expressing the human formyl peptide receptor (FPR). Accordingly, femtomolar concentrations of RERF prevent agonist-dependent internalization of FPR and inhibit N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe–dependent migration in a dose-dependent manner. In the absence of FPR, fluorescein-RERF binds to cell surface at picomolar concentrations in an αv integrin–dependent manner. The involvement of vitronectin receptor is further supported by the findings that 100 pmol/L RERF selectively inhibits vitronectin-dependent RBL-2H3 cell migration and prevents SRSRY-triggered uPAR/αv association. Furthermore, RERF reduces the speed of wound closure and the extent of Matrigel invasion by human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells without affecting cell proliferation. Finally, a 3- to 5-fold reduction of lung metastasis number and size in nude mice following i.v. injection of green fluorescent protein–expressing HT1080 cells in the presence of 3.32 mg/kg RERF is observed. Our findings indicate that RERF effectively prevents malignant cell invasion in vivo with no signs of toxicity and may represent a promising prototype drug for anticancer therapy. [Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(9):2708–17]

We previously showed that, while binding to urokinase receptor (uPAR) through its growth factor domain (GFD, residues 1-49), urokinase (uPA) can engage alphavbeta5 integrin through an internal domain (CP, residues 132-158). This novel uPA/alphavbeta5 interaction promotes cytoskeletal rearrangements and directional cell migration (Franco et al., J Cell Sci 2006;119:3424-34). We now show that treatment of cells with phosphomimic uPA (uPA138E/303E, serine 138 and 303 substituted with glutamic acid) strongly inhibits matrix-induced cell migration. Unlike uPA, binding of uPA138E/303E to cell surface did not induce F-actin enriched protruding structures and caused a 5-fold reduction in cell translocation speed, as determined by video tracking of living cells. Inhibition of migration was found to be independent of uPAR, since uPA variants lacking the GFD domain, but carrying the relevant Ser to Glu substitutions were as effective inhibitor as uPA138E/303E. Through several independent approaches, we established that the phosphomimics specifically bind to alphavbeta5 integrin through the CP region carrying the S138E mutation. This interaction blocks integrin activation, as determined by a decreased affinity of alphavbeta5 to vitronectin and a reduced association of the beta5 cytoplasmic tail with talin. Finally, stable expression of uPA138E/303E in human squamous carcinoma cells prevented tumor cell invasion in vivo. Thus, when expressed in cancer cells, the inhibitory phosphomimic effect was dominant over the effect of endogenously produced uPA. These results shed light on the regulation of cell migration by uPA phosphorylation and provide a realistic opportunity for a novel antiinvasive/metastatic therapeutic intervention.

Peptides and their functionally equiv. derivs. are disclosed, in salified or non-salified form, with the general formula L1-X1-X2-X3-X4, wherein: L1 is H, or acyl, or any natural or non-natural amino acid, optionally N-acylated, N-alkylated and/or Ca-alkylated; X1 and X3, which are equal or different, are any natural or non-natural basic amino acid, optionally N-alkylated and/or Ca-alkylated. X2 is any natural or non-natural amino acid, optionally N-alkylated and/or Ca-alkylated, with the proviso that it is not glycine and amino acids mono-substituted on the a carbon atom with a linear or cyclic alkyl group, from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, and amino acids mono-substituted on the a carbon atom with a linear or cyclic alkyl group containing 4 to 10 carbon atoms, or amino acids mono-substituted on the a carbon atom with an alkyl group containin 1 to 8 carbon atoms, optionally substituted with a carbamoyl, hydroxyl or arom. group; X4 is any natural or non-natural hydrophobic amino acid, optionally Ca-alkylated and/or amidated at the C-terminal end, or any hydrophobic amino alc., or a hydrophobic gem-diamine, optionally N'-alkylated or N'-acylated.

SummaryThe urinary-type plasminogen activator, or uPA, controls matrix degradation through the conversion of plasminogen into plasmin and is regarded as the critical trigger for plasmin generation during cell migration and invasion, under physiological and pathological conditions (such as cancer metastasis).The proteolytic activity of uPA is responsible for the activation or release of several growth factors and modulates the cell survival/apoptosis ratio through the dynamic control of cell-matrix contacts. The urokinase receptor (uPAR), binding to the EGF-like domain of uPA, directs membrane-associated extracellular proteolysis and signals through transmembrane proteins, thus regulating cell migration, adhesion and cytoskeletal status. However, recent evidence highlights an intricate relationship linking the uPA/uPAR system to cell growth and apoptosis.

The urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is able to cleave its cell surface receptor (uPAR) anchored to the cell membrane through a glycophosphatidylinositol tail. The cleavage leads to the formation of cell surface truncated forms, devoid of the N-terminal domain 1 (D1) and unmasks or disrupts, depending on the cleavage site, a sequence in the D1-D2 linker region (residues 88-92), which in the soluble form is a potent chemoattractant for monocyte-like cells. To investigate the possible role(s) of the cleaved forms of cell surface glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored uPAR, uPAR-negative human embrional kidney 293 cells were transfected with the cDNA of intact uPAR (uPAR-293) or with cDNAs corresponding to the truncated forms of uPAR exposing (D2D3-293) or lacking (D2D3wc-293) the peptide 88-92 (P88-92). Cell adhesion assays and co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that the removal of D1, independently of the presence of P88-92, abolished the lateral interaction of uPAR with integrins and its capability to regulate integrin adhesive functions. The expression of intact uPAR induced also a moderate increase in 293 cell proliferation, which was accompanied by the activation of ERK. Also this effect was abolished by D1 removal, independently of the presence of P88-92. The expression of intact and truncated uPARs regulated cell directional migration toward uPA, the specific uPAR ligand, and toward fMLP, a bacterial chemotactic peptide. In fact, the uPA-dependent cell migration required the expression of intact uPAR, including D1, whereas the fMLP-dependent cell migration required the expression of a P88-92 containing uPAR and was independent of the presence of D1. Together these observations indicate that uPA-mediated uPAR cleavage and D1 removal, occurring on the cell surface of several cell types, can play a fundamental role in the regulation of multiple uPAR functions.

Urokinase (uPA) is a 411 residues serine protease originally identified for its ability to activate plasminogen and generate plasmin, a broad-spectrum matrix- and fibrin-degrading enzyme. Later, this protease has been shown to possess also a clear-cut ability to stimulate cell migration and survival in a catalytic-independent manner. This activity turned out to be exerted through the growth factor-like domain (GFD-like, residues 1-49) of the protease binding to a GPI-anchored membrane receptor (uPAR), in complex with transmembrane receptors such as integrins, the epidermal growth factor and the formyl-peptide receptors. Direct binding of uPA to integrins through its kringle (residues 50-131) and connecting peptide (residues 132-158) regions results in enhanced migration. The dual function of uPA in promoting migration while reducing the physical resistance of extracellular matrix underlies its crucial role in the invasion of malignant tumours. Consolidated evidence emerging from animal models and clinical studies shows that the overexpression of uPA is a causal determinant to tumour metastasis and is associated to a poor prognosis. Therefore, pinpointing the molecular interactions and identifying novel agents to interfere with the diverse activities of uPA is a goal of basic and applied research. In this review, we discuss the general theme of cell migration and invasion. A description of the uPA structure-function relationship and the functional effects of isolated domains is presented. Current information on molecular agonistic as well as antagonistic compounds, including the compounds which have reached clinical trials, is provided. © 2011 Bentham Science Publishers.