1. Dbf4 and Cdc7 proteins promote DNA replication through interactions with distinct Mcm2-7 protein subunits.
- Author
-
Ramer MD, Suman ES, Richter H, Stanger K, Spranger M, Bieberstein N, and Duncker BP
- Subjects
- Cell Cycle Proteins genetics, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone genetics, DNA, Fungal genetics, DNA-Binding Proteins genetics, Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 3, Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 4, Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 6, Minichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 7, Mutation, Nuclear Proteins genetics, Nuclear Proteins metabolism, Protein Binding physiology, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases genetics, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins genetics, Cell Cycle Proteins metabolism, Chromosomal Proteins, Non-Histone metabolism, DNA Replication physiology, DNA, Fungal biosynthesis, DNA-Binding Proteins metabolism, Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases metabolism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins metabolism
- Abstract
The essential cell cycle target of the Dbf4/Cdc7 kinase (DDK) is the Mcm2-7 helicase complex. Although Mcm4 has been identified as the critical DDK phosphorylation target for DNA replication, it is not well understood which of the six Mcm2-7 subunits actually mediate(s) docking of this kinase complex. We systematically examined the interaction between each Mcm2-7 subunit with Dbf4 and Cdc7 through two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation analyses. Strikingly different binding patterns were observed, as Dbf4 interacted most strongly with Mcm2, whereas Cdc7 displayed association with both Mcm4 and Mcm5. We identified an N-terminal Mcm2 region required for interaction with Dbf4. Cells expressing either an Mcm2 mutant lacking this docking domain (Mcm2ΔDDD) or an Mcm4 mutant lacking a previously identified DDK docking domain (Mcm4ΔDDD) displayed modest DNA replication and growth defects. In contrast, combining these two mutations resulted in synthetic lethality, suggesting that Mcm2 and Mcm4 play overlapping roles in the association of DDK with MCM rings at replication origins. Consistent with this model, growth inhibition could be induced in Mcm4ΔDDD cells through Mcm2 overexpression as a means of titrating the Dbf4-MCM ring interaction. This growth inhibition was exacerbated by exposing the cells to either hydroxyurea or methyl methanesulfonate, lending support for a DDK role in stabilizing or restarting replication forks under S phase checkpoint conditions. Finally, constitutive overexpression of each individual MCM subunit was examined, and genotoxic sensitivity was found to be specific to Mcm2 or Mcm4 overexpression, further pointing to the importance of the DDK-MCM ring interaction.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF