Search

Mounting evidence is revealing a granularity within gene regulation that occurs at the level of mRNA translation. Within mammalian cells, canonical cap-dependent mRNA translation is dependent upon the interaction between the m7G cap-binding protein eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and the scaffolding protein eukaryotic initiation factor 4G (eIF4G), the latter of which facilitates pre-translation initiation complex assembly, mRNA circularization, and ultimately ribosomal scanning. In breast epithelial cells, we previously demonstrated that the CELF1 RNA-binding protein promotes the translation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) effector mRNAs containing GU-rich elements (GREs) within their 3’ untranslated regions (UTRs). Here we show that within this context, CELF1 directly binds to both the eIF4E cap-binding protein and Poly(A) binding protein (PABP), promoting translation of GRE-containing mRNAs in mesenchymal cells. Disruption of this CELF1/eIF4E interaction inhibits both EMT induction and experimental metastasis. Our findings illustrate a novel way in which non-canonical mechanisms of translation initiation underlie transitional cellular states within the context of development or human disease.

The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a ligand‐activated transcription factor that regulates growth and differentiation within normal prostate and prostate cancers. However the factors that control PPARγ within the prostate cancers have not been characterized. The goal of this study was to examine whether the androgen receptor (AR) regulates PPARγ expression and function within human prostate cancer cells. qRT‐PCR and Western blot analyses revealed nanomolar concentrations of the AR agonist dihydrotestosterone (DHT) decrease PPARγ mRNA and protein within the castration‐resistant, AR‐positive C4‐2 and VCaP human prostate cancer cell lines. The AR antagonists bicalutamide and enzalutamide blocked the ability of DHT to reduce PPARγ levels. In addition, siRNA mediated knockdown of AR increased PPARγ protein levels and ligand‐induced PPARγ transcriptional activity within the C4‐2 cell line. Furthermore, proteasome inhibitors that interfere with AR function increased the level of basal PPARγ and prevented the DHT‐mediated suppression of PPARγ. These data suggest that AR normally functions to suppress PPARγ expression within AR‐positive prostate cancer cells. To determine whether increases in AR protein would influence PPARγ expression and activity, we used lipofectamine‐based transfections to overexpress AR within the AR‐null PC‐3 cells. The addition of AR to PC‐3 cells did not significantly alter PPARγ protein levels. However, the ability of the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone to induce activation of a PPARγ‐driven luciferase reporter and induce expression of FABP4 was suppressed in AR‐positive PC‐3 cells. Together, these data indicate AR serves as a key modulator of PPARγ expression and function within prostate tumors. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 2664–2672, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Physiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.