Search

Transcriptional regulation, a pivotal biological process by which cells adapt to environmental fluctuations, is achieved by the binding of transcription factors to target sequences in a sequence-specific manner. However, how transcription factors recognize the correct target from amongst the numerous candidates in a genome has not been fully elucidated. We here show that, in the fission-yeast fbp1 gene, when transcription factors bind to target sequences in close proximity, their binding is reciprocally stabilized, thereby integrating distinct signal transduction pathways. The fbp1 gene is massively induced upon glucose starvation by the activation of two transcription factors, Atf1 and Rst2, mediated via distinct signal transduction pathways. Atf1 and Rst2 bind to the upstream-activating sequence 1 region, carrying two binding sites located 45 bp apart. Their binding is reciprocally stabilized due to the close proximity of the two target sites, which destabilizes the independent binding of Atf1 or Rst2. Tup11/12 (Tup-family co-repressors) suppress independent binding. These data demonstrate a previously unappreciated mechanism by which two transcription-factor binding sites, in close proximity, integrate two independent-signal pathways, thereby behaving as a hub for signal integration.

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) transcribed across gene promoters have been detected. These regulate transcription by mechanisms that have not been fully elucidated. We herein show that the chromatin configuration is altered into an accessible state within 290 bp downstream from the initiation site of metabolic-stress-induced lncRNAs (mlonRNAs) in the promoter of the fission yeast fbp1 gene, whose transcription is massively induced upon glucose starvation. Chromatin upstream from fbp1 is progressively altered into an open configuration, as a cascade of transcription of three overlapping mlonRNA species (-a, -b and -c in order) occurs with transcriptional initiation sites progressing 5′ to 3′ upstream of the fbp1 promoter. Initiation of the shortest mlonRNA (mlonRNA-c) induces chromatin remodeling around a transcription factor-binding site and subsequent massive induction of fbp1. We identify the cis-element required for mlonRNA-c initiation, and by changing the distance between mlonRNA-initiation site and the transcription factor-binding site, we show that mlonRNA-initiation effectively induces chromatin remodeling in a limited distance within 290 bp. These results indicate that mlonRNAs are transcribed across the fbp1 promoter as a short-range inducer for local chromatin alterations, and suggest that strict chromatin modulation is archived via stepwise mlonRNA-initiations.

Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are involved in various biological processes, including gene expression, development, and disease. Here, we identify a novel consensus sequence of a cis-element involved in long ncRNA (lncRNA) transcription and demonstrate that lncRNA transcription from this cis-element activates meiotic recombination via chromatin remodeling. In the fission yeast fbp1 gene, glucose starvation induces a series of promoter-associated lncRNAs, referred to as metabolic-stress-induced lncRNAs (mlonRNAs), which contribute to chromatin remodeling and fbp1 activation. Translocation of the cis-element required for mlonRNA into a well-characterized meiotic recombination hotspot, ade6-M26, further stimulates transcription and meiotic recombination via local chromatin remodeling. The consensus sequence of this cis-element (mlon-box) overlaps with meiotic recombination sites in the fission yeast genome. At one such site, the SPBC24C6.09c upstream region, meiotic double-strand break (DSB) formation is induced in an mlon-box-dependent manner. Therefore, mlonRNA transcription plays a universal role in chromatin remodeling and the regulation of transcription and recombination., Senmatsu et al. show that transcription of long-noncoding RNAs (lncRNA) previously identified in the fission yeast fbp1 gene and found to induce chromatin opening, also activates meiotic recombination by inducing local chromatin remodeling at a meiotic recombination hotspot. This study furthers our understanding of the connection between lncRNA transcription and DNA break activity in yeast meiosis.

Numerous noncoding RNA transcripts are detected in eukaryotic cells. Noncoding RNAs transcribed across gene promoters are involved in the regulation of mRNA transcription via chromatin modulation. This function of noncoding RNA transcription was first demonstrated for the fission yeast fbp1 gene, where a cascade of noncoding RNA transcription events induces chromatin remodeling to facilitate transcription factor binding. We recently demonstrated that the noncoding RNAs from the fbp1 upstream region facilitate binding of the transcription activator Atf1 and thereby promote histone acetylation. Histone acetylation by histone acetyl transferases (HATs) and ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers (ADCRs) are implicated in chromatin remodeling, but the interplay between HATs and ADCRs in this process has not been fully elucidated. Here, we examine the roles played by two distinct ADCRs, Snf22 and Hrp3, and by the HAT Gcn5 in the transcriptional activation of fbp1. Snf22 and Hrp3 redundantly promote disassembly of chromatin in the fbp1 upstream region. Gcn5 critically contributes to nucleosome eviction in the absence of either Snf22 or Hrp3, presumably by recruiting Hrp3 in snf22∆ cells and Snf22 in hrp3∆ cells. Conversely, Gcn5-dependent histone H3 acetylation is impaired in snf22∆/hrp3∆ cells, suggesting that both redundant ADCRs induce recruitment of Gcn5 to the chromatin array in the fbp1 upstream region. These results reveal a previously unappreciated interplay between ADCRs and histone acetylation in which histone acetylation facilitates recruitment of ADCRs, while ADCRs are required for histone acetylation.

We previously constructed a collection of fission yeast strains that express various mammalian cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) and developed a cell-based high throughput screen (HTS) for small molecule PDE inhibitors. Here we describe a compound, BC54, that is a selective inhibitor of enzymes from the cAMP-specific PDE4 and PDE7 families. Consistent with the biological effect of other PDE4 and PDE7 inhibitors, BC54 displays potent anti-inflammatory properties and is superior to a combination of rolipram (a PDE4 inhibitor) and BRL50481 (a PDE7A inhibitor) for inducing apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. We further exploited PKA-regulated growth phenotypes in fission yeast to isolate two mutant alleles of the human PDE4B2 gene that encode enzymes possessing single amino acid changes that confer partial resistance to BC54. We confirm this resistance to both BC54 and rolipram via yeast-based assays and, for PDE4B2T407A, in vitro enzyme assays. Thus, we are able to use this system for both chemical screens to identify biologically-active PDE inhibitors and molecular genetic studies to characterize the interaction of these molecules with their target enzymes. Based on its potency, selectivity, and effectiveness in cell culture, BC54 should be a useful tool to study biological processes regulated by PDE4 and PDE7 enzymes.

Transcription factors (TFs) determine the transcription activity of target genes and play a central role in controlling the transcription in response to various environmental stresses. Three dimensional genome structures such as local loops play a fundamental role in the regulation of transcription, although the link between such structures and the regulation of TF binding to cis-regulatory elements remains to be elucidated. Here, we show that during transcriptional activation of the fission yeast fbp1 gene, binding of Rst2 (a critical C2H2 zinc-finger TF) is mediated by a local loop structure. During fbp1 activation, Rst2 is first recruited to upstream-activating sequence 1 (UAS1), then it subsequently binds to UAS2 (a critical cis-regulatory site located approximately 600 base pairs downstream of UAS1) through a loop structure that brings UAS1 and UAS2 into spatially close proximity. Tup11/12 (the Tup-family corepressors) suppress direct binding of Rst2 to UAS2, but this suppression is counteracted by the recruitment of Rst2 at UAS1 and following delivery to UAS2 through a loop structure. These data demonstrate a previously unappreciated mechanism for the recruitment and expansion of TF-DNA interactions within a promoter mediated by local three-dimensional genome structures and for timely TF-binding via counteractive regulation by the Tup-family corepressors.

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe uses a cAMP signaling pathway to link glucose-sensing to Protein Kinase A activity in order to regulate cell growth, sexual development, gluconeogenesis, and exit from stationary phase. We previously used a PKA-repressed fbp1-ura4 reporter to conduct high throughput screens (HTSs) for inhibitors of heterologously-expressed mammalian cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs). Here, we describe the successful expression of all ten mammalian adenylyl cyclase (AC) genes, along with the human GNAS Gα(s) gene. By measuring expression of an fbp1-GFP reporter together with direct measurements of intracellular cAMP levels, we can detect both basal AC activity from all ten AC genes as well as GNAS-stimulated activity from eight of the nine transmembrane ACs (tmACs; AC2-AC9). The ability to use this platform to conduct HTS for novel chemical probes that reduce PKA activity was demonstrated by a pilot screen of the LOPAC®(1280) library, leading to the identification of diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI) as an inhibitor of basal AC activity. This screening technology could open the door to the development of therapeutic compounds that target GNAS or the ACs, an area in which there is significant unmet need.

The arrangement of nucleosomes in chromatin plays a role in transcriptional regulation by restricting the accessibility of transcription factors and RNA polymerase II to cis-acting elements and promoters. For gene activation, the chromatin structure is altered to an open configuration. The mechanism for this process has been extensively analyzed. However, the mechanism by which repressive chromatin is reconstituted to terminate transcription has not been fully elucidated. Here, we investigated the mechanisms by which chromatin is reconstituted in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe fbp1 gene, which is robustly induced upon glucose starvation but tightly repressed under glucose-rich conditions. We found that the chromatin structure in the region upstream from fbp1 is closed by a two-step process. When cells are returned to glucose-rich medium following glucose starvation, changes in the nucleosome pattern alter the chromatin configuration at the transcription factor binding site to an inaccessible state, after which the nucleosome density upstream from fbp1 gradually increases via histone loading. Interestingly, this histone loading was observed in the absence of the Tup family corepressors Tup11 and Tup12. Analysis of strains carrying either gene disruptions or mutations affecting nine fission yeast histone chaperone genes demonstrated that the histone chaperone Asf1 induces nucleosome loading during glucose repression. These data establish a previously unappreciated chromatin reconstitution mechanism in fbp1 repression.

The LTR-retrotransposon Tf1 preserves the coding capacity of its host Schizosaccharomyces pombe by integrating upstream of open reading frames (ORFs). To determine which features of the target sites were recognized by the transposon, we introduced plasmids containing candidate insertion sites into S. pombe and mapped the positions of integration. We found that Tf1 was targeted specifically to the promoters of Pol II-transcribed genes. A detailed analysis of integration in plasmids that contained either ade6 or fbp1 revealed insertions occurred in the promoters at positions where transcription factors bound. Further experiments revealed that the activator Atf1p and its binding site were required for directing integration to the promoter of fbp1. An interaction between Tf1 integrase and Atf1p was observed, indicating that integration at fbp1 was mediated by the activator bound to its promoter. Surprisingly, we found Tf1 contained sequences that activated transcription, and these substituted for elements of the ade6 promoter disrupted by integration.

The Hat1 histone acetyltransferase catalyzes the acetylation of H4 at lysines 5 and 12, the same sites that are acetylated in newly synthesized histone H4. By performing histone acetyltransferase (HAT) assays on various synthetic H4 N-terminal peptides, we have examined the interactions between Hat1 and the H4 tail domain. It was found that acetylation requires the presence of positively charged amino acids at positions 8 and 16 of H4, positions that are normally occupied by lysine; however, lysine per se is not essential and can be replaced by arginine. In contrast, replacing Lys-8 and -16 of H4 with glutamines reduces acetylation to background levels. Similarly, phosphorylation of Ser-1 of the H4 tail depresses acetylation by both yeast Hat1p and the human HAT-B complex. These results strongly support the model proposed by Ramakrishnan and colleagues for the interaction between Hat1 and the H4 tail (Dutnall, R. N., Tafrov, S. T., Sternglanz, R., and Ramakrishnan, V. (1998) Cell 94, 427-438) and may have implications for the genetic analysis of histone acetylation. It was also found that Lys-12 of H4 is preferentially acetylated by human HAT-B, in further agreement with the proposed model of H4 tail binding. Finally, we have demonstrated that deletion of the hat1 gene from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe causes increased sensitivity to the DNA-damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate in the absence of any additional mutations. This is in contrast to results obtained with a Saccharomyces cerevisiae hat1Delta strain, which must also carry mutations of the acetylatable lysines of H3 for heightened methyl methanesulfonate sensitivity to be observed. Thus, although the role of Hat1 in DNA damage repair is evolutionarily conserved, the ability of H3 acetylation to compensate for Hat1 deletion appears to be more variable.

The Tup family corepressors contribute to critical cellular responses, such as the stress response and differentiation, presumably by inducing repressive chromatin, though the precise repression mechanism remains to be elucidated. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe fission yeast Tup family corepressors Tup11 and Tup12 (Tup11/12), which are orthologs of Tup1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae budding yeast and Groucho in Drosophila, negatively control chromatin and the transcriptional activity of some stress-responsive genes. Here, we demonstrate that Tup11/12 repress transcription of a gluconeogenesis gene, fbp1+, by three distinct mechanisms. First, Tup11/12 inhibit chromatin remodeling in the fbp1+ promoter region where the Atf1 and Rst2 transcriptional activators bind. Second, they repress the formation of an open chromatin configuration at the fbp1+ TATA box. Third, they repress mRNA transcription per se by regulating basic transcription factors. These inhibitory actions of Tup11/12 are antagonized by three different types of transcriptional activators: CREB/ATF-type Atf1, C2H2 zinc finger-type Rst2, and CBF/NF-Y-type Php5 proteins. We also found that impaired chromatin remodeling and fbp1+mRNA transcription in php5Δ strains are rescued by the double deletions of tup11+ and tup12+, although the distribution of the transcription start sites becomes broader than that in wild-type cells. These data reveal a new mechanism of precise determination of the mRNA start site by Tup family corepressors and CBF/NF-Y proteins.

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe primarily detects glucose via a cAMP-signalling pathway. Components of this pathway include the Git3 G-protein-coupled receptor and a heterotrimeric G-protein, from which the Gpa2 Gα subunit activates adenylate cyclase (Git2/Cyr1). Three additional proteins, Git1, Git7 and Git10 are required to generate a cAMP response even in a strain expressing an activated form of Gpa2, which is capable of bypassing the loss of the GPCR and Gβγ dimer. Therefore, Git1, Git7 and Git10 either act in a G-protein-independent manner or are required to stabilize or assemble a functional signalling complex. Although prior data suggested that the Cgs2 cAMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) does not regulate the cAMP response, we now have evidence that along with adenylate cyclase regulation, PDE activation is important for limiting the response to glucose. Finally, regulation of protein kinase A activation appears to involve both traditional post-translational regulation of the function of the components of the cAMP pathway and glucose-dependent transcriptional regulation of some of these cAMP pathway genes.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe fbp1 gene is transcriptionally repressed by protein kinase A (PKA) that is activated by extracellular glucose via a cAMP-signaling pathway. We previously used an fbp1–ura4 reporter that places uracil biosynthesis under the control of the glucose-sensing pathway to identify mutations in genes of the cAMP pathway. More recently, this reporter has been used in high throughput screens for small molecule inhibitors of heterologously-expressed cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) that hydrolyse cAMP to 5′ AMP. Here we show that strains lacking the adenylyl cyclase gene respond to either exogenous cAMP or cGMP to activate PKA, thus regulating fbp1–ura4 expression and other PKA-regulated processes such as conjugation and the nuclear export of an Rst2–GFP fusion protein. Expression of cGMP-specific PDEs or ones that hydrolyse both cAMP and cGMP increases the amount of exogenous cGMP required to activate PKA in order to repress fbp1–ura4 expression, creating conditions that allow detection of inhibitors of these PDEs. As proof of this concept, we screened a collection of compounds previously identified as inhibitors of cAMP-specific PDE4 or PDE7 enzymes for their ability to inhibit the mammalian cGMP-specific PDE5A enzyme. We identified compound BC76, which inhibits PDE5A in an in vitro enzyme assay with an IC 50 of 232 nM. Further yeast-based assays show that BC76 inhibits PDE1, PDE4, PDE5, PDE8, PDE10 and PDE11, thus demonstrating the utility of this system for detecting and characterising inhibitors of either cAMP- or cGMP-metabolising PDEs.

Recent transcriptome analyses using high-density tiling arrays and data from large-scale analyses of full-length complementary DNA libraries by the FANTOM3 consortium demonstrate that many transcripts are non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). These transcriptome analyses indicate that many of the non-coding regions, previously thought to be functionally inert, are actually transcriptionally active regions with various features. Furthermore, most relatively large ( approximately several kilobases) polyadenylated messenger RNA transcripts are transcribed from regions harbouring little coding potential. However, the function of such ncRNAs is mostly unknown and has been a matter of debate. Here we show that RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) transcription of ncRNAs is required for chromatin remodelling at the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe fbp1(+) locus during transcriptional activation. The chromatin at fbp1(+) is progressively converted to an open configuration, as several species of ncRNAs are transcribed through fbp1(+). This is coupled with the translocation of RNAPII through the region upstream of the eventual fbp1(+) transcriptional start site. Insertion of a transcription terminator into this upstream region abolishes both the cascade of transcription of ncRNAs and the progressive chromatin alteration. Our results demonstrate that transcription through the promoter region is required to make DNA sequences accessible to transcriptional activators and to RNAPII.

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide–binding proteins, composed of Gα, Gβ, and Gγ subunits, are important mediators of fungal pheromone and nutrient signaling pathways. Most fungal genomes encode two or three functionally distinct Gα subunits but only a single canonical Gβ subunit, which does not bind multiple Gα subunits. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , Cryptococcus neoformans , and Schizosaccharomyces pombe have identified binding partners for Gα subunits, which are proposed to be "noncanonical Gβ subunits." This Perspective reviews these studies, summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of the claims to this designation for these four fungal proteins.

The specific induction of genes in response to distinct environmental stress is vital for all eukaryotes. To study the mechanisms that result in selective gene responses, we examined the role of the fission yeast Tup1 family repressors in chromatin regulation. We found that chromatin structure around a cAMP-responsive element (CRE)-like sequence in ade6-M26 that is bound by Atf1.Pcr1 transcriptional activation was altered in response to osmotic stress but not to heat and oxidative stresses. Such chromatin structure alteration occurred later than the Atf1 phosphorylation but correlated well with stress-induced transcriptional activation at ade6-M26. This chromatin structure alteration required components for the stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK) cascade and both subunits of the M26-binding CREB/ATF-type protein Atf1.Pcr1. Cation stress and glucose starvation selectively caused chromatin structure alteration around CRE-like sequences in cta3(+) and fbp1(+) promoters, respectively, in correlation with transcriptional activation. However, the tup11Delta tup12Delta double deletion mutants lost the selectivity of stress responses of chromatin structure and transcriptional regulation of cta3(+) and fbp1(+). These data indicate that the Tup1-like repressors regulate the chromatin structure to ensure the specificity of gene activation in response to particular stresses. Such a role for these proteins may serve as a paradigm for the regulation of stress response in higher eukaryotes.

In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the Sty1 mitogen-activated protein kinase and the Atf1 transcription factor control transcriptional induction in response to elevated salt concentrations. Herein, we demonstrate that two repressors, Tup11 and Tup12, and the Prr1 transcription factor also function in the response to salt shock. We find that deletion of both tup genes together results in hypersensitivity to elevated cation concentrations (K+and Ca2+) and we identifycta3+, which encodes an intracellular cation transporter, as a novel stress gene whose expression is positively controlled by the Sty1 pathway and negatively regulated by Tup repressors. The expression ofcta3+is maintained at low levels by the Tup repressors, and relief from repression requires the Sty1, Atf1, and Prr1. Prr1 is also required for KCl-mediated induction of several other Sty1-dependent genes such asgpx1+andctt1+. Surprisingly, the KCl-mediated induction of cta3+expression occurs independently of Sty1 in a tup11Δ tup12Δ mutant and so the Tup repressors link induction to the Sty1 pathway. We also report that in contrast to a number of other Sty1- and Atf1-dependent genes, the expression of cta3+is induced only by high salt concentrations. However, in the absence of the Tup repressors this specificity is lost and a range of stresses induces cta3+expression.

Heterotrimeric G proteins mediate signal transduction pathways to control development in fungal, plant, and animal cells. A recent study in the July issue of Molecular Cell identifies three proteins that, while not displaying sequence similarity to G protein subunits, appear to act as structural mimics of a Gβγ dimer to negatively regulate pseudohyphal growth in budding yeast.

A significant challenge to our understanding of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation is to determine how multiple signal transduction pathways converge on a single promoter to regulate transcription in divergent fashions. To study this, we have investigated the transcriptional regulation of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe fbp1 gene that is repressed by a cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) pathway and is activated by a stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. In this study, we identified and characterized two cis-acting elements in the fbp1 promoter required for activation of fbp1 transcription. Upstream activation site 1 (UAS1), located approximately 900 bp from the transcriptional start site, resembles a cAMP response element (CRE) that is the binding site for the atf1-pcr1 heterodimeric transcriptional activator. Binding of this activator to UAS1 is positively regulated by the MAPK pathway and negatively regulated by PKA. UAS2, located approximately 250 bp from the transcriptional start site, resembles a Saccharomyces cerevisiae stress response element. UAS2 is bound by transcriptional activators and repressors regulated by both the PKA and MAPK pathways, although atf1 itself is not present in these complexes. Transcriptional regulation of fbp1 promoter constructs containing only UAS1 or UAS2 confirms that the PKA and MAPK regulation is targeted to both sites. We conclude that the PKA and MAPK signal transduction pathways regulate fbp1 transcription at UAS1 and UAS2, but that the antagonistic interactions between these pathways involve different mechanisms at each site.

The Schizosaccharomyces pombe pyp1+ gene, encoding a protein tyrosine phosphatase (pyp1), was isolated as a high copy number suppressor of a mutation that results in reduced cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) activity. Overexpression of pyp1+ inhibits both transcription of the fbp1 gene, which is negatively regulated by a glucose-induced activation of PKA, and sexual development, which is negatively regulated by PKA through a nitrogen- and glucose-monitoring mechanism. Overexpression of a catalytically inactive form of pyp1 has little effect on either process. Previous studies suggest that overexpression of pyp1+ results in a mitotic delay by positively regulating wee1 activity. We show that pyp1 repression of fbp1 transcription is independent of wee1. The direct role of the pyp1 protein is to dephosphorylate and inactivate the sty1/spc1 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) that is activated by the wis1 MAPK kinase. As overexpression of pyp1+ has no further effect upon the mitotic delay observed in a wis1 deletion strain, the role of pyp1 appears to be restricted to negative regulation of the sty1/spc1 MAPK. This study indicates that pyp1 negatively regulates fbp1 transcription, sexual development and mitosis by inactivation of the sty1/spc1 MAPK, but that bifurcations downstream of the MAPK separate these processes as seen by the differential role for the wee1 gene.

An important eukaryotic signal transduction pathway involves the regulation of the effector enzyme adenylate cyclase, which produces the second messenger, cAMP. Previous genetic analyses demonstrated that glucose repression of transcription of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe fbp1 gene requires the function of adenylate cyclase, encoded by the git2 gene. As mutations in git2 and in six additional git genes are suppressed by exogenous cAMP, these ‘upstream’ git genes were proposed to act to produce a glucose-induced cAMP signal. We report here that assays of cAMP levels in wild-type and various mutant S. pombe cells, before and after exposure to glucose, show that this is the case. The data suggest that the cAMP signal results from the activation of adenylate cyclase. Therefore these ‘upstream’ git genes appear to encode a glucose-induced adenylate cyclase activation pathway. Assays of cAMP on a strain carrying a mutation in the git6 gene, which acts downstream of adenylate cyclase, indicate that git6 may function to feedback regulate adenylate cyclase activity. Thus git6 may encode a cAMP-dependent protein kinase.

We have used degenerate oligonucleotide probes based on sequences conserved among known protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) to identify two Schizosaccharomyces pombe genes encoding PTPases. We previously described the cloning of pyp1+ (S. Ottilie, J. Chernoff, G. Hannig, C. S. Hoffman, and R. L. Erikson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:3455-3459, 1991), and here we describe a second gene, called pyp2+. The C terminus of each protein contains sequences conserved in the apparent catalytic domains of all known PTPases. Disruption of pyp2+ results in viable cells, as was the case for pyp1+, whereas disruption of pyp2+ and pyp1+ results in synthetic lethality. Overexpression of either pyp1+ or pyp2+ in wild-type strains leads to a delay in mitosis but is suppressed by a wee1-50 mutation at 35 degrees C or a cdc2-1w mutation. A pyp1 disruption suppresses the temperature-sensitive lethality of a cdc25-22 mutation. Our data suggest that pyp1+ and pyp2+ act as negative regulators of mitosis upstream of the wee1+/mik1+ pathway.