Search

In mating fission yeast cells, sensing and response to extracellular pheromone concentrations occurs through an exploratory Cdc42 patch that stochastically samples the cell cortex before stabilizing towards a mating partner. Active Ras1 (Ras1-GTP), an upstream regulator of Cdc42, and Gap1, the GTPase-activating protein for Ras1, localize at the patch. We developed a reaction-diffusion model of Ras1 patch appearance and disappearance with a positive feedback by a Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factor (GEF) and Gap1 inhibition. The model is based on new estimates of Ras1-GDP, Ras1-GTP and Gap1 diffusion coefficients and rates of cytoplasmic exchange studied by FRAP. The model reproduces exploratory patch behavior and lack of Ras1 patch in cells lacking Gap1. Transition to a stable patch can occur by change of Gap1 rates constants or local increase of the positive feedback rate constants. The model predicts that the patch size and number of patches depend on the strength of positive and negative feedbacks. Measurements of Ras1 patch size and number in cells overexpressing the Ras1 GEF or Gap1 are consistent with the model., Author summary Unicellular fission yeasts mate by fusing with partners of the opposite mating type. Each pair member grows towards its selected partner that signals its presence through secreted pheromone. The process of partner selection occurs through an exploratory patch (containing activated signaling protein Cdc42 and upstream regulator Ras1) that assembles and disassembles on the cell cortex, stabilizing in regions of higher opposite pheromone concentration. We present a computational model of the molecular mechanisms driving the dynamical pattern of patch exploration and stabilization. The model is based on reaction and diffusion along the curved cell membrane, with diffusion coefficients measured experimentally. In the model, a positive Ras1 activation feedback loop generates a patch containing most of the activating protein (Ras1 GEF). The fast diffusing inhibitor Gap1 that is recruited locally from the cytoplasm spreads on the cell membrane, limiting patch size and causing its decay. Spontaneous reinitiation of Ras1 activation elsewhere on the cortex provides a mechanism for exploration. Transition of the system’s behavior to that of a single stable patch is possible upon simulated pheromone sensing. The computational model provides predictions for the number of patches and patch size dependence on parameters that we tested experimentally.

The yeast cell wall is digested to allow cell fusion during sexual reproduction. How cells coordinate this process with cell–cell contact to prevent lysis is unclear. Merlini et al. show that the Ras GAP protein Gap1, which is recruited to sites of Ras-GTP, restricts Ras activity and protects cells from lysis due to premature fusion attempts., In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, pheromone signaling engages a signaling pathway composed of a G protein–coupled receptor, Ras, and a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade that triggers sexual differentiation and gamete fusion. Cell–cell fusion requires local cell wall digestion, which relies on an initially dynamic actin fusion focus that becomes stabilized upon local enrichment of the signaling cascade on the structure. We constructed a live-reporter of active Ras1 (Ras1–guanosine triphosphate [GTP]) that shows Ras activity at polarity sites peaking on the fusion structure before fusion. Remarkably, constitutive Ras1 activation promoted fusion focus stabilization and fusion attempts irrespective of cell pairing, leading to cell lysis. Ras1 activity was restricted by the guanosine triphosphatase–activating protein Gap1, which was itself recruited to sites of Ras1-GTP and was essential to block untimely fusion attempts. We propose that negative feedback control of Ras activity restrains the MAPK signal and couples fusion with cell–cell engagement.

In fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, pheromone signalling engages a GPCR-Ras-MAPK cascade to trigger sexual differentiation leading to gamete fusion. Cell-cell fusion necessitates local cell wall digestion, the location of which relies on an initially dynamic actin fusion focus that becomes stabilized upon local enrichment of the signalling cascade. We constructed a live-reporter of active Ras1 (Ras1-GTP), also functional in S. cerevisiae, which revealed Ras activity at polarity sites peaking on the fusion structure before fusion. Remarkably, constitutive Ras1 activation promoted fusion focus stabilization and fusion attempts irrespective of cell-cell pairing, leading to cell lysis. Ras1 activity is restricted by the GTPase activating protein (GAP) Gap1, itself recruited to sites of Ras1-GTP. While the GAP domain on its own does not suffice for this localization, its recruitment to Ras1-GTP sites is essential to block untimely fusion attempts. We conclude that negative feedback control of Ras activity restrains the MAPK signal and couples fusion with cell-cell engagement.

Cell pairing is central for many processes, including immune defense, neuronal connection, hyphal fusion, and sexual reproduction. How does a cell orient toward a partner, especially when faced with multiple choices? Fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe P and M cells, which respectively express P and M factor pheromones [1, 2], pair during the mating process induced by nitrogen starvation. Engagement of pheromone receptors Map3 and Mam2 [3, 4] with their cognate pheromone ligands leads to activation of the Gα protein Gpa1 to signal sexual differentiation [3, 5, 6]. Prior to cell pairing, the Cdc42 GTPase, a central regulator of cell polarization, forms dynamic zones of activity at the cell periphery at distinct locations over time [7]. Here we show that Cdc42-GTP polarization sites contain the M factor transporter Mam1, the general secretion machinery, which underlies P factor secretion, and Gpa1, suggesting that these are sub-cellular zones of pheromone secretion and signaling. Zone lifetimes scale with pheromone concentration. Computational simulations of pair formation through a fluctuating zone show that the combination of local pheromone release and sensing, short pheromone decay length, and pheromone-dependent zone stabilization leads to efficient pair formation. Consistently, pairing efficiency is reduced in the absence of the P factor protease. Similarly, zone stabilization at reduced pheromone levels, which occurs in the absence of the predicted GTPase-activating protein for Ras, leads to reduction in pairing efficiency. We propose that efficient cell pairing relies on fluctuating local signal emission and perception, which become locked into place through stimulation.