Search

Objectives: When tested in broth, avibactam reverses ceftazidime resistance in many Pseudomonas aeruginosa that express ESBLs. We examined whether similar reversal is observed against intracellular forms of P. aeruginosa ., Methods: Strains: reference strains; two engineered strains with basal non-inducible expression of AmpC and their isogenic mutants with stably derepressed AmpC; and clinical isolates with complete, partial or no resistance to reversion with avibactam. Pharmacodynamic model: 24 h concentration-response to ceftazidime [0.01-200 mg/L alone or with avibactam (4 mg/L)] of bacteria in broth or bacteria phagocytosed by THP-1 monocytes, with calculation of ceftazidime relative potency ( C s : concentration yielding a static effect) and maximal relative effect [ E max : cfu decrease at infinitely large antibiotic concentrations (efficacy in the model)] using the Hill equation. Cellular content of avibactam: quantification by LC-MS/MS., Results: For both extracellular and intracellular bacteria, ceftazidime C s was always close to its MIC. For ceftazidime-resistant strains, avibactam addition shifted ceftazidime C s to values close to the MIC of the combination in broth. E max was systematically below the detection limit (-5 log 10 ) for extracellular bacteria, but limited to -1.3 log 10 for intracellular bacteria (except for two isolates) with no effect of avibactam. The cellular concentration of avibactam reflected extracellular concentration and was not influenced by ceftazidime (0-160 mg/L)., Conclusions: The potential for avibactam to inhibit β-lactamases does not differ for extracellular and intracellular forms of P. aeruginosa , denoting an unhindered access to its target in both situations. The loss of maximal relative efficacy of ceftazidime against intracellular P. aeruginosa was unrelated to resistance via avibactam-inhibitable β-lactamases., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Unlabelled: The magnitudes of the postantibiotic effect (PAE) and post-β-lactamase-inhibitory effect (PLIE) of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftaroline-avibactam, and aztreonam-avibactam were determined against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa that either harboured genes encoding serine and/or metallo-β-lactamases, or did not harbour bla genes. The bla genes included ones that encoded extended spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC and KPC β-lactamases, and one metallo-β-lactamase, NDM-1. No substantial PAE was observed for any combination against any isolate. One substantial PLIE was found: a value of 1·9 h for ceftazidime-avibactam against Klebsiella pneumoniae (blaKPC-2 ). From comparison with results in the literature, we propose that the existence of a substantial PLIE depends on the bacterial isolate and on the specific β-lactamase inhibitor and β-lactam combination., Significance and Impact of the Study: A wave of new β-lactamase inhibitors is entering either therapeutic use or clinical trials. The present work characterizes the postantibiotic effect (PAE) and post-β-lactamase-inhibitory effect (PLIE) of the clinically most advanced of these compounds, avibactam. We show that the existence of a measurable PLIE is strain- (and possibly compound-) dependent, and cannot be relied upon as a standard component of the primary pharmacology of a new β-lactamase inhibitor. This variability was not reported in earlier studies of clavulanic acid or sulbactam., (© 2016 The Society for Applied Microbiology.)