Search

Introduction: Repatriated corpses may have been autopsied abroad. The aim of the study was to compare the findings from second medico-legal autopsies with those from primary autopsies abroad to spotlight possible implications for the management of repatriated corpses., Material and Methods: All autopsies from a 20-year period at the Institute of Legal Medicine in Frankfurt am Main on repatriated corpses of German citizens were reviewed. The results were compared with the information from the body passports, the protocols of the autopsies in the country of death, and the police files., Results: In total, 151 corpses repatriated from 56 different countries were autopsied. The interval between death and autopsy in Germany was 2-603 days (median: 11 days). 91 of the repatriated corpses (59.5%) had previously been autopsied abroad. Three body cavities had been opened in 78.0% (71/91) of the original autopsies; among them, there were 11 cases (15.5%) with dissection of all organs, as opposed to 7 cases (9.9%) with all organs intact and in situ. Of the previously autopsied corpses, 62.6% were accompanied by a body passport that noted the cause of death. In nearly 75% of these cases, the stated cause of death was compatible with that established at second autopsy. In 5 cases (10.2%), the cause of death established in the second autopsy disagreed with that on the body passport. The most prominent disparity was a cranial gunshot wound rather than the stated fatal fall., Discussion: This analysis of individual cases spotlights the problematics of an uncritical approval of the body passport. In light of the different procedural autopsy standards around the world, the validity of an autopsy abroad is discussed in the context of the second autopsy results., Conclusion: A second external postmortem examination by qualified medical practitioners should be obligatory in all cases of repatriated corpses, with notification of the criminal police in all cases of non-natural or undetermined death. A timely second autopsy is recommended even in cases with previous autopsy abroad., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Due to the high ambient temperature, sauna deaths show a few confounding particularities, such as an accelerated onset of the postmortem changes, that can make correct assessment of the manner of death difficult and severely constrain the accuracy of post- mortem interval estimates. This retrospective study, performed at the medicolegal institutes in Hesse, Germany, reviewed all autopsy reports from the years 1994-2014 for sauna-related deaths. 9 relevant cases were found involving one woman and eight men aged between 52 and 80 years (mean and median value: 67 years). Of the individuals who had died of a natural cause, four were found to have had coronary heart disease, which, in the setting of heart hypertrophy and exposure to high temperatures, ultimately led to cardiac failure. In three other cases, a non-natural cause of death had been diagnosed; however, all were attributable to accidents. In two of these, blood alcohol concentrations (BAC) of over two per mil were found. In our opinion, the manner of death should be classified as undetermined in sauna-related fatalities. Such cases require a court-ordered autopsy to reliably identify the actual cause of death.

Background: Trisomy 21 is the most common human chromosomal abnormality. Its manifestation includes intellectual impairment and more or less typical anatomical malformations and functional deficiencies that can cause sudden or unexpected deaths. Typical medicolegal questions at autopsy are related to medical malpractice, improper care, neglect, or abuse, and, depending on the cause of death, whether the death might have been avoidable. The aim of this study was to examine whether the causes of death in individuals with trisomy 21 were linked to the known health risks for this condition and to consider how these deaths might have been prevented.Material and Methods: A retrospective study was performed at the Institutes for Legal Medicine in Giessen and Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany. All records for forensic autopsy cases within a 20-year period from 1998 to 2017 were reviewed for the diagnosis trisomy 21", respectively, "Down's syndrome".Results: Twenty-three cases complied with the inclusion criteria trisomy 21 and autopsy. The age of the deceased ranged from 23 days to 61 years. Infectious diseases, mainly respiratory, were the leading cause of death, followed by accidental deaths.Conclusion: The medicolegal relevance of the known health risks in Down's syndrome could be illustrated by the autopsy findings and the results of the additional examinations. The known high susceptibility to infections, with an increased risk of a rapid course and lethal outcome, in individuals with Down's syndrome could be confirmed in our study. A sound knowledge of the risks and abnormalities associated with trisomy 21 are helpful in medicolegal assessments, particularly, in relation to medical malpractice charges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]