Search

Background: Improving feedlot performance, carcase weight and quality is a primary goal of the beef industry worldwide. Here, we used data from 3408 Australian Angus steers from seven years of birth (YOB) cohorts (2011-2017) with a minimal level of sire linkage and that were genotyped for 45,152 SNPs. Phenotypic records included two feedlot and five carcase traits, namely average daily gain (ADG), average daily dry matter intake (DMI), carcase weight (CWT), carcase eye muscle area (EMA), carcase Meat Standard Australia marbling score (MBL), carcase ossification score (OSS) and carcase subcutaneous rib fat depth (RIB). Using a 7-way cross-validation based on YOB cohorts, we tested the quality of genomic predictions using the linear regression (LR) method compared to the traditional method (Pearson's correlation between the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) and its associated adjusted phenotype divided by the square root of heritability); explored the factors, such as heritability, validation cohort, and phenotype that affect estimates of accuracy, bias, and dispersion calculated with the LR method; and suggested a novel interpretation for translating differences in accuracy into phenotypic differences, based on GEBV quartiles (Q1Q4)., Results: Heritability (h 2 ) estimates were generally moderate to high (from 0.29 for ADG to 0.53 for CWT). We found a strong correlation (0.73, P-value < 0.001) between accuracies using the traditional method and those using the LR method, although the LR method was less affected by random variation within and across years and showed a better ability to discriminate between extreme GEBV quartiles. We confirmed that bias of GEBV was not significantly affected by h 2 , validation cohort or trait. Similarly, validation cohort was not a significant source of variation for any of the GEBV quality metrics. Finally, we observed that the phenotypic differences were larger for higher accuracies., Conclusions: Our estimates of h 2 and GEBV quality metrics suggest a potential for accurate genomic selection of Australian Angus for feedlot performance and carcase traits. In addition, the Q1Q4 measure presented here easily translates into possible gains of genomic selection in terms of phenotypic differences and thus provides a more tangible output for commercial beef cattle producers., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Spatiotemporal changes in the chromatin accessibility landscape are essential to cell differentiation, development, health, and disease. The quest of identifying regulatory elements in open chromatin regions across different tissues and developmental stages is led by large international collaborative efforts mostly focusing on model organisms, such as ENCODE. Recently, the Functional Annotation of Animal Genomes (FAANG) has been established to unravel the regulatory elements in non-model organisms, including cattle. Now, we can transition from prediction to validation by experimentally identifying the regulatory elements in tropical indicine cattle. The identification of regulatory elements, their annotation and comparison with the taurine counterpart, holds high promise to link regulatory regions to adaptability traits and improve animal productivity and welfare., Results: We generate open chromatin profiles for liver, muscle, and hypothalamus of indicine cattle through ATAC-seq. Using robust methods for motif discovery, motif enrichment and transcription factor binding sites, we identify potential master regulators of the epigenomic profile in these three tissues, namely HNF4, MEF2, and SOX factors, respectively. Integration with transcriptomic data allows us to confirm some of their target genes. Finally, by comparing our results with Bos taurus data we identify potential indicine-specific open chromatin regions and overlaps with indicine selective sweeps., Conclusions: Our findings provide insights into the identification and analysis of regulatory elements in non-model organisms, the evolution of regulatory elements within two cattle subspecies as well as having an immediate impact on the animal genetics community in particular for a relevant productive species such as tropical cattle., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

In this study, we aimed to assess the value of genotyping DNA pools as a strategy to generate accurate and cost-effective genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of sires in multi-sire mating systems. In order to do that, we used phenotypic records of 2,436 Australian Angus cattle from 174 sires, including yearling weight (YWT; N = 1,589 records), coat score (COAT; N = 2,026 records), and Meat Standards Australia marbling score (MARB; N = 1,304 records). Phenotypes were adjusted for fixed effects and age at measurement and pools of 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 animals were explored. Pools were created either by phenotype or at random. When pools were created at random, 10 replicates were examined to provide a measure of sampling variation. The relative accuracy of each pooling strategy was measured by the Pearson correlation coefficient between the sire's GEBV with pooled progeny and the GEBV using individually genotyped progeny. Random pools allow the computation of sire GEBV that are, on average, moderately correlated (i.e., r > 0.5 at pool sizes [PS] ≤ 10) with those obtained without pooling. However, for pools assigned at random, the difference between the best and the worst relative accuracy obtained out of the 10 replicates was as high as 0.41 for YWT, 0.36 for COAT, and 0.61 for MARB. This uncertainty associated with the relative accuracy of GEBV makes randomly assigning animals to pools an unreliable approach. In contrast, pooling by phenotype allowed the estimation of sires' GEBV with a relative accuracy ≥ 0.9 at PS < 10 for all three phenotypes. Moreover, even with larger PS, the lowest relative accuracy obtained was 0.88 (YWT, PS = 20). In agreement with results using simulated data, we conclude that pooling by phenotype is a robust approach to implementing genomic evaluation using commercial herd data, and PS larger than 10 individuals can be considered., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The growing concern with the environment is making important for livestock producers to focus on selection for efficiency-related traits, which is a challenge for commercial cattle herds due to the lack of pedigree information. To explore a cost-effective opportunity for genomic evaluations of commercial herds, this study compared the accuracy of bulls' genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) using different pooled genotype strategies. We used ten replicates of previously simulated genomic and phenotypic data for one low (t1) and one moderate (t2) heritability trait of 200 sires and 2,200 progeny. Sire's GEBV were calculated using a univariate mixed model, with a hybrid genomic relationship matrix (h-GRM) relating sires to: 1) 1,100 pools of 2 animals; 2) 440 pools of 5 animals; 3) 220 pools of 10 animals; 4) 110 pools of 20 animals; 5) 88 pools of 25 animals; 6) 44 pools of 50 animals; and 7) 22 pools of 100 animals. Pooling criteria were: at random, grouped sorting by t1, grouped sorting by t2, and grouped sorting by a combination of t1 and t2. The same criteria were used to select 110, 220, 440, and 1,100 individual genotypes for GEBV calculation to compare GEBV accuracy using the same number of individual genotypes and pools. Although the best accuracy was achieved for a given trait when pools were grouped based on that same trait (t1: 0.50-0.56, t2: 0.66-0.77), pooling by one trait impacted negatively on the accuracy of GEBV for the other trait (t1: 0.25-0.46, t2: 0.29-0.71). Therefore, the combined measure may be a feasible alternative to use the same pools to calculate GEBVs for both traits (t1: 0.45-0.57, t2: 0.62-0.76). Pools of 10 individuals were identified as representing a good compromise between loss of accuracy (~10%-15%) and cost savings (~90%) from genotype assays. In addition, we demonstrated that in more than 90% of the simulations, pools present higher sires' GEBV accuracy than individual genotypes when the number of genotype assays is limited (i.e., 110 or 220) and animals are assigned to pools based on phenotype. Pools assigned at random presented the poorest results (t1: 0.07-0.45, t2: 0.14-0.70). In conclusion, pooling by phenotype is the best approach to implementing genomic evaluation using commercial herd data, particularly when pools of 10 individuals are evaluated. While combining phenotypes seems a promising strategy to allow more flexibility to the estimates made using pools, more studies are necessary in this regard., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Provision of feed accounts for a high proportion of the variable cost in beef production systems, and consequently is a major determinant of overall profitability. Thus, improving the conversion of feed to animal product by identifying and breeding cattle with improved feed efficiency potential provides a method through which feed input costs may be reduced, whilst also contributing to more environmentally sustainable beef production. The rumen microbiome dictates the feed degradation capacity and subsequent nutrient supply in ruminants and is thus potentially impacted by feed efficiency phenotype. However, the relationship between rumen microbiota and host feed efficiency phenotype is yet to be fully elucidated. This is further complicated when contrasting diets, cattle breeds as well as various stages of animal development are considered. The objective of this study was to undertake network analysis on rumen microbiome data generated from two contrasting steer breed types (Charolais and Holstein-Friesian), divergent within-breed for residual feed intake (RFI), and offered contrasting diets during different stages of development: i) high-concentrate during the growing phase; ii) grass silage during the growing phase; iii) zero-grazed grass during the growing phase, and iv) high-concentrate during the finishing phase. From approximately 10 mo of age, Charolais (n = 90) and Holstein-Friesian (n = 77) steers were individually fed each of the aforementioned diets for 70 d, following an adaptation period between each diet. At the end of each dietary phase, RFI was determined for every steer and rumen fluid was sampled using a transesophageal sampling device from the 10 most-efficient (Low-RFI) and the 10 least-efficient (High-RFI) steers within each breed. Rumen fluid samples were then subjected to 16S rRNA sequencing and a network-based systems biology analysis subsequently undertaken using PCIT incorporating the 16S sequencing data and individual RFI values across each breed and dietary phase. A total of 110 microbial taxa were connected (P < 0.05; r > 0.8) to the breed and diet contrasts examined; however, no single microbe was commonly connected to all contrasts. The Pyramidobacter genus was the most represented phylotype, displaying a positive connection with the Charolais steers during the grass silage diet, as well as a negative association with Charolais steers during the first high-concentrate diet and Holstein-Friesian steers during the zero-grazed grass diet. Similarly, of the 35 microbial taxa significantly connected to more than one breed/diet contrast, 12 displayed altered direction of association, indicating a differential relationship between the rumen microbiome and RFI phenotype depending on the prevailing dietary management. Acknowledgement: The animal model used in this study was funded by the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (RSF13/S/519). Kate Keogh received funding for this work from the Research Leaders 2025 program (co-funded by Teagasc and the European Union’s Horizon 2020, Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement number 754380). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Beef is a source of essential fatty acids (EFA), linoleic (LA) and alpha-linolenic (ALA) acids, which protect against inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases in humans. However, the intramuscular EFA profile in cattle is a complex and polygenic trait. Thus, this study aimed to identify potential regulatory genes of the essential fatty acid profile in Longissimus thoracis of Nellore cattle finished in feedlot. Forty-four young bulls clustered in four groups of fifteen animals with extreme values for each FA were evaluated through differentially expressed genes (DEG) analysis and two co-expression methodologies (WGCNA and PCIT). We highlight the ECHS1, IVD, ASB5, and ERLIN1 genes and the TF NFIA, indicated in both FA. Moreover, we associate the NFYA, NFYB, PPARG, FASN, and FADS2 genes with LA, and the RORA and ELOVL5 genes with ALA. Furthermore, the functional enrichment analysis points out several terms related to FA metabolism. These findings contribute to our understanding of the genetic mechanisms underlying the beef EFA profile in Nellore cattle finished in feedlot. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context. Wagyu Feeder Check is a genomic-based tool designed to provide genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) for five feedlot growth and carcase traits. At present, Wagyu Feeder Check is based on a reference population of 8316 genotyped and phenotyped Australian fullblood (FB; N = 2120) Wagyu and Wagyu-crossed (XB; N = 6196) cattle, principally Wagyu × Angus F1 animals. Aims. We provide technical details behind the development of the Wagyu Feeder Check and validate the ability of its GEBV to predict differences in performance of Wagyu cattle in daily weight gain at feedlot, carcase weight, carcase eye muscle area, carcase marbling score and carcase rump fat at the P8 site. Methods. Data supplied from eight commercial supply chains across Australia was used to generate GEBV using mixed-model equations that incorporated a genomic relationship matrix build with 82 504 autosomal markers. The bias, dispersion, and accuracy of the GEBV were evaluated using a four-way cross-validation scheme where, in each turn, the phenotypes from a random 1549 (or 25%) XB cattle were set as missing. Key results. The genomic estimate of the Wagyu content in the FB and XB population averaged 99.12% and 59.55%, respectively, and with most of the non-Wagyu content associated with Angus. The estimates of heritability (± s.e.) were 0.497 ± 0.016, 0.474 ± 0.004, 0.347 ± 0.014, 0.429 ± 0.003 and 0.422 ± 0.003 for daily weight gain at feedlot, carcase weight, eye muscle area, marbling and rump fat, respectively. Averaged across the four XB validation populations, the accuracy of GEBV was 0.624, 0.634, 0.385, 0.620, and 0.526 for the same set of traits. Conclusions. Genomic predictions generated by Wagyu Feeder Check can predict differences in feedlot and carcase performance of Australian Wagyu cattle. Given the large content of Angus in the XB population, further research is required to determine the predictive ability of GEBV in Wagyu × Bos indicus and Wagyu × dairy animals. Implications. Commercial feedlot operators finishing animals with a strong Wagyu breed component will benefit from using Wagyu Feeder Check for decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) can regulate several aspects of gene expression, being associated with complex phenotypes in humans and livestock species. In taurine beef cattle, recent evidence points to the involvement of lncRNA in feed efficiency (FE), a proxy for increased productivity and sustainability. Here, we hypothesized specific regulatory roles of lncRNA in FE of indicine cattle. Using RNA-Seq data from the liver, muscle, hypothalamus, pituitary gland and adrenal gland from Nellore bulls with divergent FE, we submitted new transcripts to a series of filters to confidently predict lncRNA. Then, we identified lncRNA that were differentially expressed (DE) and/or key regulators of FE. Finally, we explored lncRNA genomic location and interactions with miRNA and mRNA to infer potential function. We were able to identify 126 relevant lncRNA for FE in Bos indicus, some with high homology to previously identified lncRNA in Bos taurus and some possible specific regulators of FE in indicine cattle. Moreover, lncRNA identified here were linked to previously described mechanisms related to FE in hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and are expected to help elucidate this complex phenotype. This study contributes to expanding the catalogue of lncRNA, particularly in indicine cattle, and identifies candidates for further studies in animal selection and management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]