Search

Introduction: High-frequency low-tidal-volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long-term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high-power short-duration ablation. Thirty-five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion., Results: A total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p < .001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p < .001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p < .001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p < .001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p < .001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p < .001)., Conclusion: HFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Sauer is a paid consultant for Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr Romero is a paid consultant for Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, AtriCure, Abbott, and Sanofi; Dr Romero has also received research support from Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific. Dr Tedrow is a paid consultant for Biosense Webster, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Thermedical Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Background: Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) typically requires radiation exposure with its potential adverse health effects. A completely fluoroless ablation approach is achievable using a combination of electroanatomical mapping and intracardiac echocardiography. Nonetheless, data in patients undergoing VT ablation are limited., Objectives: This study aimed to determine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of VT ablation in patients with structural heart disease using a zero-fluoroscopy approach., Methods: This multicenter study included consecutive patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing fluoroless VT ablation. Patients requiring epicardial access or coronary angiography were excluded., Results: Between 2017 and 2023 a total of 198 patients (aged 66.4 ± 13.4 years, 76% male, 48% ischemic) were included. Most patients (95.4%) underwent left ventricular (LV) mapping and/or ablation, which was conducted via transseptal route in 54.5% (n = 103), via retrograde aortic route in 43.4% (n = 82), and using a combined approach in 2.1% (n = 4). Two-thirds of patients had a cardiac device, including a biventricular device in 15%; 2 patients had a LV assist device, and 1 patient had a mechanical aortic valve prosthesis. The mean total procedural time was 211 ± 70 minutes, and the total radiofrequency time was 30 ± 22 minutes. During a follow-up period of 22 ± 18 months, the freedom from VT recurrence was 80%, and 7.6% of patients underwent a repeated ablation. Procedural-related complications occurred in 6 patients (3.0%)., Conclusions: Fluoroless ablation of VT in structural heart disease is feasible, effective, and safe when epicardial mapping/ablation is not required., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by the Mark Marchlinski E.P. Research Fund, and the Winkleman Family Fund in Cardiac Innovation. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: When ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurs after standard RF ablation (sRFA) some patients benefit from repeat sRFA, whereas others warrant advanced methods such as intramural needle ablation (INA). Our objectives are to assess the utility of repeat sRFA and to clarify the benefit of INA when repeat sRFA fails in patients with VT due to structural heart disease., Methods: In consecutive patients who were prospectively enrolled in a study for INA for recurrent sustained monomorphic VT despite sRFA, repeat sRFA was considered first. INA was performed during the same procedure if repeat sRFA failed or no targets for sRFA were identified., Results: Of 85 patients enrolled, acute success with repeat sRFA was achieved in 30 patients (35%), and during the 6-month follow-up, 87% (20/23) were free of VT hospitalization, 78% were free of any VT, and 7 were lost to follow-up. INA was performed in 55 patients (65%) after sRFA failed, or no endocardial targets were found abolished or modified inducible VT in 35/55 patients (64%). During follow-up, 72% (39/54) were free of VT hospitalization, 41% were free of any VT, and 1 was lost to follow-up. Overall, 59 out of 77 (77%) patients were free of hospitalization and 52% were free of any VT. Septal-origin VTs were more likely to need INA, whereas RV and papillary muscle VTs were less likely to require INA., Conclusions: Repeat sRFA was beneficial in 23% (18/77) of patients with recurrent sustained VT who were referred for INA. The availability of INA increased favorable outcomes to 52%., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: We previously reported feasibility of irrigated needle ablation (INA) with a retractable 27-G end-hole needle catheter to treat nonendocardial ventricular arrhythmia substrate, an important cause of ablation failure., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to report outcomes and complications in our entire INA-treated population., Methods: Patients with recurrent sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) or high-density premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) despite radiofrequency ablation were prospectively enrolled at 4 centers. Endpoints included a 70% decrease in VT frequency or PVC burden decrease to <5,000/24 h at 6 months., Results: INA was performed in 111 patients (median: 2 failed prior ablations, 71% nonischemic heart disease, and left ventricular ejection fraction 36% ± 14%). INA acutely abolished targeted PVCs in 33 of 37 patients (89%), and PVCs were reduced to <5,000/day in 29 patients (78%). During 6-month follow-up, freedom from hospitalization was observed in 50 of 72 patients with VT (69%), and improvement or abolition of VT occurred in 47%. All patients received multiple INA applications, with more in the VT group than in the PVC group (median: 12 [IQR: 7-19] vs 7 [5-15]; P < 0.01). After INA, additional endocardial standard radiofrequency ablation was required in 23% of patients. Adverse events included 4 pericardial effusions (3.5%), 3 cases of (anticipated) atrioventricular block (2.6%), and 3 heart failure exacerbations (2.6%). During 6-month follow-up, 5 deaths occurred; none were procedure-related., Conclusions: INA achieves improved arrhythmia control in 78% of patients with PVCs and avoids hospitalization in 69% of patients with VT refractory to standard ablation at 6-month follow-up. Procedural risks are acceptable. (Intramural Needle Ablation for Ablation of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia, NCT01791543; Intramural Needle Ablation for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias, NCT03204981)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Kurata has received a scholarship from the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society. Dr Hasegawa has received support from the International Rotary Fellowship of Healthcare Professionals. Dr Tedrow has received honoraria from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Abbott; and consulting fees from Thermedical Inc. Dr Dukkipati has received a research grant from Biosense Webster; and reports equity in Manual Surgical Sciences and Farapulse, which was acquired by Boston Scientific. Dr Richardson has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic; research funding from Medtronic and Abbott; and served as a consultant for Philips and Biosense Webster. Dr Kanagasundram has received speaker honoraria from Biosense Webster. Dr Koruth has received research grants from Affera, Farapulse, Cardiofocus, and Biosense Webster; consulting fees from Abbott, Farapulse, and Cardiofocus; and has equity in Affera. Dr John has received speaker honoraria from Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Sapp is a coholder of a patent for irrigated needle ablation with rights assigned to Brigham and Women’s Hospital; has received research grants from Biosense Webster and Abbott; and (modest) speaker or consulting honoraria from Medtronic, Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Varian. Dr Reddy has reported consulting fees and equity from Abalcon, Acutus Medical, Affera, Apama Medical, Aquaheart, Atacor, Autonomix, Backbeat, BioSig, Circa Scientific, Corvia Medical, Dinova-Hangzhou Nuomao Medtech Co, Ltd, East End Medical, EPD, Epix Therapeutics, EpiEP, Eximo, Fire1, Javelin, Kardium, Keystone Heart, LuxCath, Medlumics, Middlepeak, Nuvera, Sirona Medical, and Valcare; equity in Manual Surgical Sciences, Newpace, Surecor, Vizaramed, and Farapulse, which was acquired by Boston Scientific; and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Axon, Biosense Webster, Biotronic, Boston Scientific, Cardiofocus, Cardionomic, CardioNXT/AFTx, EBR, Impulse Dynamics, Medtronic, Philips, Pulse Biosciences, Stimda, and Thermedical. Dr Stevenson is a coholder of a patent for irrigated needle ablation with rights assigned to Brigham and Women’s Hospital; and has received speaking honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) due to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is difficult to treat, and long-term outcome data are limited., Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of mortality or heart transplantation (HTx) and VT recurrence., Methods: Consecutive patients with DCM accepted for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of VT at 9 centers were prospectively enrolled and followed., Results: Of 281 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 13 years, 85% men, mean left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 36% ± 12%), 35% had VT storm, 20% had incessant VT, and amiodarone was unsuccessful in 68%. During follow-up of 21 months (IQR: 6-30 months), 67 patients (24%) died or underwent HTx, and 138 (49%) had VT recurrence (45 within 30 days, defined as early); the 4-year rate of VT recurrence or mortality or HTx was 70%. Independent predictors of mortality or HTx were early VT recurrence (HR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.37-6.21; P < 0.01), amiodarone at discharge (HR: 3.23; 95% CI: 1.43-7.33; P < 0.01), renal dysfunction (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.01-3.64; P = 0.046), and LVEF (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.0-1.84; P = 0.052). LVEF ≤32% identified patients at risk for mortality or HTx (area under the curve: 0.75). Mortality or HTx per 100 person-years was 40.4 events after early, compared with 14.2 events after later VT recurrence and 8.5 events with no VT recurrence after RFCA (P < 0.01 for both). Patients with early recurrence and LVEFs ≤32% had a 1-year rate of mortality or HTx of 55%. VT recurrence was predicted by prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks, basal anteroseptal VT origin, and procedural failure but not LVEF., Conclusions: Patients with DCM needing RFCA for VT are a high-risk group. Following RFCA, approximately one-half remain free of VT recurrence. Early VT recurrence with LVEF ≤32% identifies those at very high risk for mortality or HTx, and screening for mechanical support or HTx should be considered. Late VT recurrence after RFCA does not predict worse outcome., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was partially supported by an investigator-initiated grant (IIS-310) from Biosense Webster (a Johnson & Johnson company). Dr Zeppenfeld has received research grants from Biosense Webster to the Department of Cardiology at Leiden University Medical Center. Dr Wijnmaalen has received research grants from Biosense Webster to the Department of Cardiology at Leiden University Medical Center. Dr Berruezo is a stockholder in ADAS3D; and has received research grants from Biosense Webster and Biotronik. Dr Vaseghi is an educational consultant for Biosense Webster; and holds founder shares in NeuCures. Dr de Riva has received research grants from Biosense Webster to the Department of Cardiology at Leiden University Medical Center. Dr Piorkowski is chief medical officer of Abbott EP. Dr Stevenson has received speaker honoraria from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Johnson & Johnson, and Medtronic; and has received a research grant from Thermedical. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are often amenable to catheter ablation. However, a deep intramural focus may lead to failure due to inability of standard ablation techniques to penetrate the focus. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of infusion needle ablation (INA) for PVCs that are refractory to standard radiofrequency ablation., Methods: Under 2 Food and Drug Administration approved protocols, INA was evaluated in patients with frequent PVCs that were refractory to standard ablation. Initial targets for ablation were selected by standard mapping techniques. INA was performed with a deflectable catheter equipped with an extendable/retractable needle at the tip that can be extended up to 12 mm into the myocardium and is capable of pacing and recording. After contrast injection for location assessment, radiofrequency ablation was performed with the needle tip using a temperature-controlled mode (maximum temperature 60 °C) with saline infusion from the needle. The primary end point was a decrease in PVC burden to <5000/24 hours at 6 months. The primary safety end point was incidence of procedure- or device-related serious adverse events., Results: At 4 centers, 35 patients (age 55.3±16.9 years, 74.2% male) underwent INA. The baseline median PVC burden was 25.4% (interquartile range, 18.4%-33.9%) and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.7±12.3%. Delivering 10.3±8.0 INA lesions/patient (91% had adjunctive standard radiofrequency ablation also) resulted in acute PVC elimination in 71.4%. After a mean follow-up of 156±109 days, the primary efficacy end point was met in 73.3%. The median PVC burden decreased to 0.8% (interquartile range, 0.1%-6.0%; P <0.001). The primary safety end point occurred in 14.3% consisting of 1 (2.9%) heart block, 1 (2.9%) femoral artery dissection, and 3 (8.6%) pericardial effusions (all treated percutaneously)., Conclusions: INA is effective for the elimination of frequent PVCs that are refractory to conventional ablation and is associated with an acceptable safety profile., Registration: URL: https://www., Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01791543 and NCT03204981.

Background: The short-coupled variant of torsade de pointes (sc-TdP) is a malignant arrhythmia that frequently presents with ventricular fibrillation (VF) electrical storm. Verapamil is considered the first-line therapy of sc-TdP while catheter ablation is not widely adopted. The aim of this study was to determine the origin of sc-TdP and to assess the outcome of catheter ablation using 3D-mapping., Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed five patients with sc-TdP who underwent 3D-mapping and ablation of sc-TdP at five different institutions. Four patients initially presented with sudden cardiac arrest, one patient experienced recurrent syncope as the first manifestation. All patients demonstrated a monomorphic premature ventricular contraction (PVC) with late transition left bundle branch block pattern, superior axis, and a coupling interval of less than 300 ms. triggering recurrent TdP and VF. In four patients, the culprit PVC was mapped to the free wall insertion of the moderator band (MB) with a preceding Purkinje potential in two patients. Catheter ablation using 3D-mapping and intracardiac echocardiography eliminated sc-TdP in all patients, with no recurrence at mean 2.7 years (range 6 months to 8 years) of follow-up., Conclusion: 3D-mapping and intracardiac echocardiography demonstrate that sc-TdP predominantly originates from the MB free wall insertion and its Purkinje network. Catheter ablation of the culprit PVC at the MB free wall junction leads to excellent short- and long-term results and should be considered as first-line therapy in recurrent sc-TdP or electrical storm., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Aim: To describe clinical characteristics, procedural details, specific challenges, and outcomes in patients with HeartMate3™ (HM3), a left ventricular assist device system with a magnetically levitated pump, undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA)., Methods and Results: Data were collected from patients with an HM3 system who underwent VTA in seven tertiary centres. Data included baseline patient characteristics, procedural data, mortality, and arrhythmia-free survival. The study cohort included 19 patients with cardiomyopathy presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (53% with VT storm). Ventricular tachycardias were induced in 89% of patients and a total of 41 VTs were observed. Severe electromagnetic interference was present on the surface electrocardiogram. Hence, VT localization required analysis of intra-cardiac signals or the use of filter in the 40-20 Hz range. The large house pump HM3 design obscured the cannula inflow and therefore multi imaging modalities were necessary to avoid catheter entrapment in the cannula. A total of 32 VTs were mapped and were successfully ablated (31% to the anterior wall, 38% to the septum and only 9% to the inflow cannula region). Non-inducibility of any VT was reached in 11 patients (58%). Over a follow-up of 429 (interquartile range 101-692) days, 5 (26%) patients underwent a redo VT ablation due to recurrent VTA and 2 (11%) patients died., Conclusions: Ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with HM3 is feasible and safe when done in the appropriate setup. Long-term arrhythmia-free survival is acceptable but not well predicted by non-inducibility at the end of the procedure., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the feasibility of using radioablation for arrhythmogenic a substrate modification., Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to catheter ablation., Methods: A total of 6 male patients (median age 72 years) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction 20% [interquartile range (IQR): 16%-25%]) and VT refractory to antiarrhythmic medications and catheter ablations underwent SBRT to extensive scar substrate. In addition to electroanatomical mapping, 5 of 6 patients had computed tomography segmentation using MUSIC (IHU Liryc, Univ. Bordeaux and Inria Sophia Antipolis, France). Regions of wall thinning <5 mm, calcification, and intramyocardial fat were targeted for radioablation at 25 Gy., Results: The median planning target volume was 319 (IQR: 280-330) mL. Device-treated or sustained VT episodes were not significantly reduced by radioablation (median 42 [IQR: 19-269] to 29 [IQR: 0-81]; P = 0.438). However, a reduction in device shocks was observed from 12 (IQR: 3-19) to 0 (IQR: 0-1) (P = 0.046). Over a follow-up period of 231 (IQR: 212-311) days, 3 patients died of end-stage heart failure and 3 of 6 patients had possible adverse events (heart failure exacerbation, pneumonia, and an asymptomatic pericardial effusion)., Conclusions: Substrate modification using SBRT assisted by computed tomography segmentation is feasible for treatment of VT in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Although a significant reduction in device shocks was observed, suboptimal VT burden reduction and significant mortality rate in this cohort of patients with advanced cardiomyopathy underscore the need to improve mechanistic understanding for antiarrhythmic effects to guide dosing and targeting of scar substrates., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Qian was supported by a Bushell Travelling Fellowship from the Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Dr Cochet has received speaking honoraria from Siemens Healthineers, Abbott Medical, and Biosense Webster; has received consulting fees from Farapulse; and is a shareholder in inHEART. Dr Sauer has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster. Dr Tedrow has received speaking honoraria from Abbott Medical, Biosense Webster, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific. Dr Zei has received research support and consulting fees from Varian and Biosense Webster; and has received consulting fees from Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Despite advances in drug and catheter ablation therapy, long-term recurrence rates for ventricular tachycardia remain suboptimal. Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a novel treatment that has demonstrated reduction of arrhythmia episodes and favorable short-term safety profile in treatment-refractory patients. Nevertheless, the current clinical experience is early and limited. Recent studies have highlighted variable duration of treatment effect and substantial recurrence rates several months postradiation. Contributing to these differential outcomes are disparate approaches groups have taken in planning and delivering radiation, owing to both technical and knowledge gaps limiting optimization and standardization of cardiac SBRT., Methods and Findings: In this report, we review the historical basis for cardiac SBRT and existing clinical data. We then elucidate the current technical gaps in cardiac radioablation, incorporating the current clinical experience, and summarize the ongoing and needed efforts to resolve them., Conclusion: Cardiac SBRT is an emerging therapy that holds promise for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia. Technical gaps remain, to be addressed by ongoing research and growing clincial experience., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) allows intraprocedural assessment of cardiac anatomy and identification of ischemic myocardial scar and is useful for guidance of the ablation catheter and monitoring for complications. In this review, the authors discuss and provide examples of how ICE can be used to obtain additional information to understand arrhythmia mechanisms and facilitate catheter ablation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias arising from ischemic scar substrates., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Patients with prior cardiac surgery may represent a subgroup of patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) that may be more difficult to control with catheter ablation., Methods: We evaluated 1901 patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent VT ablation at 12 centers. Clinical characteristics and VT radiofrequency ablation procedural outcomes were assessed and compared between those with and without prior cardiac surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate freedom from recurrent VT and survival., Results: There were 578 subjects (30.4%) with prior cardiac surgery identified in the cohort. Those with prior cardiac surgery were older (66.4 ± 11.0 years vs. 60.5 ± 13.9 years, p < .01), with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (30.2 ± 11.5% vs. 34.8 ± 13.6%, p < .01) and more ischemic heart disease (82.5% vs. 39.3%, p < .01) but less likely to undergo epicardial mapping or ablation (9.0% vs. 38.1%, p<.01) compared to those without prior surgery. When epicardial mapping was performed, a significantly greater proportion required surgical intervention for access (19/52 [36.5%] vs. 14/504 [2.8%]; p < .01). Procedural complications, including epicardial access-related complications, were lower (5.7% vs. 7.0%, p < .01) in patients with versus without prior cardiac surgery. VT-free survival (75.1% vs. 74.1%, p = .805) and survival (86.5% vs. 87.9%, p = .397) were not different between those with and without prior heart surgery, regardless of etiology of cardiomyopathy. VT recurrence was associated with increased mortality in patients with and without prior cardiac surgery., Conclusion: Despite different clinical characteristics and fewer epicardial procedures, the safety and efficacy of VT ablation in patients with prior cardiac surgery is similar to others in this cohort. The incremental yield of epicardial mapping in predominant ischemic cardiomyopathy population prior heart surgery may be low but appears safe in experienced centers., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Supraventricular arrhythmias are the most common cardiac arrhythmias encountered; however, it is uncommon that supraventricular tachycardias require percutaneous epicardial access for successful mapping and ablation. There are particular scenarios where epicardial access and ablation should be considered. Certain accessory pathways particularly in the posteroseptal region may require epicardial access for successful ablation. These pathways may also be approached from within the coronary sinus system. In addition, tachycardias near the phrenic nerve in the right atrium or left atrium may require epicardial access for successful ablation or to allow displacement of the phrenic nerve facilitating safe catheter ablation., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr U.B. Tedrow has received honoraria from Biosense Webster, Abbott Medical, and Medtronic. She has also received consulting fees from Thermedical Inc. Dr. Aguilar: George Mines Travelling Fellowship from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to identify midmyocardial arrhythmogenic substrates by examining the frequency content of unipolar endocardial surface electrograms, comparing sites with transmural scar versus sites with intramural excitable substrate (IES) as identified during needle catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT)., Background: Midmyocardial arrhythmogenic substrates are a common reason catheter ablation for VT may fail., Methods: A total of 659 intramural needle sites were studied in 26 patients (age 61 ± 9 years, 85% male, 69% nonischemic cardiomyopathy) who underwent intramural needle catheter ablation for VT. Among 136 sites where endocardial pacing did not capture (threshold >10 mA), needle pacing captured at 29 indicating IES, and did not capture at 107 indicating transmural scar. Intramural needle ablation was performed at 21 of 29 IES sites. Analysis of voltage amplitude, duration, and power spectra of endocardial and intramural needle electrograms was performed., Results: IES sites compared with transmural scar had higher endocardial unipolar electrogram voltage, 0.99 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.69 to 1.62) mV versus 0.78 (IQR: 0.61 to 1.09) mV; p = 0.038; higher unipolar intramural needle electrogram voltage, 1.16 (0.80 to 1.69) mV versus 0.76 (0.6 to 1.12) mV; p = 0.003; higher endocardial unipolar frequency power particularly in the 5- to 20-Hz band, 1.97 (IQR: 0.93 to 3.89) mV 2 /s versus 1.03 (IQR: 0.63 to 2.22) mV 2 /s; p = 0.002; and higher unipolar intramural electrogram frequency particularly in the 0 to 10 Hz range, 3.02 (IQR: 0.98 to 6.95) mV 2 /s versus 1.33 (IQR: 0.70 to 3.13) mV 2 /s; p = 0.018. Endocardial unipolar frequency in the 5- to 20-Hz band identified sites with IES, area under the curve of 0.676; p = 0.002; power frequency integral of >0.77 mV 2 /s provided a 90% sensitivity and 41% specificity., Conclusions: The frequency content of unipolar electrograms may complement voltage in the detection of deep intramural substrates to facilitate VT catheter ablation. (Intramural Needle Ablation for Ablation of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia; NCT01791543)., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias., (© 2020 The Heart Rhythm Society; the European Heart Rhythm Association, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology; the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society; and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc./Oxford University Press/Wiley. This article is published under the Creative Commons CC-BY license.)

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias., (© 2019 The Heart Rhythm Society; the European Heart Rhythm Association, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology; the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society; and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc./Oxford University Press/Wiley. This article is published under the Creative Commons CC-BY license.)

Background: Catheter ablation for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (PMVT/VF) may target triggering premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Targeting ventricular scar has also been suggested, but data are limited., Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the electrophysiological findings and ablation outcomes for patients with PMVT/VF and structural heart disease (SHD) compared to those with idiopathic VF., Methods: Data from 32 consecutive patients (13 idiopathic VF, 19 SHD) with recurrent PMVT/VF who underwent catheter ablation were reviewed., Results: A low-voltage area of myocardial scar was present in 15 of 19 patients with SHD. Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) associated with scar was inducible and targeted in 8, 3 of whom had previous SMVT episodes separate from PMVT/VF episodes and 5 had no history of SMVT. Triggering PVCs were identified in 11 patients and arose from an area of endocardial scar in 6. Only scar ablation was performed in 8 patients who did not have triggering PVCs. All idiopathic VF patients underwent PVC ablation only. During a median of 540 days, 74% of SHD patients and 77% of idiopathic VF patients were free of recurrence, including 75% of those with only PVC ablation, 86% of those with scar plus PVC ablation, and 63% of those with only scar ablation., Conclusion: Patients with recurrent PMVT/VF and SHD often have a low-voltage scar associated with PVCs or inducible SMVT, which may also be the substrate for PMVT/VF. When present, substrate ablation targeting scar is a reasonable option for treatment of PMVT/VF even if PVCs are absent., (Copyright © 2019 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Targets for substrate-based catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) include sites with fractionated and late potentials (LPs). We hypothesized that in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), the pacing mode may influence the timing of abnormal electrograms (EGMs) relative to the surface QRS complex., Methods: We assessed bipolar EGM characteristics in left ventricular low bipolar voltage areas (< 1.5 mV) from 10 patients with coronary disease and a CRT device undergoing catheter ablation for VT. EGMs at 81 sites were analyzed during three different pacing modes (biventricular (BiV), right ventricular (RV)-only, and left ventricular (LV)-only) pacing., Results: Stimulus to end of local electrogram duration (Stim-to-eEGM) depended significantly on the stimulation site (BiV, LV, or RV, p = 0.032). Single-chamber pacing unmasked LPs, not present during BiV pacing, in three patients. In another three patients, a concomitant increase in stimulus to end of surface QRS duration caused by single-site pacing compensated for the increase in Stim-to-eEGM duration, thereby prohibiting LP unmasking., Conclusion: The sequence of ventricular activation, as determined by the pacing site in patients with CRT devices, has a major influence on the detection of late potentials during substrate-guided ablation. Further study is warranted to define the optimal approaches, including the rhythm, for substrate mapping, but our findings suggest that BiV pacing may be most likely to obscure detection of late potentials as compared to single-site pacing.

Background: Catheter ablation is effective for eliminating most drug-refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VA). However, a major reason for procedural failure is arrhythmia originating deep within the myocardium where it is inaccessible to conventional endocardial or epicardial approaches. Affected patients have limited therapeutic options., Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the safety and outcome of a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter that used an extendable/retractable 27-g needle capable of targeting deep arrhythmia (intramural) substrate., Methods: Patients who failed at least one prior catheter ablation procedure for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or nonsustained VA with associated left ventricular dysfunction were enrolled at 3 centers. The target was sustained monomorphic VT in 26 patients, including 8 with recent VT storm or VT requiring intravenous medication, and 5 with incessant VA associated with ventricular dysfunction., Results: Needle ablation was performed in 31 patients (median of 2 failed prior ablation procedures; 71% nonischemic heart disease). After a median of 15 needle lesions/patient, ablation abolished at least 1 inducible VT in 19 of 26 VT patients (73%), and suppressed ambient arrhythmia in 4 of 5 nonsustained arrhythmia patients. At the 6-month follow-up, 48% of patients were free of recurrent arrhythmia and another 19% were improved. Procedure-related complications included a single pericardial effusion treated with percutaneous drainage and a left ventricular pacing lead dislodgement with no deaths., Conclusions: In patients with recurrent ventricular arrhythmias refractory to medications and conventional catheter ablation, intramural needle radiofrequency ablation offers significant arrhythmia control with an acceptable procedural risk., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The comparative efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy vs ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is unknown., Objective: We compared outcomes of AAD and/or β-blocker (BB) therapy with those of VT ablation (with AAD/BB) in patients with ARVC who had recurrent VT., Methods: In a multicenter retrospective study, 110 patients with ARVC (mean age 38 ± 17 years; 91[83%] men) with a minimum of 3 VT episodes were included; 77 (70%) were initially treated with AAD/BB and 32 (29%) underwent ablation. Subsequently, 43 of the 77 patients treated with AAD/BB alone also underwent ablation. Overall, 75 patients underwent ablation., Results: When comparing initial AAD/BB therapy (n = 77) and VT ablation (n = 32) after ≥3 VT episodes, a single ablation procedure rendered 35% of patients free of VT at 3 years compared with 28% of AAD/BB-only-treated patients (P = .46). Of the 77 AAD/BB-only-treated patients, 43 subsequently underwent ablation. For all 75 patients who underwent ablation, 56% were VT-free at 3 years after the last ablation procedure. Epicardial ablation was used in 40/75 (53%) and was associated with lower VT recurrence after the last ablation procedure (endocardial/epicardial vs endocardial-only; 71% vs 47% 3-year VT-free survival; P = .05). Importantly, there was no difference in survival free of death or transplantation between the ablation- and AAD/BB-only-treated patients (P = .61)., Conclusion: In patients with ARVC and a high VT burden, mortality and transplantation-free survival are not significantly different between drug- and ablation-treated patients. These patients have a high risk of recurrent VT despite drug therapy. Combined endocardial/epicardial ablation is associated with reduced VT recurrence as compared with endocardial-only ablation., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the incidence and significance of atrioventricular (AV) block associated with ventricular arrhythmia (VA) ablation., Background: Attempted ablation of VAs that arise from the septum carries a risk of AV block., Methods: Data from 1,418 patients who had catheter ablation for drug-refractory VAs were evaluated. Two analyses were conducted. The first analysis assessed the patient and procedure characteristics associated with ablation-induced AV block. The second analysis investigated outcome differences between patients with and without AV block. For the second analysis, patients with AV block (Group I) were compared with a 1:2 propensity score-matched control group (Group II) and with patients with pre-existing AV block before ablation (Group III)., Results: Twenty-one (1.6%) patients developed AV block. In multivariable analysis, nonischemic cardiomyopathy (odds ratio: 3.33; 95% confidence interval: 1.32 to 8.40; p = 0.011) and transcoronary ethanol ablation (odds ratio: 46.50; 95% confidence interval: 14.10 to 153.00; p < 0.001) were independently associated with AV block. Subsequent to the AV block, 9 patients were upgraded from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator to cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D), 2 had de novo CRT-D implantation, 5 had pre-existing CRT-D, and 5 had pacing without CRT. VAs recurred in 33% of patients in Group I, 17% in Group II (log-rank p = 0.842), and 35% in Group III (p = 0.636). The composite outcome of heart failure hospitalization, heart transplantation, or death occurred in 29% of patients in Group I, 17% in Group II (p = 0.723), and 45% in Group III (p = 0.303)., Conclusions: Complete AV block occurs in fewer than 2% of patients undergoing VA ablation and does not appear to be associated with the worse outcome of heart failure hospitalization, heart transplantation, or death., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Percutaneous pericardial access for catheter ablation is associated with a bleeding risk. We sought to elucidate the relation of hemorrhagic and thromboembolic events associated with epicardial procedures to anticoagulation strategy., Methods: Anticoagulation strategy before and during pericardial access for 355 patients (57±14 years old) who had ventricular arrhythmia mapping and ablation were reviewed. Oral anticoagulants were stopped perioperatively and heparin administered before the procedure. Pericardial bleeding >80 mL was considered significant. The patients were divided into 3 groups per the anticoagulation strategy. Group 1: no heparin was administered before pericardial access, group 2: heparin was administered and reversed before pericardial access, and group 3: heparin was administered and not reversed., Results: Significant pericardial bleeding occurred in 46 cases (13%) and did not differ among the groups ( P=0.720). Unintentional cardiac puncture and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% were independently associated with pericardial bleeding (odds ratio, 16.4; 95% CI, 7.35-36.40; P<0.001 and odds ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.02-5.10; P=0.044). Of 38 procedures with unintentional cardiac puncture, there was no difference in pericardial bleeding for different anticoagulation strategies. Thromboembolic events occurred in 5 patients; 1 coronary embolism, 1 stroke, 2 deep vein thrombosis with 1 fatal pulmonary embolism, and 1 thrombus on a temporary ventricular assist device., Conclusions: Bleeding is the major risk related to pericardial access and seems to be more related to unintentional cardiac puncture than to the anticoagulation strategy. Thrombotic complications are infrequent but potentially severe. The major focus for improving safety should be on the prevention of unintentional cardiac puncture.

Objectives: This study sought to characterize ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation outcomes across nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) etiologies and adjust these outcomes by patient-related comorbidities that could explain differences in arrhythmia recurrence rates., Background: Outcomes of catheter ablation of VT in patients with NICM could be related to etiology of NICM., Methods: Data from 2,075 patients with structural heart disease referred for catheter ablation of VT from 12 international centers was retrospectively analyzed. Patient characteristics and outcomes were noted for the 6 most common NICM etiologies. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for potential confounders., Results: Of 780 NICM patients (57 ± 14 years of age, 18% women, left ventricular ejection fraction 37 ± 13%), underlying prevalence was 66% for dilated idiopathic cardiomyopathy (DICM), 13% for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), 6% for valvular cardiomyopathy, 6% for myocarditis, 4% for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 3% for sarcoidosis. One-year freedom from VT was 69%, and freedom from VT, heart transplantation, and death was 62%. On unadjusted competing risk analysis, VT ablation in ARVC demonstrated superior VT-free survival (82%) versus DICM (p ≤ 0.01). Valvular cardiomyopathy had the poorest unadjusted VT-free survival, at 47% (p < 0.01). After adjusting for comorbidities, including age, heart failure severity, ejection fraction, prior ablation, and antiarrhythmic medication use, myocarditis, ARVC, and DICM demonstrated similar outcomes, whereas hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular cardiomyopathy, and sarcoidosis had the highest risk of VT recurrence., Conclusions: Catheter ablation of VT in NICM is effective. Etiology of NICM is a significant predictor of outcomes, with ARVC, myocarditis, and DICM having similar but superior outcomes to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular cardiomyopathy, and sarcoidosis, after adjusting for potential covariates., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Cardiomyopathies frequently lead to conduction system disease and/or arrhythmias necessitating device therapy, catheter ablation, or both. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is avoided with recent right ventricle (RV) lead implants and optimal timing is uncertain. We determined outcomes of EMB at the time of ablation or device implantation procedures., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing EMB during their electrophysiological procedure between January 2014 and July 2016. EMB was obtained using cephalic/subclavian access prior to device implants or femoral venous/arterial access after ablation procedures. Sites of electrogram (EGM) abnormality and/or scar on imaging were targeted when possible., Results: Twenty-five patients (23 male, 59.7 ± 15.1 years) were included. Sixteen had reduced ejection fraction. EMB was performed during device implants in 9, during ablation in 13, and during combined procedures in 3 patients. RV and left ventricle (LV) EMB were obtained in 19 and 6 patients, respectively. 3.9 ± 1.8 samples/patient (median 4) were obtained. EMB yielded a diagnosis in 7 (28%, all RV) patients (4 cardiac implantable electronic device implantation, 2 ablation, and 1 both): cardiac amyloid in 4, lymphocytic myocarditis in 2, and cardiac sarcoid in 1. All 7 patients had imaging or voltage abnormalities in the chamber biopsied. Abnormal but non-diagnostic findings, most commonly fibrotic change, were found in 14 patients. At mean follow-up of 1.1 ± 0.9 years, 5 other patients received a clinical diagnosis (3 cardiac sarcoid, 1 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, and 1 Brugada syndrome/arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy overlap syndrome). Two patients developed minor device pocket hematomas and one developed pericardial effusion (underwent concomitant epicardial mapping and ablation for VT)., Conclusions: RV or LV EMB can be performed safely during EP procedures and can assist with diagnosis, influencing management. EGM-guided EMB in patients presenting with scar-related VT was low yield for specific pathologies.

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly common, but is associated with potential major complications. Technology, experience, and protocols have evolved significantly in recent times, and may have impacted procedural safety. We sought to compare AF ablation safety profiles, including complication rates and fluoroscopy times in a "modern" versus "historical" cohort., Methods and Results: We evaluated consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation from a modern cohort (MC) from 2014 to 2015 and a historic cohort (HC) from 2009 to 2011 for complications. Major complications were categorized according to Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. We included 1,425 patients, 726 in the HC and 699 in the MC. The MC was older, had more OSA and less valvular AF. Fifty-two (3.5%) procedures suffered major complications across the cohorts, with significantly fewer in the MC (5.0% vs. 2.3%, P  =  0.007). The largest reductions were seen in vascular, hemorrhagic, ischemic stroke, and perforation/tamponade related complications. Periprocedural antiplatelets drugs (aHR 2.1 [95 CI 1.1-3.9], P  =  0.02) and force-sensing catheters (aHR 0.4 [95 CI 0.2-0.9], P  =  0.03) were independently related to major complication rates. Direct oral anticoagulants and uninterrupted anticoagulation were not associated with complications. There was a decrease in both fluoroscopy (-17.4 minutes [95 CI 19.2-15.6], P < 0.0001) and radiofrequency ablation times (-561 seconds [95CI -750 to -371], P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The safety profile of AF ablation has improved significantly in less than a decade., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: A commonly held notion is that patients with a family history of atrial fibrillation (AF) have worse atrial substrate and higher rates of arrhythmia recurrence following ablation. We sought to examine differences in atrial substrate and catheter ablation outcomes in patients with a 1st degree family member with paroxysmal or persistent AF (PeAF) compared to those without., Methods and Results: A total of 256 consecutive patients undergoing their 1st ablation for AF (123 paroxysmal, 133 persistent) with >1 year follow up were included. The presence of one 1st-degree family relative was defined as a 'positive family history'. Clinical characteristics, electroanatomic map findings, ablation characteristics and outcomes were compared in patients with and without a positive family history of AF. Patients with paroxysmal fibrillation with a positive family history (n = 57; 46%) had similar clinical characteristics and arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation as those without. Of those that recurred, patients with a positive family history were more likely to have progressed to PeAF (P = 0.05). Patients with PeAF with a positive family history (n = 75; 56%) had similar clinical characteristics, electroanatomic mapping findings and ablation characteristics, but worse long term arrhythmia free survival (P = 0.04)., Conclusion: The presence of a 1st-degree family member with AF does not impact the clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. However, a positive family history is associated with worse arrhythmia free survival in patients with PeAF. This finding is not explained by differences in clinical characteristics, atrial substrate assessed by voltage maps or ablation characteristics.

Objectives: This study sought to examine the relationship between the number of oral antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) failures before referral for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation and subsequent clinical outcomes., Background: Failure of AADs prompts referral for VT ablation., Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 669) with sustained VT who were referred for a first-time ablation were divided into 2 groups according to the number of oral Class 1 or 3 AAD failures before referral: single-drug failure (≤1 AAD; n = 256) or multidrug failure (>1 AADs; n = 413). Outcomes were stratified according to underlying disease type (no structural heart disease [SHD] [n = 87]; ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM] [n = 368]; and ischemic cardiomyopathy [NICM] [n = 214]) and reported at a mean follow-up of 35 ± 46 months., Results: Patients with multidrug failure, compared with patients with single-drug failure, had more advanced SHD and required more extensive ablation to control arrhythmia. Multidrug failure, compared with single-drug failure, was associated with lower ventricular arrhythmia-free survival in ICM (46 ± 4% vs. 58 ± 6%; p = 0.03) and NICM (26 ± 5% vs. 49 ± 6%; p = 0.008), but not in the absence of SHD (71 ± 8% vs. 85 ± 7%; p = 0.10). Overall survival was lower in multidrug failure versus single-drug failure groups in patients with ICM (71 ± 3% vs. 84 ± 4%; p = 0.03) and NICM (70 ± 5% vs. 88 ± 4%; p < 0.001). Multidrug failure was independently associated with a higher risk of ventricular arrhythmia recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.6; p = 0.01) and mortality in NICM (hazard ratio: 2.6; p = 0.008), but not in ICM., Conclusions: Patients with SHD and failure of multiple oral AADs before VT ablation referral have more advanced heart disease and worse clinical outcomes following ablation, especially in NICM., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Right ventricular (RV)-scar related ventricular tachycardia (VT) is often due to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) or cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but some patients whose clinical course has not been described do not fulfill diagnostic criteria for these diseases. We sought to characterize the electrophysiologic substrate and catheter ablation outcomes of such patients, termed RV cardiomyopathy of unknown source (RCUS)., Methods and Results: Data of 100 consecutive patients who presented with RV cardiomyopathy and/or RV-related VT for ablation were reviewed (51 ARVC/D, 22 CS; 27 RCUS). Compared to ARVC/D, RCUS patients were older (P = 0.001), less commonly had RV dilatation (P = 0.001) or dysfunction (P = 0.01) and fragmented QRS, parietal block, and T-wave inversion. Compared to CS, R-CUS patients had less severe LV dysfunction. Extent and distribution of endocardial/epicardial scar and inducible VTs in RCUS patients were comparable with ARVC/D and CS patients. At a median follow-up of 23 months, RCUS patients had more favorable VT-free survival (RCUS 71%, ARVC/D 60%, CS 41%, P = 0.03) and survival free of death or cardiac transplant (RCUS 92%, ARVC/D 92%, CS 62%, P = 0.01). No RCUS patients developed new criteria for ARVC/D or CS in follow-up., Conclusions: Up to one-third of patients with RV scar-related VT are not classifiable as ARVC/D or CS. These patients had a somewhat better prognosis than ARVC/D or sarcoid and did not develop evidence of these diseases during the initial 2 years of follow-up. The extent to which this population comprises mild ARVC/D, CS, or other diseases is not clear., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients receiving hemodynamic support (HS) during ventricular tacchycardia (VT) ablation., Background: There are limited real-world data evaluating its effect of HS in ablation outcomes., Methods: An analysis of 1,655 patients from the International VT Ablation Center Collaborative group was performed. A total of 105 patients received HS with percutaneous ventricular assist device., Results: Patients in the HS group had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and more implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks, VT storm, and antiarrhythmic drug use (all p < 0.05). The HS group also required significantly longer fluoroscopy, procedure, and total lesion time. Acute procedural success (71.8% vs. 73.7%; p = 0.04) was significantly lower and complications (12.5% vs. 6.5%; p = 0.03) and 1-year mortality (34.7% vs. 9.3%; p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the HS group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated HS as an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 5.01; 95% confidence interval: 3.44 to 7.20; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in VT recurrence between groups. In a subgroup analysis including LVEF ≤20% and NYHA functional class III to IV patients, acute procedural success (74.0% vs. 70.5%; p = 0.8), complications (15.6% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.2), VT recurrence (30.2% vs. 38.1%; p = 0.44), and 1-year mortality (40.0% vs. 28.8%; p = 0.2) were no different between the HS and no-HS groups., Conclusions: Patients requiring HS were sicker with multiple comorbidities and, as expected, had a significantly higher 1-year mortality than did those patients in the no-HS group. In patients with LVEF ≤20% and NYHA functional class III to IV, there was also no significant difference in clinical outcomes when compared with no HS. Further studies are needed to systematically evaluate patients undergoing VT ablation receiving HS., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Noninducibility of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) postablation does not insure absence of later recurrence in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. This study aims to determine the relation between inducible nonsustained VT postablation and VT recurrences., Methods and Results: One hundred sixty-five consecutive patients (156 male; age 68±9 years) underwent ablation for SMVT because of ischemic cardiomyopathy; 44 patients who did not have induction testing or in whom only ventricular fibrillation was induced after ablation were excluded. In 38 patients (23%), SMVT was inducible (group C). Of the 83 patients without inducible SMVT after ablation, nonsustained VT defined as ≥5 beats lasting for <30 s, was induced in 34 patients (group B, 21%), whereas the remaining 49 patients had no VT induced by the induction test (group A, 30%). Over a median follow-up of 18.7 months, freedom from recurrent VT at 24 months was 60% in group A, 45% in group B ( P =0.017 versus group A), and 38% in group C ( P =0.005 versus group A). In patients without inducible SMVT, inducible nonsustained VT and left ventricular ejection fraction was independently associated with VT recurrence (hazard ratio, 3.66 and 1.07; 95% CI, 1.3-11.1 and 1.01-1.14)., Conclusions: Inducible nonsustained VT postablation suggests the continued presence of functional arrhythmia substrate. Further trials are needed to assess whether additional ablation would improve outcome in this group., (© 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Background: Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is common in adults and often involves reentry through ≥2 atrioventricular nodal-atrial connections. Although AVNRT can be a trigger for atrial fibrillation (AF), we have observed new-onset AVNRT after AF ablation procedures., Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether ablation involving the septum or proximal coronary sinus (CS) during AF ablation may create a substrate favorable for AVNRT., Methods: Cases of ablation for persistent AF who required a repeat ablation procedure between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed for diagnosis of AVNRT., Results: Nine patients were identified; the mean age was 54 years, 7 (78%) were men, 2 with prior Cox-MAZE procedures, 5 had radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for AF, and 2 patients had both RFA and Cox-MAZE procedure. None of the patients with prior RFA had dual atrioventricular node physiology at baseline. All patients had evidence of atrial fibrosis in the septum or proximal CS, and 6 had undergone ablation either at the septum or the CS ostium/body, and the other 3 had received inferior mitral lines at a surgical MAZE procedure. All had typical AVNRT inducible that was abolished by slow pathway ablation, but 5 required ablation in the roof of the CS or on the mitral valve annulus., Conclusion: Ablation involving the septum or proximal CS may create a substrate favorable for AVNRT. These findings are consistent with the theory that the posteroseptal left atrium and its connections to the CS are critical for some forms of AVNRT., (Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors sought to investigate the effect of low irrigation flow rate on lesion characteristics and ablation outcomes in a clinicopathological study., Background: Irrigated ablation produces deeper lesions compared with nonirrigated ablation, which may not be desirable in the thin-walled posterior left atrium (LA), where collateral esophageal injury is possible., Methods: Lesions were placed on the smooth posterior right atrium in 20 swine and posterior LA in 60 patients at a maximum power of 20 to 25 W with either: 1) power-controlled ablation at an irrigation flow rate of 17 ml/min (high-flow group 10 swine; n = 40) or 2) temperature-controlled ablation at an irrigation flow rate of 2 ml/min (low-flow group 10 swine; n = 20). Safety and efficacy was also compared in 326 patients undergoing AF ablation using high-flow (n = 160) or low-flow settings (n = 166) for posterior LA ablation., Results: Low-flow, compared with high-flow, lesions in swine had a higher incidence of lesions with: impedance fall ≥10 Ω, loss of pace capture, electrograms characteristic of transmural lesions, and visible lesions on anatomic inspection (p < 0.05 for all). Low-flow lesions had a maximal diameter at the endocardial surface, whereas high-flow lesions had a maximal diameter at the epicardial surface. In humans, impedance, pace capture, and transmurality data also strongly favored low-flow lesions. There was no difference in acute pulmonary vein isolation, complications, or 12-month arrhythmia-free survival between the groups., Conclusions: Low-flow irrigated ablation provides favorable lesion characteristics for posterior LA ablation without increasing the risk of adverse events., (Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In patients referred for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the setting of structural heart disease, early post-procedural mortality (EM) has not been previously investigated., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate EM after catheter ablation of scar-related VT., Methods: Associations between clinical and procedural variables and EM (within 31 days of the procedure) were tested in patients with structural heart disease undergoing RFCA of VT at 12 international centers., Results: Of 2,061 patients (mean age 62 ± 13 years; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 34 ± 13%; 53% ischemic etiology), EM occurred in 100 (5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4% to 6%). A total of 54 (3%) patients died before hospital discharge (median 9 days after the procedure; 25% for refractory VT), including 12 (0.6%) after a major procedure-related complication. In multivariable analysis, the following factors were found to be significantly associated with EM: LVEF (odds ratio [OR] per percent decrease: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.05 to 1.20; p < 0.001), chronic kidney disease (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.10 to 6.80; p = 0.030), presentation with VT storm (OR: 3.61; 95% CI: 1.37 to 9.48; p = 0.009), and presence of unmappable VTs (OR: 5.69; 95% CI: 1.37 to 23.69; p = 0.017). Recurrent VT was also associated with an increased risk of subsequent death (hazard ratio: 7.19; 95% CI: 5.57 to 9.28; p < 0.001) and EM (hazard ratio: 11.45; 95% CI: 7.47 to 17.59; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: In a contemporary cohort of patients with scar-related VT undergoing RFCA, EM occurred in 5% of cases. Clinical and procedural variables indicating poorer clinical status (low LVEF, chronic kidney disease, VT storm, and unmappable VTs) and post-procedural VT recurrence may predict EM. Identification of such features may prompt early consideration for hemodynamic support or other care to help mitigate later potential complications., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL) are two separate entities that coexist in a significant percentage of patients. We sought to investigate whether AF inducibility during CTI AFL ablation predicted the occurrence of AF at follow-up after successful AFL ablation., Methods: A systemic review of Medline, Cochrane, and Embase was done for all the clinical studies in which assessment of AF inducibility in patients undergoing ablation for CTI AFL was performed. Given the low heterogeneity (i.e., I 2 <25), we used a fixed effect model for our analysis., Results: A total of 10 studies (4 prospective and 6 retrospective) with a total of 1299 patients (male, 73%; mean age 59 ± 11 years) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. During a mean follow-up period of 23 ± 7.6 months, 407 patients (31%) developed AF during AFL ablation. The overall incidence for new-onset AF during follow-up was 29% (47% in the group with inducible AF vs. 21% in the non-inducible group). The odds ratio (OR) for developing AF after AFL ablation in patients with AF inducibility for all studies combined was 3.72, 95% CI 2.83-4.89 [prospective studies (OR 5.52, 95% CI 3.23-9.41) vs. retrospective studies (OR 3.23, 95% CI 2.35-4.45)]., Conclusions: Although ablation for CTI AFL is highly effective, AF continues to be a long-term risk for individuals undergoing this procedure. AF induced by pacing protocols in patients undergoing CTI AFL predicts for future AF. Inducible AF is a clinically relevant finding that may help guide decisions for long-term anticoagulation after successful typical AFL ablation especially in patients with elevated CHADS-VASc scores (≥2) and in considering prophylactic PVI during CTI AFL ablation.

Introduction: Women are underrepresented in clinical studies on catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT). The role of gender as a predictor for VT recurrence after CA is unclear and complication rates have not been compared in a large cohort., Methods and Results: We analyzed data of consecutive patients undergoing CA for sustained monomorphic VT at our center between 2005 and 2015. A total of 948 patients underwent 1314 ablation procedures: 114 patients without structural heart disease (SHD) (48% female), 486 with coronary artery disease (CAD) (9% female), 301 with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) (22% female), and 46 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (17% female). Women with CAD and NICM were younger than men at first ablation (63 years vs. 68 years, P = 0.05; resp. 53 years vs. 59 years, P = 0.026) with no other significant differences in baseline characteristics. Age, LVEF, NYHA-class, and VT-recurrence but not gender were independently associated with increased mortality in CAD and NICM. Mortality rates in patients with no SHD and ARVC are low in men (0%, 2.6%) and women (1.8%, 0%)., Conclusions: Although heart disease tends to present later in women, our data do not suggest that women are referred later than men. Women with CAD or NICM and VT present for ablation at younger age with disease severity comparable to men. VT ablation in women can be accomplished with success- and complication rates comparable to male patients in both those with and without SHD., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Aims: Catheter ablation can be lifesaving in ventricular tachycardia (VT) storm, but the underlying substrate in patients with storm is not well characterized. We sought to compare the clinical factors, substrate, and outcomes differences in patients with sustained monomorphic VT who present for catheter ablation with VT storm versus those with a nonstorm presentation., Methods: Consecutive ischemic (ICM; n = 554) or nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients (NICM; n = 369) with a storm versus nonstorm presentation were studied (ICM storm 186; NICM storm 101)., Results: In ICM, storm compared with nonstorm patients had significantly lower left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), greater number of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) failures, slower VTs, greater number of scarred LV segments, higher incidence of anterior, septal, and apical endocardial LV scar (all P < 0.05). However, outcomes in follow-up were similar (12-month ventricular arrhythmia [VA]-free survival: 51% vs. 52%, P = 0.6; survival free of death/transplant 75% vs. 87%, P = 0.7). In addition to the above differences, NICM storm patients were also older; however, the extent and distribution of scar was similar except for a higher incidence of lateral endocardial scar in storm patients (P = 0.05). VA-free survival (36% vs. 47%, P = 0.004) and survival free of death/transplant, however, were worse in NICM storm than nonstorm patients (72% vs. 88%, P = 0.001). NICM storm patients had worse VA-free survival than ICM storm patients., Conclusion: There are differences in clinical factors and scar patterns in patients undergoing VT ablation who present with VT storm versus those with a nonstorm presentation. Clinical outcomes are worse in NICM storm patients., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: Substrate-based ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) has gained prominence: however, there is limited data comparing it to ablation guided predominantly by activation and entrainment mapping of inducible and hemodynamically tolerated VTs. We compared the acute procedural efficacy and outcomes of predominantly substrate-based ablation versus ablation guided predominantly by activation and entrainment mapping., Methods and Results: Database searches through April 2016 identified 6 eligible studies (enrolling 403 patients, with 1 randomized study) comparing the 2 strategies. The relative risk of VT recurrence at follow-up was assessed as the primary outcome using a random-effects meta-analysis. Secondary endpoints of acute success (based on noninducibility of VT), procedural complications, and mortality were assessed using weighted mean difference with the random effects model. At a median follow-up of 18 months, the relative risk (RR) of VT recurrence was not significantly different with substrate-based versus activation/entrainment guided VT ablation (0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.18), P = 0.2). Acute success (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.95-1.1, P = 0.6), procedural complications (RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.35-1.82, P = 0.5) cardiovascular mortality and total mortality did not differ significantly (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.38-1.79, P = 0.6 and RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.36-1.59, P = 0.5, respectively)., Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates similar acute procedural efficacy, and complications, VT recurrence and mortality rates when comparing a predominantly substrate-based ablation strategy to a strategy guided predominantly by activation and entrainment mapping of inducible and hemodynamically tolerated VTs., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Long-term outcomes after ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation are sparsely described., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to describe long-term prognosis after VT ablation in patients with no structural heart disease (no SHD), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM)., Methods: Consecutive patients (N = 695: no SHD, 98; ICM, 358; NICM, 239) ablated for sustained VT were followed for a median of 6 years. Acute procedural parameters (complete success [noninducibility of any VT]) and outcomes after multiple procedures were reported., Results: Compared with patients with no SHD or NICM, patients with ICM were the oldest, were more likely to be men, lowest left ventricular ejection fraction, highest drug failures, VT storms, and number of inducible VTs. Complete procedure success was highest in patients with no SHD than in patients with ICM and those with NICM (79%, 56%, 60%, respectively; P < .001). At 6 years, ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival was highest in patients with no SHD (77%) than in patients with ICM (54%) and those with NICM (38%) (P < .001), and overall survival was lowest in patients with ICM (48%), followed by patients with NICM (74%) and patients with no SHD (100%) (P < .001). Age, left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of SHD, acute procedural success (noninducibility of any VT), major complications, need for nonradiofrequency ablation modalities, and VA recurrence were independently associated with all-cause mortality., Conclusion: Long-term follow-up after VT ablation shows excellent prognosis in the absence of SHD, highest VA recurrence, and transplantation in patients with NICM and highest mortality in patients with ICM. The extremely low mortality for those without SHD suggests that VT in this population is rarely an initial presentation of a myopathic process., (Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lamin A/C (LMNA) cardiomyopathy is a genetic disease with a proclivity for ventricular arrhythmias. We describe the multicenter experience with percutaneous catheter ablation of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in LMNA cardiomyopathy., Methods and Results: Twenty-five consecutive LMNA mutation patients from 4 centers were included (mean age, 55±9 years; ejection fraction, 34±12%; VT storm in 36%). Complete atrioventricular block was present in 11 patients; 3 patients were on mechanical circulatory support for severe heart failure. A median of 3 VTs were inducible per patient; in 82%, mapping was consistent with origin from scar in the basal left ventricle, particularly the septum, but also basal inferior wall and subaortic mitral continuity. After multiple procedures (median 2/patient; transcoronary alcohol in 6 and surgical cryoablation in 2 patients), acute success (noninducibility of any VT) was achieved in only 25% of patients. Partial success (inducibility of a nonclinical VT only: 50%) and failure (persistent inducibility of clinical VT: 12.5%) was attributed to intramural septal substrate in 13 of 18 patients (72%). Complications occurred in 25% of patients. After a median follow-up of 7 months after the last procedure, 91% experienced ≥1 VT recurrence, 44% received or were awaiting mechanical circulatory support or transplant for end-stage heart failure, and 26% died., Conclusions: Catheter ablation of VT associated with LMNA cardiomyopathy is associated with poor outcomes including high rate of arrhythmia recurrence, progression to end-stage heart failure, and high mortality. Basal septal scar and intramural VT origin makes VT ablation challenging in this population., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Ventricular arrhythmias arising from the region of the left ventricular summit can be challenging for catheter-based percutaneous ablation. A detailed knowledge of the anatomy of this region and the need of high-density mapping of surrounding structures are critical in ensuring safe and effective ablation. This case-based review focuses on the particular challenges with ablation in this region., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Optimal procedure endpoints of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) are not defined and multiple repeat procedures are sometimes required. However, there are few studies to compare the details of repeat procedures to the initial procedure. The aim of this study is to compare the characteristics of clinical and induced VT throughout multiple procedures and clarify their relations., Methods and Results: Of 425 consecutive patients with structural heart disease who underwent catheter VT ablation, second, third and fourth procedures were performed in 101, 23, and 5 patients, respectively. Of 227 VTs that were induced during the second procedure, 68 (30%) VTs had previously been induced at the first procedure. In multivariable analysis, identification of an exit/isthmus site (HR = 0.29, P = 0.047), early termination of VT during radiofrequency application (HR 0.11, P = 0.037) and elimination of target VT at the end of first procedure (HR = 0.43, P = 0.036) were independently associated with noninducibility of the same VT at the second procedure. Over the course of multiple procedures the mean VT cycle length gradually lengthened (381 ± 107, 413 ± 111, 460 ± 124, 507 ± 99 milliseconds in first, second, third, and fourth procedure, respectively, P < 0.001) and more induced VTs became mappable (32%, 40%, 62%, and 70% in first, second, third, and fourth procedure, respectively, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Identification and ablation of VT exit/isthmus, early termination of VT during radiofrequency application and elimination of targeted VT are associated with absence of that VT during a repeat procedure, and recurrences are then mostly due to new VTs or other VTs that were not induced at the first procedure., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) from the epicardial space for ventricular arrhythmias is limited or impossible in some cases. Reasons for epicardial ablation failure and the effect on outcome have not been systematically analyzed., Methods and Results: We assessed reasons for epicardial RFA failure relative to the anatomic target area and the type of heart disease and assessed the effect of failed epicardial RFA on outcome after ablation procedures for ventricular arrhythmias in a large single-center cohort. Epicardial access was attempted during 309 ablation procedures in 277 patients and was achieved in 291 procedures (94%). Unlimited ablation in an identified target region could be performed in 181 cases (59%), limited ablation was possible in 22 cases (7%), and epicardial ablation was deemed not feasible in 88 cases (28%). Reasons for failed or limited ablation were unsuccessful epicardial access (6%), failure to identify an epicardial target (15%), proximity to a coronary artery (13%), proximity to the phrenic nerve (6%), and complications (<1%). Epicardial RFA was impeded in the majority of cases targeting the left ventricular summit region. Acute complications occurred in 9%. The risk for acute ablation failure was 8.3× higher (4.5-15.0; P<0.001) after no or limited epicardial RFA compared with unlimited RFA, and patients with unlimited epicardial RFA had better recurrence-free survival rates (P<0.001)., Conclusions: Epicardial RFA for ventricular arrhythmias is often limited even when pericardial access is successful. Variability of success is dependent on the target area, and the presence of factors limiting ablation is associated with worse outcomes., (© 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.)