Search

Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping systems is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation. However, it may be affected by respiration movements. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of respiratory gating on procedural parameters in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF)., Methods and Results: One-hundred forty consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation were admitted to study. Respiratory gating module (AccuResp algorithm, Carto3, Biosense Webster) was enabled in 70 patients and disabled in 70 patients during procedures. Successful pulmonary vein isolation and sinus rhythm were obtained in all patients. A significant reduction in total procedure times [median 77, interquartile range (IQR 66-95) min vs median 82 (IQR 72-104) min, p < 0.05] and fluoroscopy times [median 14 (IQR 9-17) min vs median 16 (IQR 12-22) min, p < 0.05] were observed in the respiratory gated group. Although ablation times (duration between the first and last ablation) were significantly shorter in respiratory gated group [median 37 (IQR 32-53) min vs median 48 (IQR 39-65) min, p < 0.05], total RF application durations were not different between two groups [median 1,554 (IQR 1,213-2,196) s vs median 1,802 (IQR 1,344-2,448) s, p = 0.11]. Difference in electroanatomical map reconstruction times was not significant [median 14 (IQR 12-16) min in gated group vs median 13 (IQR 10-18) min in nongated group, p = 0.19]., Conclusion: Respiratory gating significantly improves fluoroscopy and ablation times during electroanatomic mapping guided AF ablation. Respiratory gated maps may provide uninterrupted continuous ablation applications. Furthermore, using automatic respiratory gating module does not prolong mapping times.

Abstract: Introduction: Although macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (MRAT) and focal atrial tachycardia (FAT) can be successfully cured by catheter ablation, the proper diagnosis and treatment of these arrhythmias can still be challenging. Aim: The objective of this study is to develop an algorithm allowing rapid diagnosis of the mechanism and the chamber of origin of atrial tachycardia based on intracardiac catheter recordings from the right atrium and the coronary sinus (CS). Methods: A 2-stepped algorithm was designed: (1) The time of biatrial activation expressed as a percentage of the tachycardia cycle length served to discriminate FAT from MRAT. (2) In FAT, the direction of activation of the CS catheter and the earliest atrial activation were used to define the chamber of origin. In MRAT, the time of right atrium activation was determined or entrainment was used at different sites. Thirty-two intracardiac recordings were reviewed off-line after the algorithm by 4 electrophysiologists blinded to the mechanism and the chamber of origin. The results of their analysis were compared with the intraoperative diagnosis. Results: The algorithm correctly identified 11 (100%) of 11 FATs and 19 (90.4%) of 21 MRATs. The site of origin was correctly identified in 8 (72.7%) of 11 FATs and in 20 of 21 (95.2%) MRATs. The site of origin was misidentified in 3 FATs, all arising from the CS ostium. Conclusions: This algorithm allows rapid discrimination between FAT and MRAT. The chamber of origin is detected with a high accuracy in MRAT. However, the earliest atrial activation taken as an isolated event is not a good predictor for the chamber of origin in FAT arising from the ostium of the CS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]