Search

Background: The presence of heart failure (HF) has been associated with poorer outcomes in patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the effectiveness of CA amongst the subset of patients with tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) remains poorly defined., Methods and Results: In a retrospective analysis we compared outcomes of first-time CA for persistent AF in a cohort of patients with previously diagnosed TIC (n = 45; age 58 ± 8 years; 91% male) to those with structurally normal hearts (non-TIC; n = 440; age 55 ± 9 years; 95% male). TIC was defined as an impaired ventricular function (left ventricular ejection function [LVEF] <50%), which was reversed after the treatment of HF. We compared atrial arrhythmias (AAs) recurrence after the CA in the TIC and non-TIC cohorts. In the TIC group, LVEF improved from 35.8% ± 8.1% to 57.5% ± 8.3% after treatment of HF. During 3.3 ± 1.5 years follow-up, AAs-free survival after CA was significantly higher in the TIC group as compared with the non-TIC group (69% vs 42%; P = .001), despite a comparable CA strategy between the two groups. In multivariable analysis, absence of HF with TIC, longer AF duration, and complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation were independent predictors of arrhythmia recurrence (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03; P < .01; OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.79; P < .01 and OR, 2.29; 95%CI; 1.27-4.11; P < .01, respectively). In addition, the outcome after the last procedure was superior in the TIC cohort (89% vs 72%; P = .03) with fewer CA procedures as compared with the non-TIC cohort (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 1.5 ± 0.7; P = .01)., Conclusions: Persistent patients with AF with TIC have a more favorable outcome after the CA as compared with those without., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Atrial fibrillation (AF), especially asymptomatic cases, is often detected by medical checkups. We investigated the outcome of AF ablation in cases detected by medical checkups. We reviewed the data of 735 patients with AF (56 ± 10 years, paroxysmal: 441 patients) who underwent initial catheter ablation. All patients were divided into two groups based on their AF being diagnosed either by a medical checkup (group M) or not (group NM). AF was diagnosed by medical checkups in 263 (36%) patients. In Group M, the age was younger, time from the diagnosis to ablation shorter, left atrium dimension larger, and left ventricular ejection fraction lower than in Group NM. Male gender, persistent AF, and asymptomatic AF were more frequently seen in Group M than in Group NM. A mean of 13 ± 11 months after the initial ablation procedure, AF recurrence was more frequently observed in group M compared to group NM (P = 0.018). While the AF recurrence rate was similar in both groups in persistent AF patients (P = 0.87), it was more frequently observed in Group M than in Group NM in paroxysmal AF patients (P = 0.005). AF diagnosed by medical checkups was often associated with a worse outcome of catheter ablation, especially in paroxysmal AF patients.

Purpose: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is performed with and without deep sedation, which could affect the arrhythmogenic activity during the procedure. We investigated the impact of sedation on electrophysiological properties in patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation., Methods: This study consisted of 255 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (229 males, persistent: 105 patients) who underwent a single-catheter ablation procedure. The patients were divided into the following two groups according to the depth of sedation during the procedure: group M (mild sedation with flunitrazepam in 138 patients) and group D (deep sedation with propofol in 117 patients). Peripheral oxygen saturation was continuously monitored via pulse oximetry throughout the procedure., Results: A spontaneous dissociated pulmonary vein activity after pulmonary vein isolation occurred more frequently in group M than in group D (29.1 vs 15.7%, P < 0.01). Adenosine-induced dormant pulmonary vein conduction was more frequently observed in group M than in group D (19.2 vs 13.0% P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidence of non-pulmonary vein triggers between groups M and D (15.2 vs 11.1%, P = 0.53). The atrial fibrillation recurrence rate following the single procedure did not differ between the two groups (29.0 vs 26.5%, in groups M and D, P = 0.85)., Conclusions: Although deep sedation reduced the incidence of a dissociated pulmonary vein activity and dormant pulmonary vein conduction following pulmonary vein isolation, it did not affect the recurrence rate for atrial fibrillation after the procedure.

Background: Recent evidence has suggested that the transient re-conduction of the isolated pulmonary vein (PV) induced by the intravenous injection of adenosine (dormant PV conduction) might predict the incidence of subsequent venous reconnection after the procedure, which is the main cause of the atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after PV isolation (PVI). We tested the hypothesis that the elimination of these dormant PV conductions by additional radiofrequency (RF) applications can improve the efficacy of the PVI., Methods and Results: One hundred forty-eight patients (124 males; mean age 53 +/- 9 years) with drug-refractory AF underwent the PVI procedure. The standard PVI was performed in 94 patients (Group A), whereas the elimination of adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-induced dormant conduction using additional RF energy was performed in addition to the standard PVI in other 54 patients (Group B). Dormant conduction was observed in 56% of the patients (30/54) in Group B and 95% of these transient re-conductions were successfully eliminated by additional RF applications (mean: 1.5 +/- 1.0 times). During the mean follow-up period of 20 months, recurrences of AF after the procedures were observed significantly less frequently in Group B (20%) than in Group A (40%) (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: The use of additional RF applications to eliminate transient PV reconnection induced by ATP injection led to a reduction of AF recurrence after PVI, most likely due to the minimization of the subsequent PV reconnection.

Introduction: Although in the treatment of common atrial flutter, the isthmus between the tricuspid valve annulus and the eustachian ridge is often chosen as the site for conduction block by radiofrequency ablation, the precise path of the flutter circuit remains unknown. We therefore investigated the propagation of the atrial flutter wave front around the coronary sinus ostium and how its path is altered by application of radiofrequency current., Methods and Results: To assess activation pattern, activation in the region surrounding the coronary sinus ostium was mapped using a deflectable decapolar catheter under basal conditions and while applying radiofrequency current to the septal isthmus, between the tricuspid valve annulus and the eustachian ridge. In five of eleven patients studied, the eustachian ridge side, below the coronary sinus ostium, was activated earlier, and the flutter wave exited from either the tricuspid valve annulus side or the eustachian ridge side, above the coronary sinus ostium. In four patients, a partial line of block created by applying radiofrequency current between the tricuspid valve annulus and the coronary sinus ostium or between the coronary sinus ostium and the eustachian ridge led to a shift in the direction of propagation of the flutter wave front from anterior to posterior or from posterior to anterior of the coronary sinus ostium, and prolongation of the cycle length., Conclusion: Application of radiofrequency current to the septal isthmus, between the tricuspid valve annulus and the eustachian ridge, can shift both the anterior and posterior propagation of flutter around the coronary sinus ostium.

Background: Little is known about the manner in which the superior vena cava (SVC) is activated during sinus rhythm.Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the manner of caval activation with an ultra-high-density mapping system (Rhythmia, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) and its utility for SVC isolation.Methods: Forty patients with atrial fibrillation (mean age 55 ± 12 years; paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 23[58%]) who underwent SVC mapping with Rhythmia were studied. The location of the sinus node (SN), phrenic nerve (PN), and the manner of caval activation during sinus rhythm were analyzed. The SVC was isolated by radiofrequency applications at electrical connections, shown as breakthroughs on the Rhythmia map.Results: The SN location varied widely (lateral/posterior/anterior 60%/8%/32%), while the PN was mostly located in the lateral segment (lateral/anterior 82%/18%). In 36 patients who underwent SVC isolation, the mean number of breakthroughs was 2.5 ± 0.8. The first breakthrough predominantly located in the anterior aspect (anterior/septal/posterior/lateral 78%/14%/5%/3%), and atrial activation was conducted superiorly and clockwise from the SN (referred to as spiral activation) in 32 patients (89%). The mean rotation angle from the SN to the first breakthrough was 79° ± 41°. In addition, 10 patients (25%) showed the SN within the SVC. Although radiofrequency applications were needed at the PN capture site in 11 patients (31%) the SVC was successfully isolated without any complications in all patients.Conclusion: The SN location showed great heterogeneity; however, atrial activation predominantly showed a clockwise spiral form. This is the first report to use ultra-high-resolution mapping to demonstrate the manner of spiral activation, which is useful for the safe and efficient isolation of the SVC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: It is sometimes difficult to differentiate the transient appearance of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation from a true recurrence of AF. We attempted to differentiate them by analyzing the time course after the procedure. Methods and Results: 79 patients who underwent PV isolation were divided into two groups (successful: N = 60 and unsuccessful: N = 19) according to the final outcome. Antiarrhythmic drugs were used either temporarily or continuously to treat re-appearance of AF after the procedure. The transient appearance of AF in the successful group gradually faded, while true AF recurrence in the unsuccessful group consistently increased in line with the follow-up (F/U) period. The appearance of AF after 3 months predicted a subsequent failure of the procedure with a positive/negative predictive value of 87/90%, respectively. Conclusion: Since the transient appearance of AF decreased and the true recurrence of AF increased in line with the F/U period, we should therefore wait at least 3 months before judging the outcome of PV isolation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Although the efficacy of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) has been well-established, its effect on persistent AF has not been sufficiently established to date. Methods and Results: In 68 consecutive patients (mean age, 52 ± 10 years) with paroxysmal (45) and persistent (23) AF, isolation of all four PVs was performed and the subsequent clinical outcome was evaluated. In total, 268/272 PVs (99%) were completely isolated from the left atrium by radiofrequency applications. During a mean follow-up period of 11 months, 84% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 57% of patients with persistent AF were free from symptomatic AF without any antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy (p = 0.04). In the remaining recurrent AF patients, no significant difference between the paroxysmal and persistent AF was observed as long as they took AADs which had been ineffective at baseline (freedom from AF; 98% and 96%, respectively, p = NS). Repeat procedure performed in the 12 recurrent patients (paroxysmal AF 6, persistent AF 6) allowed 11 (92%) of them to become free from AF recurrence without AADs. Conclusion: Electrical isolation of PV by standard catheter technique is equally and highly effective for both paroxysmal and persistent AF patients, when all four PVs were isolated. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]