Search

Introduction: Regardless of the catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) strategy, the role of early recurrences during the blanking period (BP) is still unclear. Our aim was to evaluate atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) recurrences during the BP after CA with the laser-balloon (LB) technique., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing LBCA were enrolled. Primary outcome of the study was the overall crude ATA recurrence rate during the BP. ATA recurrences after the BP and in-hospital readmissions during the BP were deemed secondary outcomes., Results: Two hundred and twenty-four patients underwent CA with the LB. Median age was 63.0 (55.5-69.5) years and 74.1% were males. 28.6% were persistent AF patients, and 34.8% of patients were followed up with a loop recorder. 15.6% of patients experienced at least an ATA recurrence during the BP. Male sex, chronic heart failure, persistent AF, and recurrences during the BP were found to be associated with long-term ATA recurrences. Recurrences during the BP remained associated with the outcome of interest at multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 12.393, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 3.699-41.865, p < .001). An association over time was found between early and late recurrences, with 73.7%, 45.5%, and 10.8% of patients presenting with recurrences at 1-, 2-, and 3-month follow-up being free from recurrences after the BP, respectively. 8.0% of patients were readmitted during the BP: 4.5% for AF electrical cardioversion, and 1.8% for CA of other atrial arrhythmias; no redo CA was performed., Conclusion: After adjusting for confounders, ATA recurrences during the BP represent the most significant predictor of ATA recurrences after the BP, regardless of AF pattern., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS., (© 2024. Heart Rhythm Society, the European Society of Cardiology, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.)

Objective: Cryoballoon (CB) and laser-balloon (LB) catheter ablation (CA) has been demonstrated to achieve durable and effective pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Only one head-to-head comparison with an intermittent rhythm monitor strategy is currently available. The aim of this study was to compare acute and long-term outcomes of CB and LB atrial fibrillation ablation procedures, by using a continuous rhythm monitoring strategy., Methods: This was a prospective two-arm nonrandomized propensity-matched observational trial that compared the outcomes of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation using LB and CB techniques. To evaluate AF recurrences, an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) was implanted before hospital discharge to detect atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrences., Results: A total of 110 propensity-matched patients undergoing AF ablation with an LB (n = 55) or with a CB system (n = 55) were enrolled (paroxysmal AF 57.3%). Procedural time (LB: 87 [73-104] vs. CB 90 [70-130] min; p = 0.264) and fluoroscopy time did not differ. No differences in ATA recurrences were observed at 12 months (LB-30.9% vs. CB-29.1% and LB-45.5% vs. CB-38.2%; log-rank 0.539). As for AF burden, the 12-month median was 0 [0-1] vs. 0 [0-3]% (p = 0.127) in the LB and CB groups, respectively. When considering only PeAF patients, the median 12-month ATA burden was 26 [18.5-40.5] vs. 29 [26-35]% (p = 0.919) for the LB and CB patients, respectively., Conclusion: In a propensity-matched cohort undergoing AF ablation, arrhythmia outcomes assessed by continuous rhythm monitoring did not differ between LB and CB, with an overall low ATA burden. The only predictor of recurrences was persistent AF. There was no difference in procedure or fluoroscopy time., (Copyright © 2022 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Balloon-based technologies have been developed to simplify catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), to improve the clinical outcome of the procedure and to achieve durable pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of second-generation laser balloon (LB2) ablation in the treatment of AF using a continuous cardiac rhythm monitoring strategy. Atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATas) recurrences were assessed with implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) or devices., Methods and Results: All patients underwent LB2 ablation procedure. The primary endpoint was the first recurrence of any, >5.5 and >24 h duration ATas after the blanking period (90 days). In-hospital visits were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. Seventy-three patients (68% male, mean age 59.8 ± 11.3) were included in the study. The average procedure, fluoroscopy, and laser ablation times were 81.5 ± 30.1, 21.5 ± 12.4, and 33.8 ± 9.7, respectively. All PVs were isolated using the LB2 with no need of touch-up using focal catheters. No major complications occurred during or after the procedures. The one-year freedom from recurrences was 66.9% (95% CI: 57.0-76.7%), 81.0% (69.5-88.5%), and 86.8% (76.1-92.9%) considering any, 5.5-h and 24-h cut-off duration, respectively. At 3, 6, and 12 months, any ATas was recorded in 22%, 32%, and 25% of patients, with a ≥5% arrhythmic burden documented in 4%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. Few patients reported AF-related symptoms (7%, 8%, and 5%)., Conclusion: LB2 ablation is a safe and effective procedure, showing a high freedom from recurrences and low arrhythmic burden as documented by a continuous rhythm monitoring strategy., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author(s) 2021. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The success rate after cryoballoon ablation (CB-A) performed for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) might be overestimated by traditional noninvasive monitoring techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcome of CB-A in patients with PAF implanted with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) after the procedure., Methods: Between January 2017 and March 2019, all patients who underwent CB-A for PAF and who were subsequently implanted with an ILR were retrospectively included. All devices were equipped with remote monitoring. All ILR-documented atrial tachycardia (AT) or AF episodes ≥ 6 min were considered as recurrence; both true and false episodes were collected. A 3-month post-procedural blanking period (BP) was applied., Results: A total of 102 patients (77 men, mean age 60.6 ± 9.6 years) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by CB-A were included; mean time from first diagnosis of AF to PVI was 51.5 ± 46.9 months. Mean follow-up was 29.3 ± 8.1 months; at 12-month follow-up, the success rate was 65.7%, while at 2-year follow-up, freedom from AT/AF recurrences was achieved in 59.3% of the patients. In the follow-up, a total of 4987 ECG strips were analyzed; true-positive episodes were confirmed in 2026 cases (40.6%), whereas 2961 episodes (59.4%) were considered false-positive., Conclusion: In patients with PAF implanted with an ILR, CB-A results in freedom from any AT/AF recurrence in 65.7% of patients at 12-month follow-up and in 59.3% of patients when evaluated at 2-year. Careful adjudication of all ILR-documented AF episodes is required to avoid misdiagnosis., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the best documented target for catheter ablation, and different technologies have shown comparable outcomes. The multielectrode phased-RF/duty cycled (PhRF/DC) pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) and its second generation (PVAC-GOLD) have shown promising clinical results in single and multicenter experiences. Our aim is to assess and compare the safety and efficacy in the real clinical practice among two generations of circular PhRF/DC catheters by performing PVI in patients suffering from recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF)., Methods: Eighty-four AF patients treated with PVAC and 64 with PVAC-GOLD were prospectively followed in five Italian cardiology centers in the mainframe of the 1STOP-ClinicalService project., Results: Fluoroscopic and total procedure time were significantly different in the two groups. In particular, in the PVAC-GOLD group, the mean fluoroscopic time was 22.8 ± 12.7 min vs 31.6 ± 18.9 in the PVAC group (p = 0.002), and the mean total procedure duration was 117.6 ± 36.0 vs 147.4 ± 40.6, in the PVAC-GOLD group and the PVAC group, respectively (p = 0.001). Only two out of 148 patients reported a peri-procedural complication. Over 20.9 ± 12.0 months of follow-up, AF recurrence occurred in 58 patients. Kaplan-Meier freedom from AF recurrence did not differ between the two groups (64.1 ± 10% in the PVAC group vs 68.2 ± 9% in the PVAC-GOLD group at 1 year, p = ns)., Conclusions: In our multicenter analysis, AF ablation using two generations of circular PhRF/DC catheters is safe and effective. No difference was observed in terms of safety and efficacy of the AF ablation between the two catheters, with the mean procedural time being shorter in the PVAC-GOLD group.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the established cornerstone for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, indeed current guidelines recognize PVI as the gold standard for first-time AF ablation, regardless of if it is paroxysmal or persistent. Since 1998 when Haïssaguerre pioneered AF ablation demonstrating a burden reduction after segmental pulmonary vein (PV) ablation, our approach to PVI was superior in terms of methodology and technology. This review aims to describe how paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation has evolved over the last twenty years. We will focus on available techniques, a mechanistic understanding of paroxysmal AF genesis and the possibility of a tailored approach for the treatment of AF, before concluding with a future perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background/Objective Balloon-guided catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as an alternative option for atrial fibrillation (AF) management. The recent introduction of a novel-size adjustable second-generation cryoballoon (CB) system offers innovations, but clinical outcomes remain unexplored. This study aims to assess the acute performance of the POLARx FIT™ CB system in AFCA. (2) Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation with the POLARx FIT™ CB system in our center were included. The primary outcome was the rate of 31 mm balloon-size utilization, with secondary outcomes including acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) rate, periprocedural complications, and in-hospital AF recurrences. (3) Results: Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 59.5 years, predominantly male (87.5%), and exhibiting paroxysmal AF (91.7%) were enrolled. Procedural characteristics demonstrated a high acute success rate (100% PV isolation) with a favorable safety profile. Notably, the 31 mm CB configuration was utilized in 51% of applications, showcasing its adaptability in challenging anatomies. No major complications occurred, with two patients experiencing in-hospital self-limiting AF recurrences. (4) Conclusions: This study represents the first comprehensive assessment of the POLARx FIT™ CB system in AF ablation. While acknowledging the study's limitations, this novel CB emerges as a promising tool, warranting further exploration in larger studies with extended follow-up periods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. The safety and efficacy of an uninterrupted direct anticoagulation (DOAC) strategy during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been fully investigated with different ablation techniques. Methods. We evaluated consecutive AF patients undergoing catheter ablation with three different techniques. All patients were managed with an uninterrupted DOAC strategy. The primary endpoint was the rate of periprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding events. The secondary endpoints of the study were the rate of MACE and bleeding events at one-year follow-up. Results. In total, 162 patients were enrolled. Overall, 53 were female and the median age was 60 [55.5–69.5] years. The median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 2 [1–4] and 2 [1–2], respectively. In total, 16 patients had a past stroke or TIA while 11 had a predisposition or a history of bleeding. The CA procedure was performed with different techniques: RF 43%, cryoballoon 37%, or laser–balloon 20%. Overall, 35.8% were on rivaroxaban, 20.4% were on edoxaban, 6.8% were on apixaban, and 3.7% were on dabigatran. All other patients were all naïve to DOACs; the first anticoagulant dose was given before the ablation procedure. As for periprocedural complications, we found three groin hematomas not requiring interventions, one ischemic stroke, and one systemic air embolism (the last two likely due to several catheter changes through the transeptal sheath). Five patients reached the secondary endpoints: one patient for a myocardial infarction while four patients experienced minor bleeding during 1-year follow-up. Conclusions. Our results corroborate the safety and the efficacy of uninterrupted DOAC strategy in patients undergoing CA for AF, regardless of the ablation technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Available reports on the post-discharge management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in COVID-19 patients are scarce. The aim of this case series was to describe the clinical outcomes of new-onset AF in COVID-19 patients referred to a tertiary cardiac arrhythmia center after hospital discharge. Methods: All consecutive patients referred to our center for an ambulatory evaluation from 18 May 2020 to 15 March 2022 were retrospectively screened. Patients were included in the current analysis if new-onset AF was diagnosed during hospitalization for COVID-19 and then referred to our clinic. Results: Among 946 patients, 23 (2.4%) were evaluated for new-onset AF during COVID-19. The mean age of the study cohort was 71.5 ± 8.1 years; 87.0% were male. Median time from COVID-19 discharge and the first ambulatory evaluation was 53 (41.5–127) days; median follow-up time was 175 (83–336) days. At the in-office evaluation, 14 (60.9%) patients were in sinus rhythm, and nine patients were in AF. In 13.0% of cases, oral anticoagulation was stopped according to CHADS-VASc. Eight patients in AF were scheduled for electrical cardioversion; one patient was rate-controlled. Four patients were treated with catheter ablation (CA) during follow-up. Two post-cardioversion AF recurrences were detected during follow-up, while no recurrences were diagnosed among patients who underwent CA. Conclusion: Our data suggest that AF may not be considered as a simple bystander of the in-hospital COVID-19 course. Management of new-onset AF in post-COVID-19 patients referred to our clinic did not significantly differ from our usual practice, both in terms of long-term oral anticoagulation and in terms of rhythm control strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice, represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality, with an increasing prevalence. Pharmacologic treatment remains the cornerstone of its management through rhythm and rate control, as well as the prevention of thromboembolism with the use of oral anticoagulants. Recent progress in percutaneous interventional approaches have provided additional options in the therapeutic arsenal, however. The use of the different catheter ablation techniques can now lead to long arrhythmia-free intervals and significantly lower AF burden, thus reducing the rate of its complications. Particularly encouraging evidence is now available for patients with persistent AF or concomitant heart failure, situations in which catheter ablation could even be a first-line option. In the field of stroke prevention, targeting the left atrial appendage with percutaneous device implantation may reduce the risk of thromboembolism to lower rates than that predicted with conventional ischemic risk scores. Left atrial appendage occlusion through the approved Watchman or Amplatzer devices is a well-established, efficacious, and safe method, especially in high-ischemic and bleeding risk patients with contraindications for oral anticoagulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]