Search

Background and Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia. Currently, catheter ablation is a preferred treatment strategy. The main objective of our study was a temporary trends analysis of patients' data undergoing a single AF ablation procedure using radiofrequency energy (RF). The efficacy of the procedure underwent assessment during a 12-month follow-up. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 585 consecutive patients with symptomatic, recurrent, and drug-refractory AF hospitalized in our department between 2013 and 2018 who underwent RF ablation supported by a 3D electroanatomical system. The baseline characteristics, periprocedural parameters, and efficacy of the procedure at 6-, 9- and 12-month follow-ups were analyzed over the years. Results: The number of patients undergoing ablation increased. Patients with paroxysmal AF predominated (71.5%). However, the number of patients with the persistent type of arrhythmia increased over the years. The percentage of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) increased to 27.5% in 2018, and patients presented with increasingly larger left atria (LA). In all patients, circumferential pulmonary vein isolation was performed. The percentage of patients who underwent arrhythmogenic substrate modification and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation increased. Over the years, the efficacy of a single procedure at the 12-month follow-up remained without significant differences between the years (72.0%, 69.6%, 75.5%, 74.8%, 71.7%, 71.7%). Conclusions: The rate of patients with CHF and advanced LA disease undergoing more extensive ablation increased over the years. The efficacy of a single procedure remained without significant differences between the years.

Background: Available data suggest the important role of ablation of the left atrial posterior wall and epicardial myocardial layers in rhythm control therapy in patients with persistent drug‑refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). However, endocardial ablation is not always effective in transmural substrate modification. The alternative treatment option is minimally invasive hybrid approach (HABL) combining the strengths of surgical and catheter ablation., Aim: This study aimed to assess the periprocedural safety as well as acute and long‑term outcomes of HABL for AF., Methods: This is a retrospective single‑center study of patients who underwent HABL using the minimally invasive transabdominal approach between July 2009 and January 2020. Demographic in‑hospital data and 12‑month follow‑up results were obtained. The number of hospitalizations, cardioversions, re‑ablations, and severe adverse events in a 3‑year period before and after HABL were compared using data from the national healthcare provider., Results: In total, 158 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.02 [10.67] years) who underwent HABL were included; 61.4% had persistent AF. There was a 4.4% incidence of periprocedural complications without any fatalities. In 66% of patients, additional endocardial substrate modification was needed, in 52.6% on the posterior wall. In the 12‑month follow‑up, most patients (78.3%) remained free of arrhythmias. There was a significant reduction in the number of hospitalizations (for AF, 1.65 vs 0.54; or any other cause, 2.56 vs 1.31 per patient), cardioversions, and re‑ablations after HABL (all P <0.05)., Conclusions: The hybrid multidisciplinary approach for treatment of AF is a safe and very effective treatment method in long‑term follow‑up, which reduces healthcare burden. It could be considered as an alternative therapeutic option especially in patients with persistent AF.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation has become one of the core modalities of the rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)., Aims: The aim of the study was to analyze temporal trends in the availability and efficacy of AF and atrial flutter (AFL) catheter ablation in an urban area of Upper Silesia in Poland., Methods: The source data were obtained from the SILCARD (Silesian Cardiovascular Database) covering an adult population of 3.8 million. The final study population included patients with diagnosis code I48 referred for catheter ablation between 2006 and 2017. The data included total number of procedures, patient sex, age, comorbidities, number of hospital admissions, and mortality rate., Results: A total of 2745 patients were enrolled. The number of ablated patients increased more than 10‑fold (43 in 2006 vs 507 in 2017; P = 0.008) in the follow‑up period. The analysis showed an upward trend in the proportion of women (P = 0.02), hypertension prevalence (P = 0.004), and percentage of patients implanted (P = 0.02). A decrease was observed in the percentage of patients with stable angina (P <0.005) and hospitalization length (P <0.005). The all‑cause hospital readmissions rate decreased from 55.8% to 25.4% (P <0.005). There were significant reductions in the 12‑month all‑cause mortality (2.3% in 2006 vs 0.2% in 2017; P <0.005), stroke (2.3% in 2006 vs 0.2% in 2017; P = 0.047), and myocardial infarction rates (2.3% in 2006 vs 0.4% in 2017; P = 0.03)., Conclusions: A considerable increase in the availability and efficacy of AF / AFL ablations was documented over the 12‑year follow‑up period.

Background: Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) could be associated with a thermal oesophageal (EO) injury. To avoid this complication intraluminal EO temperature monitoring and ablation power reduction at the areas with excessive heating could be used. However, the reduced energy could limit the ablation lesion depth, without creation of lasting transmural scar and influence on long-term ablation results., Aim: The primary goal was to evaluate the homogeneity of forced ablation power reduction due to excessive EO heating in different parts of the left atrium. The secondary goal was to assess the influence of power reduction in different EO locations on long-term AF recurrence., Methods: We examined retrospectively 109 consecutive patients with symptomatic, medically refractory paroxysmal AF, who underwent pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency ablation. In 40.4% of the patients the EO course was central (group B) left atrium posterior wall, in 31.2% it was left sided (group A), and in 28.4% it was right sided (group C)., Results: The maximal measured temperature (41.0 ± 1.0 vs. 39.2 ± 1.5 vs. 40.6 ± 0.7°C) and forced ablation power (15.9 ± 5.6 vs. 23.5 ± 6.1 vs. 17.4 ± 5.7 W) differed significantly according to the EO course (A, B, C, respectively). In six-month follow-up 76.15% of patients were free of arrhythmias. There was no statistically significant difference between groups (A-C) regarding the AF recurrence rate: 32.4% vs. 20.5% vs. 19.4% (p = 0.37)., Conclusions: The maximal intraluminal EO temperatures and the necessary level of power reduction during AF ablation are inhomogeneous in different parts of the left atrium, but they are not associated with different six-month follow-up results.

Background: Left atrial (LA) low-voltage areas (LVAs) are frequently observed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and may predict AF recurrence after catheter ablation., Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical tool to identify LVAs that are associated with AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)., Methods: In a cohort of 238 patients, voltage maps were created during LA procedures. LVAs were defined as areas with electrogram amplitudes <0.5 mV. On the basis of regression analysis, predictors of LA substrate were identified. These parameters were used to establish a dedicated risk score (DR-FLASH score, based on diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, persistent form of AF, LA diameter >45 mm, age >65 years, female sex, and hypertension). This risk score was then prospectively validated in a multicenter cohort of 180 patients. The association of the score with long-term recurrence of atrial arrhythmias after circumferential PVI was tested in a retrospective cohort of 484 patients., Results: The DR-FLASH score effectively identified LVA substrate (C statistic = 0.801, P < .001). In the prospective multicenter validation cohort, the predictive value of the DR-FLASH score was confirmed (C statistic = 0.767, P < .001). The probability for the presence of LA substrate increased by a factor of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.9, P < .001) with each point scored. Furthermore, the risk of AF recurrence after PVI increased by a factor of 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5, P < .001) with every additional point and was almost 2 times higher in patients with a DR-FLASH score >3 (odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.8, P = .026)., Conclusion: The DR-FLASH score may be useful to identify patients who may require extensive substrate modification instead of PVI alone., (Copyright © 2015 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Thromboembolic complications remain one of the most severe adverse events associated with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), but data on such events are limited., Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence, characteristics, and risk factors of thromboembolic complications after AF ablation., Methods: Cerebral thromboembolic complications occurring within 1 month of 3360 consecutive AF radiofrequency catheter ablations were assessed. Stroke was defined as a neurologic deficit lasting more than 24 hours or with imaging study showing new infarction. Transient ischemic attack (TIA) was defined as a deficit lasting less than 24 hours and without documented infarction., Results: There were 17 peri-interventional cerebral thromboembolic events (0.5%). Nine cases (53%) were diagnosed as strokes and 8 (47%) as TIAs. Sixty percent of the events occurred within 48 hours after the ablation; the rest occurred within 1 week. In univariate analysis, peri-interventional thromboembolism was associated with peripheral vascular disease (P = .010), impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (P = .040), periprocedural bridging with heparin (P = .007), and previous stroke (P = .026). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio [OR] 8.81, confidence interval [CI] 1.61-48.31, P = .012) and previous stroke (OR 6.13, CI 1.18-31.91, P = .031) were independent predictors. In a different model, the CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with thromboembolism (OR 1.35, CI 1.00-1.80, P = .049)., Conclusion: Cerebral thromboembolic complications after AF radiofrequency catheter ablation are rare. They mostly occur within 48 hours after the procedure and remain without lasting neurologic deficits in the majority of cases. Such complications are associated with peripheral vascular disease, previous stroke, and the CHA2DS2-VASc score., (Copyright © 2014 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)