Search

Background: This study evaluated the arrhythmia profile and ablation outcome in women with atrial fibrillation (AF) aged ≥75 years., Methods: A total of 573 consecutive female patients undergoing first AF ablation were classified into group 1: ≥75 years (n = 221) and group 2: < 75 years (n = 352). Isolation of PVs, posterior wall and superior vena cava was performed in all. Non-PV triggers from other areas were ablated based on operator's discretion., Results: Group 1 had higher prevalence of hypertension (154 (69.7%) vs. 188 (53.4%), p < .001) and non-paroxysmal AF (136 (61.5%) vs. 126 (35.8%), p < .001). Non-PV triggers were detected in 194 (87.8%) patients from group 1 and 143 (40.6%) from group 2 (p < .001) and were ablated in 152 (68.8%) and 114 (32.4%) from group 1 and 2 respectively. Remaining patients (group 1: 69/221 and group 2: 238/352) received no additional ablation. At 4 years, 109 (49.3%) and 185 (52.6%) from group 1 and 2, respectively, were arrhythmia-free, p = .69. When stratified by ablation-strategy, success-rate was similar across groups in patients receiving non-PV trigger ablation (96 (63.2%) in group 1 and 76 (66.7%) in group 2, p = .61), whereas it was significantly lower in group 1 patients not receiving additional ablation compared to those from group 2 (13 (18.8%) vs. 109 (45.8%), p < .001)., Conclusion: Non-paroxysmal AF was more common in women aged ≥75 years. Furthermore, significantly higher number of non-PV triggers were detected in elderly women and ablation of those provided similar ablation success as that in women aged < 75 years., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: It is unclear whether isolation of the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) offers additional benefits over pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF)., Objective: We sought to determine the impact of PVAI and LAPW isolation (PVAI+LAPW) versus PVAI alone on the outcome of ablation of persistent AF., Methods: During the first procedure, PVAI was performed in 20 patients (group 1), whereas in 32 patients (group 2), PVAI was extended to the left atrial (LA) septum and coronary sinus (CS), and isolation of the LAPW was targeted (ePVAI+LAPW). Isolation of the superior vena cava was achieved in both groups. All patients, regardless of arrhythmia recurrence, underwent a second procedure 3 months after the first procedure. In patients with reconnection of pulmonary veins or LAPW, reisolation was performed, and a third procedure was performed 3 months later to verify isolation. Patients entered follow-up only after PVAI (group 1) or PVAI+LAPW (group 2) isolation was proven., Results: At the 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up examinations, the rates of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia without use of an antiarrhythmic drug were 20%, 15%, and 10% in group 1 and 65%, 50%, and 40% in group 2, respectively (log-rank P < .001). The median recurrence-free survival time was 8.5 months (interquartile range 6.5-11.0) in group 1 and 28.0 months (interquartile range 8.5-32.0) in group 2., Conclusion: Proven isolation of the LAPW provides additional benefits over PVAI alone in the treatment of persistent AF and improves procedural outcome at follow-up. However, the ablation strategy of ePVAI+LAPW is still associated with a significant high incidence of very late recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia., Clinical Trial Registration: "Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation After Permanent Pulmonary Vein Antrum Isolation With or Without Proven Left Atrial Posterior Wall Isolation" (LIBERATION). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01660100., (Copyright © 2016 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: It is unclear whether extended pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) plus nonpulmonary vein (non-PV) trigger elimination prevents more arrhythmia recurrence than PVAI alone in patients with mechanical mitral valve (MMV) undergoing AF ablation. This study compared the efficacy and long-term outcome of 2 ablation strategies--PVAI alone versus extended PVAI plus non-PV trigger elimination--for the treatment of AF in patients with MMV., Methods and Results: One hundred and nine consecutive AF patients with MMV were divided into 2 groups: standard PVAI was performed in group 1 (N = 45); in group 2 (N = 64) PVAI was extended to the LA posterior wall, LA septum, and CS; and all non-PV triggers were eliminated. Patients were followed up for 3 years. At the 12th month, 7 (15.6%) patients in group 1, and 39 (60.9%) patients in group 2 were arrhythmia free (log-rank P < 0.001). Four patients (8.9%; 3 cases of AT and 1 case of AF) from group 1, and 12 patients (18.8%; 9 cases of AT, and 3 cases of AFL) from group 2 experienced very late recurrence. At 36 ± 7 months follow-up, the cumulative recurrence after a single procedure was 42/45 (93.3%) in group 1, and 37/64 (57.8%) in group 2 (log-rank P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Compared with the standard PVAI alone, a strategy including extended PVAI and non-PV trigger elimination is associated with a higher 12-month and long-term arrhythmia-free survival in patients with MMV undergoing AF ablation. Very late recurrence may occur years after the initial procedure with focal AT as the most common type of recurrent arrhythmia., (© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) may be associated with pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) failure. The aim of the present study was to investigate if treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) improved PVAI success rates., Methods and Results: From January 2004 to December 2007, 3000 consecutive patients underwent PVAI. Patients were screened for OSA and CPAP use. Six hundred forty (21.3%) patients had OSA. Patients with OSA had more procedural failures (P=0.024) and hematomas (P<0.001). Eight percent of the non-OSA paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients had nonpulmonary vein antrum triggers (non-PV triggers) and posterior wall firing versus 20% of the OSA group (P<0.001). Nineteen percent of the non-OSA nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation population had non-PV triggers versus 31% in the OSA group (P=0.001). At the end of the follow-up period (32±14 months), 79% of the non-CPAP and 68% of the CPAP group were free of atrial fibrillation (P=0.003). Not using CPAP in addition to having non-PV triggers strongly predicted procedural failure (hazard ratio, 8.81; P<0.001)., Conclusions: OSA was an independent predictor for PVAI failure. Treatment with CPAP improved PVAI success rates. Patients not treated with CPAP in addition to having higher prevalence of non-PV triggers were 8 times more likely to fail the procedure.